对冲基金和降息:生成性人工智能对未来业绩的影响

币界网Pubblicato 2024-08-15Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-08-15

币界网报道:

对冲基金在应对高利率和高通胀率环境的波动性方面有着出色的历史表现记录,但随着人们期待已久的美联储货币政策转变迫在眉睫,机构是否做好了应对降息的充分准备?

最近几周,尽管越来越多的策略师提高了标普500指数的目标,但对冲基金在华尔街采取了更为谨慎的行动。

高盛(Goldman Sachs)的数据显示,许多对冲基金在2024年6月以2022年3月以来的最高集体利率积极降低了对市场的敞口,从而降低了其长期-短期总杠杆率。

经济放缓表明,机构投资者对当前的市场走势不确定。虽然人们最初希望美联储在2024年3月之前降息,但强于预期的CPI数据推迟了这一计划。

现在的预测表明,降息可能会在9月开始。持续的延迟和货币政策的转变使市场更加动荡,这通常有利于熟练的对冲基金。然而,目前的情况似乎有所不同。

高利率意味着高机构绩效

我们可以回顾过去,评估较低的利率通常会如何影响对冲基金。2008年金融危机之后,向鸽派货币政策的转变使对冲基金更难产生阿尔法,因为接近零的利率影响了新资产价格的发现。

以Albourne对冲基金指数为基准,随着美联储在金融危机和新冠肺炎大流行期间推出历史性的低利率,对冲基金阿尔法世代跌至最低水平,2019年曾短暂降至0%以下。

近年来,由于高利率和通货膨胀,对冲基金蓬勃发展,带来了丰厚的利润。尽管降息推迟,但这一趋势一直持续到2024年。

然而,随着向鸽派货币政策的潜在转变临近,对冲基金正变得更加谨慎。这可能意味着产生阿尔法的挑战又回来了,这表明对冲基金可能需要更加精明地发现投资机会。

拥抱人工智能革命

到2032年,生成型人工智能将成为一个1.3万亿美元的市场,出于各种原因,这可能会被对冲基金所利用。最重要的是,该技术可以帮助推动大数据的发展大数据是指收集的数据过于复杂和庞大,无法通过标准数据库工具进行处理。没有具体的数据量,它被设定为被视为大数据的最低水平。对全球信用卡交易收集的数据进行图像处理。许多政府使用大数据分析来研究最近的疫情传播。大数据这一术语最早由查尔斯·蒂利于1980年提出。大数据一词主要用于计算机科学、统计学和经济学。大数据是指收集的数据过于复杂和庞大,无法通过标准数据库工具进行处理。没有具体的数据量,它被设定为被视为大数据的最低水平。对全球信用卡交易收集的数据进行图像处理。许多政府使用大数据分析来研究最近的疫情传播。大数据这一术语最早由查尔斯·蒂利于1980年提出。大数据一词主要用于计算机科学、统计学和经济学。在机会变得更加稀缺的时候阅读本术语见解。

根据AIMA的一项调查,多达86%的对冲基金为其员工提供了生成人工智能工具,这使得即将到来的美联储降息成为对该技术熟练程度的重大考验。

至关重要的是,生成式人工智能可以提供下一代预测模型,分析大量数据集,为对冲基金提供可操作的见解。

人工智能可以管理的大量数据包括历史价格、交易量、经济指标和大量非结构化数据,以告知市场决策。

在最好的情况下,生成性人工智能和机器学习机器学习被定义为人工智能(AI)的一种应用,它希望在没有明确编程的情况下从经验中自动学习和改进。机器学习是一个快速发展的领域,它也专注于开发可以访问数据并使用数据进行自我学习的计算机程序。这对包括金融服务业在内的大多数行业和部门都有许多潜在的好处。机器学习可以解释为机器学习被定义为人工智能(AI)的一种应用,它希望在没有明确编程的情况下从经验中自动学习和改进。机器学习是一个快速发展的领域,它也专注于开发可以访问数据并使用数据进行自我学习的计算机程序。这对包括金融服务业在内的大多数行业和部门都有许多潜在的好处。机器学习解释机器学习可以解释阅读本术语它所建立的技术可以在前所未有的水平上利用非结构化数据,提供在上次温和的货币回归期间不可能获得的市场情报水平。

替代数据时代

生成式人工智能使用自然语言处理(NLP)来分析有关股票、行业和商品的在线对话,以衡量情绪。它还可以利用卫星图像、信用卡交易和网站流量等替代数据源来制定先进的交易策略,并可能超越谨慎的对冲基金。

例如,Man AHL和Two Sigma使用机器学习来识别与经济活动相关的卫星图像中的模式。为了有效地利用这些人工智能和机器学习见解,对冲基金可以从26 Dgrees Global Markets等服务中受益,这些服务提供直接的市场准入和全球覆盖。

为低利率做准备

对冲基金一直在努力应对较低的利率和平静的市场,人们仍然记得2010年代的表现不佳。然而,自2008年经济衰退以来,投资格局已经发生了变化,可以获得更多样化的数据来源。

雄心勃勃的对冲基金可能会从中受益,而能够进行情绪分析并使用卫星图像获取经济数据的生成性人工智能的兴起可能标志着金融业开始发生重大转变。

Letture associate

STRC 跌破面值,比特币财库实验进入下半场

The price of STRC, Strategy's dividend-paying preferred stock, has fallen below its $100 face value, triggering a re-evaluation of the "bitcoin treasury" corporate model. This highlights a critical tension: the company's asset base consists of high-volatility, non-cash-flow-generating Bitcoin, while its capital structure requires continuous cash payouts for dividends and interest. The decline of STRC signals that market pressure is shifting from asset price volatility to the pricing of the company's financing tools. Strategy's core model involves a three-step conversion: turning equity into Bitcoin exposure, converting Bitcoin holdings into capital market credit, and packaging non-yielding BTC into cash-paying securities like STRC. While Strategy holds a massive 847,363 BTC, the focus is now on cash flow mismatches. The company faces annual preferred stock dividend obligations of approximately $1.7 billion, far exceeding the cash flow from its legacy software business. Its ability to meet these obligations relies on continued access to capital markets. The market is now scrutinizing which of three potential costs becomes untenable first: rising dividend costs to attract investors, dilution costs from issuing more common stock, or the reputational cost of selling BTC—a move contrary to its "hodl" narrative. For the broader crypto market, a constrained Strategy means the potential loss of a predictable, narrative-driven marginal buyer for Bitcoin. The STRC discount serves as a reminder that the longevity of such models depends not just on Bitcoin's price, but also on financing windows, cash reserves, and investor willingness to pay a "trust premium" for the structure.

marsbit24 min fa

STRC 跌破面值,比特币财库实验进入下半场

marsbit24 min fa

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

Standard Chartered Bank has issued an optimistic research report predicting that the AAVE token could surge 50-fold to $3,500 by 2030. This forecast is based on the projection that the total value locked (TVL) in DeFi will grow 37x to approximately $2.7 trillion, driven by stablecoin expansion and the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA). The bank's model links Aave's potential valuation directly to its protocol revenue, which is primarily driven by net interest margins. The report highlights Aave's current dominant position, noting it captures over 80% of the net earnings ("protocol retained earnings") in the lending sector while holding only about half of its TVL. It also points to the recent launch of the Aave V4 architecture and a healthy revenue stream of $142 million in 2025 as positive fundamentals. Grayscale's separate analysis, applying traditional valuation metrics like DCF, concluded AAVE is currently undervalued. However, the article notes significant challenges. Aave's peer-to-pool lending model suffers from inherent capital inefficiency, with an estimated $52 million annual "deadweight loss" due to idle funds needed for liquidity buffers. This structural flaw was exposed during the April KelpDAO exploit, which locked a WETH pool at 100% utilization for days. Emerging protocols like Morpho, with more efficient point-to-point models, are cited as growing competitive threats. In summary, while institutional forecasts paint a macro picture of massive growth fueled by RWA adoption, Aave's path forward hinges on addressing its core structural limitations and competitive pressures within the evolving DeFi lending landscape.

链捕手1 h fa

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

链捕手1 h fa

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

Tidal Investment remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market narrative has changed. While recent large-scale IPOs (e.g., SpaceX) and major fundraising plans by tech giants like Alphabet and Meta have caused some nervousness, this isn't a sign of an AI peak. The focus has moved from the initial question of AI's viability to the sustainability of massive investment cycles. The key players—primarily the major cloud providers—are not slowing down; their capital expenditure (Capex) guidance for 2026 has been increased across the board (e.g., Alphabet to $180B, Amazon to $200B). This investment cycle is proving resilient and difficult to stop. Unlike traditional hardware cycles, current AI Capex is distributed across multiple physical layers—computing, memory, networking, and critically, power infrastructure. Bottlenecks are shifting from chips to elements like electricity, transformers, and cooling systems, which have much longer lead times and cannot be easily pre-built like fiber optics during the dot-com bubble. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's 240% YoY data center orders) confirms this broad-based, project-driven expansion. Market concerns are acknowledged but viewed differently. First, while Capex growth currently outpaces revenue growth, raising ROI questions, this mirrors the early scaling phase of cloud computing itself. A change in view would require concrete signals like downward Capex revisions or missed AI product targets, which haven't materialized by mid-2026. Second, comparisons to the 2000 dot-com bust are flawed. That crash was driven by a massive, parallel oversupply of cheap capacity (fiber). The current cycle faces *supply constraints* in critical, capital-intensive physical infrastructure that cannot be overbuilt as easily. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the next, more complex act of the AI story. Physical bottlenecks and sustained high Capex plans suggest this is not the finale but an ongoing, capital-intensive build-out phase. The script has changed, but the play is far from over.

marsbit2 h fa

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

marsbit2 h fa

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

Tidal Investments remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market is concerned about massive concurrent fundraising by tech giants like SpaceX, OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta, fearing an AI peak. However, the authors argue this signals the next act of AI development, not its end. Capital expenditure (Capex) from major cloud providers (Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle) continues to surge aggressively into 2026. This investment cycle is more resilient than past hardware cycles due to its scale and complexity. Bottlenecks have shifted from chips to critical physical infrastructure like power grids, transformers, cooling, and data center construction—areas with long lead times and limited capacity for rapid expansion. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's orders) confirms substantial, tangible progress. Key market concerns are addressed: 1. **ROI vs. Capex Growth**: While Capex growth outpaces revenue, the authors note cloud giants have historically overcome similar phases through scale. The cycle will only be in danger if Capex guidance is cut, orders are canceled, or AI product demand falters—none of which are currently observed. 2. **Comparison to the 2000 Dot-com Bubble**: Unlike the telecom bubble, where cheap, oversupplied fiber crashed prices, AI infrastructure (especially power) is constrained, customized, and subject to lengthy approvals, making a similar supply glut and crash unlikely. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the immense, ongoing capital needs for AI's next phase, constrained by slow-moving physical bottlenecks. The AI cycle is not over; the script has simply changed.

链捕手2 h fa

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

链捕手2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片