卡玛拉对加密货币的打击?”她的顾问选择表明……”

币界网Pubblicato 2024-08-14Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-08-14

币界网报道:
    Galaxy Digital的高管声称,哈里斯可能会延长对加密货币的打击。然而,彭博社的一位分析师认为,她可能对市场持中性或积极态度。

尽管Kamala Harris有加密重置计划,但一些业内人士越来越怀疑她在该行业的影响,特别是如果她赢得美国大选的话。

Galaxy Digital的研究主管Alex Thorn是最新一位对哈里斯发出警告的人。Thorn认为,哈里斯在聘请反加密货币作为她的经济顾问后,将扩大对加密货币的打击。

“她的顾问选择表明,她将保持拜登对加密货币的敌对态度。哈里斯正在与拜登政府的两名主要反加密官员Brian Deese和Bharat Ramamurti合作。”

对哈里斯反加密雇佣的看法不一

Thorn补充说,这两名官员也支持Choke Point 2.0。

“Deese和Ramamurti是拜登政府反加密运动的两位关键建筑师,包括chokepoint 2.0。”

从长远来看,Choke Point 2.0指的是美国监管机构对加密货币公司进入银行系统的限制。加密货币友好型客户银行是Choke Point 2.0的最新受害者。

据Thorn称,据称这些官员还影响并扼杀了稳定币立法。

就他而言,Bankless的Ryan Adams呼应了Thorn的观点,并称Harris的举动是,

“非常令人失望,但也是一个明确的信息。”

彭博交易所交易基金分析师詹姆斯·塞法特对哈里斯所谓的加密重置持讽刺态度,但也有一些保留意见。他说,

“与现任拜登政府相比,哈里斯政府将保持中立,可能对未来的空间持略微积极的态度。”

然而,另一位市场评论员Adam Cochran为哈里斯辩护,并声称最近的选择并不一定表明她对未来政策的不信任。

他补充说,她的顾问一直在与该行业接触。

“与此同时,她的顾问们正在与加密货币举行圆桌会议,与游说团体接触,并取得真正的进展。如果你想改变政策,就参与进来。”

Ro Khanna领导了上述大多数民主党发起的加密货币圆桌会议,并承诺支持两党对加密货币的态度。

然而,与唐纳德·特朗普不同,哈里斯没有澄清她的加密货币立场。

与此同时,哈里斯在预测网站Polymarket上赢得美国大选的几率比特朗普更高。哈里斯的获胜几率为53%,而特朗普为46%。

Letture associate

Why Hasn't the U.S. Seen the Rise of 'Huabei' or 'Jiebei'?

The article explores why the U.S. lacks large-scale consumer credit products like China's "Huabei" and "Jiebei," despite having a developed financial sector. Key reasons include: 1. **Structural Barriers**: A fragmented federal and state regulatory system, reinforced by post-2008 reforms like the Dodd-Frank Act, raises compliance costs and protects traditional banks, stifling fintech innovation. 2. **Credit Card Dominance**: Credit cards, used by 70-80% of adults, form a $1.28 trillion debt market with high APRs (avg. 22.3%). This system cross-subsidizes users who pay in full with those carrying balances, creating a predatory yet entrenched ecosystem. 3. **Data Privacy Laws**: Strict regulations (e.g., FCRA, CCPA) prevent tech giants from leveraging behavioral data for credit scoring, unlike in China where such data fuels fintech models. 4. **Capital Market Disincentives**: Wall Street penalizes tech firms entering finance due to lower valuations associated with heavy regulation and risk, as seen in Apple’s failure with Apple Card. 5. **Banking Oligopoly**: Major banks control consumer lending, leveraging lobbying power and consumer habits to maintain high-cost credit, while alternatives like payday loans (400% APR) or "unbanked" services remain niche or exploitative. Ultimately, regulatory, structural, and corporate interests collectively block the emergence of accessible, low-cost digital lending in the U.S.

Odaily星球日报1 h fa

Why Hasn't the U.S. Seen the Rise of 'Huabei' or 'Jiebei'?

Odaily星球日报1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片