这次暴跌是本轮熊市的312吗?

币界网Pubblicato 2024-08-06Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-08-06

币界网报道:

对于这次暴跌,有不少大V将其比作是上一轮熊市到牛市行进过程中的312。

既然不少人都这样提了,那我们不妨回顾一下312(2020年3月12日)前后加密市场的走向。

回顾历史最好的方法就是审视数据。

我们就以比特币为例看看当年312前后整个加密市场到底发生了什么。

get?code=MmViMmMwODc0MjZmY2EyNzllYWU0ZDEzM2QwOGRkMzEsMTcyMjk0Mjc5MDgzMw==

上图是比特币从2019年5月到2021年7月之间的走势。这是我认为整个312过程中最典型、最有特点的一段走势。

在那一轮熊市中,比特币在2019年6月27日达到了熊市中的峰值13000美元,然后在2020年3月12日当天从7900美元暴跌到3月13日的5140美元。

此后,比特币就开启了一轮一去不复返、轰轰烈烈的牛市:

在2021年的4月16日达到了那一轮牛市的第一个峰值63000美元;

然后经历了一次较大的修正,在2021年7月最低跌到了30000美元;

最后在2021年的11月达到了那一轮牛市真正的峰值67000美元。

单从这些数据来看,那一轮的312有下面这些特点:

1. 比特币在上一轮熊市中达到高点(13000美元)后,一直处于震荡下行的走势,直到312发生崩盘。

2. 在312崩盘前,比特币的价格(7900美元)几乎只有熊市高点(13000美元)的60%。

3. 在312崩盘后的几天内,比特币的价格只有此前熊市高点(13000美元)的一半不到。这个闪崩的初始跌幅都超过30%。

4. 3月13日的5140美元是不是312崩盘的最低点呢?不是,其后在3月17日,比特币进一步下挫到了5000美元左右。

zEWOraOLUc8NHy556GFGrbAtevo3ajxdqXRnZaZa.png

5. 比特币在312崩盘后,才开始真正开启一路走高的牛市行情,然而这个过程也并非一蹴而就,而是依旧在1万美元以下徘徊了超过半年的时间,到2020年10月才真正突破前期熊市的高点(13000美元)。

6. 在此后的牛市中,在2021年11月真正达到峰值前,比特币的价格再也没有低过312崩盘后的价格。即便是在1年后2021年7月的大修正中,比特币最低也只是跌到了3万美元,这个价格都远远高于其在熊市的高点(13000美元)。

在这5个特点中,前3点都是我们现在可以验证的,而后3点则还需要时间来证明。

在验证前,我们看看本次闪崩前市场的状况:

在本轮熊市中,比特币曾经创下的高点是在今年3月14日创下的73000美元。

在昨天闪崩发生前,比特币的价格是6万美元。

在昨天闪崩后,比特币的价格一度最低达到了49000美元。

用这些数据来对比上面5个特点中的前3个,我们就能发现:

第1点勉强接近;

第2点和第3点则不太匹配-------这次闪崩在跌幅上比起312还是逊色太多了。

所以我认为这次的所谓“闪崩”仅仅算是熊市中一个比较正常、幅度稍大的下跌而已。

不过,如果这次下跌真的能像312那样是本轮熊市中的最后一次大跌,并且后面的状况真能照着312后的行情重演,那反倒是太能让人想入非非了。

因为:

312之后,比特币在接下来的牛市中其峰值超过了312闪崩后的10倍。

这种涨幅还能在接下来的本轮牛市中重现吗?

如果可以,那这次大跌无论如何都不应该让我们悲观,反倒应该让我们乐观向上、激动不已。

Letture associate

OpenAI's "Most Open" Move: Codex No Longer Exclusively Favors GPT

OpenAI has significantly opened up its Codex programming agent by introducing a "model provider" configuration layer that allows users to connect it with various open-source models, not just its proprietary GPT. Through a configuration file or a simple `--oss` command-line flag, Codex can now route requests to local services like Ollama or LM Studio, or to third-party APIs such as Mistral or DeepSeek. This move is seen as one of OpenAI's most "open" steps, potentially lowering costs and enhancing privacy for developers who can run code generation offline. However, integration isn't seamless for all models. Codex primarily uses OpenAI's newer Responses API, while many open-source models rely on the older Chat Completions interface. This creates compatibility issues, especially for advanced features like function calling. The developer community is already building "routing" or adapter layers (e.g., CC Switch, LiteLLM) to translate between these protocols, enabling hybrid setups where GPT handles planning and open-source models handle execution. Analysts interpret this as a strategic shift for OpenAI: from competing solely on model superiority to controlling the platform and interface standards. By making Codex a flexible, pluggable entry point for AI-assisted programming, OpenAI aims to become the central hub in the developer toolchain ecosystem, even as users gain the freedom to switch underlying models.

marsbit6 min fa

OpenAI's "Most Open" Move: Codex No Longer Exclusively Favors GPT

marsbit6 min fa

When 500 Million People Abandon ChatGPT

ChatGPT's Global AI Assistant Market Share Drops Below 50% Three and a half years after its groundbreaking launch, ChatGPT faces a pivotal moment. While it remains the largest AI assistant globally, its market share has fallen below 50% for the first time, reaching 46.4% as of May, according to Sensor Tower's 2026 AI landscape report. Google's Gemini (27.7%) and Anthropic's Claude (10.3%) are now its main competitors, with Grok, Perplexity, and others also gaining ground. The market has evolved from awe and initial adoption into a phase of product comparison, ecosystem integration, and commercialization. User behavior has matured significantly. Loyalty is low; users readily switch between assistants for specific tasks. Gemini benefits from deep integration within Google's ecosystem (Search, Gmail, Android), while Claude has carved a niche among productivity-focused users with strong retention, nearly matching ChatGPT's. User choice is now influenced by a complex mix of capability, ecosystem, price, use case, and even brand trust. Commercialization is accelerating. AI app downloads continue but growth is slowing, while user spending is rising. Over $4.2 billion was spent in-app during H1 2026. Claude leads in premium subscription conversion rates (13%). OpenAI is expanding its revenue streams, testing ads shown to 17% of ChatGPT users daily by May. This shift highlights the immense financial pressure of model training and inference costs. Despite revenue growth, OpenAI's cash burn is intense, reaching $3.7 billion in Q1 2026. The company projects this could rise to $25-57 billion in the coming years, underscoring the industry-wide challenge of scaling profitably. The symbolism is clear: ChatGPT no longer defines the AI assistant market alone. The era of a single dominant product is over. Gemini, Claude, and specialized tools are collectively shaping user habits and business models. As AI assistants move from novelty to utility—judged on accuracy, efficiency, and value—they are becoming embedded in everyday digital life. ChatGPT may have lost its majority, but AI as a whole is winning, entering a mature, competitive, and diverse new phase.

marsbit8 min fa

When 500 Million People Abandon ChatGPT

marsbit8 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片