SEC起诉Metamask 这次连Lido和Rocket Pool也难逃一劫 LDO暴跌近18%

金色财经Pubblicato 2024-07-08Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-07-09

Introduzione

币圈用户广泛使用的小狐狸钱包 MetaMask,其母公司 Consensys 于昨日(28 日)正式被美国证券交易委员会(SEC)起诉。SEC 指控 MetaMask 的 Swap 和质押产品涉嫌违反联邦证券法,并指出 Consensys 自 2020 年以来一直以未注册经纪商的身份运营,通过 MetaMask 从事未注册证券的发行和销售。

币圈用户广泛使用的小狐狸钱包 MetaMask,其母公司 Consensys 于昨日(28 日)正式被美国证券交易委员会(SEC)起诉。SEC 指控 MetaMask 的 Swap 和质押产品涉嫌违反联邦证券法,并指出 Consensys 自 2020 年以来一直以未注册经纪商的身份运营,通过 MetaMask 从事未注册证券的发行和销售。
据 Coindesk 和 Cointelegraph 报道,SEC 在起诉书中提到,MetaMask 允许用户通过其 “Swap” 服务直接在应用程序内买卖数字资产。Consensys 对这项服务收取手续费,并在过去四年内促成了超过 3600 万笔加密货币交易。SEC 声称,其中至少有 500 万笔交易涉及 “加密资产证券”。
这些加密资产证券包括 Polygon (MATIC)、Mana (MANA)、Chiliz (CHZ)、Sandbox (SAND) 和 Luna (LUNA) 等在 SEC 先前诉讼中被归类为证券的代币。SEC 还暗示,其他一些数字资产也有可能被视为证券。

图片


SEC 追击质押服务!Lido 和 Rocket Pool 被点名
起诉书还指出,Consensys在未注册的情况下,通过加密资产经纪交易和质押服务收取了超过2.5亿美元的手续费,从而剥夺了投资者的重要保护。SEC针对此次Consensys涉嫌违反联邦证券法的行为,谋求永久禁令、民事处罚以及其他公平救济。
此次执法行动证实了业界长久以来的忧虑。尽管上个月以太坊现货ETF的关键文件意外获得批准,降低了ETH被归类为证券的可能性,但SEC仍试图将以太坊衍生的流动性质押代币视作证券,包括Lido的stETH和Rocket Pool的rETH。
LDO 重挫近18%,RPL 下跌6%

图片


受到 SEC 指控的影响,Lido(LDO)昨晚从 2.43 美元暴跌超过 23%,今晨最低触及 1.86 美元,截至截稿前报价为 1.95 美元,近 24 小时大幅下跌 17.6%;Rocket Pool(RPL)24 小时跌幅相对较小,约为 6%,在撰稿时报价为 19.23 美元。被列为主要被告的 MetaMask 则尚未发行代币。

Letture associate

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbit58 min fa

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbit58 min fa

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手1 h fa

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手1 h fa

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbit1 h fa

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbit1 h fa

AI Bubble Is Bursting

The AI Bubble is Bursting: A Necessary Purge on the Path to Ubiquitous Intelligence Market volatility has reignited debates about an AI bubble, with figures like Ray Dalio pointing to high valuations. However, this parallels the dot-com bubble, which, despite its crash, laid the physical infrastructure for today's internet era. The current AI investment frenzy, with tech giants planning trillions in infrastructure spending far outstripping current AI application revenues, appears similarly imbalanced. This 'bubble' is seen as an inevitable phase for a disruptive technology, paying the "innovation tax." Critically, AI inference costs have plummeted over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence nearly free at the margin. This hasn't reduced spending but has instead unlocked massive new demand, as seen in enterprise AI cloud expenditure tripling. This follows the Jevons Paradox: efficiency gains lead to greater total consumption. The market is now entering a cleansing phase, weeding out speculative ventures lacking real moats. The deeper shift is a move from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to value creation in operational expenditure (OpEx) through AI applications that solve real industry problems. While infrastructure valuations are high, rapid earnings growth from widespread AI adoption across sectors—from manufacturing and finance to law and healthcare—may digest these valuations over time. Ultimately, this creative destruction will leave behind robust infrastructure and optimized models, cheaply powering an AI-augmented future for all industries, much as the internet became indispensable after its own bubble burst. The core productive potential remains undiminished.

链捕手1 h fa

AI Bubble Is Bursting

链捕手1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare LDO

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Lido (LDO) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente LidoLDO.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Lido (LDO)Dopo aver acquistato Lido (LDO), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Lido (LDO)Scambia facilmente Lido (LDO) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

310 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.11Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare LDO

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di LDO LDO sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片