以太坊ETF今年能否通过?AR的出货策略是什么?

金色财经Pubblicato 2024-07-08Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-07-08

来源:道说区块链

1、比特币二层的龙头是哪个?

我觉得现在比特币二层中暂时还没有龙头。不少项目现在都还没发币。一些发了币的项目都是一些比较老的项目。这些发了币的老项目我觉得无论在技术上还是在TVL的沉淀上明显都不如新项目。所以未来的龙头大概率会是在还没发币的新项目中,至于具体是哪个,还是等市场竞争给出答案吧。

2、以太坊ETF今年能否通过?

我觉得判断这个比判断美联储降不降息还难,因为它没有明确、公开的政策和标准,所以美国监管部门操作的空间很大。

既然操作的空间很大那就必然涉及众多利益的博弈和妥协。这里面最大的博弈力量估计就是华尔街的财团和监管部门了。

长远看,我相信这个ETF一定能过,因为财团们已经从比特币ETF中看到并收获了巨大的红利,不可能放着第二大资产以太坊置之不理。

更重要的是在现有的加密生态中,以太坊具备完备的设施,可以让开发者开发各种金融工具和应用,这里面的想象空间太大了。

比如贝莱德一直以来在以太坊ETF方面的各种公开动作和喊话就是最明显的标志。

但是作为监管,要考虑的问题也会很多,比如:从正常的逻辑来说,如果以太坊ETF获批,那其它一系列POS区块链的ETF就都没有理由阻拦;可现在比特币ETF才刚批没多久,又接二连三批出这么多ETF,监管又会受到质疑......

我有时候会想香港在这方面能不能动作更快一些,步子更大一些?

在最近香港举行的一系列Web 3活动中,木头姐就公开表达了对香港监管在加密生态监管方面的赞美。对她的这个评价我是很赞同的。如果香港能在以太坊ETF方面先行一步,将会起到很好的推动作用,也能为香港经济找到新的动力和活力。

说起香港,最近还看到一则挺有意思的新闻:国内一些基金公司,包括像嘉实、华夏这样的大基金都准备在香港开设比特币ETF。它们的这些动作显然是面对一些高净值国人群体的。

这些动作客观上都在为接下来的牛市蓄水。

3、AR的出货策略?

AR和我所有看好的币一样,都不会现在出货,只要项目方不出问题,我只会在接下来的牛市接近高潮时再考虑出货。

4、比特币ETF通过后,通过ETF购买的,当利润丰厚时,这些人会选择卖出,机构对应就要卖出。那是不是对应未来也可能出现这些人疯狂卖出ETF也会导致比特币被疯狂抛售?

我也注意到了这个问题,并且一直在观察。

一个很值得关注的现象是:在最近这一轮调整中,比特币从最高大概7.4万美元跌到了最低6.1万美元。在这个过程中ETF一直在流出。这个过程和ETF通过以前我们散户买卖的行为非常类似。

而现在还不是牛市,并且还有ETF的加持,在这样的情况下,比特币依旧能有接近20%的跌幅。这说明至少在接下来的牛市中,比特币下跌20%甚至更多是完全可能的。

我之所以也在关注这个问题,是因为这个特性对牛市中制定抛售策略非常重要。

此前我在文章中写过,我一直在考虑需不需要在接下来的牛市中调整曾经的抛售策略。而这需要观察一系列ETF通过后,市场可能出现的新特性和新规律。

比特币可能的跌幅就是其中一个非常重要的指标。

Letture associate

Interview with PPP: How the World Cup Ignited the Prediction Market, and How to Find "Replicable Smart Money"?

Interview with PPP: World Cup Ignites Prediction Markets, How to Find “Replicable Smart Money”? With the World Cup underway, prediction markets are experiencing a historic surge in data and activity. However, most ordinary users struggle to achieve consistent profits amidst the volatility. Simply chasing "smart money" signals on social media is often ineffective due to slow manual execution. Even dedicated copy-trading tools can be misleading, as high total profits don't guarantee a strategy is suitable or sustainable for others to follow. Prediction market strategy platform PPP (Prediction Position Platform) argues that not all profitable addresses are fit for copying. Truly replicable "smart money" must demonstrate stable, long-term profitability across key metrics like win rate, max drawdown, and strategy consistency. PPP aims to solve this by building a system that structures complex on-chain data into actionable strategies for users. It employs a dual AI-modeling and manual-review process to analyze addresses based on performance, risk, capital allocation, and more, filtering out偶然性盈利 to identify statistically reliable strategies. The platform categorizes these strategies into two main products: a "Strategy Square" featuring long-term, vetted strategies with strict criteria like a six-month minimum track record, and a "Trading Leaderboard" highlighting shorter-term, high-performing opportunities from the past 30 days. Both are presented with clear style descriptions (e.g., "high implied win rate, high volatility"). Currently accessible via a Telegram Bot, PPP offers features like one-click trading, address copying, and an AI address analysis tool. It uses a subscription model and a non-custodial wallet. A trial run by the author yielded significant short-term gains, though subsequent drawdowns highlighted the importance of risk management and adjusting copy parameters per strategy. PPP’s core value lies not just in copy-trading, but in compiling and structuring混沌的交易信号 into replicable strategies, reducing information asymmetry in prediction markets. While it can’t guarantee future profits, it provides a more systematic, higher-probability entry point for users navigating the uncertain but opportunity-rich landscape, especially during events like the World Cup.

Odaily星球日报2 min fa

Interview with PPP: How the World Cup Ignited the Prediction Market, and How to Find "Replicable Smart Money"?

Odaily星球日报2 min fa

Bitcoin at 59,000 Is Not the Bottom, One Last Drop Needed! Chain Data and Liquidity Analysis: Where is BTC's True Bottom?

Based on analysis by trader Mr. Beggar, Bitcoin's (BTC) recent low of $59k is likely not the final cycle bottom. He argues that while a bottom is near, a final downward movement is still probable to target liquidity below that level, making a deeper low healthier for a sustainable reversal. Mr. Beggar's framework combines on-chain data for long-term cycles and liquidity-based technical analysis for shorter-term trades. His "four deep bear buying models" include Cointime Price (market cost weighted by coin holding time) and AVIV (an enhanced MVRV indicator), which currently suggest prices are nearing cyclical bottom zones. While a PSIP (Percent Supply in Profit) signal has flashed below 50%, it alone is not considered definitive; typically, the first signal is not the final bottom. He presents three potential scenarios for the current market: 1) a direct drop from here, 2) an upward liquidity sweep (stop hunt) of the recent high near $67.3k before declining, and 3) a direct reversal without new lows. He heavily discounts the third scenario due to significant un-swept liquidity in the $59k-$62.3k range, suggesting the market must revisit these levels. Mr. Beggar shares that he used on-chain signals to identify potential cycle tops in late 2024/early 2025 and later established low-leverage BTC-denominated short positions. He emphasizes the importance of risk management and staying within one's expertise ("strike zone"), warning against investing in assets like AI/semiconductor stocks simply because they are rising.

marsbit30 min fa

Bitcoin at 59,000 Is Not the Bottom, One Last Drop Needed! Chain Data and Liquidity Analysis: Where is BTC's True Bottom?

marsbit30 min fa

From Signal Monitoring to Strategy Copy Trading: How PPP Lowers the Barrier to Trading on Polymarket?

From Signal Monitoring to Strategy Copy Trading: How PPP Lowers the Barrier to Polymarket Trading The surge in trading demand on prediction markets like Polymarket, especially during events like the World Cup, exposes a common challenge for novice users: emotional and impulsive trading due to a lack of stable strategies and reliable signals. Prediction Position Platform (PPP) addresses this by serving as a Telegram-based tool for strategy discovery and automated copy-trading on Polymarket. PPP offers a suite of features through a subscription model. Key functionalities include 24/7 market signal monitoring (tracking smart money movements and rapid probability shifts), an "AI Address Analysis" tool to evaluate trader performance metrics, and specialized sections like a "World Cup Zone" for quick access to related markets. Its core value lies in two curated lists: the "Strategy Square," which identifies addresses suitable for long-term tracking based on comprehensive metrics like returns, win rate, and drawdowns, and the "Trading Leaderboard," highlighting recently outperforming addresses for short-term opportunities. Users can manually analyze any address or set up automated copy-trading with customizable parameters like investment amount and stop-loss. After initiating copy-trades, users can manage all positions from a unified dashboard, adjusting parameters or stopping follows as needed, and review historical performance data. Crucially, PPP employs a non-custodial wallet model, meaning user funds remain in their own self-custodied wallets, enhancing security and trust. In summary, PPP aims to reduce the learning curve and trial-and-error cost for Polymarket users by aggregating signals, curating and analyzing profitable traders, and facilitating automated, yet manageable, copy-trading execution.

Odaily星球日报30 min fa

From Signal Monitoring to Strategy Copy Trading: How PPP Lowers the Barrier to Trading on Polymarket?

Odaily星球日报30 min fa

From the White-Haired Stock God to the Billion-Dollar Fund Titan: The Smart People Shorting NVIDIA Are Getting Rich Using the Same Framework

From "white-haired stock god" to billionaire fund manager, those profiting from shorting NVIDIA share a common framework. The article analyzes the critical bottlenecks in the AI hardware supply chain, which have become key investment focal points. The core argument is that the real constraint on the AI boom isn't software or algorithms, but fundamental physical infrastructure. The piece dissects nine major bottlenecks, organized around the lifecycle of an AI accelerator circuit board. *Before the Board*: The pre-manufacturing stage faces constraints in EDA tools, new materials (like GaN, SiC, InP) replacing silicon, and the critical, non-renewable supply of helium for semiconductor fabrication. *On the Board*: The primary bottlenecks are High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM), essential for unleashing GPU power, and advanced packaging (e.g., CoWoS), required to integrate components. Both are in severe shortage. *Between Boards*: Chip-to-chip communication is hitting limits with copper, pushing photonics and optical interconnects (CPO) as the next-gen solution, with NVIDIA heavily investing in this area. *Around the Board*: Power delivery requires new materials (GaN/SiC) for efficient voltage conversion from 48V to sub-1V. High-density AI racks (120kW+) are forcing a shift from air to liquid cooling as the standard. *Beyond the Board*: The ultimate bottleneck is electricity. AI data centers consume power equivalent to mid-sized cities, and grid expansion lags far behind demand, causing project delays and a scramble for power contracts. Prominent investors like Leopold and "white-haired stock god" are heavily betting on these infrastructure bottlenecks. Leopold's fund, for instance, holds no NVIDIA stock but uses massive put options to short the semiconductor sector while going long on power and physical infrastructure. His thesis is that while chip competition may eventually erode margins, the scarcity of foundational elements like electricity is more persistent. The framework's validity is tied to the supply-demand gap. Major new capacity in HBM and photonics is scheduled for 2027-2028, but demand continues to outpace it. Experts like Intel's CEO suggest no relief before 2028. However, the article warns of a potential reversal around 2028-2029 if AI capex slows and new capacity floods the market, turning scarcity into oversupply. Until then, the imbalance persists.

链捕手1 h fa

From the White-Haired Stock God to the Billion-Dollar Fund Titan: The Smart People Shorting NVIDIA Are Getting Rich Using the Same Framework

链捕手1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片