Odaily编辑部投资操作全记录（6月21日）

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2024-06-21Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-06-21

Introduzione

保安来给大饼画区间了，大家“用行动给市场一点反应”。

本新栏目为 Odaily 编辑部成员真实投资经历分享，不接受任何商务广告，不构成投资建议（因为本司同事都很擅长亏钱），旨在为读者扩充视角、丰富信源，欢迎加入 Odaily 社群（微信@Odaily 2018 ，Telegram 交流群，X 官方账号）交流吐槽。

Odaily编辑部投资操作全记录（6月21日）

推荐人：南枳（X：@Assassin_Malvo）

简介：链上玩家，数据分析师，除了 NFT 什么都玩

分享：一级行情回暖，每日新诞生一个千万美元市值 Meme 代币，重点关注两个特征：Solana 上猫狗行情复苏，头部基本为动物；同一热点常常出现多网络同时开花情况，但以太坊和 Solana 只会存活下来一个，Solana 动物占优，以太坊其他概念胜出概率大，可重点关注同时出现的热点。

推荐人：Wenser（X：@wenser 2010 ）

简介： 10 U 战神，交易所卸载玩家

分享：

  1. 大盘在震荡中探底，之后的关键节点成了月底 28 号的期权交割日和 7 月初的以太坊 ETF 通过消息。

  2. 最近刷到一篇在川普概念币 DJT 出现后做 LP 的帖子，或许之后的热门 meme 币这块也是一个套利机会。帖子链接：https://d1x7dwosqaosdj.cloudfront.net/images/2024-06-21/7ab2803938a3f079b32b782cef8397fc

  3. 其他的感觉越抄底越不知道底在哪，大家看着抄一点吧，给市场一点反应，不然进圈的人更少了，要记住：你抄的不是底，是为加密货币行业托起的希望。

推荐人：秦晓峰（X：@QinXiaofeng 888 ）

简介：期权疯狗，Meme 接盘侠

分享：

  1. BTC 低点不断下移，可能要下探 60000 美元大关，但个人感觉只要不破 64000 美元还是看涨的，毕竟目前机构现货 ETF 的平均持仓成本都在 6 万美元左右，微策略过去一个月的买入均价也在 65000 美元。现在的行情，只要一跟大阳线就可以收复跌势。推荐接下来每周买入当周的周五的看涨期权，为防止意外同时可以开 3 成看跌进行对冲。

  2. 现货方面，昨晚领到了 ZRO 在第一时间卖了。个人感觉接下来一段时间山寨都没啥大的行情，甚至还会继续下跌 20% 以上，毕竟机构对后市行情并不确定的情况下，一般会在山寨币解锁后卖出山寨买入比特币。

推荐人：星球保安（Twitter：@BTC2024ATH）

简介：无脑梭哈二级，只看多，怒锤空军狗头

分享：（大饼）目前跌得太少，跌得少就需要更多的横盘。这里相当于两个区间， 63500-71500 ，或者是更宽的 60000-72000 。两个区间的区别是：大区间意味着相对结实的底部结构，小区间需要更多的测试和交易量。小区间的话需要在 65500 和 67100 左右做相对应的拉升动作。但是大区间在 6 w 左右确认之后仅需要观察 71500 就行。中间可以忽略。

还有一个比较有用的看盘点，尤其是看大区间的：

Odaily编辑部投资操作全记录（6月21日）但是目前绿色的横盘结构，第二段没有创新高，所以相对看上去比较复杂，没有明确额信号，好在目前整体的流出都被相对稳定地吃掉了，而且大区间波动里面在一些位置主力有明显的介入，空头的力量并没有想象的强，所以给我的感觉就是 6 w 这里测试之后大概率也会是一个底部区域。

推荐人：Asher（X：@Asher_ 0210 ）

简介：低市值山寨长线埋伏、链游打金、撸毛党

分享：

  1. 撸毛：ZKsync、LayerZero 空投宣布之后把以太二层各个网络的资金都归集到交易所了，未来准备关注 BTC 生态撸毛机会。

  2. 链游：Pixels 第二章的更新简直就是拉胯，材料、资源等大变动让人一时间摸不到头脑，最重要的是代币收益不但没提升还有所下降，虽然今天更新后好些但目前的收益无法有效吸引新人；Mavia 虽然开放了红宝石兑换代币机制，但收益也是低的可怜，已弃坑。

  3. 山寨：BWB 终于拉盘了，继续持有，目标 1 u。

往期记录

6 月 12 日

6 月 14 日

6 月 17 日

推荐阅读

币圈“ 618 ”大促，山寨币还有救吗？

链上聪明钱追踪： 10 大价值币建仓高手地址合集

行情索然时，收下这份稳定币增值攻略

Letture associate

David Villa Officially Appointed as Brand Ambassador for BitradeX

David Villa, the legendary Spanish striker and 2010 World Cup champion, has been officially appointed as the Global Brand Ambassador for BitradeX. This partnership, announced amid the global excitement for the 2026 World Cup, aims to enhance the platform's international brand influence. Villa, a key figure in Spain's golden era of football and the nation's all-time top scorer, embodies a spirit of perseverance, focus, and the relentless pursuit of excellence. BitradeX officials stated that this champion mentality aligns perfectly with their own core values of innovation, long-term development, and global strategic expansion. As a global AI-driven digital asset ecosystem, BitradeX will collaborate with Villa across branding, global market promotion, community engagement, and strategic initiatives. The company believes Villa's widespread influence and trusted international image will serve as a crucial bridge to connect with users worldwide. This collaboration marks a significant step in BitradeX's globalization strategy, with both parties committed to exploring new opportunities in the digital age and writing a new chapter of shared achievement.

链捕手11 min fa

David Villa Officially Appointed as Brand Ambassador for BitradeX

链捕手11 min fa

STRC 跌破面值，比特币财库实验进入下半场

The price of STRC, Strategy's dividend-paying preferred stock, has fallen below its $100 face value, triggering a re-evaluation of the "bitcoin treasury" corporate model. This highlights a critical tension: the company's asset base consists of high-volatility, non-cash-flow-generating Bitcoin, while its capital structure requires continuous cash payouts for dividends and interest. The decline of STRC signals that market pressure is shifting from asset price volatility to the pricing of the company's financing tools. Strategy's core model involves a three-step conversion: turning equity into Bitcoin exposure, converting Bitcoin holdings into capital market credit, and packaging non-yielding BTC into cash-paying securities like STRC. While Strategy holds a massive 847,363 BTC, the focus is now on cash flow mismatches. The company faces annual preferred stock dividend obligations of approximately $1.7 billion, far exceeding the cash flow from its legacy software business. Its ability to meet these obligations relies on continued access to capital markets. The market is now scrutinizing which of three potential costs becomes untenable first: rising dividend costs to attract investors, dilution costs from issuing more common stock, or the reputational cost of selling BTC—a move contrary to its "hodl" narrative. For the broader crypto market, a constrained Strategy means the potential loss of a predictable, narrative-driven marginal buyer for Bitcoin. The STRC discount serves as a reminder that the longevity of such models depends not just on Bitcoin's price, but also on financing windows, cash reserves, and investor willingness to pay a "trust premium" for the structure.

marsbit24 min fa

STRC 跌破面值，比特币财库实验进入下半场

marsbit24 min fa

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

Standard Chartered Bank has issued an optimistic research report predicting that the AAVE token could surge 50-fold to $3,500 by 2030. This forecast is based on the projection that the total value locked (TVL) in DeFi will grow 37x to approximately $2.7 trillion, driven by stablecoin expansion and the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA). The bank's model links Aave's potential valuation directly to its protocol revenue, which is primarily driven by net interest margins. The report highlights Aave's current dominant position, noting it captures over 80% of the net earnings ("protocol retained earnings") in the lending sector while holding only about half of its TVL. It also points to the recent launch of the Aave V4 architecture and a healthy revenue stream of $142 million in 2025 as positive fundamentals. Grayscale's separate analysis, applying traditional valuation metrics like DCF, concluded AAVE is currently undervalued. However, the article notes significant challenges. Aave's peer-to-pool lending model suffers from inherent capital inefficiency, with an estimated $52 million annual "deadweight loss" due to idle funds needed for liquidity buffers. This structural flaw was exposed during the April KelpDAO exploit, which locked a WETH pool at 100% utilization for days. Emerging protocols like Morpho, with more efficient point-to-point models, are cited as growing competitive threats. In summary, while institutional forecasts paint a macro picture of massive growth fueled by RWA adoption, Aave's path forward hinges on addressing its core structural limitations and competitive pressures within the evolving DeFi lending landscape.

链捕手1 h fa

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

链捕手1 h fa

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

Tidal Investment remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market narrative has changed. While recent large-scale IPOs (e.g., SpaceX) and major fundraising plans by tech giants like Alphabet and Meta have caused some nervousness, this isn't a sign of an AI peak. The focus has moved from the initial question of AI's viability to the sustainability of massive investment cycles. The key players—primarily the major cloud providers—are not slowing down; their capital expenditure (Capex) guidance for 2026 has been increased across the board (e.g., Alphabet to $180B, Amazon to $200B). This investment cycle is proving resilient and difficult to stop. Unlike traditional hardware cycles, current AI Capex is distributed across multiple physical layers—computing, memory, networking, and critically, power infrastructure. Bottlenecks are shifting from chips to elements like electricity, transformers, and cooling systems, which have much longer lead times and cannot be easily pre-built like fiber optics during the dot-com bubble. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's 240% YoY data center orders) confirms this broad-based, project-driven expansion. Market concerns are acknowledged but viewed differently. First, while Capex growth currently outpaces revenue growth, raising ROI questions, this mirrors the early scaling phase of cloud computing itself. A change in view would require concrete signals like downward Capex revisions or missed AI product targets, which haven't materialized by mid-2026. Second, comparisons to the 2000 dot-com bust are flawed. That crash was driven by a massive, parallel oversupply of cheap capacity (fiber). The current cycle faces *supply constraints* in critical, capital-intensive physical infrastructure that cannot be overbuilt as easily. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the next, more complex act of the AI story. Physical bottlenecks and sustained high Capex plans suggest this is not the finale but an ongoing, capital-intensive build-out phase. The script has changed, but the play is far from over.

marsbit2 h fa

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

marsbit2 h fa

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

Tidal Investments remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market is concerned about massive concurrent fundraising by tech giants like SpaceX, OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta, fearing an AI peak. However, the authors argue this signals the next act of AI development, not its end. Capital expenditure (Capex) from major cloud providers (Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle) continues to surge aggressively into 2026. This investment cycle is more resilient than past hardware cycles due to its scale and complexity. Bottlenecks have shifted from chips to critical physical infrastructure like power grids, transformers, cooling, and data center construction—areas with long lead times and limited capacity for rapid expansion. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's orders) confirms substantial, tangible progress. Key market concerns are addressed: 1. **ROI vs. Capex Growth**: While Capex growth outpaces revenue, the authors note cloud giants have historically overcome similar phases through scale. The cycle will only be in danger if Capex guidance is cut, orders are canceled, or AI product demand falters—none of which are currently observed. 2. **Comparison to the 2000 Dot-com Bubble**: Unlike the telecom bubble, where cheap, oversupplied fiber crashed prices, AI infrastructure (especially power) is constrained, customized, and subject to lengthy approvals, making a similar supply glut and crash unlikely. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the immense, ongoing capital needs for AI's next phase, constrained by slow-moving physical bottlenecks. The AI cycle is not over; the script has simply changed.

链捕手2 h fa

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

链捕手2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片