Warren Davidson’s New Bill Bans Federal Agencies From Restricting Crypto

BitcoinistPubblicato 2022-02-16Pubblicato ultima volta 2022-02-16

Introduzione

Is U.S. Congressman Warren Davidson reacting to the current situation in Canada? He recently introduced the “Keep Your Coins Act”.

Is U.S. Congressman Warren Davidson reacting to the current situation in Canada? He recently introduced the “Keep Your Coins Act” to protect private bitcoin and crypto usage in his country. Specifically, it prohibits Federal Agencies from interfering with the right to self-custody and to transact P2P. It restricts their ability to ban “self-hosted” cryptocurrency wallets.

In Canada, things are looking bad for freedom. The government reduced the legitimacy of all crowdfunding platforms by prohibiting them to give to the Canadian truckers the money people donated. And then, it got worse.

As X Strategies’ Greg Price puts it, “Canada’s Deputy Prime Minister says, under the Emergencies Act, banks can immediately freeze or suspend bank accounts without a court order and be protected from civil liability.“

To that, Warren Davidson responded. “Our office will be introducing legislation in the US House of Representatives shortly to protect Americans from this version of overt theft.” And then, Davidson explained his rationale. “A number of people will undoubtedly recognize that, “Bitcoin fixes this.” That’s only true with self-custody. Account-based crypto has similar vulnerabilities.”

While describing the Canadian truckers situation, controversial TV presenter Tucker Carlson said:

“Tally Coin, for example, is a small crowdfunding service that uses Bitcoin. It’s not controlled by banks, that’s the point. They’re hosting a fundraiser for the truckers. Now, why is this appealing? No one can steal the money. No government can pressure anyone to turn the money over, because governments don’t control crypto.”

That’s only true with self-custody.

So, What Did Warren Davidson’s New Bill Say Exactly?

Let’s answer that with a direct quote from Davidson’s “Keep Your Coins Act”:

“IN GENERAL.—No agency head may prohibit or otherwise restrict the ability of a covered user to— (1) use virtual currency or its equivalent for such user’s own purposes, such as to purchase real or virtual goods and services for the user’s own use; or (2) conduct transactions through an self-hosted wallet.”

To clarify, according to Davidson, bitcoin and crypto act “as a substitute for currency but may not possess all the attributes (including legal tender status).” Warren Davidson has been working on this for a while, when Bitcoinist reported on his presentation at the Bitcoin 2021 conference, we said:

“Politicians only care about a few things, and money is one of them. “If we don’t do this right, the capital will flow out of the United States,” said the Representative referring to the regulation around Bitcoin. According to him, Congress should pass law and define, “What is a security and what’s not” The country needs more clarity.”

And, if the “Keep Your Coins Act” passes, it will have more clarity.

Did Warren Davidson Say Something About The New Bill?

He did, in a recent interview. The article’s author defined the “Keep Your Coins Act” as, “protecting the ability to act as a self-custodian and conduct peer-to-peer transactions by prohibiting any agency from impairing this right.”

In it, Davidson says that his inspiration was actually U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen:

“We started working on the text after it was obvious that Secretary Yellen would resurrect the effort to restrict self-custody. If they can’t stop crypto, they want to try to move it to an account-based system.”

And he tells us the exact reason that he used the loaded term “self-hosted wallet.”

“It takes the FinCen language that’s been out there for a while now and provides a framework for KYC that protects self-custody.”

Ok, he was using the language of the enemy, but, why is Warren Davidson talking about KYC? The very short bill doesn’t even mention it, but, as you can see, it’s in the Congressman’s mind. In any case, the “Keep Your Coins Act” still has to pass, which is easier said than done. The crypto industry has powerful enemies, and self-custody isn’t a popular concept among that crowd.

Letture associate

Can DeepSeek Save China One Trillion Dollars?

"DeepSeek and the $1 Trillion Infrastructure Question" The article examines whether DeepSeek's AI optimization breakthroughs could potentially save China $1 trillion in future AI infrastructure costs. The analysis begins with Nvidia's upcoming Vera Rubin AI platform, costing ~$7.8 million, where memory (HBM4/LPDDR5X) constitutes $2 million—a 435% cost increase in one year, highlighting how AI hardware spending is shifting toward expensive memory components. DeepSeek's approach works in the opposite direction. Through three key technical innovations showcased in DeepSeek V4, the company dramatically improves hardware efficiency: 1. **Memory Compression (MLA)**: Re-engineers the attention mechanism to compress long-context memory (KV Cache) by over 90%, drastically reducing expensive HBM usage. 2. **Selective Activation (MoE)**: Employs Mixture-of-Experts architecture where only a small fraction of parameters (e.g., 49B out of 1.6T in V4-Pro) are activated per token, allowing most parameters to reside in cheaper memory/SSD. 3. **Computation Caching**: Reuses previously computed results via cache hits, replacing expensive GPU computations with cheap memory reads. Combined, these optimizations allow the same hardware to produce approximately 4x more tokens, effectively reducing required hardware investment by 75%. DeepSeek's pricing reflects this: a 10-billion token workload costs ~$522 monthly versus ~$9,000-$10,000 for competitors. The $1 trillion savings projection stems from McKinsey's estimate that global AI infrastructure will require ~$5.2 trillion investment by 2030. As China's daily token consumption grows toward quadrillions, even marginal efficiency gains scale massively. With a conservative 4x throughput improvement, China could avoid building tens of thousands of AI data centers equivalent to ~7 trillion RMB ($1 trillion) in saved investment. Critically, this strategy shifts dependency from scarce, expensive GPU/HBM—where China lags—toward more accessible storage, caching, and systems engineering where domestic suppliers like CXMT are gaining strength. Rather than "replacing Nvidia," DeepSeek rebalances AI's value chain away from monolithic hardware dependency. Ultimately, DeepSeek's technical breakthroughs could lower the barrier to AI adoption across Chinese industries by making advanced capabilities affordable at scale—transforming who can access next-generation AI.

marsbit1 h fa

Can DeepSeek Save China One Trillion Dollars?

marsbit1 h fa

Overturning the Mainstream Approach to Hallucinations: Metacognition is the New Solution for Large Models to Break the Hallucination Barrier

This paper, "Hallucinations Undermine Trust; Metacognition is a Way Forward," proposes a paradigm shift in combating AI hallucination. It argues that the current mainstream approaches—striving for omniscience by scaling data/models or having AI abstain from uncertain answers—are fundamentally flawed. The former has inevitable knowledge gaps, while the latter imposes a crippling "utility tax," requiring the rejection of many correct answers to achieve high accuracy, due to models' poor "discrimination" (the ability to distinguish correct from incorrect answers internally). The core contribution is redefining hallucination not as "being wrong," but as "expressing false information with unwarranted certainty." The proposed solution is **Faithful Uncertainty** or **Metacognition**: enabling AI to accurately perceive its internal uncertainty and honestly express it in its language (e.g., using hedging phrases when unsure). This creates a more reliable assistant that provides useful information while signaling its confidence, minimizing harm from errors. The paper emphasizes that metacognition is critical for the era of AI Agents. Without it, Agents cannot intelligently decide when to use tools like search engines, leading to inefficiency and misuse. Key implementation challenges are highlighted: the "bootstrapping paradox" of training with static uncertainty data, the "alignment distortion signal" where human preference training suppresses internal uncertainty cues, and the difficulty of causally evaluating true metacognition vs. its superficial imitation. The paper concludes that the goal should not be an infallible AI, but one that is honest about the limits of its knowledge, thereby building user trust through transparent communication of its certainty.

marsbit1 h fa

Overturning the Mainstream Approach to Hallucinations: Metacognition is the New Solution for Large Models to Break the Hallucination Barrier

marsbit1 h fa

Hedge by Buying Gold and Oil, Chase Soaring Returns with AI. ‘Dated’ Bitcoin Enters a Bear Market

Bitcoin has recently declined, hitting a two-month low near $66,123, while Ethereum fell to a three-month low around $1,837. Analysts suggest the drop is not merely due to factors like ETF outflows or MicroStrategy's selling but reflects a deeper issue: Bitcoin is losing a broader asset competition. In a near-zero interest rate environment, Bitcoin previously thrived as an outlet for investor dissatisfaction with inflation and limited options. However, the market landscape has shifted. Bitcoin now occupies an "awkward middle ground," facing competition on three fronts. For inflation hedging, investors prefer gold, energy stocks, and commodity producers—assets with tangible backing and clearer pricing power. For growth exposure, AI-related companies with actual revenues and profits are more attractive. Even within crypto, investors can choose stablecoins, exchanges, or infrastructure firms tied directly to adoption, offering clearer business models and leverage. Thus, Bitcoin is no longer the top choice for hedging, growth, or crypto exposure. This shift is evident in market reactions: despite recent warnings about persistent inflation from a Fed official, Bitcoin did not rally as it might have in the past. Instead, capital flowed to assets with direct commodity or energy exposure. The recent ETF outflows and MicroStrategy sales are symptoms, not causes, of this new reality. Investors are becoming more selective, demanding clearer value propositions beyond mere scarcity. The emerging bear case for Bitcoin is not about it being a bubble or failed technology, but that scarcity alone is no longer sufficient.

华尔街日报1 h fa

Hedge by Buying Gold and Oil, Chase Soaring Returns with AI. ‘Dated’ Bitcoin Enters a Bear Market

华尔街日报1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片