比特币为何狂飙?多头给出简单原因:供应不够了!

金十Pubblicato 2024-03-07Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-03-07

为什么比特币本周飙升至创纪录水平?世界上最大的加密货币的粉丝们表示,这是由于传统的供求规律。

比特币就像任何商品的价格一样,其价格对需求的波动很敏感。今年1月,在可以直接投资比特币的比特币现货ETF推出后,市场对比特币的需求激增。

自那以后,投资者向这些ETF投入了数十亿美元。这些资金流入促使这些基金购买比特币以满足需求,从而推高了比特币的价格。

比特币的供应受到严格限制

比特币与其他大宗商品的不同之处在于,它的供应受到严格限制,这种动态可能导致比特币价格大幅飙升。

支撑比特币的计算机代码规定了比特币的总量只有2100万个,其中90%以上已被“挖出”。

为了扩大供应,矿工会通过让计算机运行算法来“挖掘”新的比特币。但他们每天只能挖出大约900个新的比特币,预计在下个月出现所谓“减半”的周期性事件后,这一生产速度还会下降。大约在2140年,当最后一枚比特币被开采出来时,比特币的供应最终将停止。

Galaxy Digital研究主管Alex Thorn表示:

“比特币是世界上最稀缺的资产之一,而且正日益稀缺。”

但就价格而言,谁也不能保证比特币会继续上涨。比特币目前的高价可能会鼓励持有者出售,从而锁定利润。

值得注意的是,比特币的前几轮牛市之后都是毁灭性的崩盘:在2021年11月达到上一个峰值后,比特币在接下来的一年里下跌了70%以上。持怀疑态度的人,包括政府官员和华尔街高管仍然认为比特币是一种没有内在价值的投机资产。

目前,比特币自年初以来已经上涨了58%。

对需求“十分敏感”

用经济学术语来说,比特币的供给是高度无弹性的,这意味着它不会对价格波动做出反应,而具有这种特性的大宗商品容易出现价格波动。例如,天然气生产商无法在短期内大幅增加天然气产量以利用高气价。

不过,从长期来看,天然气价格的持续高企会促使钻探者寻找新的燃料来源。同样,当黄金价格长时间处于高位时,黄金开采商可以追求成本高昂的新采矿项目,在越来越陌生的地方寻找这种贵金属。

但比特币不是这样运作的。比特币代码中的规则规定了矿工将新比特币带入市场的速度,这一速度会周期性地减半。过去,由于加密货币投资者预计供应会趋紧,比特币的价格会在这种减半之前攀升。

比特币应该有一个固定的最大供应量的想法来自比特币的匿名创造者中本聪(Satoshi Nakamoto),他写道,这样的设计将使比特币免于通胀。

投资公司Swan Bitcoin的私人客户服务主管Steven Lubka表示,“从根本上说,市场上不会有额外的比特币供应。”

这就使得比特币对需求的增长非常敏感,而新的比特币现货ETF自1月11日推出以来一直在大量买入比特币。当天,9只新的ETF首次上市交易,而现有的一只基金灰度比特币信托也转换成了一只ETF。从那时起,近80亿美元的资金净流入比特币现货ETF,其中9只新基金的资金流入超过了灰度旗下比特币现货ETF的资金流出。

据投资研究公司ByteTree估计,截至周二,全球ETF或其他投资基金持有的比特币占全球总供应量的5%,高于1月11日美国比特币现货ETF开始交易时的4.4%。

小心抛压!

当比特币现货ETF购买新的比特币以满足投资者需求时,它们通常依赖于芝加哥交易巨头DRW Holdings的子公司Cumberland或纽约Jane Street Capital等自营交易公司。这些公司运营着加密交易部门,并在数字货币市场上搜寻大量比特币,以填补基金的订单。

一些分析师表示,从大持有者那里获得比特币变得越来越困难。公开的区块链数据显示,全球供应的约1960万枚比特币中,有很大一部分位于“沉睡”数字钱包中,这些钱包很少移动比特币,可能是因为它们属于拒绝出售的长期比特币持有者,也可能是因为所有者丢失了密码,导致他们的比特币无法移动。

瑞士私人银行Julius Baer分析师Manuel Villegas上周在一份研究报告中说,在过去六个月里,大约80%的比特币供应没有转手。Villegas写道,再加上ETF资金的流入,以及数据显示交易所可供出售的比特币库存有限,这“可能会加剧供应紧张”。

其他人表示,有很多卖家愿意在反弹中卖出比特币,这可能是比特币在短暂超过2021年的纪录后,上涨势头有所停滞的原因。

DRW的关系管理主管Rob Strebel说,在最近几周ETF资金大量流入的情况下,Cumberland不难找到比特币来满足现货ETF对比特币的需求。他说,该公司从大型加密投资者那里获得了大部分比特币,这些投资者在比特币价格较低时购买了比特币,并借此机会获利了结。 Strebel说:

“当你看到市场呈抛物线走势时,就像比特币一样,这是一个自然的卖出机会。尤其是当人们回忆起2021年的上一轮牛市时,他们会从桌面上拿走一些筹码。”

Letture associate

A Company Once on the Brink of Bankruptcy Just Surpassed Bitcoin in Market Cap

On June 22nd, driven by rising stock prices, SK Hynix’s market capitalization reached $1.35 trillion, surpassing Bitcoin's total market cap of approximately $1.29 trillion. This temporarily made it South Korea's highest-valued company. The core driver of this surge is HBM (High Bandwidth Memory), for which SK Hynix is the primary supplier to NVIDIA, holding over 60% market share. AI's demand for high memory bandwidth has translated into immense profitability, with SK Hynix reporting a 72% operating profit margin in Q1. The company's success follows a 13-year bet on HBM technology, beginning in 2009. It nearly failed after the 2001 dot-com bubble, was acquired by SK Group in 2012, and was subsequently recapitalized to continue its long-term HBM development. The article contrasts this with the Crypto AI narrative. Capital currently favors AI infrastructure players like SK Hynix due to "real orders, physical barriers, and quantifiable profit margins." In comparison, Crypto AI projects, promising decentralized compute and data markets, remain largely conceptual with limited tangible progress. Examples include Bittensor, whose core mechanisms are still under development, and Bitcoin miners transitioning to AI, who face significant funding gaps and execution challenges. The piece cites analysis suggesting the AI sector has absorbed nearly all new market liquidity since 2022, leaving little for crypto. It concludes that the current AI infrastructure红利 is captured by entities with proven technical barriers and supply capabilities, while crypto networks still need to define their concrete role in the value chain.

链捕手38 min fa

A Company Once on the Brink of Bankruptcy Just Surpassed Bitcoin in Market Cap

链捕手38 min fa

Bittensor Moves Towards Ultimate Decentralization: The Critical 18 Months for the TAO Ecosystem is Here?

Bittensor, a decentralized AI protocol, is accelerating its transition to full decentralization over the next 18 months, as outlined in a recent post by co-founder Const. The project currently operates in a "semi-decentralized" state: ownership and network participation are open and permissionless, with TAO distribution based on competitive contribution. However, protocol upgrades and governance have remained under core team control to enable rapid iteration in the fast-evolving AI sector. This strategic shift comes as the ecosystem matures, boasting 128 subnets and a large community. Const argues that continued centralization now poses risks, including single points of failure and regulatory scrutiny. The upcoming decentralization roadmap includes optimizing validator competition, opening liquidity pools, introducing governance rights for Alpha holders, and refining economic models. The move could fundamentally reshape TAO's value proposition, adding governance premiums to its existing valuation based on AI narrative and scarcity. It also signals a potential maturation of the AI crypto sector, where competition may shift from hype to sustainable protocol design and real economic activity. Bittensor positions itself not just as another AI token, but as foundational infrastructure aiming to decentralize intelligence production—analogous to Bitcoin's role in decentralizing money—with the goal of creating a resilient "Millennium Intelligence Federation."

marsbit51 min fa

Bittensor Moves Towards Ultimate Decentralization: The Critical 18 Months for the TAO Ecosystem is Here?

marsbit51 min fa

Japan's AI Dark Horse Emerges: How a 7B Small Model Challenges Fable and Mythos?

In June 2026, Sakana AI's new model Fugu caused a stir in the AI community. Its Fugu Ultra variant achieved scores of 73.7 on SWE-Bench Pro and 82.1 on TerminalBench 2.1, surpassing GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8, and was claimed to be comparable to export-restricted models like Fable 5 and Mythos Preview. Remarkably, the core of this high-performance system is not a massive model, but a small 7B-parameter RL Conductor model. Fugu operates as a multi-agent orchestrator: the 7B model acts as a "foreman," dynamically analyzing user tasks and delegating subtasks to a pool of top-tier global models (e.g., GPT-5, Gemini 3.1 Pro). It then synthesizes and verifies their outputs. This architecture represents a paradigm shift from monolithic models to an expert-team approach. It enhances performance in complex, multi-step engineering tasks like code review and security testing by enabling cross-validation from specialized models, improving long-session stability and token efficiency. However, Fugu's strengths come with trade-offs: it faces inherent latency due to multiple API calls, relies heavily on underlying US model APIs (creating dependency risks), and its benchmark comparisons with Fable/Mythos are based on reported scores, not head-to-head testing. For Japan's AI ecosystem, which lacks the massive compute and data resources of the US or China, Fugu exemplifies an "asymmetric breakthrough" strategy. Instead of competing directly in parameter scale, it focuses on intelligent orchestration of existing global models, offering a degree of AI sovereignty and resilience. While a significant system-level innovation, its ultimate capability is still bounded by the underlying models it coordinates.

marsbit51 min fa

Japan's AI Dark Horse Emerges: How a 7B Small Model Challenges Fable and Mythos?

marsbit51 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片