SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240304):BTC站上65K关口冲击ATH

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2024-03-04Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-03-04

Introduzione

数字货币方面,BTC日内上涨逾4%,期权收盘前又一波拉盘将币价推上65K关口,向着All Time High发出挑战。

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240304):BTC站上65K关口冲击ATH

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240304):BTC站上65K关口冲击ATH

上周五美联储公布了半年度货币政策报告,指出了银行体系健全且有韧性的,但金融稳定方面仍存在一些弱点,此外,美联储官员高度关注通胀风险,在更有说服力的评估数据公布之前并不急于降息。数据方面,周五公布的经济数据普遍低于预期,增强了市场对降息的预期,美国三大股指齐涨,美债收益率逐步回落,当前两年期/十年期分别为 4.552% /4.204 。

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240304):BTC站上65K关口冲击ATH

Source: SignalPlus, Economic Calendar

数字货币方面,BTC 日内上涨逾 4% ,期权收盘前又一波拉盘将币价推上 65 K 关口,向着 All Time High 发出挑战。此轮上涨行情的重要催化剂当属 BTC Spot ETFs 带来的资金流入,日均 10000 BTC 价值的购买需求已经远远超出 BTC 挖矿的产量,更别提即将到来的 Bitcoin Halving 将再度减少比特币一半的产出,加剧供需不平衡的现状。

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240304):BTC站上65K关口冲击ATH

Source: Binance & TradingView

若币价能延续上行势能,突破历史最高点的时刻想必也不会遥远,期权市场也在日内将前端隐含波动率指数再度推高至 BTC 90% / ETH 85% 的高峰,同时衡量曲面斜率的 25 d RR 指标也再度上升打破过去三个月的最高点。从交易上看,以 Long Call Spread/Call Butterfly 为代表的大宗策略成为交易的热门,表达了有限看涨的观点。

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240304):BTC站上65K关口冲击ATH

Source: Deribit (截至 4 MAR 16: 00 UTC+ 8)

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240304):BTC站上65K关口冲击ATH

Source: SignalPlus

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240304):BTC站上65K关口冲击ATH

Source: SignalPlus

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240304):BTC站上65K关口冲击ATH

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240304):BTC站上65K关口冲击ATH

Data Source: Deribit,BTC 成交分布

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240304):BTC站上65K关口冲击ATH

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240304):BTC站上65K关口冲击ATH

Data Source: Deribit,ETH 成交分布

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240304):BTC站上65K关口冲击ATH

Source: Deribit Block Trade

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240304):BTC站上65K关口冲击ATH

Source: Deribit Block Trade

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240304):BTC站上65K关口冲击ATH

您可在 ChatGPT 4.0 的 Plugin Store 搜索 SignalPlus ,获取实时加密资讯。如果想即时收到我们的更新,欢迎关注我们的推特账号@SignalPlus_Web3 ,或者加入我们的微信群(添加小助手微信:SignalPlus 123)、Telegram 群以及 Discord 社群,和更多朋友一起交流互动。

SignalPlus Official Website:https://www.signalplus.com

Letture associate

Commerce Ministry's Latest Export Controls Target 10 US Companies: Three Market-Moving Threads Explained

China's Ministry of Commerce placed 10 U.S. entities, including MP Materials, USA Rare Earth, Red Cat Holdings, and Teal Drones, on an export control list, banning the export of dual-use items. This move is seen as part of an ongoing countermeasure in the rare earth sector. The analysis suggests the primary impact is on U.S. companies within the **military, drone, and rare earth** sectors, aiming to restrict their access to critical Chinese materials and technology. For the Chinese market, the event is interpreted as reinforcing the **strategic value and pricing power** of domestic rare earth suppliers. However, the potential stock market reactions are nuanced: 1. **Chinese Rare Earth Upstream:** Companies like Northern Rare Earth are near yearly highs, indicating this event's "beneficiary" logic is largely priced in. It may confirm the trend but is unlikely to be a new major catalyst. 2. **Chinese Rare Earth Mid/Downstream & Drones:** Sectors like magnetic materials (e.g., Da Di Bear, Zhenghai Magnetic) and military drones (e.g., China Aerospace) are relatively undervalued. While the drone listing highlights sectoral competition, it doesn't directly translate to new orders for Chinese firms. 3. **Impact on Listed U.S. Companies:** The effect on stocks like MP Materials is ambiguous. While Chinese restrictions pose a challenge, these companies are also core to U.S. supply chain security efforts and may receive increased government support, potentially offsetting negative impacts. Their pre-announcement stock prices did not indicate panic selling. In summary, the export controls strengthen China's position in the global rare earth supply chain but have uneven effects across related stock market segments, with upstream Chinese gains likely priced in and downstream/drone sectors receiving more indirect, sentiment-driven attention. The outcome for the targeted U.S. stocks depends on the balance between restriction impacts and potential compensatory U.S. policy support.

marsbit5 min fa

Commerce Ministry's Latest Export Controls Target 10 US Companies: Three Market-Moving Threads Explained

marsbit5 min fa

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

Uniswap v4's Hook mechanism is a major innovation, enabling custom logic injection into liquidity pool lifecycle events like swaps and liquidity provisioning. This transforms the AMM into programmable infrastructure, shifting the security model from protocol-level to pool-level, as each pool's safety now depends on its bound Hook contract. The core architecture revolves around the singleton PoolManager contract, which manages all pools via a flash accounting system. State changes are tracked in transient storage and must be settled by the end of a transaction. Hook contracts are permanently bound to pools via a PoolKey, with their permissions encoded directly into their address via specific low-order bits. This design introduces unique security considerations and challenges for future upgrades. Key vulnerabilities and best practices identified include: - **Access Control Gaps:** Early versions of the BaseHook abstract contract only protect `unlockCallback()`, leaving other lifecycle functions (`beforeSwap`, `afterSwap`, etc.) exposed unless explicitly secured by developers. - **Unrestricted Pool Binding:** The `initialize()` function does not validate if a Hook "consents" to a new pool. Hooks must implement their own whitelisting in `beforeInitialize` to prevent unauthorized pool creation. - **Async/Custom Curve Hooks:** These high-risk Hooks can completely replace Uniswap's swap logic. Their security depends entirely on their own implementation, as they operate outside the native protocol's pricing safeguards. - **Delta Accounting Risks:** The system ensures final balance (NonzeroDeltaCount == 0) but cannot guarantee the *correctness* of intermediate delta states, which attackers could manipulate. - **Token Confusion:** Protocols must implement semantic validation for tokens in user-created markets, not just interface checks, to prevent cross-market confusion attacks. The article emphasizes that Hook auditing requires a "sub-protocol" approach due to extended interaction chains, highlighting a significant shift in security methodology for the v4 ecosystem.

marsbit57 min fa

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

marsbit57 min fa

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

Alibaba Executive Chairman Joe Tsai recently outlined the company's comprehensive AI strategy in a public discussion. He believes AI represents a massive opportunity, estimating its potential economic impact at up to $50 trillion, stemming from the automation of human intelligence and productivity. Tsai detailed Alibaba's four-layer investment approach across the AI stack: starting from the chip level, moving to cloud infrastructure (Alibaba Cloud), then the model layer with its open-source Qwen model, and finally applications within its vast digital ecosystem (e-commerce, logistics, etc.). The company avoids the energy layer due to China's efficient infrastructure. This broad strategy is designed to ensure Alibaba captures value regardless of where it ultimately concentrates in the AI value chain. He dismissed concerns about an AI investment bubble, pointing to the enormous $50 trillion opportunity. While acknowledging U.S. cloud giants' higher capital expenditure, he argued Chinese firms, including Alibaba (funded by its cash-generative e-commerce core), need to invest more in AI infrastructure. A key theme was technological sovereignty. Tsai positioned open-source models like Qwen as a solution for companies, especially in Europe, seeking independence from proprietary U.S. models and greater data privacy control. He contrasted this with the trend of U.S. giants keeping their models closed-source. Tsai highlighted Alibaba's collaborations with European manufacturers like Bosch and Siemens, using AI for design and quality control. He concluded with an optimistic vision of AI agents enhancing productivity, ultimately freeing up human time for leisure, family, and experiences like live entertainment.

marsbit1 h fa

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片