一览Avalanche生态9个未发币项目

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2024-02-06Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-02-06

Introduzione

9个项目涵盖游戏、借贷、社交等应用领域。

原文作者:Aylo, 加密 KOL

原文编译:Felix, PANews

Avalanche 生态有很多可以尝试的应用程序和子网,而这些可能在 2024 年迅速发展。加密 KOL Aylo 盘点了 9 个可以在 Avalanche 生态上交互的未发币项目,并指出了可能获得空投的交互方式。

Struct Finance

Struct Finance 在 Avalanche C 链上推出,提供利息金库和“分档”机制,为 DeFi 用户提供固定/非固定收益产品。该机制将计息产品分为不同“档”,分别应用不同的策略。该协议刚刚获得了 100 万美元的 AVAX 激励。用户可以选择一个金库,获得固定或可变收益+积分(空投)。

一览Avalanche生态9个未发币项目

相关阅读:Avalanche 第三季度报告:领域合作多面开花,生态系统充满活力

Hubble Exchange

Hubble Exchange 是一个使用 USDC 作为 Gas 代币的订单簿 DEX。用户使用 LayerZero 只需点击一次即可将资产从 EVM 直接存入 Hubble。

一览Avalanche生态9个未发币项目

Hyperspace

Avalanche 链上的 NFT 表现得相当不错。用户在 NFT 平台 Hyperspace 上交易 NFT 可以赚取积分,目前正在举行 Season 3 活动,时间截至 2 月 3 日。积分将转化为 AVAX 奖励。

一览Avalanche生态9个未发币项目

相关阅读:接力 Solana?盘点 Avalanche 生态最新进展

Gunzilla Games

Gunzilla Games 是建立在 Avalanche 子网上的 AAA 游戏工作室。目前正在开发一款赛博朋克大逃杀 2.0 游戏《Off The Grid》(OTG)。2022 年 6 月,Gunzilla Games 完成 4600 万美元融资,Republic Capital 领投、Griffin Gaming Partners、Animoca Brands、Jump Crypto 等参投。

用户可以下载 Technocore 应用程序(测试手机游戏,Season 2 已上线)和应用程序商店中的 GUNZ 平台。

相关阅读:揭秘最有钱的游戏风投基金 Griffin Gaming Partners 投资了哪些Web3项目?

BloodLoop

BloodLoop 一款利用 Avalanche 子网与区块链集成的 5 v 5 英雄射击游戏。

用户可以购买他们的 NFT 系列:https://avax.hyperspace.xyz/collection/avax/semcapsules

完成任务:https://sesamelabs.xyz/bloodloop/

Spellborne

Spellborne(前身为 Defimons)刚刚筹集了一轮资金,其中包括 Animoca 等投资人)。Spellborne 是一款基于 Avalanche 子网构建的复古风格捕捉怪物的 MMORPG 游戏(大型多人在线角色扮演游戏)。

DeltaPrime

DeltaPrime 是一个部署在 Avalanche 上的借贷平台。用户可以存入和借出资金(贷款的最低抵押率为 20% )。借来的资金可用于投资集成协议。

一览Avalanche生态9个未发币项目

The Arena

去中心化社交协议 The Arena(原名 Stars Arena)值得再次尝试,该协议有了新的领导层,新任首席执行官为 Jason Desimone。该协议的 TVL 在上周翻了一番。用户可以通过参与该平台赚取积分。社交网络或将迎来第二波浪潮。

LEVR.bet

LEVR.bet 是 Avalanche 链上的杠杆体育博彩平台。用户在其网站上注册测试版即可参与并赚取空投。

Letture associate

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit1 h fa

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit1 h fa

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit2 h fa

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit2 h fa

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit2 h fa

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片