2.5万人参与,全网疯卷邀请码,Merlin代币公平发射如何参与?

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2024-02-06Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-02-06

Introduzione

Launchpad只是开胃菜。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | 夫如何

编辑|秦晓峰

2.5万人参与,全网疯卷邀请码,Merlin代币公平发射如何参与?

这两天,社交媒体以及加密社区中随处可见的 Merlin 邀请码到底是什么?

Merlin Chain 是基于比特币网络的 Layer 2 ,采用 zk-Rollup,将自身二层的交易证明打包记载在比特币网络的 Taproot。Merlin Chain 由 Bitmap Tech 推出,Bitmap 和 BRC-420 “蓝盒”系列已成为最热门的 Ordinals 资产之一,团队在比特币生态的知名度较高。

近期,Merlin Chain 动作不断。一方面宣布完成融资,OKX Ventures、ABCDE、Foresight Ventures、Arkstream Capital 等 24 家机构参投。另一方面,创始人 Jeff 喊话称,Merlin Chain 将推出最大的 L2 公平发射,代币 MERL 空投比例远远高于常见的 5% ,还将通过“fair launch”的方式分发其治理代币,旨在奖励真实用户和构建者。

2 月 5 日,Merlin Chain 宣布将代币总量的 1% (2100 万枚 MERL )用于 Launchpad,平台是 People's Launchpad,活动持续 5 天,初始购买价格为 0.00004762 USDT。

或许是份额有限,市场的参与热情远超想象,全网开始疯卷 Merlin。Odaily星球日报手把手教大家如何获得 Merlin 的 Launchpad 份额,以及可能付出的隐形成本。

交互教程。

首先,选择一个朋友或者推特 KOL 的邀请码链接打开网址。在链接钱包的过程中,需要采用 Twitter 和 Discord 双重认证。

2.5万人参与,全网疯卷邀请码,Merlin代币公平发射如何参与?

根据上图,有四个任务需要完成「DO IT」:

  • 第一步,关注 Merlin Chain Twitter 账号。这一步主要是为项目方吸粉,并不会获得能量;

  • 第二步,邀请好友,本次公平发射的代币购买份额设置了上限,通过验证码可以为自己加 200 点能量;

  • 第三步,质押 200 万枚 ALLY 代币,可以获得 80000 点能量(后文详解);

  • 第四步,确保自己钱包在 Melin Chain 主网中拥有至少 0.00025 枚 BTC;每 0.00025 枚 BTC 可以获得 1000 点能量,上限 80000 点能量,即 0.02 枚 BTC。

第二步不设上限,但每拉一个人在获得 200 点能量的同时,也意味着多了一位竞争者,相对来说 KOL 们更容易在这一步获得优势。

第三步质押 200 万枚 ALLY,这一步是想要获得高份额的必做一步,但同时也要承担资产缩水的风险。ALLY 是铭文,且还要质押 28 天, 200 万枚 ALLY 成本在 1000 USDT 以上,资产价值可能存在较大波动,再结合铭文流动性较差,Odaily星球日报建议该步骤请谨慎操作。(Odaily 注:ALLY 是首个仅支持通过账户抽象协议铸造的 EVM 铭文,在 L2 linea 上铸造,所有铭刻都通过 Particle Network 的全链账户抽象协议进行。)

操作步骤如下:

(1)点击质押 200 万枚 ALLY 任务栏中的 DO IT。

2.5万人参与,全网疯卷邀请码,Merlin代币公平发射如何参与?

(2)点击上述任意位置,即可看到购买页面。

2.5万人参与,全网疯卷邀请码,Merlin代币公平发射如何参与?

(3)ALLY 持有者会将其铭文拆分为 200 万枚来挂单,购买第一个即可。

2.5万人参与,全网疯卷邀请码,Merlin代币公平发射如何参与?

(4)根据上图左面部分,截止发文时, 200 万枚 ALLY 价值近 1300 USDT。上图左面是质押 ALLY 铭文的界面,从图中可以看到质押时间的长短与获取能量的数值有关,最长质押时间 28 天,不少用户也没有进行这一步操作。

第四步核查 BTC 数量。由于 Merlin 主网的官方桥尚未开通,导致 BTC 跨链存在较大壁垒。目前项目方给出解决方案是通过 meson.fi 跨链到 Merlin 主网,或者直接场外 OTC 购买。

2.5万人参与,全网疯卷邀请码,Merlin代币公平发射如何参与?

根据推特 KOL「链游玩鸭 Sir」的测试,从 Arbitrum 跨到 Merlin 主网,手续费较低,仅需 0.9 USDT;同时需要注意,转入的 BTC 需要 7-14 天才能从 Merlin 主网转出来。

Merlin Chain 创始人 Jeff 上周在 Twitter Space 中透露,主网上线后,多种优质资产皆可以参与 Merlin Chain 主网质押挖矿计划,包括 BTC、Bitmap、BRC-420、BRC-20 的头部资产等,所以提前存入更有利于抢占先机。

本次 Launchpad 时间范围为北京时间 2 月 5 日 20: 00 至 2 月 10 日 20: 00 ,共计 5 天。截止发文前,能量排行榜前 54 名都是将第三步质押和第四步 BTC 验证做完,能量值为 16 万;前 500 名的能量值在 8 万以上;用户参与总数近 2.5 万人。

Odaily星球日报提醒,务必理性参与,把控成本,建议除了第三步质押之外均可尝试,免费获得一定数量的代币份额也是不错的选择。

Letture associate

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit1 h fa

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit1 h fa

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit2 h fa

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit2 h fa

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit2 h fa

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片