除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2024-02-05Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-02-05

Introduzione

Farcaster作为一个加密社交的新阵地还会催生出更多的新项目和代币。

原文作者:深潮 TechFlow

最近一周,加密市场中频繁提及的话题,是 Farcaster。

作为一个建立在以太坊上基于 OP Stack 的社交协议,用户拥有以太坊钱包即可注册。

其界面和功能看起来都与推特类似,但与传统的 Web2 平台相比,Farcaster 强调用户对数据的控制,并允许社交数据在其生态系统内的不同应用程序之间进行转移。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

早在 2021 年,Farcaster 就已经完成了由 A16Z 领投的 3000 万美金的天使轮融资,且 Vitalik 等加密核心人物经常在其中发表见解。

而今,是什么让 Farcaster 再度火热?

从开发端看,近期 Farcaster 推出了 Frame 的新功能,它可以将任何 cast(你可以理解成 Farcaster 的推文或帖子)变成一个交互式应用;这个新功能为 Farcaster 生态系统带来了更多的可能性,包括在 cast 中内置的空投检查器和一键免 Gas 费的 NFT 铸造。

也就是说,Frame 很容易吸引加密开发者,为更多玩出花的加密业态铺路。

而在用户端,Faracaster 上的代币空投,则让财富效应更进一步传播,更多用户因为部分人早期的空投收益纷纷开始投机尝试。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

在多重因素刺激下,Farcaster 的用户量、发帖数和活跃度都显著提升, 手机端 warpcast 一度崩溃无法登录,而这种迹象或许也为叙事热点的轮转打开了一个新机会。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

当前的 Farcaster 生态中,有哪些代币和项目还值得进一步关注?

$Degen : Facaster 的 meme 龙头

币如其名,该代币更多包含着投机意味,同时也是 Farcaster 生态中目前的代币龙头。

该代币的起源非常简单,用户只要在 Farcaster 的 degen 频道中进行发言等其他活跃动作,就有可能会收到 $Degen 代币奖励。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

从本质上看,Degen 是一个 MEME 代币,更多在鼓励加密 degen 们在 Farcaster 上讨论投机信息。但如今 Degen 也从一众空投代币中杀出重围,成为了加密媒体近期关注的焦点。

代币生成在 Base 链上,当前 Degen 的市值已经来到 1.1 亿美金,且最近 24 小时价格迎来巨大上涨。

而在 1 月 26 日左右,Degen 的价格不过 0.0002 美金,目前看已经上涨了接近 15 倍。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

在 Degen 的代币经济学中, 15% 的代币总量已经被空投出去,而下一阶段还有 20% 左右的空投会产生,因此积极在 Degen 频道中做更多活跃的动作或有机会得到更多空投;而作为目前 Farcaster 生态的龙头 MEME,直接关注 Degen 二级市场本身的表现也是一个不错的选择。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

$ Frame:与 Frame 功能重名的代币

与 Farcaster 最近的推出的 Frame 功能同名的代币,目前市值不到 700 万美金,与$DEGEN 相差甚远,不过也意味着更多的机会。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

代币最初于 2 月 2 日在 Base 上创建,其目的是为了测试 Farcaster 上的 Frame 的功能而进行的实验,但随后演变成更多与 MEME 相关的一种符号。

目前$FRAME 将用于向 Farcaster 生态系统中的 Builder,特别是那些使用 Frames 构建的 builder 提供赠款、赏金和奖励。但空投代币已经领完,目前仅可在 Uniswap 等二级市场上进行购买。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

$Cast : 与发帖功能重名的代币

在 Farcast 的应用 app warpcast 中,你的每一个发帖都有一个名为「cast」的按钮,点击即可发送自己的帖子。除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

因此 cast 与发推的意思类似,也构成了 Farcast 最核心的功能之一。同样的,MEME 无孔不入,与该功能重名的$CAST 代币开始出现,截止发文时市值仅为 4 万美金。

需要注意的是,这种强行绑定层概念的代币风险与收益并存,可能会瞬间引起注意,也可能会快速被人遗忘。但与铭文早期的占山为王抢先命名一样,与核心概念绑定的越早,越容易吸引热度和关注。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

对于市值更小的代币,类似的还有 $Far(致敬 Farcaster 的名字),还请 DYOR。

$Points : 因玩笑诞生又老树开花的 MEME

早在去年 12 月,推特用户 Kyle McCollom 发了条推文,预测会有一个名为 Points 的 MEME 币出现,而且注定会失败。除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

这个看似随意的推文由一名加密行业的 OG Matthias 实现,他部署了一份合约,向 Farcaster 用户发起了 $Points 代币空投,并创建了一个铸币前端。

在去年 12 月中,Points 代币暴涨,曾一度较开盘时上涨 2800% 左右,但随后慢慢没了热度,价格也回到了冰点。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

之前,创始人 Matthias 甚至还直播销毁了 Points 代币供应的 75% ,颇有一种公开透明的娱乐精神。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

近期随着 Farcaster 又一次火热,Points 代币也迎来了阶段性上涨。从下图可以看到,Points 在 3 号左右突然快速拉升,随后又迅速回落。

作为一个 Farcaster 相关的早期 MEME,一点风吹草动必然会波及到该代币的表现,因此或许也可以将其加入观察清单,配合 Farcaster 的相关利好利空进行操作。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

NFT 相关

除了 MEME 以外,一些 NFT 项目也值得关注。

Farcaster OG:

官方发的 OG NFT,有一定的空投预期,当前地板价已经来到了 2.4 E。除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

Farcats:

以猫形象为主的 NFT 系列,官方描述其为 Farcaster 的吉祥物,以 1661 个独特且可收藏的 NFT 的形式出现。当前地板价为 0.7 E 左右

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

Castaways:

由 Farcaster 生态内最知名艺术家 0x en 创作,一千个独特的 Farcaster NFT 的集合。该系列最初是对 Farcaster「拱形」标志的模因可能性的探索,后来演变成一个拥有无数重新诠释的大型系列。

当前地板价 0.25 E 左右。

值得一提的是,该项目是一个老系列,去年 3 月就开始了 Mint,但是一直没有太多的热度,直到今年 2 月左右,Farcaster 翻红,所有的 NFT 才被 Mint 完毕。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

总体上来看,Farcaster 主应用的火热,给了 Meme 和 NFT 短期蹿升的空间,同时也更表明加密热点的快速轮转多诞生于社交讨论中。

Farcaster 作为一个加密社交的新阵地,其中必然还会催生出更多的新项目和代币;对普通玩家来说,必须积极参与到该社交平台中关注新话题的动向,尽可能的参与讨论,以博取空投的新机会,和发现早期新项目的信息差。

对 Farcaster 有兴趣的读者,也可以通过笔者的邀请链接进行注册,成功注册后也可以得到 50 个 warps,用于在应用中创建频道、Mint NFT 或进行更多操作。除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

原文链接

Letture associate

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit2 h fa

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit2 h fa

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit2 h fa

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit2 h fa

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit3 h fa

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit3 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片