JPMorgan CEO backlashed for Bitcoin ETF role amid anti-crypto comments

JinsPubblicato 2023-12-29Pubblicato ultima volta 2023-12-31

Introduzione

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon is being hauled over the hot coals by the crypto community on X (formerly Twitter) after being named an authorized participant (AP) by BlackRock, which dropped its updated S-1.

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon is being hauled over the hot coals by the crypto community on X (formerly Twitter) after being named an authorized participant (AP) by BlackRock, which dropped its updated S-1.
Commenting on the BlackRock amendment, Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas said, “BlackRock just dropped its updated S-1, and it DOES name the APs: Jane Street and JPMorgan (which is kinda ironic).” possibly referring to the choice of the investment bank as AP.
BlackRock's updated filing named Jane Street and JPMorgan Securities “authorized participants” in its proposed spot Bitcoin ETF application. However, JPMorgan's CEO, Jamie Dimon, hasn't consistently endorsed Bitcoin (BTC) publicly.
How about that @ewarren, Jamie Dimon’s @jpmorgan is involved with #Bitcoin despite its only use case serving terrorists, drug cartels and other criminals. Or maybe you and Jamie Dimon are simply gas lighting the American public. https://t.co/1dBilLTh7k
— John E Deaton (@JohnEDeaton1) December 29, 2023
In a Dec. 6 hearing of the Senate Banking Committee on oversight of Wall Street firms, JPMorgan Chase chair and CEO Jamie Dimon told several United States lawmakers that if he had the authority in government, he would try to shut down crypto, claiming Bitcoin BTC and cryptocurrency’s “only true use case” is to facilitate crime.
Crypto pundits have quickly pointed out the hypocrisy of JPMorgan as an authorized participant in BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF. “Perhaps money laundering, tax evasion, criminal participation, and drug trafficking is their business as well” said crypto enthusiast @silzimzil on X.
“If BlackRock wants to do all that, then fine, but how can JP Morgan do all that after telling Congress and Elizabeth Warren that this is what it’s used for?” another crypto user, @sunny051488, asked on X.
Related: Invesco Galaxy, Bitwise, WisdomTree, Fidelity join BTC ETF revision rush
XRP lawyer John Deaton also expressed skepticism about Senator Elizabeth Warren’s stance on Bitcoin and pointed out that Jamie Dimon’s JPMorgan is involved with Bitcoin despite “negative associations with criminals.” Deaton questioned whether this was an attempt to mislead the public or engage in gaslighting.
Despite being “deeply opposed” to the digital asset sector, JPMorgan recently launched its crypto token — JPM Coin — on a private version of the Ethereum blockchain for its institutional client base.
The bank also rolled out a blockchain-based tokenization platform in October, with BlackRock as one of its clients. It also contributed to a $65 million funding round for Ethereum infrastructure firm Consensys in April 2021.
Magazine: Expect ‘records broken’ by Bitcoin ETF: Brett Harrison (ex-FTX US), X Hall of Flame

Letture associate

To Those Ordinary People Who Haven't Invested in AI: You Think You're Late, You're Just Lacking Your Own Worldview

**Summary:** The article argues that ordinary investors feeling FOMO over missing the AI investment boom lack not timing, but their own independent worldview. Most people chase "what to buy" based on others' opinions (FOMO, envy) rather than fundamental analysis. This leads to costly mistakes: not knowing when to exit winning trades or cut losses on losing ones. The core solution is to develop a personal, long-term (5-10 year) worldview about societal shifts and technological bottlenecks. For most, building this from scratch (Path A) is too demanding. A practical alternative (Path B) is to follow the **capital expenditures (capex)** and strategic investments of visionary leaders, as their money reveals true conviction more reliably than their words. Five key figures to track for different AI perspectives are highlighted: Jensen Huang (NVIDIA, infrastructure), Elon Musk (Tesla/SpaceX/xAI, capex signals), Sam Altman (OpenAI, commercialization, but beware hype), Dario Amodei (Anthropic, technical/safety focus), and Liang Wenfeng (DeepSeek, efficiency/anti-consensus view). The article details how to read capex signals from hyperscalers' financial reports, NVIDIA's revenue breakdown, and strategic investments. It maps the complete AI产业链 (supply chain) from raw materials/energy to models/applications, explaining value flow and inter-dependencies (e.g., how a model release triggers demand across chips, memory, and optics). Finally, it provides an action plan: secure personal finances first, allocate a limited portfolio percentage (max 25%) to the theme, prefer broad ETFs (like QQQ), use dollar-cost averaging over 6-12 months, and write down strict investment rules beforehand to combat emotional errors during market volatility. The conclusion is that a stable, personally-held worldview enables disciplined, long-term investment far more than chasing short-term trends.

marsbit35 min fa

To Those Ordinary People Who Haven't Invested in AI: You Think You're Late, You're Just Lacking Your Own Worldview

marsbit35 min fa

Microsoft Halts Vibe Coding: "Burning Tokens" Is Now More Expensive Than Employees

Microsoft has halted the widespread internal use of Claude Code, withdrawing licenses from most employees by the end of its fiscal year, June 30, 2026. This reversal comes just six months after actively promoting the AI coding tool to boost productivity via "vibe coding"—where developers describe intent in natural language and let the LLM generate code. The core issue isn't the tool's effectiveness; internal reports suggest employees preferred Claude Code over Microsoft's own Copilot CLI. The problem is financial: the "copilot mode" adds a variable, consumption-based token cost on top of existing employee salaries without a proportional revenue increase. As usage grew, the token bills became unsustainable, leading to what sources describe as a cost-structure failure. Similar overruns have been reported at other firms like Uber. The article contrasts this with the approach of AI-native startups, exemplified by Y Combinator's philosophy. Here, high token consumption is strategic—it replaces, rather than supplements, human labor. Startups operate with tiny teams where AI agents handle work previously done by many, making the high token bill financially viable as it offsets much larger personnel costs. The conclusion is that "vibe coding" isn't dead, but its economics fail within traditional corporate structures that treat AI as a productivity add-on for existing staff. Success requires a foundational shift to an AI-native organization, where processes are built to be "legible to AI," and the company's core knowledge and assets reside in documented, AI-accessible systems rather than solely in employees' minds. The future divide will be between companies that merely add AI tools and those that redesign their organizations around them.

marsbit54 min fa

Microsoft Halts Vibe Coding: "Burning Tokens" Is Now More Expensive Than Employees

marsbit54 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片