埋伏下一个Celestia,这些模块化项目值得关注

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2023-11-02Pubblicato ultima volta 2023-11-02

Introduzione

六大模块化潜力项目及交互建议一览

原文来源:Biteye

Celestia 的大碗猪脚饭空投引起了对模块化热潮的关注,其是第一个但绝不是最后一个发币的模块化项目,我们后续可以关注哪些该赛道的机会呢?本期 Biteye 为大家带来了六大模块化潜力项目及交互建议;

  • Fuel

  • Altlayer

  • Polygon Avail

  • Caldera

  • Eclipse

  • 其他建议

Fuel

@fuel_network的方向是建立一个模块化执行层,通过使用欺诈证明机制和 UTXO 实现并行交易,和轻型客户端来提高安全性。 Fuel 的联创也是 Celestia 的联创之一,去年 9 月完成融资$ 80 M。

交互方式:

1、安装 Fuel 原生钱包,去其生态网站中选取项目交互:https://alpha.fuel.network/ecosystem

2、测试网跨链桥交互:https://alpha.fuel.network/bridge/?from=eth&to=fuel

Altlayer

@alt_layer是一个 Rollup-as-a-Service 协议,允许开发人员快速定制具有欺诈/ZK 证明的 Rollups,预计 2024 年上线主网。 Polychain 领投融资了$ 7.2 M,并入选了第六季币安 MVB 孵化计划。

交互方式:

1、完成官方发布的银河任务: https://galxe.com/unsupportedregion

2、去 Altlayer 的 Dashboard 中创建 Flash 层: https://dashboard.alt.technology/login

Dymension

@dymension是 Cosmos 的模块化结算层,旨在让开发人员通过 RDK 和专门的结算层快速部署特定应用程序的 Rollup。 去年 6 月完成$ 6.7 M 融资,创始人声明说预计会有第 2 轮融资。

交互方式:

1、进入官方 DC 领水

2、通过官方网站进行各 Rollup 间的代币交换: https://portal.dymension.xyz/ibc

3、安装 Go 配置相关硬件运行节点,详情可见文档:https://docs.dymension.xyz/validate/dymension-hub/overview/

Polygon Avail

@AvailProject是专注于模块化区块链中数据可用性层的提供商,允许 Rollup 将数据发布到 Avail 中存储并选择其他网络进行结算。 Polygon 联创之一脱离 Polygon 出走而后带领的项目,目前暂未融资。

交互方式:

目前 Avail 在举办 Validator Spotlight 活动,用户可以填表加入成为测试网的验证者:https://twitter.com/AvailProject/status/1715008696835600451

Caldera

@Calderaxyz是一个 Raas 服务,其创新在于将数据可用性与结算层解耦,定制化的 Rollup 可将交易内容发送到以太坊或者专门的 DA 层,如 Celestia 来优化交易成本。 Caldera 融资$ 9 M,Drangonfly,红杉领投,1kx 等机构参投。

交互方式:

1、在其测试网上进行跨链交互:https://testnet.caldera.dev

2、交互以该项目为底层的网络,如 Manta PacificInjective 等。

Eclipse

@EclipseFND是一个模块化结算层,跟 Caldera 类似,它可以通过选择所需的共识和 DA 层来创建自定义执行链,从而为特定用例创建最佳组合提供了可定制的特性,Eclipse 在执行环境上支持 EVM 和 SVM(支持 SolanaVM 被认为是 Eclipse 的优势 zhi),并计划在未来支持更多虚拟机,同时在 DA 层上已经支持 Celestia,未来可能支持 Eigen DA 和 Avail 等协议。 Eclipse 共进行了两轮融资,总融资额为$ 15 M,其中 Polygon Ventures 跟 Polychain 参投。

交互方式:

1、Eclipse 的主网已经上线,可以多关注与其合作的项目,交互这些项目来获得一些权重。

项目可参考:https://eclipse.builders/partners

Celestia 是目前 Eclipse 支持的 DA 层,可以继续关注 Celestia 的交互,比如质押$TIA,运行 Celestia 轻节点,详情可见:https://www.eclipse.builders/partners

其他建议

最后一点 Last but not least,除了直接参与项目方的交互,以下方法也可以帮助普通用户获取空投

• 质押 atom 或者 osmos,$TIA 这次给质押 75 刀以上的有 50 个低保的空投,$TIA 空投以后也可以部分质押

• evm 链交互,对于一些大项目方来说,即使不是 evm 生态的项目,也会给到 evm 参与者,很多拿了 Arb 和 Op 空投的地址,这次都有$TIA,重点是主网 tx+二层 tx+一定余额+防女巫,点击查看详情

原文链接

Letture associate

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Bitcoin prices declined 13% this week, reversing the recent rebound and signaling a likely transition into the later stages of a bear market. Key on-chain metrics deteriorated, with the short-term holder cost basis falling below the Realized Price—a pattern last seen in early 2022, characteristic of bear market maturity. The rally to ~$82k proved to be a bear market bounce, as evidenced by the 90-day realized profit/loss ratio failing to sustain above the bullish threshold of 2. Daily realized losses surged to $1.35B, including significant selling from long-term holders who accumulated near cycle tops, indicating ongoing supply redistribution. Price was rejected almost precisely at the aggregate US spot ETF cost basis of ~$83k, turning that level into resistance and leaving the average ETF investor underwater again. Spot market selling pressure intensified, with the 7-day volume delta turning significantly negative to its weakest level since February. While a major long liquidation event cleared over $400M in leverage, spot demand has not yet stepped in to absorb the resulting supply. Options markets continue pricing in higher future volatility (elevated volatility risk premium) and maintain a skew toward put options, reflecting persistent demand for downside protection, though not yet panic. Overall, market structure remains fragile. Sustained recovery likely requires a reclaim of the ETF cost basis, a shift back to positive spot demand, and a slowdown in realized loss-taking. Until then, the market risks further downside or extended consolidation within the broader bear trend.

Foresight News1 h fa

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Foresight News1 h fa

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight News1 h fa

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight News1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片