一文对比Oasis、Injective和Near三条公链

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2023-11-01Pubblicato ultima volta 2023-11-01

Introduzione

相对于其市值,Injective的交易量更高,这可能表明其吸引着更多的市场兴趣,交易更活跃。

原文作者:Axel Bitblaze(@Axel_bitblaze 69 

原文编译:Joyce,BlockBeats

编者按:加密研究员 Axel Bitblaze 从技术、用例、性能、共识机制、市场地位及代币经济学角度分析了 InjectiveOasis 和 Near 三条公链。并根据 Injective 的交易量 / 市值比率较高,认为短期内市场对 Injective 的兴趣更多,其上的交易也更为活跃。BlockBeats 编译如下:

专注于隐私的 L1 解决方案 Oasis Protocol

技术:专注于隐私保护功能;结合安全计算技术(如可信执行环境)以及区块链框架;

共识机制:采用权益证明(PoS)来达成共识;

用例:主要针对需要隐私的应用程序;尤其适用于需要保护敏感数据的医疗保健或金融领域;

性能:具有高可扩展性和低 gas 费;PoS 机制和优化的网络结构的优势;

市场定位:作为一个以隐私为中心的平台,可能会吸引一个利基市场;对处理敏感数据的行业尤其有吸引力。

一文对比Oasis、Injective和Near三条公链

DeFi 和衍生品 L1 解决方案 Injective

技术:旨在为衍生品和无 DeFi 创建一个完全去中心化的平台;允许创建无需许可和去中心化的市场;

共识机制:使用 PoS 模型,有助于更快的交易速度和更低的费用;

用例:专注于交易和金融,支持期货、永续期货等一系列金融产品;

性能:高交易吞吐量和低延迟,解决了 DeFi 和交易中的一些常见痛点;

市场定位:对 DeFi 社区和寻找去中心化、安全高效交易平台的交易员具有强烈吸引力。

一文对比Oasis、Injective和Near三条公链

Near protocol

技术:利用分片技术实现可扩展性,允许网络在增长时处理更多事务;

共识机制:采用 Nightshade,一种 PoS 的变体,有助于实现高吞吐量和低交易成本;

用例:旨在成为一个开发者友好的平台,支持各种 dApp,包括 NFT、游戏和 DeFi;

性能:采用了一种独特的分片方法(sharding-as-you-go),为区块链不可能三角问题提供了一个潜在的解决方案;

市场定位:专注于可用性和可扩展性,旨在瞄准区块链生态系统中从开发者到最终用户的更广泛细分市场。

一文对比Oasis、Injective和Near三条公链

对比分析

1)侧重领域

$ROSE 因其隐私功能而与众不同。

$INJ 针对 DeFi 和交易市场。

$NEAR 将自己定位为适用于各种 dApp 的通用、可扩展区块链。

2)技术优势

$ROSE 隐私保护方法是一个关键的差异化因素,在关注数据敏感性的行业尤其相关。

$INJ 为金融部门提供专业工具,特别是衍生品和交易。

$NEAR 分片技术为可扩展性提供了坚实的基础,对许多 dApp 开发人员具有广泛的吸引力。

3)用例和生态系统

$ROSE 可能会在需要数据隐私的行业中看到利基采用。

$INJ 可以吸引金融机构和 DeFi 爱好者。

$NEAR 由于其灵活性和可扩展性,有可能被更广泛地采用,吸引了多样化的 dApp 开发。

4)投资者视角

$ROSE 对于那些希望投资加密货币隐私领域的人来说可能很有吸引力。

$INJ 可能会吸引对区块链上金融应用的增长和创新感兴趣的投资者。

$NEAR 对于押注区块链技术在各个领域广泛采用的投资者来说,这可能是一个合适的选择。

一文对比Oasis、Injective和Near三条公链

代币经济学

1)市值

• $NEAR 1, 228, 940, 901 美元

• $ROSE : 263, 770, 383 美元

• $INJ 1, 152, 649, 407 美元

分析:

与 ROSE 相比,NEAR 和 INJ 的市值明显更高。这表明市场估值更高,投资者的信心或效用感知可能更高。较高的市值通常意味着在市场上的地位更成熟,但也可能意味着更成熟,与小盘币相比,可能提供更低的增长率。

一文对比Oasis、Injective和Near三条公链

2) 24 小时交易量及市值比率

$NEAR :

- 交易量: $ 22, 437, 661 

- 交易量/市值比率: 0.02 

$ROSE :

- 交易量: $ 6, 461, 412 

- 交易量/市值比率: 0.02 

$INJ :

- 交易量: $ 51, 954, 873 

- 成交量/市值比率: 0.05 

分析:

$INJ 相对于其市值,交易量明显更高,表明交易更活跃,短期内可能有更高的流动性和投资者兴趣。

$NEAR 和 $ROSE,虽然具有相似的比率,但相比之下不太活跃。

一文对比Oasis、Injective和Near三条公链

供应指标:

1)流通供应量

$NEAR : 989, 205, 461 (占总供应量的 98.92% )

$ROSE : 5, 029, 357, 184 (占总供应量的 50.29% )

$INJ : 83, 755, 556 (占总供应量的 83.76% )

2)总供应量和最大供应量

$NEAR : 10 亿总供应量,未定义最大供应量

$ROSE : 100 亿总供应量,未定义最大供应量

$INJ : 1 亿总供应量和最大供应量

$NEAR 其供应量几乎完全流通,表明通胀压力有限。

$ROSE 只有其总供应量的一半在流通,可能导致通货膨胀影响。

$INJ 供应有上限,如果需求保持强劲,则吸引价值升值。

一文对比Oasis、Injective和Near三条公链

代币经济学的结论

• $INJ 脱颖而出 - 相对于其市值,它的交易量更高,这可能表明市场兴趣或投机交易更活跃。

• 流通供应比例至关重要:

$NEAR :几乎完全稀释。

$INJ : 大部分的代币供应量已经达到了设定的最大供应上限,并可以在市场上自由交易。

$ROSE : 相当一部分尚未进入流通。

原文链接

Letture associate

Single-Day Plunge of 30%, Arthur Hayes Suddenly Liquidates: Why Did ZEC Get Exploded by Security Issues?

On June 5th, Zcash founder Zooko Wilcox disclosed a critical soundness vulnerability in the project's latest Orchard privacy pool. This flaw, found in the elliptic curve multiplication constraints, could allow an attacker to create unlimited counterfeit ZEC within the shielded pool, with transactions appearing valid. The vulnerability was discovered in late May by security researcher Taylor Hornby, who utilized Anthropic's new Opus 4.8 AI model for a targeted audit. The Zcash ecosystem had already performed an emergency network upgrade to patch the issue. However, the detailed disclosure triggered severe market panic, causing ZEC's price to plummet over 30% in a single day. Notably, prominent investor Arthur Hayes announced he had sold his entire ZEC position following the news. The incident starkly challenges the "technological trust" narrative central to privacy coins. Despite years of top-tier cryptographic audits, the bug persisted until uncovered with advanced AI-assisted research. This highlights the growing gap between theoretical perfection and practical implementation in privacy technology. The event serves as a industry-wide warning: in an AI-driven security landscape, the assumption that "undiscovered equals safe" is obsolete. It underscores the urgent need for continuous, proactive security practices combining AI audits, formal verification, and rapid response mechanisms.

foresightnews_api1 h fa

Single-Day Plunge of 30%, Arthur Hayes Suddenly Liquidates: Why Did ZEC Get Exploded by Security Issues?

foresightnews_api1 h fa

Breaking the Curse of DeFi Cascading Liquidations, Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

**Vitalik Buterin Proposes New DeFi Design to Eliminate Forced Liquidations** Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has published a proposal for a new decentralized finance (DeFi) architecture aimed at removing the automatic liquidation mechanisms prevalent in current lending protocols. The core idea involves creating synthetic assets using options as building blocks, fundamentally avoiding the抵押借贷结构 that triggers forced sell-offs. The proposal responds to a recurring flaw in DeFi: during sharp market downturns, mass自动清算 of under-collateralized positions can exacerbate price declines, creating systemic selling pressure and market instability, as evidenced by recent crypto market volatility. Buterin's model would split an asset like 1 ETH into two option-like derivatives, P and N, pegged to a price index with a set strike price and expiration. At expiry, an oracle determines the settlement price to allocate the underlying ETH between P and N holders. This design eliminates the "cliff" of instant liquidation. Instead, a position's value would gradually drift from its target peg if not actively rebalanced by the user, transferring the rebalancing decision from the protocol to the user or automated tools. A key advantage is the reduced reliance on high-frequency, real-time oracle price feeds, which are vulnerable to manipulation and errors in current systems. The delayed settlement in the options model allows for more robust, fault-tolerant oracle designs. However, significant challenges remain for practical adoption. High transaction costs (slippage) from frequent rebalancing on automated market makers (AMMs) could erode user funds. The model may not be suitable for stablecoins requiring a strict 1:1 dollar peg, as it inherently allows for value drift. Success would depend on developing new liquidity provisioning models and deep markets for these synthetic assets. The proposal represents a fundamental rethinking of DeFi risk management, challenging the industry to explore alternatives to被动集中平仓 rather than merely optimizing existing liquidation processes. It remains a theoretical framework awaiting implementation and testing by development teams.

foresightnews_api1 h fa

Breaking the Curse of DeFi Cascading Liquidations, Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

foresightnews_api1 h fa

Bitcoin's Decline Marks the Transformation of Crypto

Title: The Decline of Bitcoin Marks the Transformation of Crypto While Bitcoin's price recently fell below $70,000, down approximately 45% from its peak, the broader crypto industry is not following it into decline. Instead, crypto is maturing and evolving beyond its dependence on Bitcoin's price movements. Two of Bitcoin's core functions are being usurped. First, AI has captured its role as the primary speculative asset. AI, with its tangible revenue, explosive demand, and massive capital inflows ($700-830 billion in 2024), is siphoning off the speculative "hot money" that once drove Bitcoin. It also contributes to a sustained high-interest-rate environment, further tightening liquidity for assets like Bitcoin. Second, dollar-pegged stablecoins like USDC and USDT have replaced Bitcoin as the crypto market's foundational currency and primary on/off-ramp. Most trading pairs and on-chain transactions are now settled in stablecoins, severing the historical link where all capital inflows had to pass through Bitcoin first. This decoupling allows projects to thrive based on their own fundamentals rather than Bitcoin's price. Examples include Hyperliquid, an on-chain derivatives exchange with annual revenues of $8-13 billion, and prediction market platform Polymarket, valued at $200 billion with $3.65 billion in annual fees. These projects are evaluated on traditional metrics like revenue and user growth. New opportunities are emerging, particularly around privacy. Privacy coins like Zcash (ZEC) are seeing surging demand, while infrastructure like NEAR enables private, cross-chain asset transfers without requiring users to hold a specific token—privacy becomes a universal service layer. In this new paradigm, stablecoins are the universal cash, various project tokens represent equity, and privacy-enabled cross-chain coordination layers (like NEAR) act as the critical infrastructure connecting a fragmented, multi-chain ecosystem. Bitcoin is now just one asset among many. The era where the entire crypto market moved in lockstep with Bitcoin is over. The industry's health should now be judged by project fundamentals—real revenue, active users, and tokenomics that capture value—and the development of the underlying infrastructure enabling a mature, dollar-denominated crypto economy.

foresightnews_api1 h fa

Bitcoin's Decline Marks the Transformation of Crypto

foresightnews_api1 h fa

Lightspark CEO: In Ten Years, Bitcoin Will Be as Invisible as TCP/IP, Yet Power Trillions in Daily Transactions

A decade from now, Bitcoin will function like TCP/IP — invisible yet foundational, supporting trillions in daily transactions globally, according to Lightspark CEO David Marcus. In this future, a coffee shop in Lagos receives instant payment, a manufacturer in São Paulo settles an invoice with a supplier in Ho Chi Minh City, and a freelancer in Bangalore gets paid weekly from an Austin startup — all via Bitcoin's settlement layer, with none of the parties consciously interacting with it. This vision parallels the adoption of open protocols: first driven by necessity where existing systems fail, then scaling rapidly as tools mature and economic benefits become clear. The structural shift begins with wallets. Modern non-custodial wallets, like Spark, allow users to hold dollars, local currency, and Bitcoin in a single address, seamlessly switching between them. This eliminates friction and revolutionizes global custody, moving significant deposits to user-controlled keys not by ideology, but by superior utility. As a result, Bitcoin becomes the default savings layer for billions, as its fixed supply and appreciating value make it a rational choice for savers holding it alongside stablecoins in their everyday wallets. Businesses follow a similar path, from small companies in emerging markets to multinational corporations, holding Bitcoin alongside operational stablecoins. The latest trend is direct Bitcoin transactions for commerce. When both parties hold Bitcoin, transacting in it becomes the simplest option — no conversions, no intermediary currency. This starts in niche areas like high-value B2B settlements but grows as infrastructure makes sending Bitcoin as easy as stablecoins. An accelerating force is AI agents. By 2036, AI agents conducting commerce on behalf of individuals and firms will increasingly choose Bitcoin for settlement. Optimizing for speed, finality, and minimal counterparty risk across jurisdictions, they find Bitcoin's global, neutral, and programmable network ideal for netting and settling obligations. Thus, Bitcoin is becoming the native currency for machine commerce, just as it has become a native savings asset for humans. The global monetary system is being rebuilt from the protocol layer: open infrastructure, default self-custody, Bitcoin settling everything underneath, with stablecoins as the interface. Most users won't think about Bitcoin when they transact — and they won't need to.

foresightnews_api1 h fa

Lightspark CEO: In Ten Years, Bitcoin Will Be as Invisible as TCP/IP, Yet Power Trillions in Daily Transactions

foresightnews_api1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片