长推:为什么我认为市场顶点还未到来,依然看多后市

MarsBitPubblicato 2023-05-04Pubblicato ultima volta 2023-05-04

Introduzione

k线看跌没毛病,每次牛市来前都有拦腰大跌的刻舟求剑式分析形成共识也是市场合力。我只是说,宏观上我确实看不到更多利空信息。以上供参考。

美股仍然先看多到年中,我觉得顶的时间还没有到。衰退之所以会导致美股跌,是因为担心盈利,衰退前美股一般会有一波下跌,因为担心盈利,就是现在这个阶段。而为什么这个阶段我认为没有到,因为近期,最近两周的经济数据,都是超预期的好,是指向增长反弹,不是指向衰退。

没人能精准判断哪个月衰退,都是边走边看经济数据,动态调整这个判断,musk不一定是对的,过去两周的经济数据都是超预期地好,衰退概率是下降的。而且衰退对币的冲击最小,因为币没有盈利,然后在分母端,美联储宽松是大概率事件,明天的FOMC讲话指引不可能非常鹰,只可能中性或者鸽派。

衰退对币的冲击最小,因为币没有盈利。这一波市场无论怎么波动,比特币都会是赢家。如果美债违约,美元崩盘,那么比特币会上涨;如果货币极大宽松,成长股上涨,那么比特币还会是赢家。

目前市场预期的位置是加息25bp同时暗示停止加息。这里的争论点是,“暗示”的程度有多高:如果鲍威尔说“我们现在已经开始讨论停止加息这个问题了,但还没有作出决定”,就“暗示”到这个程度,这个就是中性;如果鲍威尔说“我们已经讨论了停止加息这个问题,但通胀还是很高,六月还是有可能加息”,这就是鹰派

美股要跌;如果鲍威尔说“还没做出决定,但继续加息的必要性下降”类似这种,就是鸽派,美股要涨。第二种清形是概率很低,我给5-10%的可能性,其他两种都是利好。

第二种清形的概率很低的原因是这个。这个点阵图里的10个人里,一定有鲍威尔、FOMC副主席/纽约联储主席威廉姆斯、几乎全部的联储总行Board Governors。 他们在三月的时候就预期加息到5.125%(就是五月加完就没了),过去两个月银行危机加通胀超预期下行,没道理再来个更鹰派的指引。

有一些家办跟我说,纳指pe现在按照5.125%的加息终点,仍然高估一倍。盈利如果上调,PE不就是下来了。所以衰退对美股很重要,如果衰退概率下降,盈利预期上调,PE就下来了。纳斯达克pe高是事实,但这不能用来指引未来1-2个月的市场判断。去年底PE也巨高,但QQQ可以涨20%。

我的分析里缺技术/趋势/动能分析,这一块也很重要,这个就是大部分币圈OG现在看空的原因。k线看跌没毛病,每次牛市来前都有拦腰大跌的刻舟求剑式分析形成共识也是市场合力。我只是说,宏观上我确实看不到更多利空信息。以上供参考。

Letture associate

North Korean Hackers Loot $500 Million in a Single Month, Becoming the Top Threat to Crypto Security

North Korean hackers, particularly the notorious Lazarus Group and its subgroup TraderTraitor, have stolen over $500 million from cryptocurrency DeFi platforms in less than three weeks, bringing their total theft for the year to over $700 million. Recent major attacks on Drift Protocol and KelpDAO, resulting in losses of approximately $286 million and $290 million respectively, highlight a strategic shift: instead of targeting core smart contracts, attackers are now exploiting vulnerabilities in peripheral infrastructure. For instance, the KelpDAO attack involved compromising downstream RPC infrastructure used by LayerZero's decentralized validation network (DVN), allowing manipulation without breaching core cryptography. This sophisticated approach mirrors advanced corporate cyber-espionage. Additionally, North Korea has systematically infiltrated the global crypto workforce, with an estimated 100 operatives using fake identities to gain employment at blockchain companies, enabling long-term access to sensitive systems and facilitating large-scale thefts. According to Chainalysis, North Korean-linked hackers stole a record $2 billion in 2025, accounting for 60% of all global crypto theft that year. Their total historical crypto theft has reached $6.75 billion. Post-theft, they employ specialized money laundering methods, heavily relying on Chinese OTC brokers and cross-chain mixing services rather than standard decentralized exchanges. Security experts, while acknowledging the increased sophistication, emphasize that many attacks still exploit fundamental weaknesses like poor access controls and centralized operational risks. Strengthening private key management, limiting privileged access, and enhancing coordination among exchanges, analysts, and law enforcement immediately after an attack are critical to improving defense and fund recovery chances. The industry's challenge now extends beyond secure smart contracts to safeguarding operational security at the infrastructure level.

marsbit1 h fa

North Korean Hackers Loot $500 Million in a Single Month, Becoming the Top Threat to Crypto Security

marsbit1 h fa

Circle CEO's Seoul Visit: No Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance, But Met All Major Korean Banks

Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire's recent activities in Seoul indicate a strategic shift for the company, moving away from issuing a Korean won-backed stablecoin and instead focusing on embedding itself as a key infrastructure provider within Korea’s financial and crypto ecosystem. Despite Korea accounting for nearly 30% of global crypto trading volume—with a market characterized by high retail participation and altcoin dominance—Circle has chosen not to compete for the role of stablecoin issuer. Instead, Allaire met with major Korean banks (including Shinhan, KB, and Woori), financial groups, leading exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone), and tech firms like Kakao. This approach reflects a broader industry transition: the core of stablecoin competition is shifting from issuance rights to systemic positioning. With Korean regulators still debating whether banks or tech companies should issue stablecoins, Circle is avoiding regulatory uncertainty by strengthening its role as a service and technology partner. The company is deepening integration with trading platforms, building connections, and promoting stablecoin infrastructure. This positions Circle to benefit regardless of which entity eventually issues a won stablecoin. Allaire also noted the potential for a Chinese yuan stablecoin in the next 3–5 years, underscoring a regional trend of stablecoins becoming more regulated and integrated with traditional finance. Ultimately, Circle’s strategy highlights that future influence in the stablecoin market will belong not necessarily to the issuers, but to the foundational infrastructure layers that enable cross-system transactions.

marsbit1 h fa

Circle CEO's Seoul Visit: No Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance, But Met All Major Korean Banks

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片