More Crypto Clarity: US SEC Says Most Staking Activities Are Not Securities

bitcoinistDipublikasikan tanggal 2025-05-31Terakhir diperbarui pada 2025-05-31

Abstrak

In a significant development for the industry, the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Division of Corporation Finance shared its...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

In a significant development for the industry, the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Division of Corporation Finance shared its view on crypto staking after the recent call for clear guidance on the sector. The SEC branch seeks to “provide greater clarity on the application of the federal securities laws to crypto assets.”

SEC Offers Clarity On Crypto Staking

On Thursday, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issued new guidance on Protocol Staking, affirming that most of these activities are not subject to US securities laws and “don’t need to register with the Commission transactions under the Securities Act.”

In its statement, the regulatory agency said that certain staking activities on Proof-of-Stake (PoS) networks are not considered securities transactions under federal regulations. The SEC explained that the new guidance addresses the staking of cryptocurrencies “intrinsically linked to the programmatic functioning of a public, permissionless network.”

Therefore, these activities, including self-staking, self-custodial staking with direct third-party validators, and custodial staking where platforms stake assets on behalf of customers, don’t meet the criteria for an investment contract under the Howey Test and don’t involve the offer and sale of securities.

Journalist Eleanor Terret highlighted that the SEC’s statement “is a big deal for ETF providers who want to offer staking,” as it clarifies that “staking in this format is generally not thought of as a securities transaction by the Division of Corporation Finance.”

However, the guidance noted that it doesn’t address all staking practices: “This statement addresses Protocol Staking generally rather than all of its variations. Further, this statement does not address all forms of ‘staking,’ such as so-called ‘liquid staking,’ ‘restaking’ or ‘liquid restaking.’”

‘Stake It Till You Make It’?

Following the news, SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce stated that the new guidance “provides welcome clarity for stakers” as uncertainty surrounding regulatory views discouraged Americans from engaging in staking activities for fear of violating securities laws.

“Providing Security is not a ‘Security,’” she affirmed, adding that the unclear rules “artificially constrained participation in network consensus and undermined the decentralization, censorship resistance, and credible neutrality of proof-of-stake blockchains.”

The new guidance follows the industry’s call for clear staking rules, where a coalition of nearly 30 industry players and advocacy groups urged the SEC to offer clarity. As reported by Bitcoinist, the Crypto Council for Innovation’s (CCI) Proof of Stake Alliance (POSA) sent a letter signed by 29 industry giants to the SEC’s Crypto Task Force on April 30.

Acknowledging the SEC’s regulatory shift under the Trump administration, the letter argued that the existing securities disclosure regime was ill-suited for staking services, which are fundamentally technical instead of financial.

The crypto coalition asked for clear, principles-based guidance for staking and staking services, citing the SEC’s March statement on Proof-of-Work (PoW) mining, to protect users while enabling the growth of the staking industry.

However, not all SEC Commissioners agreed with the new guidance. Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw expressed her discontent in a Thursday statement, claiming that “staff ignores how its conclusions conflict with that applicable law.”

Crenshaw considers that the Division of Corporation Finance’s analysis “may reflect what some wish the law to be, but it does not square with the court decisions on staking and the longstanding Howey precedent on which they are based,” affirming that “This is yet another example of the SEC’s ongoing ‘fake it ‘till we make it’ approach to crypto – taking action based on anticipation of future changes while ignoring existing law.”

crypto, TOTAL

Total crypto market capitalization is at $3.27 trillion in the one-week chart. Source: TOTAL on TradingView
Featured Image from NBC News, Chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Rubmar is a crypto enthusiast who likes learning and improving constantly. She enjoys reporting on the latest news and developments in the crypto industry. Rubmar also enjoys scrapbooking, crafting, simulation games, and watching football.

Bacaan Terkait

Setelah Aave Pergi dan TVL Berguncang Hebat, Di Mana Anchor Valuasi MegaETH Berada?

Berdasarkan data DefiLlama, TVL MegaETH mengalami fluktuasi tajam pada 9-10 Juli, turun sekitar 60% dalam 24 jam menjadi sedikit di atas $30 juta, turun sekitar 70% dari puncaknya pada Mei. Protokol teratas Aave V3 menarik sekitar 80% likuiditas. Harga MEGA turun ke sekitar $0.048, dengan kapitalisasi pasar sekitar $54 juta dan FDV sekitar $480 juta. Artikel ini menganalisis tiga ketidaksesuaian dalam valuasi MegaETH: 1. **Ketidaksesuaian valuasi dengan penggunaan nyata**: FDV $4.7 miliar tidak didukung oleh aktivitas ekonomi riil. Pendapatan protokol 30 hari kurang dari $900k dengan hanya 2.619 alamat aktif harian. Sekitar 88.7% token belum beredar, berpotensi menciptakan tekanan jual di masa depan. 2. **Ketidaksesuaian narasi token dengan kualitas ekosistem**: Meski dinarasikan sebagai blockchain DeFi berkinerja tinggi, sebagian besar pendapatannya justru berasal dari game kartu Monster (sekitar 80%). Aave hanya menyumbang sekitar $90k. Volume perdagangan DEX dan kontrak berlanjut rendah, dan stablecoin native USDM terus menyusut. 3. **Ketidaksesuaian ekspektasi jangka pendek dengan realisasi jangka panjang**: TVL awal didorong oleh insentif dan strategi arbitrase siklus (seperti yang melibatkan USDe), bukan kebutuhan riil yang stabil. Integrasi protokol besar seperti Uniswap dan Aave tidak mempertahankan TVL. Penurunan serupa terlihat pada Monad (MON), menunjukkan pasar mulai meminta dukungan nilai yang lebih jelas daripada sekadar TVL dan narasi. Kesimpulannya, setelah insentif dan modal arbitrase keluar, MegaETH kekurangan pijakan nilai yang solid antara valuasi saat ini dan fundamental on-chain-nya. Pemulihan berkelanjutan bergantung pada kemampuan tim untuk mengubah likuiditas jangka pendek menjadi penggunaan nyata dan mewujudkan hasil ekosistem yang konkret. Tanpa itu, selain pemulihan jangka pendek dari sentimen pasar, sulit menemukan alasan kuat untuk valuasi yang stabil.

链捕手5j yang lalu

Setelah Aave Pergi dan TVL Berguncang Hebat, Di Mana Anchor Valuasi MegaETH Berada?

链捕手5j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
活动图片