SEC Files New Crypto Lawsuit Against Unicoin Over Alleged $100M Fraud

bitcoinistDipublikasikan tanggal 2025-05-22Terakhir diperbarui pada 2025-05-22

Abstrak

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged New York-based crypto investment Unicoin and three top executives for allegedly...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged New York-based crypto investment Unicoin and three top executives for allegedly misleading investors and defrauding over $100 million from customers.

Crypto Company Hit With SEC Lawsuit

On Tuesday, the SEC announced it had filed a lawsuit in the US District Court For The Southern District of New York against crypto company Unicoin, its CEO and Board Chairman Alex Konanykhin, its former president Silvina Moschini, and its former CIO Alex Dominguez.

The regulatory agency accused the Defendants of making false and misleading statements related to the Unicoin token and the offering of the company’s common stock, charging Unicoin, Konanykhin, Moschini, and Dominguez with violations of the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws.

crypto

SEC's complaint against Unicoin and its top executives. Source: SEC

It also charged Konanykhin and Unicoin with violating the registration provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, and Konanykhin as a control person for certain of the company’s antifraud violations.

Additionally, it accused Richard Devlin, Unicoin’s general counsel, of violating federal securities laws by making similar false statements in private placement memos the company used to offer and sell rights certificates and Unicoin common stock.

According to Mark Cave, Associate Director in the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, Unicoin and the executives “exploited thousands of investors with fictitious promises that its tokens, when issued, would be backed by real-world assets including an international portfolio of valuable real estate holdings.”

However, “the real estate assets were worth a mere fraction of what the company claimed, and the majority of the company’s sales of rights certificates were illusory. Unicoin’s most senior executives are alleged to have perpetuated the fraud, and today’s action seeks accountability for their conduct,” Cave explained.

Unicoin To ‘Fight Back’ Allegations In Court

The SEC’s complaint affirms that, since February 2022, Unicoin and Konanykhin violated the federal securities laws by engaging in unregistered offers and sales of rights certificates, with Konanykhin offering and selling over 37.9 million of his rights certificates “to offer better pricing and target investors the company had prohibited from participating in the offering to avoid jeopardizing its exemption to registration requirements.”

The executive trio is accused of convincing over 5,000 investors to purchase rights certificates “through false and misleading statements that portrayed them as investments in safe, stable, and profitable ‘next generation’ crypto assets,” including claiming that the tokens had sold more than $3 billion in rights certificates, when it seemingly raised just $110 million.

crypto

 SEC's complaint accuses the Defendants of false and misleading statements. Source: SEC

The SEC also alleges that the crypto company falsely claimed the right certificates and Unicoin tokens were “SEC-registered” or “US-registered,” and made extensive promotional efforts to market the right certificates to the public, including advertisements in major airports, New York taxis, on television, and on social media.

As such, the complaint seeks permanent injunctive relief, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, and civil penalties against the Defendants. Additionally, it seeks officer-and-director bars against Konanykhin, Moschini, and Dominguez.

In an April interview with crypto journalist and podcast host Eleanor Terret, Unicoin’s CEO revealed the company planned to fight the SEC’s allegations in court as news of a potential lawsuit emerged.

Following the financial watchdog’s complaint, Konanykhin told Terret they lament the SEC’s actions, affirming they are persecuting “the most compliant cryptocurrency company in the country using blatantly false charges.”

bitcoin, btc, btcusdt, crypto

Bitcoin (BTC) trades at $107,291 in the one-week chart. Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView
Featured Image from Unsplash.com, Chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Rubmar is a crypto enthusiast who likes learning and improving constantly. She enjoys reporting on the latest news and developments in the crypto industry. Rubmar also enjoys scrapbooking, crafting, simulation games, and watching football.

Bacaan Terkait

Jatuhnya Zapper, Bencana Alam atau Kesalahan Manusia?

**Zapper, Platform DeFi Terkemuka, Akan Ditutup: Apa Penyebabnya?** Pada 8 Juli 2026, Zapper, platform dashboard dan agregator DeFi, mengumumkan penutupan total. Platform yang pernah memiliki 2 juta pengguna aktif bulanan dan memproses transaksi senilai $13 miliar ini menghentikan operasinya setelah bertahun-tahun berjuang. Zapper lahir pada 2020 dari merger DeFiZap dan DeFiSnap, tepat saat "DeFi Summer" dimulai. Ia berkembang pesat berkat kebutuhan pengguna untuk melacak portofolio yang tersebar di berbagai protokol. Zapper berhasil mengumpulkan pendanaan $16.5 juta dari investor ternama seperti Framework Ventures dan Mark Cuban. Namun, kesuksesan awal tidak bertahan. Model pendapatan Zapper yang bergantung pada biaya kecil dari agregasi perdagangan DEX ternyata tidak berkelanjutan di tengah persaingan ketat. Biaya tinggi untuk memelihara sistem data multi-rantai juga membebani keuangan mereka. Sementara itu, lanskap DeFi berubah: dana dan pengguna semakin terkonsentrasi di protokol-prototokol besar, mengurangi kebutuhan akan alat pelacak portofolio yang kompleks. Zapper mencoba beberapa kali untuk bertransformasi, seperti meluncurkan sistem poin berbasis NFT (Chainchat) dan merencanakan protokol dengan token ZAP. Sayangnya, upaya-upaya ini gagal menghasilkan aliran pendapatan yang stabil atau menangkap kebutuhan pasar yang sebenarnya. Analisis menunjukkan Zapper terlalu berfokus pada produk berbiaya tinggi (pelacak portofolio) dan kurang mengembangkan fitur penghasil pendapatan. Mereka juga terjebak dalam "pemikiran blockchain" untuk produk konsumen (2C), mencoba menciptakan kebutuhan baru alih-alih menyelesaikan masalah yang ada. Nasib Zapper menjadi peringatan bagi produk-produk alat DeFi lainnya. Ketika lingkungan pasar berubah, bertahan pada model lama tanpa adaptasi yang cepat dan fokus pada kelayakan ekonomi adalah resep kegagalan. Kesuksesan awal yang didorong tren tidak menjamin kelangsungan jangka panjang.

Foresight News16m yang lalu

Jatuhnya Zapper, Bencana Alam atau Kesalahan Manusia?

Foresight News16m yang lalu

Zuckerberg Mulai Bertaruh pada Pasar Prediksi, Sementara Negara-Negara Asia Masih Menganggapnya Sebagai Perjudian

Inti artikel: Pasar prediksi, yang mengizinkan perdagangan kontrak berbasis hasil suatu peristiwa (misalnya, "Apakah J.D. Vance akan menjadi kandidat presiden Republik 2028?"), telah tumbuh menjadi industri utama dengan volume perdagangan bulanan mencapai $14 miliar. Dukungan dari perusahaan seperti Meta dengan proyek "Arena" semakin mengukuhkan validitasnya. Mekanisme pasar ini sederhana: jika peristiwa terjadi, kontrak diselesaikan senilai $1; jika tidak, $0. Harga perdagangan mencerminkan probabilitas real-time. Akurasi informasi didorong oleh prinsip "skin in the game" di mana peserta rugi jika prediksi salah. Di Barat, pasar ini semakin diintegrasikan ke dalam sistem keuangan formal. Namun, di banyak negara Asia, pasar prediksi masih sering disamakan dengan perjudian tradisional dan dilarang. Pendekatan ini menimbulkan tiga masalah utama: 1) arbitrase regulasi dan aliran keluar modal ke platform lepas pantai, 2) hilangnya kedaulatan informasi karena data sosial yang berharga dikumpulkan di luar negeri, dan 3) kurangnya perlindungan pengguna. Artikel berargumen bahwa Asia perlu mengubah diskusi dari cara memblokir pasar ini menjadi cara memanfaatkan datanya secara bertanggung jawab dalam sistem yang diatur. Regulasi seharusnya berfungsi sebagai saluran penyalur, bukan tembok penghalang, untuk mengintegrasikan inovasi ini secara transparan dan mengembalikan data yang dihasilkan sebagai aset nasional.

marsbit19m yang lalu

Zuckerberg Mulai Bertaruh pada Pasar Prediksi, Sementara Negara-Negara Asia Masih Menganggapnya Sebagai Perjudian

marsbit19m yang lalu

Trading

Spot
活动图片