Are crypto and blockchain safe for kids, or should greater measures be put in place?

CointelegraphDipublikasikan tanggal 2022-02-27Terakhir diperbarui pada 2022-02-27

Abstrak

Crypto is going mainstream, and the world’s younger generation, in particular, is taking note.

Crypto is going mainstream, and the world’s younger generation, in particular, is taking note. Cryptocurrency exchange Crypto.com recently predicted that crypto users worldwide could reach 1 billion by the end of 2022. Further findings show that Millennials — those between the ages of 26 and 41 — are turning to digital asset investment to build wealth. For example, a study conducted in 2021 by personal loan company Stilt found that, according to its user data, more than 94% of people who own crypto were between 18 and 40.
Keeping children safe
While the increased interest in cryptocurrency is notable, some are raising concerns regarding the ways those under the age of 18 are interacting with digital assets. These challenges were highlighted in UNICEF’s recent “Prospects for children in 2022” report, which examines the impact that global trends may have on children, including concerns around the mainstream adoption of cryptocurrency.
Melvin Breton Guerrero, policy specialist for UNICEF’s Office of Global Insight and Policy, told Cointelegraph that he wrote the section of the report on digital currencies. According to Guerrero, this portion of the document is highly relevant because the cryptocurrency industry is still developing and, therefore, requires child safeguards:
“We need to take steps to prevent harm to children that could occur by third-parties engaging with cryptocurrency or from self-inflicted harm. As such, we need to prepare children under the age of 18 for a future where cryptocurrencies and blockchain applications are going to be a part of everyday life, just as the internet is.”
Although there are no official safeguards in place for children when it comes to accessing crypto and blockchain applications, Guerrero explained that one of the most important factors to consider is age verification. “We need to make sure that minors are not wrongly engaging with blockchain applications or misusing cryptocurrencies,” he remarked.
Given the anonymity of cryptocurrency transactions, Guerrero is aware that anyone can set up and access a cryptocurrency wallet. He added that some online cryptocurrency exchanges don’t question the age of their users. “A child can transact using various crypto wallets, and nothing can be done,” said Guerrero.
While there are technically no age restrictions when it comes to crypto, most major cryptocurrency exchanges have Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements to ensure that users are 18 or older. For example, Coinbase’s website explicitly states that users must be 18 or older to access its services. Before this policy was implemented in July 2017, however, Coinbase did allow users who were at least 13 years of age to access its services with parental consent.
It’s also interesting to note that the United States-based cryptocurrency exchange Gemini offers custodial accounts for minors. A company blog post published on Jan. 25 explains that the new service is powered by EarlyBird, a Gemini Frontier Fund portfolio company, and allows parents to invest in their children’s financial futures.
Caleb Frankel, co-founder and chief operating officer of EarlyBird, told Cointelegraph that the offering is focused on providing access to digital assets so that parents can invest on behalf of their children:
“Each account is held by a parent or guardian over the age of 18. We believe that crypto is part of a balanced modern portfolio and are prioritizing the education of families and the next generation of investors as digital asset markets mature.”
Frankel added that EarlyBird is not only working with Gemini but also proactively with regulators as well to ensure the development of a safe, secure crypto ecosystem. While progress is still being made, Guerrero commented that it’s important to ensure new wallets are always created by someone of legal age. Even though children don’t initially create the wallets, Guerrero believes this is one solution to ensure they properly utilize crypto funds.
Unfortunately, other challenges can also arise when children gain access to cryptocurrency. For instance, 2021 saw an increase in crypto scams, and children inexperienced in the sector are likely to be more vulnerable. Larry Cameron, chief information security officer of the Anti-Human Trafficking Intelligence Initiative (ATII) — an organization focused on combating human trafficking by monitoring cryptocurrency transactions — told Cointelegraph that there are many risks to consider when children dabble in cryptocurrency:
“Namely, the scams and fake platforms are risks for minors. Online predators are experts at seeking out inexperienced people and exploiting them. Data breaches, identity theft or fraud can be accomplished in the child’s name without their knowledge. Children are also more likely to lose a private key, but this happens even to adults.”
As such, Cameron believes that acquiring digital assets will make children a target for criminals. “Until crypto exchanges collectively add more verification and authentication measures when opening an account, children’s privacy will be at risk. Ideally, anyone under the age of 18 would need to provide documentation from their parents as permission to open an account,” he remarked.

Is blockchain a double-edged sword?
In addition to concerns around cryptocurrency, blockchain technology may also pose unintended consequences for minors. For instance, Guerrero explained that blockchain could be harmful to children because information recorded is permanent and immutable, and this immutability could conflict with current regulations:
“The European Union’s ‘right to be forgotten’ appears in Article 17 of the General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR. This means that children who volunteer their information when they don’t necessarily understand the consequences should have a right when they are of legal age to have that information deleted. But blockchain, by definition, does not permit the deletion of information. So, how can we protect children’s data in this case?”
Moreover, Guerrero pointed out that while blockchain applications could help migrant children have a portable identity to access goods and services, they could also be leveraged as a form of surveillance. Given these concerns, he emphasized that there must be a balance when harnessing the benefits of blockchain technology: “Having this balance is important, and the blockchain and crypto community must keep this in mind when building new applications.”
Fortunately, some organizations are making progress on this front. For example, while UNICEF has recognized the challenges associated with digital currency adoption and children, the organization is aware that blockchain technology can be used for good.
Sunita Grote, lead of the ventures team for UNICEF’s Office of Innovation, told Cointelegraph that her office has been exploring the use of blockchain through its venture fund. “This fund provides seed funding to test open-source solutions that have the potential to accelerate results for children. Blockchain is one of the technology areas that we are exploring,” she said.
Specifically, Grote believes that blockchain-based solutions allow organizations and individuals to rethink the way problems can be solved due to their enhanced transparency, efficiency in systems and better coordination of data across multiple parties. With this in mind, Grote understands the potential that blockchain can have when it comes to responding to the threats for children in the online environment. She shared that UNICEF’s venture fund recently invested in two startups developing open-source, AI-powered solutions to address digital risks to children.
On the other hand, Grote also understands that blockchain could increase children’s exposure risk and harm online: “Being online can magnify traditional threats and harms that many children already face offline and can further increase vulnerabilities with online risks also present.”
Calling on the blockchain community to protect children
Given the risks associated with crypto and blockchain in regard to minors, Guerrero mentioned that it’s up to the blockchain and crypto community to help ensure the well-being of children moving forward. “The blockchain and crypto community must use their deeper technical understanding to actively engage with the child rights community,” he remarked.
As a solution, Guerrero thinks that blockchain applications should have built-in KYC requirements. This may be easier said than done, though, as he also believes that KYC remains an open question for crypto wallets and exchanges. Although KYC requirements may be challenging, Guerrero noted that having more educational tools will benefit the well-being of minors who are getting involved with crypto and blockchain. This may be a more realistic solution for the time being, as several educational initiatives are already underway.
For example, in 2021, Gemini partnered with Learn & Earn, an app that teaches students about financial literacy while earning fiat rewards. In addition to initiatives from exchanges, some governments are taking it upon themselves to teach youth about crypto. Last year, Colombia funded a mobile app, board game and book designed to educate young people on investing in cryptocurrencies and the stock market.
Other organizations are also developing additional educational projects. Aaron Kahler, founder and CEO of ATII, told Cointelegraph that ATII is hosting regular child safety training sessions and lectures on how to keep minors safe when engaging with digital assets and blockchain applications: “We are hosting a summit on the topic in May that will include a ‘dark webathon’ and child safety day. We are also bringing in folks from law enforcement and other organizations to speak about child safety.”

Bacaan Terkait

Setelah Marvell Naik 32%, Keluarga Chip Tionghoa di Baliknya Muncul ke Permukaan

6 Juni, Marvell melonjak 32.5% dalam satu hari ke rekor tertinggi, dipicu oleh publik endorsement CEO NVIDIA, Jensen Huang, atas ASIC kustom dan interkoneksi optiknya yang ia sebut sebagai inti dari arsitektur pusat data AI. Di balik lonjakan ini, muncul kisah keluarga chip China yang berjaringan luas: keluarga Dai dan Sutardja. Marvell didirikan pada 1995 oleh Dai Weili dan suaminya, Sehat Sutardja. Weili adalah yang termuda dari tiga bersaudara Dai. Kakaknya, Dai Weimin, adalah Chairman VeriSilicon (Chipus), perusahaan IP semikonduktor terkemuka di China yang terdaftar di pasar saham A. Kakak keduanya, Dai Weijin, adalah Direktur Chipus dan pernah mendirikan Vivante, yang kemudian diakuisisi oleh Chipus. Selama tiga dekade, tiga bersaudara ini telah mendirikan atau terlibat dalam enam perusahaan di bidang semikonduktor, dua di antaranya go public dan empat diakuisisi. Jejak mereka mencakup pergeseran paradigma industri: dari era fabless dan EDA, ledakan desain chip China pasca-WTO, GPU tertanam untuk IoT, hingga yang terkini – platform chiplet dan AI SuperNIC (Dream Big, diakuisisi Arm), pabrik pengemasan chiplet canggih (Silicon Box), serta IP interkoneksi berkecepatan tinggi (Alphawave, diakuisisi Qualcomm). Jaringan ini, yang dikombinasikan dari kedalaman ekosistem keluarga Dai di China dan jaringan teknik global keluarga Sutardja, telah menciptakan portofolio aset strategis yang mencakup banyak lapisan kritis infrastruktur AI dan era pasca-Moore: IP, interkoneksi, fabrikasi pengemasan, dan chip komputasi khusus. Mereka mewakili "jalur ketiga" dalam semikonduktor AI – bukan sebagai raksasa platform seperti NVIDIA, juga bukan startup ASIC mandiri, tetapi sebagai pemasok komponen kunci dan kapasitas di titik peralihan standar terbuka. Portofolio mereka, yang tersebar di berbagai wilayah dan perusahaan, diperkirakan bernilai lebih dari $22 miliar dan menangkap logika kenaikan yang sama dengan Marvell: mengatasi tantangan ASIC kustom, interkoneksi berkecepatan tinggi, dan pengemasan canggih di pusat data AI.

marsbit48m yang lalu

Setelah Marvell Naik 32%, Keluarga Chip Tionghoa di Baliknya Muncul ke Permukaan

marsbit48m yang lalu

Microsoft Sangat Takut Disingkirkan oleh Raksasa AI

Dulu, OpenAI membutuhkan Microsoft. Hari ini, Microsoft harus membuktikan mereka tidak membutuhkan OpenAI. Pada Build 2026, CEO Microsoft Satya Nadella merilis tujuh model AI buatan sendiri, stasiun kerja AI untuk pengembang, platform pengelolaan Agent untuk perusahaan, dan chip kuantum. Semua ini menandai pergeseran besar: Microsoft mulai berpisah dari sekutu terdekatnya. Titik baliknya adalah revisi perjanjian 27 April, di mana lisensi eksklusif Microsoft atas model OpenAI berubah menjadi non-eksklusif. OpenAI kini bebas bekerja dengan penyedia cloud lain. Ini memecah tembok pertahanan Microsoft. Tujuh model baru, seperti MAI Thinking 1 dan MAI Code 1 Flash, bukan sekadar bukti kemampuan, melainkan upaya menyamai pesaing seperti Anthropic, yang kini unggul dalam adopsi perusahaan. Laporan internal Microsoft mengungkap ketidakpuasan pengembang terhadap Copilot dibanding alat luar. Meski pendapatan AI Microsoft mencapai $37 miliar, sebagian besar berasal dari infrastruktur Azure yang menjalankan model pihak lain, seperti OpenAI dan Anthropic. Pangsa pasar Copilot turun, dan penggunaannya terjebak di pinggir alur kerja utama. Kehadiran Jensen Huang dari Nvidia di Build 2026 juga bermuka dua. Di satu sisi, ia mendukung AI PC Windows dengan chip RTX Spark. Di sisi lain, komputasi AI lokal yang ia promosikan berpotensi mengurangi ketergantungan pada cloud Azure. Build 2026 secara mencolok mengabaikan konsumen dan fokus pada pengembang dan bisnis. Nadella bertaruh pada masa depan di mana sistem operasi AI perusahaan—platform untuk mengelola identitas, kepatuhan, keamanan, dan banyak model/Agent—akan menjadi kunci. Platform seperti Agent 365 dirancang untuk mengunci perusahaan dalam ekosistem Microsoft. Kecemasan terbesar Nadella adalah setelah OpenAI dan Anthropic go public, mereka akan menjadi mandiri, membangun infrastruktur sendiri, dan mengikis pendapatan Azure Microsoft. Nadella berusaha membangun lapisan infrastruktur yang tak tergantikan di bawah semua model AI sebelum itu terjadi. Intinya, Microsoft beralih dari penumpang yang bergantung pada OpenAI menjadi pengemudi di era AI, bertekad tidak ketinggalan lagi seperti di era mobile.

marsbit1j yang lalu

Microsoft Sangat Takut Disingkirkan oleh Raksasa AI

marsbit1j yang lalu

Saham AS Melonjak 16% dalam Dua Bulan: Hanya 4 Kali dalam Sejarah, Terakhir Jelang Kejatuhan 1987

Pasar saham AS melonjak 16% dalam dua bulan (April-Mei), sebuah kenaikan yang hanya terjadi 4 kali sejak Perang Dunia II. Tiga di antaranya terjadi selama pemulihan resesi, tetapi satu-satunya contoh lain *tanpa* latar belakang resesi justru terjadi beberapa bulan sebelum crash "Black Monday" 1987, seperti yang ditekankan oleh strategis Deutsche Bank Henry Allen. Meskipun didukung oleh antusiasme AI dan data ekonomi yang kuat, kecepatan rally ini melampaui preseden sejarah dalam ekonomi yang tidak sedang pulih dari resesi. Sinyal risiko konsumen bermunculan: tingkat tabungan AS sangat rendah (2,6% pada April) dan indeks kepercayaan konsumen mencapai rekor terendah sejarah pada Mei. Sementara pasar saham dan kredit tampak kebal (spread kredit sangat ketat), pasar obligasi pemerintah bergerak sendiri. Imbal hasil obligasi melonjak ke level tertinggi dalam lebih dari satu dekade, mengikuti harga minyak dan mencerminkan kekhawatiran inflasi/fiskal, menciptakan perbedaan yang berbahaya dengan pasar saham. Ketahanan aset berisiko sebagian didukung oleh reaksi harga minyak yang mengejutkan tenang, meskipun blokade Selat Hormuz telah berlangsung lebih lama dari perkiraan awal. Kurva futures minyak tetap stabil, mencegah penetapan harga risiko stagflasi yang parah. Namun, Allen memperingatkan bahwa risiko ekor dari geopolitik dan ketidakselarasan pasar tetap sangat menonjol.

marsbit1j yang lalu

Saham AS Melonjak 16% dalam Dua Bulan: Hanya 4 Kali dalam Sejarah, Terakhir Jelang Kejatuhan 1987

marsbit1j yang lalu

CPU, Diam-diam Kembali ke Panggung Utama Komputasi AI

Selama tiga tahun terakhir, narasi kekuatan komputasi AI hampir sepenuhnya berpusat pada GPU, dengan CPU hanya dianggap sebagai peran pendukung. Namun, mulai 2026, narasi ini mulai retak. Intel meluncurkan prosesor Xeon 6+ di Beijing, yang dideskripsikan bukan sebagai pendamping GPU, melainkan sebagai "bidang kendali" infrastruktur AI, yang bertanggung jawab atas orkestrasi, konkurensi, dan aliran data. Laporan dari SemiAnalysis pada Februari 2026 juga menyoroti "kembalinya CPU" dengan cara yang berbeda. Pergeseran ini didorong oleh perubahan beban kerja AI dari pelatihan model skala besar ke inferensi dan agen AI yang melibatkan ribuan tugas ringan secara bersamaan. Di sinilah CPU, dengan kemampuan orkestrasi dan penanganan aliran data, menjadi penting kembali—bukan karena lebih cepat daripada GPU, tetapi karena menyelesaikan hambatan baru yang tidak dapat ditangani GPU. Xeon 6+ memilih jalur inti efisiensi (E-core) hingga 288 inti, berfokus pada kepadatan dan efisiensi tinggi untuk menangani beban kerja throughput tinggi seperti agen AI. Namun, jalan Intel tidak tanpa tantangan: persaingan dengan NVIDIA (yang mengembangkan solusi CPU+GPU terintegrasi), CPU ARM buatan vendor cloud seperti AWS Graviton, serta ketatnya kompetisi teknologi proses manufaktur 18A melawan TSMC N2 dan Samsung 2nm. Kesimpulannya, kembalinya CPU ke panggung kekuatan AI adalah nyata, didorong oleh kebutuhan orkestrasi dalam era agen AI. Namun, siapa yang akan memimpin "kembalinya" ini—apakah Intel, ARM, vendor cloud, atau NVIDIA—masih harus dibuktikan dalam beberapa tahun ke depan.

marsbit1j yang lalu

CPU, Diam-diam Kembali ke Panggung Utama Komputasi AI

marsbit1j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片