7*24

Hot topic

Market

Activities

HTX Creation Challenge — Post and Win 1,500UHTX 13th-Anniversary Carnival XRP Faces 5.5% Annual Supply Dilution as XRPL Revenue Falls 81.6% $XRP Supply Dilution Outpaces Fee Burns $XRP’s circulating s

HTX Creation Challenge — Post and Win 1,500U

XRP Faces 5.5% Annual Supply Dilution as XRPL Revenue Falls 81.6%

$XRP Supply Dilution Outpaces Fee Burns

$XRP’s circulating supply expanded through monthly escrow releases that exceeded the amount returned to escrow. Comparing $XRP with other crypto payment assets, an Aug. 19 analysis from 21Shares stated: “One metric where $XRP compares favorably is supply dilution. Circulating supply grew 5.5% year-on-year through escrow releases and re-locks, driven by approximately 272 million $XRP added monthly.”

According to 21Shares, $XRP dilutes its holders less than Toncoin, which runs at 9.6% a year, and Stellar’s XLM at 8.8%. Only Tron generated enough revenue to offset its supply growth, leaving holders a net positive return of 1.4% a year. The report added:

“$XRP holders face a net annual drag of 5.5% at current fee levels.”

The firm estimated that revenue would need to rise approximately 12,700-fold to offset one year of new supply at current market values. It also reported that U.S. spot $XRP exchange-traded products (ETPs) absorbed only 14.8% of the first-half increase in circulating supply and recorded net selling during two of six months.

According to the report, ETP buying covered more than half of new supply during May, the strongest month on record for those funds. Their $588 million annualized inflow rate still amounts to roughly one-seventh of annual net supply.$XRP ETP net flows covered a growing share of new supply during the first half of 2026. Source: 21Shares, Glassnode, XRPL API.



XRP Faces 5.5% Annual Supply Dilution as XRPL Reve

Trending Token Price Prediction ChallengeHTX 13th-Anniversary CarnivalHTX Creation Challenge — Post and Win 1,500U $XRP’s circulating supply expanded through monthly escrow releases that exceeded the 

 Trending Token Price Prediction Challenge

$XRP’s circulating supply expanded through monthly escrow releases that exceeded the amount returned to escrow. Comparing $XRP with other crypto payment assets, an Aug. 19 analysis from 21Shares stated: “One metric where $XRP compares favorably is supply dilution. Circulating supply grew 5.5% year-on-year through escrow releases and re-locks, driven by approximately 272 million $XRP added monthly.”

According to 21Shares, $XRP dilutes its holders less than Toncoin, which runs at 9.6% a year, and Stellar’s XLM at 8.8%. Only Tron generated enough revenue to offset its supply growth, leaving holders a net positive return of 1.4% a year. The report added:

“$XRP holders face a net annual drag of 5.5% at current fee levels.”

The firm estimated that revenue would need to rise approximately 12,700-fold to offset one year of new supply at current market values. It also reported that U.S. spot $XRP exchange-traded products (ETPs) absorbed only 14.8% of the first-half increase in circulating supply and recorded net selling during two of six months.

According to the report, ETP buying covered more than half of new supply during May, the strongest month on record for those funds. Their $588 million annualized inflow rate still amounts to roughly one-seventh of annual net supply.

Broader use could create demand beyond transaction fees if $XRP gains a larger role in treasury management, payments, and liquidity. Anodos Finance has echoed Ripple’s earlier “north star” description of $XRP, citing the asset’s use for corporate holdings and employee payments.

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has separately identified an opportunity within $16 trillion in annual payments and clearing activity, although digital assets currently represent a minimal share of those flows. Converting even part of that existing activity into $XRP-based settlement could create demand, but t

Trending Token Price Prediction ChallengeHTX 13th-Anniversary CarnivalHTX Creation Challenge — Post and Win 1,500UThe next phase of tokenization is utilityThe following is a guest post and opinion fro

The next phase of tokenization is utilityThe following is a guest post and opinion from Vincent Maliepaard, VP of Marketing at Sentora.

Tokenized funds have stopped being a novelty. Tokenized US Treasury funds alone now hold roughly $16 billion in distributed value and the list of issuers includes most of the largest names in traditional asset management. Issuance is a solved problem. The harder question is what happens to one of these assets after it exists onchain, because most of them currently do very little.

The typical tokenized fund is held, occasionally transferred, and eventually redeemed. That is a real improvement in distribution and settlement, but it leaves the asset economically idle. The larger opportunity lies in financial utility: using a traditional asset inside an onchain system as collateral, as margin, or as a component of a structured position. The two outcomes look almost identical on a balance sheet, and they behave very differently in practice.


Source: Tokenized Treasury Funds – RWA.XYZ
From Representation to Utility
Consider an investor holding a tokenized fund that owns $100 million of bonds. If that investor needs cash, the conventional path is to redeem the fund, wait for the underlying assets to settle, receive the proceeds, and then deploy that capital somewhere else. The plumbing is faster than it would be offchain, but the economics are unchanged. The investor gave up the position in order to access liquidity.

The alternative is to deposit the same token into a lending market as collateral and borrow stablecoins against it. The credit exposure and its yield stay with the investor, the loan provides the cash, and nothing is sold. The function of the asset changes rather than the asset itself, and that shift is where tokenization begins to look like financial infrastructure rather than a faster distribution chan

The next phase of tokenization is utility

Trending Token Price Prediction ChallengeHTX 13th-Anniversary CarnivalHTX Creation Challenge — Post and Win 1,500U $FARTCOIN’s 17% weekly breakout faced abrupt selling as profit-taking disrupted its r

$FARTCOIN’s 17% weekly breakout faced abrupt selling as profit-taking disrupted its recovery and intensified liquidation-driven pressure across the market. The turnaround came after a strong weekly gain, suggesting profit-taking could be part of the reason for the sharp drop.

Before sellers wiped out some buying momentum, $FARTCOIN had risen to $0.20. However, the liquidation event then added another risk during an already volatile pullback. Seven wallets suffered large $FARTCOIN liquidations within only five minutes. The total liquidations reached 65.05 million, worth $12.93 million.

Such concentrated liquidations likely accelerated the decline after traders started locking in weekly gains. Moreover, the weekly recovery had not yet completely faded, despite the rapid pullback.

The token’s price remained considerably above the $0.12082 support that anchored its August recovery. Therefore, the sellers had tamped down the rally, but not yet broken the overall pattern.

Exchange inflows strengthen the profit-taking case
Spot flows added another bearish element as $FARTCOIN entered into its post-rally correction. Netflows settled around $470.15K at press time, following a few sessions of smaller Netflows.

Positive Netflows usually indicate increased exchange-side supply with tokens flowing to trading venues. The development coincided with traders getting their hands on potential gains after the weekly 17% increase in the price.

Notably, earlier periods had seen larger negative Netflows, thereby reducing the exchange supply. The recent positive reading, therefore, presented a positive development in the short-term supply picture.

However, $470.15K was still far behind some of the previous peaks in the chart. Profit-taking appeared more consistent with a short-term supply increase than widespread distribution.

Continued positive Netflows, however, would add further selling pressure on the recovery.


Source: CoinGlass
Top traders have maintained their bullish bias


$FARTCOIN’s 17% weekly breakout faced abrupt selli

🪶 $SNX The trend has lost some of its earlier steepness, settling into a more gradual ascent. Momentum oscillators have flattened, reflecting the absence of a clear directional edge. The lower band of

🔗 One Clean Reclaim Could Shift Momentum $RARE remains connected to digital collectibles and NFT infrastructure, making marketplace activity and liquidity important. 🎨 I want buyers to reclaim resista

Can $0.14 anchor $ENA’s breakout? Following a long period of consolidation, Ethena rebounded from a key price level, and its structure has shifted dramatically as buyers broke $ENA’s highs. Price had 

Can $0.14 anchor $ENA’s breakout?

Following a long period of consolidation, Ethena rebounded from a key price level, and its structure has shifted dramatically as buyers broke $ENA’s highs.

Price had traded largely between $0.07 and $0.14 since February before finally clearing the upper resistance. The breakout pushed $ENA up to $0.1707, bringing the token right under the $0.1774 resistance.

Notably, MACD strengthened aggressively during the breakout itself, rather than appearing quietly after price expansion. The MACD line hit 0.0150 as of writing, whereas the signal line was much lower at 0.0061.

The histogram has widened to 0.0089, indicating the bulls have been accelerating strongly as the price moved up from $0.14. Therefore, a sustained push through the $0.1774 zone would likely extend $ENA’s expansion toward the $0.25 resistance zone.

However, the fading buying strength could leave the breakout vulnerable to retracement as whale participation weakens.



Can $0.14 anchor $ENA’s breakout? Following a lon

🗺️ $POWR Repeated tests of a key structural level have failed to produce a clean breakout in either direction. Order flow data suggests a more balanced distribution between aggressive buyers and selle

📊 $RPL Price remains anchored below a descending trendline that has capped several recovery attempts. Momentum oscillators have flattened, reflecting the absence of a clear directional edge. The lower

Citi downgraded Micron and expects DRAM prices to peak in the quarter ending May next year. Citi expects DRAM prices to decline 3% in the second half of 2027 versus the first half. Citi expects NAND p

Semua Komentar0TerkiniHangat

Topik Trending