Why Coinbase Will Be the Biggest Winner in the AI Financial Era?

链捕手Publié le 2026-05-08Dernière mise à jour le 2026-05-08

Résumé

Coinbase is poised to be a major winner in the AI finance era, transforming from a cyclical crypto exchange into a foundational layer for AI-native finance. The market undervalues its exposure to two key secular trends: the rise of stablecoins and the emergence of agentic commerce. Firstly, with the global stablecoin supply projected to reach $3 trillion by 2030, Coinbase benefits as the dominant, most compliant distributor of USDC. Its revenue-sharing agreement with Circle is structurally advantageous and durable, positioning Coinbase to capture significant value from stablecoin growth independent of crypto trading volumes. Secondly, in agentic commerce—where AI agents autonomously transact—Coinbase's technology stack is already dominant. Over 92% of real agent payments occur on its Base network, settled primarily in USDC via the x402 protocol it helped develop. This stack creates a powerful, self-reinforcing ecosystem across four layers: USDC for settlement, Base for execution, developer tools (CDP/AgentKit), and service discovery (Agentic.Market). Key revenue streams include USDC reserve interest, Base sequencer fees, and platform fees from its infrastructure and marketplace. By 2030, agent-related revenue could contribute billions annually. Supported by favorable regulatory tailwinds like the CLARITY Act, Coinbase's valuation should reflect its role as critical financial infrastructure, not just a brokerage, with a clear path to becoming a $300 billion company.

Compiled by: Zhou, ChainCatcher

Introduction

As the convergence of crypto and AI accelerates, Coinbase will no longer be just a crypto exchange; it is evolving into the settlement layer, distribution layer, and commercial layer of AI-native finance.

Most people still view Coinbase as a cyclical crypto brokerage, believing its performance is tightly linked to crypto trading volumes.

This is understandable, as Coinbase's valuation multiples are closely correlated with traditional brokers like IBKR, Robinhood, and Schwab. In contrast, Circle, as a pure-play bet on stablecoin growth, commands a high NTM P/E ratio of 103.9x.

However, Coinbase has a full opportunity to grow into a $300 billion company by 2031 (approximately 6x from current levels, corresponding to a 35% annualized growth rate). The driving force is not just its exchange business, but its position as the top winner in the stablecoin and agent-based commerce fields.

Our core assumptions are as follows:

Stablecoin supply reaches $3 trillion by 2031

Agent-based commerce volume reaches $7.5 trillion by 2031

Core exchange business aligns with market consensus: trading revenue of approximately $6 billion by 2028

What the market overlooks is that Coinbase is simultaneously benefiting from two epochal tailwinds:

1. The Rise of Stablecoins and Global Demand for a Digital Dollar

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent predicts stablecoin supply will reach $3 trillion by 2030 (a 10x increase from current levels). Bain & Company estimates the supply will expand 12x, reaching approximately $3.8 trillion by then.

2. The Rise of Agent-Based Commerce

McKinsey predicts global agent-based commerce will reach $3 to $5 trillion by 2030; we further predict that one-third of this volume will be completed on-chain and settled via agent-based payment protocols like x402 and MPP. We are already observing rapid growth of agent-based payments on-chain.

Coinbase is a clear beneficiary of both trends, continuously accumulating value through its position as the largest and most compliant distributor of USDC and the top network in agent-based payments.

Even if institutional investors are skeptical of DeFi or believe the crypto market is "dead," Coinbase's success will not rely on crypto asset or exchange trading volumes, but on its role as the most trusted, dominant stablecoin platform and AI agent payment infrastructure.

Why Coinbase is the Winner in the Stablecoin Race

The market fails to realize that Coinbase is a clear winner from stablecoin growth. Even as crypto trading volumes decline, stablecoin usage has historically continued to rise.

The USDC distribution agreement is an asset of Coinbase, not Circle's. The revenue share Circle pays to Coinbase has risen from 32% in 2022 to about 50% in recent years.

The structural reason is straightforward: USDC held within Coinbase products can earn approximately 100% of the interest income, and it receives a substantial share of off-platform balances under the Payment Base waterfall distribution mechanism.

As Coinbase's distribution scale expands (with USDC average balances held in Coinbase products reaching a record $17.8 billion in Q4 2025), its share in the waterfall also increases.

From an investor's perspective, this agreement is more akin to Coinbase outsourcing compliance and reserve management to Circle, rather than Circle paying Coinbase for distribution access.

The cooperation agreement automatically renews every 3 years, subject to three threshold conditions (product, company, distributor). Public filings indicate that once these conditions are met, "the Circle agreement may not be terminated." The renewal mechanism is not a renegotiation cliff, but a continuous lock-in.

For Circle, exiting means cutting off USDC's largest single distribution channel. For Coinbase, the benefits in an upside scenario (scaled stablecoin payments due to regulatory clarity, significant USDC market cap expansion) will flow directly through the same contractual terms. The structure of this contract continuously strengthens Coinbase's market position, regardless of who leads Circle.

Future Growth of USDC

Beyond Coinbase, we also see rich use cases for USDC across numerous emerging protocols. Over the past two years, USDC supply has grown significantly within protocols like Polymarket, Hyperliquid, and MakerDAO. As new financial use cases continue to emerge on blockchain platforms, USDC usage in these protocols will deepen.

Coinbase is well-positioned to capture the next wave of stablecoin applications (payments). Over the past year, various transaction types based on card payment rails (B2B, B2C) have grown significantly, and USDC's share in such transactions has continued to increase.

Looking at inter-address USDC transfer data (which can serve as a proxy for the transaction types above), USDC is steadily gaining market share from USDT.

Has the Market Misinterpreted the CLARITY Act?

The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (H.R. 3633, known as the CLARITY Act) passed the US House of Representatives with bipartisan votes of 294 to 134 on July 17, 2025. The bill aims to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets beyond payment stablecoins.

For Coinbase, the CLARITY Act is the most impactful piece of pending US legislation for its regulatory environment, building a largely complete federal regulatory architecture for the digital asset ecosystem in which Coinbase operates.

The CLARITY Act's impact on Coinbase's stablecoin business is also far more profound than commonly perceived by the market.

The revenue generated under current interest rate assumptions from Coinbase's distribution and reserve income-sharing arrangement with Circle is already on par with the economic benefits Circle itself receives as the issuer. Meanwhile, Coinbase's USDC Rewards program contributes another revenue stream, the ultimate size of which depends on the final wording of the Tillis-Alsobrooks compromise.

The market underestimates the scale and durability of these stablecoin-related revenues, viewing them as ancillary to the exchange business rather than independent infrastructure economics.

The CLARITY Act further strengthens this thesis by formally establishing the broader regulatory framework upon which stablecoins rely for clearing, settlement, and circulation, and explicitly defining the registered intermediaries through which institutional stablecoin flows pass. It reframes Coinbase's stablecoin business as the application layer of a regulated, rapidly institutionalizing system, rather than a consumer product line that fluctuates with retail token trading volumes.

Why Coinbase is the Winner in the Agent-Based Payments Race

Most investors view Stripe (valued at $159 billion in February 2026) and Tempo as the clear winners in agent-based commerce, but on-chain data tells a different story: 92.8% of real agent-based payment volume occurs on Base, and 99.8% is settled in USDC.

And of all agent-based payment volume, over 99.8% is completed via x402, an open payment protocol spearheaded by Coinbase.

AI agents are evolving from assistants that answer questions into autonomous systems that execute transactions on behalf of users, purchasing APIs, data endpoints, compute, inference services, and various resources at sub-cent pricing and machine speed.

Existing card payment rails are simply not designed for this. A typical card transaction has fixed costs of approximately $0.03 to $0.04 even before interchange fees, making a $0.003 API call economically unfeasible—a full two orders of magnitude difference.

In contrast, settling with stablecoins on a high-throughput L2 costs fractions of a cent, takes seconds, and requires no human intervention to set up billing relationships.

McKinsey predicts global agent-based commerce sales will reach $3 to $5 trillion by 2030. Gartner estimates that by 2028, AI agents will be involved in over $15 trillion of B2B procurement decisions.

These numbers have directional significance and should be taken as trend indicators; however, it is certain that if these scales materialize, stablecoin payment rails will be structurally prioritized, and USDC is already the default asset on this rail, from which Coinbase will directly benefit.

Current Track Record

The x402 standard, an HTTP-native micropayment protocol co-developed by Coinbase (now managed by the Linux Foundation), has become the mainstream open protocol for agent-initiated payments.

Since October 2025, x402 has processed over 180 million agent-based payments, circulating $47.5 million in agent spending across more than 5,000 agent-facing merchants.

When merchants open their services for agent invocation, Coinbase's L2 and USDC are already the default payment rails.

Furthermore, Agentic.Market provides Coinbase a path to control the resource discovery layer. If agents use it to discover, evaluate, and route x402 services, then value accumulates not only through Base settlement and USDC transaction volume, but also in Coinbase's role as the transaction coordination platform between agents and services.

How Coinbase Monetizes

Coinbase captures the economic value of agent-based payments through four revenue lines that are mutually reinforcing and built around the stablecoin core: USDC float interest, Base settlement revenue, CDP/AgentKit monetization, and Agentic.Market distribution revenue.

1. USDC Reserve Earnings

Coinbase's most significant upside revenue source is not trading fees, but float interest. Agent wallets need prefilled balances to authorize autonomous spending, pay API fees, cover usage-based services, and settle machine-to-machine commerce in real-time.

As agents become economic actors, USDC balances held in wallets controlled by Coinbase become deposits that generate continuous income. Every dollar of USDC held by an agent, regardless of turnover frequency, generates reserve earnings.

2. Base Sequencer Revenue

Every x402 or MPP-type transaction settled on Base becomes a sequencer transaction that can generate priority fees. This revenue line scales with the number of transactions, not payment amounts—a key point, as agent-based commerce is likely characterized by high frequency and low value, distinct from human commercial behavior.

However, as transaction costs tend to decline long-term, sequencer fees may have the smallest upside potential.

3. CDP, AgentKit & Facilitator Monetization

Coinbase can monetize at the developer level—the layer that enables agents to hold wallets, manage permissions, sponsor gas fees, complete x402 payments, and interact with paid services. This includes facilitator fees for x402 transactions, wallet infrastructure, gasless transactions, key management, policy control, and enterprise-grade developer tools.

If CDP becomes the default infrastructure stack for agent-based payments, Coinbase gains platform revenue even if individual payment amounts are low.

Scale Modeling

We assume annual agent-based commerce volume reaches $5 trillion by 2030. A majority of this will still flow through traditional rails like cards, ACH, and bank transfers, especially for large consumer and enterprise purchases.

However, machine-native, high-frequency, cross-border, API-based commerce will disproportionately adopt stablecoins and payment standards like x402 and MPP.

In an optimistic scenario, about 20% of agent-based commerce settles via stablecoin rails, corresponding to annual stablecoin agent-based payment volume of approximately $1 to $1.5 trillion. The optimistic scenario revenue breakdown is as follows:

USDC Float Interest: $200 billion average agent USDC balance × 4% reserve yield × 50% Coinbase attribution share = $4 billion

CDP/AgentKit/Facilitator/Agentic.Market: Developer subscriptions, wallet infrastructure, x402 facilitator fees, market routing, service provider analytics, and distribution fees = $750 million

Base Sequencer: $250 to $300 billion agent-based payment volume processed on Base, tens of billions of transactions, low economic gain per transaction = $250 million

Total approximate $4.25 billion Coinbase-attributed agent revenue. The key takeaway: Once Coinbase becomes the operating account, developer platform, discovery layer, and settlement rail for autonomous commerce, real value accumulates continuously—and over the past few months, they have taken solid steps on this path.

Why Coinbase and USDC Will Prevail

Coinbase's advantage lies in controlling four mutually reinforcing layers of the agent-based payment stack: USDC float interest, Base settlement, CDP/AgentKit infrastructure, and the Agentic.Market discovery layer.

USDC is already the default settlement asset, meaning developers prioritize integrating it because it has the best tooling, deepest liquidity, and broadest developer support.

Base benefits from this, becoming the natural settlement chain for USDC-native agent-based payments, with low developer friction and growing facilitator coverage.

CDP and AgentKit sit a layer above, providing developers with wallets, key management, gas sponsorship, and payment infrastructure, giving agents genuine economic agency.

Finally, Agentic.Market has the potential to become the discovery and routing layer where agents find, compare, and invoke x402 services.

Competitors wanting to enter this market must simultaneously replicate liquidity, settlement capabilities, developer infrastructure, and distribution channels. And with every new agent, merchant, or service added, the existing Coinbase tech stack becomes increasingly difficult to dislodge.

Conclusion

The market views Coinbase as a crypto exchange, overlooking that it is building the underlying platform for AI-native finance.

Global leaders predict stablecoin supply reaching $3 trillion and agent-based commerce reaching $5 trillion by 2030. Stablecoin momentum has decoupled from crypto asset prices.

Coinbase has positioned itself as a core winner in this world and is already showing early leadership. x402, USDC, and Base have become the de facto tech stack for agent-based commerce, with each layer holding over a 90% share advantage against competitors.

Coinbase's unique position stems from developing Base, incubating x402, and holding a favorable position in the USDC economic split.

The market mispricing logic rests on three pillars.

The structure of the Circle agreement is a continuous lock-in, not a renewable contract, meaning the stablecoin revenue line has durability, not cliff risk.

The CLARITY Act formally codifies the regulated infrastructure layer Coinbase already operates, re-basing its valuation benchmark from a consumer product to a core market utility.

The flywheel effect of the four-layer agent tech stack (USDC, Base, CDP, Agentic.Market) is self-reinforcing; with every new agent and merchant added, the moat becomes harder to breach.

Coinbase's valuation benchmark should be closer to infrastructure companies than brokers.

We believe, riding these two epochal tailwinds, Coinbase will grow into a $300 billion company, with the majority of its revenue coming from subscription and service business lines like stablecoins and agent-based commerce.

Cryptos en tendance

Questions liées

QWhy is Coinbase considered a key beneficiary in the stablecoin sector, and how does its agreement with Circle contribute to this?

ACoinbase is the largest and most compliant distributor of USDC. Its agreement with Circle is structured so that as USDC distribution scales (like the $17.8B average balance in Q4 2025), Coinbase receives a greater share of the interest income from reserves, with its share rising from 32% in 2022 to around 50% recently. The contract is designed to auto-renew and is difficult for Circle to terminate, making Coinbase's revenue stream from stablecoins persistent and locked-in.

QAccording to the article, what are the two major megatrends that will drive Coinbase's growth beyond its core exchange business?

AThe two major megatrends are: 1) The rise of stablecoins and global demand for a digital dollar, with supply projected to reach $3 trillion by 2030. 2) The rise of agentic commerce, where AI agents autonomously conduct transactions, with a projected market size of $3-5 trillion by 2030. Coinbase is positioned to be a primary beneficiary in both areas.

QHow does Coinbase capture value from the agentic commerce trend, and what are its four key revenue streams in this area?

ACoinbase captures value through a four-layer tech stack that reinforces itself: 1) USDC float interest from agent wallets. 2) Base sequencer fees from settlement transactions. 3) Revenue from developer tools like CDP/AgentKit and facilitator fees. 4) Potential revenue from the Agentic.Market discovery and routing layer. This integrated stack makes it difficult for competitors to replicate.

QWhat is the x402 protocol, and why is it significant for Coinbase's position in AI-native finance?

Ax402 is an HTTP-native micropayment protocol co-developed by Coinbase (now managed by the Linux Foundation). It has become the dominant open standard for agent-initiated payments, processing over 99.8% of real agent payment volume. Its significance is that it enables low-cost, high-speed machine-to-machine transactions, for which traditional card networks are ill-suited. As the default protocol settled in USDC on Base, it solidifies Coinbase's role as the infrastructure layer for AI agent commerce.

QHow does the CLARITY Act potentially change the investment thesis for Coinbase, according to the article?

AThe CLARITY Act establishes a comprehensive federal regulatory framework for digital assets. The article argues the market underestimates its impact on Coinbase. It formally recognizes the regulated infrastructure layer that Coinbase operates within for stablecoin circulation. This should help re-rate Coinbase's valuation from being viewed as a cyclical consumer brokerage to being valued more like a core, regulated market infrastructure utility company.

Lectures associées

Des groupes catholiques et de l'application de la loi mettent en garde contre la loi CLARITY qui pourrait affaiblir les garde-fous contre la criminalité liée aux crypto-actifs

Une coalition de dirigeants catholiques, de groupes liés à l'application de la loi et de défenseurs de la lutte contre la traite des êtres humains met en garde contre le projet de loi CLARITY Act. Ils estiment qu'il pourrait affaiblir les garde-fous utilisés pour lutter contre la criminalité facilitée par les crypto-monnaies. Leurs critiques portent principalement sur des dispositions qui protégeraient les développeurs de logiciels non-custodiaux d'être assimilés à des transmetteurs de fonds. Ce débat soulève une question centrale de la régulation des crypto-actifs : comment distinguer un logiciel neutre d'une intermédiation financière ? Les partisans des crypto-monnaies soutiennent que les développeurs publiant du code non-custodial ne devraient pas être régulés comme des plateformes d'échange. Les critiques, quant à eux, craignent que des exemptions trop larges ne rendent plus difficile le suivi des financements illicites. Le logiciel non-custodial est au cœur de la finance décentralisée (DeFi), permettant des transactions sans qu'une entreprise ne contrôle les fonds. Si cette architecture est un pilier de la valeur des crypto-actifs, elle pose aussi des défis pour les autorités lorsque des acteurs malveillants l'utilisent. L'opposition rencontrée par le CLARITY Act signifie que ses partisans devront répondre aux préoccupations concernant d'éventuelles lacunes favorisant la finance illicite. Cela pourrait conduire à des amendements, des protections plus limitées ou des obligations de déclaration supplémentaires. Pour l'industrie, l'enjeu est de taille : des règles plus claires pourraient stimuler les investissements, mais si le projet est perçu comme affaiblissant la lutte contre le crime, son adoption politique deviendra plus difficile.

bitcoinistIl y a 3 h

Des groupes catholiques et de l'application de la loi mettent en garde contre la loi CLARITY qui pourrait affaiblir les garde-fous contre la criminalité liée aux crypto-actifs

bitcoinistIl y a 3 h

L'histoire complète de Blockstream, la licorne de la cryptographie, profondément impliquée dans de graves fraudes

Depuis le début de l'année, Blockstream, la société cofondée par le pionnier du Bitcoin Adam Back, est sous le feu des critiques. Une enquête publiée début juin par NatInfoSec accuse la société d'avoir potentiellement levé des milliards de dollars via des billets de mine (BMN) liés à des revenus miniers, mais soulève des doutes sur la réalité des fermes de minage et de la puissance de calcul sous-jacente, évoquant des caractéristiques de type schéma de Ponzi. Les principaux points d'accusation sont les suivants : 1. **Capacité de minage et de paiement douteuses** : Pour honorer ses obligations, Blockstream aurait besoin d'une puissance de calcul bien supérieure (20-45 EH/s) à celle affichée sur son tableau de bord (15 EH/s). Aucune preuve publique (connexions électriques, importations de matériel, parts de pool minier) ne corrobore l'existence d'une infrastructure à cette échelle. Les clauses contractuelles permettraient de plus d'utiliser des bitcoins provenant de sources non divulguées pour les paiements. 2. **Rendements élevés et risque** : Les billets offriraient des rendements fixes allant jusqu'à environ 20% par an, ce qui est considéré comme très élevé et difficile à justifier dans le secteur cyclique du minage de Bitcoin. 3. **Antécédents et divulgation concernant Chris Cook** : Christopher William Cook, ancien responsable des opérations minières de Blockstream et actuel PDG d'Exacore (une entité scindée), a été condamné en 2008 pour fraude postale. Ce passé judiciaire n'aurait pas été divulgué dans les documents d'offre des BMN. Des allégations portent également sur des déclarations trompeuses concernant son expérience professionnelle. 4. **Implications potentielles pour BSTR** : L'enquête soulève des questions sur l'entreprise Bitcoin Standard Treasury (BSTR), liée à Adam Back, qui prévoit une introduction en bourse via SPAC, s'interrogeant sur la divulgation des risques liés aux BMN et sur d'éventuels conflits d'intérêts dans sa structure. La recherche BitMEX a apporté des nuances, confirmant probablement les antécédents de Cook et s'interrogeant sur les rendements, mais estimant que d'autres accusations manquaient de preuves ou étaient trompeuses, notamment concernant la séparation juridique entre les BMN et BSTR. Le débat dans la communauté s'est concentré sur la **vérifiabilité** : les investisseurs et observateurs peuvent-ils indépendamment vérifier la puissance de calcul, les revenus miniers réels et la source des paiements ? Malgré les prises de position divergentes, des questions cruciales sur les BMN demeurent sans réponse claire : leur taille réelle et leurs limites de responsabilité, l'adéquation entre la puissance minière et les obligations, l'origine des rendements élevés, la traçabilité des paiements en BTC, et le rôle exact de Chris Cook. Blockstream n'a pas encore publié de réponse systématique à ces allégations.

marsbitIl y a 7 h

L'histoire complète de Blockstream, la licorne de la cryptographie, profondément impliquée dans de graves fraudes

marsbitIl y a 7 h

Le collectif Reddit qui avait "short-squeezé" Wall Street a-t-il trouvé le prochain GME ?

En juin 2024, l'action de Wendy's (WEN) a connu une hausse significative après la diffusion d'un post populaire sur le forum Reddit r/wallstreetbets intitulé "We need to save Wendy's". Cette dynamique rappelle le phénomène des meme stocks, comme celui de GameStop (GME) en 2021. Le post, jouant sur un running gag de la communauté (le fait de devoir travailler chez Wendy's après de mauvais trades), a généré un fort engouement retail, se traduisant par un volume d'échanges anormalement élevé et une hausse de prix. WEN présente certains ingrédients classiques d'un "short squeeze" potentiel : un taux de ventes à découvert élevé (environ 32% des actions en circulation) et une attention communautaire soutenue. Cependant, l'article nuance fortement la comparaison avec le squeeze historique de GME. La structure est jugée moins extrême : le taux de découvert est significatif mais loin des niveaux de GME (qui avait dépassé 100%), et il manque pour l'instant des preuves solides d'un "gamma squeeze" auto-entrenenu via les options. L'élan actuel semble davantage être un "meme pop" à court terme, alimenté par l'attention et un faible prix de l'action, plutôt qu'un mouvement de fond structurel. L'histoire montre que Wendy's, par sa notoriété et son lien avec la culture WSB, est propice à ce genre de vague, mais que la volatilité qui en découle est souvent temporaire. La durabilité de la hausse dépendra de la persistance de la discussion en ligne, des volumes d'échanges sur plusieurs jours et surtout de l'activité sur le marché des options, qui pourrait, ou non, amplifier mécaniquement la tendance.

marsbitIl y a 7 h

Le collectif Reddit qui avait "short-squeezé" Wall Street a-t-il trouvé le prochain GME ?

marsbitIl y a 7 h

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articles tendance

Comment acheter ERA

Bienvenue sur HTX.com ! Nous vous permettons d'acheter Caldera (ERA) de manière simple et pratique. Suivez notre guide étape par étape pour commencer votre parcours crypto.Étape 1 : Création de votre compte HTXUtilisez votre adresse e-mail ou votre numéro de téléphone pour ouvrir un compte sur HTX gratuitement. L'inscription se fait en toute simplicité et débloque toutes les fonctionnalités.Créer mon compteÉtape 2 : Choix du mode de paiement (rubrique Acheter des cryptosCarte de crédit/débit : utilisez votre carte Visa ou Mastercard pour acheter instantanément Caldera (ERA).Solde :utilisez les fonds du solde de votre compte HTX pour trader en toute simplicité.Prestataire tiers :pour accroître la commodité d'utilisation, nous avons ajouté des modes de paiement populaires tels que Google Pay et Apple Pay.P2P :tradez directement avec d'autres utilisateurs sur HTX.OTC (de gré à gré) : nous offrons des services personnalisés et des taux de change compétitifs aux traders.Étape 3 : stockage de vos Caldera (ERA)Après avoir acheté vos Caldera (ERA), stockez-les sur votre compte HTX. Vous pouvez également les envoyer ailleurs via un transfert sur la blockchain ou les utiliser pour trader d'autres cryptos.Étape 4 : tradez des Caldera (ERA)Tradez facilement Caldera (ERA) sur le marché Spot de HTX. Il vous suffit d'accéder à votre compte, de sélectionner la paire de trading, d'exécuter vos trades et de les suivre en temps réel. Nous offrons une expérience conviviale aux débutants comme aux traders chevronnés.

599 vues totalesPublié le 2025.07.17Mis à jour le 2026.06.02

Comment acheter ERA

Discussions

Bienvenue dans la Communauté HTX. Ici, vous pouvez vous tenir informé(e) des derniers développements de la plateforme et accéder à des analyses de marché professionnelles. Les opinions des utilisateurs sur le prix de ERA (ERA) sont présentées ci-dessous.

活动图片