Hermes Agent Guide: Surpassing OpenClaw, Boosting Productivity by 100x

marsbitPublié le 2026-04-13Dernière mise à jour le 2026-04-13

Résumé

A guide to Hermes Agent, an open-source AI agent framework by Nous Research, positioned as a powerful alternative to OpenClaw. It is described as a self-evolving agent with a built-in learning loop that autonomously creates skills from experience, continuously improves them, and solidifies knowledge into reusable assets. Its core features include a memory system (storing environment info and user preferences in MEMORY.md and USER.md) and a skill system that generates structured documentation for complex tasks. The agent boasts over 40 built-in tools for web search, browser automation, vision, image generation, and text-to-speech. It supports scheduling automated tasks and can run on various infrastructures, from a $5 VPS to GPU clusters. Popular tools within its ecosystem include the Hindsight memory plugin, the Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills pack, and the mission-control dashboard for agent orchestration. Key differentiators from OpenClaw are its architecture philosophy—centered on the agent's own execution loop rather than a central controller—and its autonomous skill generation versus OpenClaw's manually written skills. Installation is a one-line command, and setup is guided. It integrates with messaging platforms like Telegram, Discord, and Slack. It's suited for scenarios requiring a persistent, context-aware assistant that improves over time, automates workflows, and operates across various deployment environments.

On February 25th, a team called Nous Research quietly released a v0.1.0 on GitHub. Initially, the Hermes model only had a one-line installation command and a one-sentence product positioning: "An agent that grows with you".

At the time, very few people noticed it. Even though Nous Research has a certain reputation in the model community, and their Hermes series models have accumulated 33 million downloads on HuggingFace, the entire developer community's attention was focused on the deified OpenClaw "Crawfish". Gaining stars 33% faster than React to become the historical number one, "Crawfish" became the fastest-growing project in GitHub history, peaking at 710 stars per hour. But at the same time, security researchers were disclosing vulnerabilities at an average rate of 2.2 CVEs per day within the same time window, accumulating 138 security vulnerabilities over 63 days. The entire community began to rethink a question: Can this thing actually be used in a production environment?

Against this backdrop, Hermes Agent, as a competing product, finally found an opportunity and welcomed its own first period of rapid growth.

Hermes wrote a one-click migration tool from OpenClaw into its code. Those developers leaving OpenClaw needed a place to land, and Hermes Agent became a well-recommended choice passed around by word of mouth.

So, starting from early March, Hermes Agent broke into GitHub Trending, reaching a high of 11th place, with stars surpassing 2200. AwesomeAgents called it "the most ambitious open-source Agent release of 2026 so far". Currently, Hermes has 69.9k Stars and 9k Forks on GitHub.

Today, BlockBeats will talk to everyone about what makes this Agent different.

What is Hermes Agent?

Hermes Agent is a self-evolving AI agent built by Nous Research, and it is currently the only Agent with a built-in learning loop.

It can automatically create skills from usage experience, continuously improve these skills during use, actively solidify knowledge into reusable assets, retrieve its own past conversation history, and continuously deepen its understanding of you, the user, across multiple sessions.

So, simply put, the biggest advantage of Hermes Agent is: The more you use it, the smarter and more handy it becomes.

Its positioning is not a programming assistant bound to an IDE, nor is it a chat wrapper for a single API, but a truly autonomous agent that resides on your server, remembers what it has learned, and grows stronger the longer it runs.

Nous Research has positioned itself from the beginning as an open-source first, decentralization-oriented AI lab, aiming to build AI that users can control autonomously, rather than concentrating intelligence in the hands of a few closed companies. Their early work focused on the Hermes model series, while also investing heavily in infrastructure and systems level, exploring technologies like DisTrO for model training across globally distributed consumer-grade GPUs, and simulation environments like WorldSim and Doomscroll for multi-agent interaction and long-term behavior.

The team behind Hermes Agent is the same group that previously built a series of models like Nomos and Psyche.

What are the useful tools?

The core mechanisms of Hermes Agent are its memory system and skill system. The Agent maintains two concise core files: MEMORY.md stores environmental information, conventions, and experiences summarized from past tasks; USER.md stores your preferences and communication style. These two files are automatically injected into the system prompt at the start of each session, acting as the Agent's "long-term working memory". Additionally, all historical sessions are stored in a SQLite full-text search database, allowing the Agent to retrieve conversation content from weeks ago.

Regarding the skill system, each time a complex task is completed (typically involving 5 or more tool calls), the Agent autonomously creates a structured Markdown "skill document" recording the steps, known information, and verification methods for future reuse. Skill files follow a progressive disclosure pattern: the Agent by default only sees the skill name and description (about 3000 tokens), and loads the full content of a specific skill only when needed, thus controlling token consumption.

At the tool level, Hermes Agent comes with over 40 built-in tools, covering web search, browser automation, visual understanding, image generation, text-to-speech, and also supports setting up scheduled tasks via natural language, allowing the Agent to automatically perform periodic work like report generation, data backup, and system monitoring unattended.

Among these, the most popular tools, meaning those with the highest frequency of use by the community users, the most feedback, and based on Hermes's functional architecture and the typical needs of the developer community, the ones ranked at the top are these:

Hindsight is currently the hottest single tool in the ecosystem and is the officially recommended long-term memory plugin for Hermes. It automatically recalls relevant context before each LLM call, supports local PostgreSQL or cloud deployment, and is already integrated into Hermes as a native Memory Provider.

Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is the skill pack with the highest Stars in the ecosystem, containing 753+ structured cybersecurity skills, fully mapping the MITRE ATT&CK framework, suitable for security research and penetration testing scenarios.

mission-control is currently the most popular Agent orchestration dashboard in the ecosystem, supporting Agent fleet management, task distribution, cost tracking, and multi-Agent collaborative workflows, recommended by the community as the standard for production-level deployment.

Hermes Agent Self-Evolution is an evolutionary self-improvement technique using DSPy + GEPA to optimize skills, prompts, and code.

Hermes Workspace is the native workspace for Hermes, integrating a chat interface, terminal, and skill manager, and is the most popular graphical entry point.

Furthermore, it can spawn independent sub-agents, each with its own dialogue context, independent terminal, and Python RPC scripts, enabling zero-context-cost parallel pipelines.

In terms of infrastructure flexibility, it supports six terminal backends: local run, Docker, SSH remote, Daytona serverless, Singularity containers, and Modal cloud functions. Daytona and Modal hibernate when idle, costing almost nothing. You can run it on a $5 VPS or a GPU cluster, issue commands through Telegram, and have it work on cloud servers you never SSH into directly.

Hermes Agent currently constitutes the most direct competition with OpenClaw, as both are open-source Agent frameworks aimed at developers.

The architectural philosophies of the two are截然不同 (distinctly different): OpenClaw's design core is a "control plane", a unified long-running process responsible for managing sessions, routing, tool execution, and state—everything flows through this central controller. Hermes, however, centers around the Agent's own execution loop, building the gateway, task scheduler, tool runtime, etc., all around this "do, learn, improve" iterative cycle.

The difference in the skill systems is particularly significant: OpenClaw's skills are mostly manually written, loaded from different levels like workspace, personal, shared, or plugins; Hermes's approach is to let the Agent generate skills from experience itself, forming a true autonomous learning loop.

How to Install and Use

Getting started is extremely simple. A single command, "curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/main/scripts/install.sh | bash", completes the installation. It works on Linux, macOS, and WSL2. Hermes Agent automatically completes all configuration without manual operation.

Hermes Official Website

After Hermes Agent is installed, run "hermes setup" to start the setup wizard. Select your model provider (supports Nous Portal, OpenRouter, OpenAI, or any custom endpoint), connect your messaging platform (Telegram, Discord, Slack, or WhatsApp), and then start your first conversation. From the first interaction, Hermes Agent immediately enters learning mode, starting to build memory, create skills, and becoming more capable after each session.

Core commands for daily use include:

hermes (start conversation),

hermes model (select LLM provider and model),

hermes tools (configure which tools to enable),

hermes gateway (start message gateway, connect to Telegram, Discord, etc.),

hermes setup (run the full setup wizard, configure everything at once),

hermes claw migrate (migrate from OpenClaw),

hermes update (update to the latest version),

hermes doctor (diagnose problems);

Hermes Agent is suitable for scenarios including: General AI assistants that need to remember context across sessions and continuously improve capabilities; Custom Agent workflows that need to combine tools, plugins, MCP servers, browsers, or Shell; Deploying Agents on local hardware, cloud VMs, or low-cost serverless infrastructure; and Persistent assistant scenarios that require cross-platform searchable conversation history and acquired skills.

More specifically, you can use it to talk to it on Telegram while it executes tasks on a cloud VM, set up automations and push reports to any platform, have it take over periodic tasks; you can also integrate it into Slack or Discord to provide AI collaboration support for the entire team; or utilize its trajectory export function to generate training data for RL training of next-generation tool-calling models.

Questions liées

QWhat is the core mechanism that makes Hermes Agent unique according to the article?

AIts memory system and skill system. It maintains two core files (MEMORY.md and USER.md) for long-term working memory and autonomously creates structured Markdown skill documents from complex tasks for future reuse.

QWhat was a key factor that contributed to Hermes Agent's initial growth period?

AThe security vulnerabilities discovered in the competing project OpenClaw, which caused the developer community to reconsider its use in production environments. Hermes provided a migration tool for developers leaving OpenClaw.

QName one of the most popular tools in the Hermes Agent ecosystem mentioned in the article.

AHindsight, which is the official long-term memory plugin that automatically recalls relevant context before each LLM call.

QHow does the installation process for Hermes Agent work?

AWith a single command: `curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/main/scripts/install.sh | bash`. It automatically completes all configuration.

QWhat is the fundamental architectural difference between Hermes Agent and OpenClaw as described in the article?

AOpenClaw is designed around a central 'control plane' that manages everything, while Hermes is built around the agent's own execution loop of 'do, learn, improve', with all components supporting that cycle.

Lectures associées

Une "déesse de la charité" de 3 millions d'abonnés entièrement créée par IA, un orphelinat factice, un "faux philanthrope" transnational s'effondre du jour au lendemain

**[Guide] Scandale : Une influenceuse australienne prétendant aider des orphelins avec 3 millions d'abonnés a été démasquée pour avoir utilisé l'IA afin de créer de fausses images et vidéos de son oeuvre caritative.** L'ABC révèle que Lily Jay, une influenceuse australienne convertie à l'islam avec près de 3 millions d'abonnés, a orchestré une vaste escroquerie caritative en utilisant l'intelligence artificielle. Sa fondation, le "Lily Jay Foundation", prétendait construire des mosquées, distribuer de la nourriture à Gaza et gérer un orphelinat en Ouganda. Cependant, l'enquête montre que des vidéos clés, notamment celle de l'inauguration de l'orphelinat où des enfants tiennent des sucettes, étaient intégralement générées par IA, avec des incohérences typiques comme des erreurs de texte sur les vêtements. Aucune trace de l'orphelinat "Ada Nur" ou de la boulangerie à Gaza n'a pu être vérifiée sur place. Un trophée "humanitaire" présenté en mai 2026 portait le filigrane invisible d'un générateur d'images AI. Le site web de la fondation admettait discrètement ne pas être un organisme de bienfaisance enregistré, échappant ainsi aux obligations de transparence financière. Opérant depuis Chypre et le Kosovo, Lily Jay (de son vrai nom Lily Jay Hinson) mène une vie luxueuse sur ses réseaux personnels. Après les questions de l'ABC, le site a modifié son contenu pour les visiteurs australiens, supprimant les options de don et les pages compromettantes, tout en les conservant pour le public international. Les experts alertent sur la dangerosité de ces escroqueries qui exploitent la générosité et la volonté de croire en de belles histoires. À l'ère du deepfake, la défense reste un questionnement critique : est-ce vrai ?

marsbitIl y a 4 mins

Une "déesse de la charité" de 3 millions d'abonnés entièrement créée par IA, un orphelinat factice, un "faux philanthrope" transnational s'effondre du jour au lendemain

marsbitIl y a 4 mins

L2 « recalibrage » : quand L1 devient son propre Rollup, quel est le destin final d’Ethereum ?

"L2 Recalibration": When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame? In recent years, the proliferation of L2s (Rollups) has solved Ethereum's scalability issues but at the cost of fragmenting liquidity, user states, and the unified chain experience. This has prompted a fundamental reevaluation of the relationship between L1 and L2 within the Ethereum community. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The core challenge is no longer just creating more block space, but redefining the roles of L1, L2, execution, and settlement layers in a fragmented ecosystem. L1 is actively enhancing its own scalability (increasing Gas Limit, statelessness, zkEVM). Consequently, L2s can no longer rely solely on "cheaper, faster transactions" for long-term value. Their future role shifts towards providing differentiated features (privacy, custom governance, application-specific optimizations) that L1 cannot easily offer uniformly, while still contributing extra capacity. Interoperability is key to restoring a seamless user experience. The goal is not just cross-chain bridges but enabling different execution environments to trust each other's states faster and at lower cost. Initiatives like Open Intents Frameworks and the Ethereum Interoperability Layer (EIL) aim to make cross-L2 interactions feel like single-chain transactions. Crucially, shortening Ethereum's finality time (from minutes to seconds) is a major focus, as it directly benefits cross-chain applications by reducing the trust latency for state changes. A provocative idea from researcher Barnabé Monnot suggests that as proof systems (like zkEVM) mature on mainnet, L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." Here, specialized nodes would execute transactions and generate validity proofs, while validators would verify these proofs instead of re-executing everything. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture than a strict layer. The vision is a future where multiple L2s act as specialized execution domains (for DeFi, gaming, privacy, etc.) under a shared Ethereum security, settlement, and state framework—a system that is fragmented in execution but unified in trust and liquidity. In conclusion, Ethereum's endgame is not L2s replacing L1 or being made obsolete by a scaled L1. It is an ecosystem where L2s become a spectrum of execution environments with varying features, all capable of securely interoperating and sharing Ethereum's foundational security and liquidity. The next phase is about re-integrating what was fragmented back into a coherent, user-friendly "one chain" experience.

marsbitIl y a 5 mins

L2 « recalibrage » : quand L1 devient son propre Rollup, quel est le destin final d’Ethereum ?

marsbitIl y a 5 mins

Grayscale Dépose le Premier ETF sur Worldcoin auprès de la SEC sous le Symbole GWLD

La société Grayscale Investments a déposé une demande d'enregistrement Form S-1 auprès de la SEC américaine pour créer un nouveau fonds négocié en bourse (ETF) lié à la cryptomonnaie Worldcoin, sous le ticker GWLD sur Nasdaq. Ce fonds, établi le 10 juillet, offrirait aux investisseurs américains un accès régulé à Worldcoin (WLD), alors que les citoyens américains ne sont pas éligibles aux subventions utilisateurs du projet. Le dépôt intervient alors que le WLD a atteint son plus bas historique en mai 2026, avant de connaître une hausse de plus de 8% à l'annonce de l'ETF. Le dossier de Grayscale soulève également des questions importantes sur la tokenomique de Worldcoin, notamment la concentration des tokens (les 100 plus grands portefeuilles détiennent environ 90% de l'offre en circulation) et le déblocage continu de tokens par les initiés jusqu'en 2028, ce qui exercera une pression vendeuse. De plus, l'écosystème de Worldcoin, qui utilise des dispositifs biométriques de scan oculaire (Orbs), est confronté à des défis réglementaires spécifiques dans plusieurs juridictions. Malgré un calendrier incertain (l'introduction en bourse n'est pas attendue avant fin 2026) et l'approbation de la SEC encore en suspens, cette démarche illustre la volonté de Grayscale d'étendre son offre d'investissements cryptographiques régulés et de se positionner sur le marché émergent des ETF.

TheNewsCryptoIl y a 21 mins

Grayscale Dépose le Premier ETF sur Worldcoin auprès de la SEC sous le Symbole GWLD

TheNewsCryptoIl y a 21 mins

L'Éternel Fragment de l'Argent : Les Paiements Tiers N'ont Pas de Principe Premier

L'article examine les défis de l'industrie des paiements, en prenant l'exemple de la trajectoire de Stripe et de sa récente tentative de rachat de PayPal. Il souligne que le secteur reste hautement fragmenté, avec des acteurs locaux ou spécialisés résilients, et qu'il est structurellement subordonné au système bancaire traditionnel. Stripe, ayant manqué la fenêtre d'introduction en bourse pendant la pandémie, cherche désormais à étendre son écosystème via des acquisitions (comme PayPal pour sa clientèle grand public) et en investissant dans les stablecoins (OUSD) et les infrastructures de paiement pour agents autonomes (AI). Cependant, l'auteur note que les stablecoins ne sont pas encore une pratique courante et que l'économie des agents reste naissante. La thèse centrale est que le futur modèle économique pourrait résider dans les réseaux de compensation (clearing). En obtenant des licences bancaires et en développant des blockchains dédiées (comme Tempo pour Stripe), ces entreprises pourraient capturer une partie de la valeur en améliorant l'efficacité des règlements, potentiellement en marge du système bancaire traditionnel. En conclusion, la bataille dans les paiements tiers est comparée à une guerre de tranchées sans fin, où aucun acteur ne peut éliminer tous les autres par la seule taille. L'avenir passe par la diversification et l'innovation sur les infrastructures de compensation.

marsbitIl y a 29 mins

L'Éternel Fragment de l'Argent : Les Paiements Tiers N'ont Pas de Principe Premier

marsbitIl y a 29 mins

Trading

Spot
活动图片