Community is Dead, Long Live Community

链捕手Publié le 2026-05-15Dernière mise à jour le 2026-05-15

Résumé

The author reflects on the transformative and often painful evolution of crypto communities. They nostalgically recall the early days of Web3, where genuine bonds formed around shared beliefs in projects like DeFi and NFTs, leading to deep friendships and passionate collaboration. However, the essay argues this authentic "community" is now largely dead. It has been corrupted by a culture of extraction, where most participants in modern Discord servers are motivated solely by financial gain—grinding for points, chasing airdrops, and immediately selling tokens. This dynamic creates a facade of engagement that vanishes after a token launch, often replaced by hostility. The author uses their project, Across Protocol, as a case study, announcing the shutdown of its Discord server because it no longer represents a true community but a toxic space dominated by mercenary actors. The piece concludes with a bittersweet farewell to the old era and a determined call to continue building with the few remaining genuine believers. The title's paradox, "Community is dead. Long live community," mourns the loss of the original ideal while expressing hope for its future revival.

Author: jamesrichardfry, Head of Marketing, Across Protocol

Compiled by: Jiahuan, ChainCatcher

I've been struggling with how to write this. Part of me wants to sugarcoat it. Dress it up in marketing speak. Frame it as something beautiful and move on.

But that wouldn't be entirely honest. If you know me, you know I wear my heart on my sleeve and I'm incapable of lying. So here it is, bluntly.

Community is dead. Of course, it wasn't always this way. That goes without saying, but I'm saying it out loud anyway.

I still miss the good old days on Clubhouse and Discord chatrooms. The times we spent hours "vibing" with people from across the internet about magic internet money, the latest NFT drop, the best staking opportunities, complaining about the money we lost, dreaming about the next great project, and actually *building*.

To this day, I'm still good friends with many of those people. Some have even become friends in real life. When community is good, it's good. I miss those days.

Zooming out a bit, what is community? I talked about this for way too long during a recent all-hands meeting, and I could almost hear the eyes rolling from my colleagues.

To share a bit of that epiphany with you, here's my take on community:

A community is a group of people gathered around a shared interest. In many aspects of our daily lives, we have community.

From the school you go to, the sport you play, the religion you practice, the gym you frequent, even the grocery store you shop at.

Some communities are shallow. The group of old men I see at the gym Monday through Friday is a community, but it's clearly very different from the friend circle community we intentionally spend time with.

Web3 or crypto community is no different.

We all gathered around our shared interests. DeFi summer. NFT mania. NFT winter. Cross-chain interoperability whatever. Zero-knowledge proofs whatever.

Whatever you're into, there's a group of people diving down the rabbit hole with you.

Some were there for the financial speculation. Others, from a deep belief and commitment to the early cypherpunk movement. Some crypto communities were surface-level or perfunctory.

Others were deeply profound. I mean, deeply, deeply profound. Like a religious congregation, fanatic following, belief-in-your-gut, put-your-money-where-your-mouth-is profound.

We wore the same "clothes" (PFP), spoke our own language (WAGMI), looked crazy to outsiders, and we didn't care one bit because we believed in what we were all gathering to pursue.

Early crypto community was inseparable from belief.

Not just belief, but a deep, gut-wrenching conviction that gave you the courage to get on stage and talk for hours in front of hundreds about why you believed in the founder, the project, the roadmap, and why you were the project's diamond-handed hodler.

Conviction. That's what drove the parabolic growth in the early days. Without community, crypto would be nothing.

Across, by the way, was no exception. The early days of the Across community were the golden days. The vibes were high. There was deep conviction (yes, I'm repeating that word). Excitement, energy, people genuinely caring about the project for the innovation, not for the token price.

We hired people from that community who are still with us today. And some of the early people who stuck around are still die-hard community members, riding the waves with us.

When community is good, it's good.

And then, everything changed.

Fast forward to today. I'm going to make some sweeping generalizations here. Please know that I'm not referring to "all" community members, "every" community group, and not painting with a broad brush. But if I continue to be blunt, I'm referring to most. Vast majority.

The word "community" has been bastardized by the crypto "extractors." In many ways, if you want to know why "the love of money is the root of all evil," look no further than the countless Discord "communities."

Thousands of unread messages a day. Impressive daily active users. Constant social support, until the Token Generation Event (TGE) hits. We all know the playbook.

The vibe before TGE mimics the early crypto community sentiment. Deep conviction. Gut-wrenching fire. Courage to get on stage. PFP and project tags in bios. Ride or die, diamond hands, bullish hodler.

Then, everyone changes.

You go to sleep one night, barely able to keep up with the Discord notifications.

You wake up the next morning, and it's a ghost town.

Or worse.

You find your loyal "community" coming at you with pitchforks and torches.

Over the airdrop.

You see, "community" is no longer community.

It's devolved into endless, AI-generated spam to farm points, for the hope of an airdrop, to immediately dump, then complain about the token price, and call the project a scam or rug (which, to be fair, is often true).

You know where I'm going with this long-winded rant, right?

"Community" is no longer community. You know it. You feel it. The timeline feels off. Discord servers feel off. Podcasts feel off. Twitter Spaces feel off.

Everything feels wrong, like "Con" will never be "Confucius." Everyone reading this today knows it deep down, even if you've never articulated it this clearly before.

Today's "community" is a cheap imitation of the early community that built crypto into what it is. The shared interest of these "community" members boils down to one thing. Extraction. Quick. Decisive. Extraction. It's the poison that kills what crypto could have been, and should have been.

Most of today's (again, not all) Discord "communities" consist of the dregs of the remnants.

Some are genuine loyalists and believers. (To those who have stuck with Across, we wouldn't be here without you. Thank you. You know where to find us, we'll always have a place for you.)

Some, often the majority, are there to extract from the project. I won't dwell on that here.

And finally, those who only appear to complain. Because in every bear market, these specific types of "community" members will kick you when you're down, as if the bear market hasn't affected every team member, and as if we caused the bear market to happen.

Unfortunately, the Across Discord has recently fallen into this "majority" category as well. Our "community" has become something else.

The people who recognize the incredible achievements we've made, the progress Across has pioneered for the entire industry, and who still support us, are tired of being part of this extractive "community" and have left the Discord.

The few who remain will happily move with us to Twitter and other channels. The rest are what I defined above as "community." Yes, I'm saying this with gut-wrenching fire and deep conviction.

Therefore, today, the Across Discord is moving to read-only mode.

This is the first step in our planned, full shutdown of the server.

To the community of believers still standing with us, let's keep building. We have a lot of work to do.

To Discord, thank you for hosting some of the good old days of crypto. I will cherish them forever.

Community is dead.

Long live community.

Questions liées

QAccording to the author, what is the core difference between early crypto communities and today's so-called 'communities'?

AThe author argues that the core difference lies in the underlying motive. Early crypto communities were driven by a deep, shared belief and passion for the technology and vision. Today's 'communities' are primarily driven by extraction - the desire to farm points, earn airdrops, sell tokens immediately for profit, and then often turn hostile towards the project. They are characterized as cheap knock-offs of the genuine early communities.

QWhat specific action is the author announcing for the Across Protocol Discord server, and why?

AThe author announces that the Across Protocol Discord server will be set to read-only mode, which is the first step in a planned full shutdown. The reason is that their Discord has been overrun by the 'extractive' majority, driving away the genuine, loyal community members. The noise and negativity no longer serve the project's builders and true believers.

QHow does the author define a 'community' in the broader sense, beyond just web3?

AThe author defines a community as a group of people gathered around a shared interest. They provide examples from everyday life such as school, sports, religion, the gym, or even a local grocery store. The author notes that communities can be shallow (like nodding acquaintances at the gym) or deep and meaningful (like close friend groups).

QWhat positive aspects of the early 'golden era' of crypto communities does the author miss?

AThe author misses the authentic 'vibing' on platforms like Clubhouse and Discord, where people discussed crypto topics out of genuine interest, shared experiences, dreamed up new projects, and collaboratively 'built' things. These interactions were based on excitement, innovation, and a shared belief in the project's potential, not just token price. Many real friendships were formed during this time.

QWhat is the primary 'poison' that the author believes has killed the potential of what crypto communities could have been?

AThe author identifies 'extraction' as the primary poison. The current environment is dominated by individuals whose sole common interest is to quickly and decisively extract value from projects through activities like airdrop farming, followed by selling tokens and complaining. This self-serving behavior has corrupted the genuine communal spirit.

Lectures associées

Point de vue : La relation de couverture entre les obligations d'État américaines et le marché boursier a pris fin, le BTC, en tant qu'actif à risque, subit une double pression

Au cours des 20 dernières années, la relation de couverture traditionnelle entre les obligations américaines et les actions s'est effondrée. Désormais, ces deux classes d'actifs évoluent en tandem à la baisse, éliminant le "coussin de sécurité" habituel des portefeuilles. Le Bitcoin, en tant qu'actif risqué à l'extrémité de la courbe de risque, subit une double pression. Cette rupture de corrélation, à son niveau le plus bas depuis 1996 selon l'UBS, est principalement due à la volatilité de l'inflation qui est devenue le facteur dominant des marchés, contrairement aux préoccupations liées à la croissance. Les investisseurs recherchent désormais la sécurité sans risque de durée, privilégiant les liquidités et les titres à court terme tandis qu'ils vendent les obligations à long terme. Cette dynamique est renforcée par des déficits élevés, une charge d'intérêt croissante et un recul de la demande étrangère pour la dette américaine. Dans ce contexte, le Bitcoin est devenu aussi sensible aux conditions macroéconomiques que le dollar ou l'or. Il bénéficie d'un dollar faible et de taux bas, mais souffre lorsque les rendements obligataires grimpent. La hausse des taux sans risque augmente le coût d'opportunité de détenir un actif ne versant pas de revenus, tandis que les baisses des actions réduisent l'appétit pour le risque. Ainsi, le BTC absorbe simultanément ces deux pressions. Les conditions qui renforcent sa proposition de valeur à long terme (déficits, rendements élevés) le pénalisent donc à court terme. Pour que les obligations redeviennent un actif refuge, il faudrait que la volatilité inflationniste s'atténue et que les risques de croissance redeviennent prédominants. En attendant, dans un marché où la plus grande classe d'actifs au monde n'absorbe plus les chocs, le plancher est retiré sous tous les actifs risqués, en particulier ceux, comme le Bitcoin, qui ne versent aucun revenu.

marsbitIl y a 14 mins

Point de vue : La relation de couverture entre les obligations d'État américaines et le marché boursier a pris fin, le BTC, en tant qu'actif à risque, subit une double pression

marsbitIl y a 14 mins

Bulletin de financement | Crypto.com obtient 400 millions de dollars d'investissement, les secteurs de la CeFi et des stablecoins continuent d'attirer des capitaux

**Résumé des Investissements Hebdomadaires (13-19 Juillet)** Le marché du financement crypto a connu une nette accélération la semaine dernière, avec 17 transactions totalisant plus de 812 millions de dollars, soit un doublement en nombre et en volume. Les secteurs de la finance centralisée (CeFi) et des stablecoins ont dominé les investissements. L'échange **Crypto.com** a levé 4 milliards de dollars auprès de Citadel Securities, portant sa valorisation à 200 milliards de dollars. **Alpaca** (infrastructure de courtage API) a levé 135 millions de dollars, tandis que **Flex** (plateforme bancaire transfrontalière basée sur des stablecoins) a obtenu 70 millions de dollars. **Velocity** (solutions de règlement par stablecoins) a sécurisé 38 millions de dollars. **Tether** a investi 20 millions de dollars dans la banque numérique argentine Ualá. Dans l'infrastructure financière, **ADI Chain** (règlement de stablecoins) a levé 50 millions de dollars, **Cyclops** (infrastructure de paiement par stablecoins) 20 millions de dollars, et **Pact Labs** (intégration de l'USDT dans les salaires) 7 millions de dollars dirigés par Tether. Le secteur DeFi a annoncé deux levées, dont **Quote Trade** (DEX axé sur l'IA) avec 4 millions de dollars. Un tour de table notable est celui de la plateforme de marché prédictif **Pascal**, qui a levé 9 millions de dollars. Parallèlement, le secteur IA/robotique reste très actif. L'entreprise de cloud IA **Fireworks** (soutenue par Nvidia) a levé 1.5 milliard de dollars, la startup de robots humanoïdes **Walden Robotics** (filiale de Toyota) 300 millions de dollars, et le fabricant chinois de robots humanoïdes **逐际动力 (Climber Robotics)** près de 200 millions de dollars dans un tour Pre-IPO. Enfin, plusieurs acquisitions ont eu lieu, notamment celle de l'échange singapourien **Coinhako** par le japonais SBI Holdings, et de la startup de dépôts crypto **Glide** par **MoonPay**.

marsbitIl y a 1 h

Bulletin de financement | Crypto.com obtient 400 millions de dollars d'investissement, les secteurs de la CeFi et des stablecoins continuent d'attirer des capitaux

marsbitIl y a 1 h

Le bear market le plus doux ? Les vendeurs de BTC délaissent le marché, ARK et Bitwise affichent un optimisme collectif

La volatilité demeure sur le marché des cryptomonnaies. Le bitcoin (BTC) évolue autour de 75 000 USD, tandis que l'ether (ETH) lutte pour maintenir 1 900 USD. Les liquidations à court terme ont principalement affecté les positions vendeuses. Les perspectives des institutions sont mitigées mais montrent des signes de retour de l'optimisme prudent. Polymarket estime à 33% la probabilité que le BTC passe sous 50 000 USD cette année. ARK Invest relève des signaux de tension vendeuse, avec une part historiquement élevée des BTC détenus à long terme. Bitwise qualifie ce ralentissement de "baissier structurellement le plus doux" jamais enregistré, notant que les creux de cycle sont de plus en plus hauts et que les investisseurs institutionnels voient les baisses comme des opportunités. D'un point de vue technique, Bit estime que le creux de la vague baissière (C) est probablement formé, une zone de fond idéale se situant entre 50 000 et 55 000 USD. Cependant, un analyste de Glassnode met en garde : si le BTC ne dépasse pas durablement 66 000 USD, un risque de sommet à court terme subsiste. L'analyste Darkfost identifie quant à lui une bande de soutien cruciale entre 59 000 et 70 000 USD. Signe notable d'un changement de sentiment, le trader Doctor Profit a annoncé avoir fermé toutes ses positions vendeuses sur les cryptos, réalisant d'importants bénéfices, et a recommencé à accumuler du BTC au comptant depuis 64 000 USD. Il estime que le marché anticipe trop uniformément un creux vers 40 000-50 000 USD à l'automne, ce qui pourrait ne pas se matérialiser.

Foresight NewsIl y a 2 h

Le bear market le plus doux ? Les vendeurs de BTC délaissent le marché, ARK et Bitwise affichent un optimisme collectif

Foresight NewsIl y a 2 h

Trading

Spot
活动图片