Brad Garlinghouse says CLARITY Act could pass by April as Polymarket odds hit 85%

ambcryptoPublié le 2026-02-19Dernière mise à jour le 2026-02-19

Résumé

Brad Garlinghouse, CEO of Ripple, has stated that the US CLARITY Act could pass as early as April, signaling potential regulatory clarity for digital assets. This optimism is reflected in prediction markets, with Polymarket traders assigning an 85% probability of the bill becoming law by 2026, a significant increase from 60% earlier this year. Garlinghouse and other industry leaders view the legislation as a crucial step toward resolving long-standing regulatory uncertainty, which they argue has disadvantaged US crypto firms. While some industry reservations remain about specific provisions, the rising market confidence suggests passage is increasingly seen as the base case. The act is viewed as a medium-term structural shift rather than an immediate market catalyst.

Brad Garlinghouse has said the US CLARITY Act could pass as early as April, adding momentum to a growing narrative that regulatory clarity for digital assets may finally be within reach.

Garlinghouse’s comments, made during a recent television interview, came as prediction markets sharply increased their confidence in the bill’s prospects.

Data from Polymarket shows traders now assigning an 85% probability that the legislation will be signed into law in 2026, up from around 60% earlier this year.

Prediction markets signal rising confidence

The jump in Polymarket odds suggests that confidence in the CLARITY Act has hardened beyond industry rhetoric. Prediction markets aggregate capital-weighted sentiment, meaning the surge reflects traders backing their views with money rather than opinion alone.

The move higher followed a series of public remarks from industry leaders, including Garlinghouse, who framed the bill as a meaningful—if imperfect—step toward resolving long-standing uncertainty around how digital assets are regulated in the US.

Ripple executive frames April as a key window

Garlinghouse, CEO of Ripple, said the industry is “closer than ever” to clear rules and pointed to April as a realistic timeline for passage, provided negotiations continue to move forward.

Ripple has been one of the most vocal supporters of market-structure legislation, following its multi-year legal battle with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Garlinghouse has consistently argued that prolonged regulatory ambiguity has pushed innovation offshore and disadvantaged US-based crypto firms.

Industry alignment remains uneven

While the Polymarket data suggests optimism, industry consensus is not universal.

Some firms have expressed reservations about aspects of the CLARITY Act, particularly around how authority would be divided between regulators and how certain crypto products would be classified.

Still, the combination of public executive support and rising market-priced probabilities indicates that traders increasingly see passage as the base case rather than a long shot.

Policy momentum versus market reality

The growing confidence in Washington contrasts with the broader crypto market, which remains sensitive to macro conditions and liquidity.

For now, the CLARITY Act’s progress appears to be viewed as a medium-term structural shift rather than an immediate market catalyst.

If the bill does advance on the timeline Garlinghouse outlined, it would mark one of the most consequential regulatory milestones for the US crypto industry to date.


Final Summary

  • Brad Garlinghouse’s April timeline aligns with a sharp rise in market-priced confidence around the CLARITY Act.
  • Polymarket odds at 85% suggest traders increasingly expect regulatory clarity despite remaining industry divisions.

Questions liées

QWhat is the current probability assigned by Polymarket traders for the CLARITY Act being signed into law in 2026?

APolymarket traders currently assign an 85% probability that the CLARITY Act will be signed into law in 2026.

QAccording to Brad Garlinghouse, when could the CLARITY Act potentially pass?

ABrad Garlinghouse stated that the CLARITY Act could pass as early as April.

QWhy has Ripple been a vocal supporter of market-structure legislation like the CLARITY Act?

ARipple has been a vocal supporter following its multi-year legal battle with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, arguing that prolonged regulatory ambiguity has pushed innovation offshore and disadvantaged US-based crypto firms.

QWhat does the surge in Polymarket odds for the CLARITY Act indicate about trader sentiment?

AThe surge in Polymarket odds to 85% indicates that traders are backing their optimistic views with money, reflecting a hardened confidence beyond mere industry rhetoric.

QIs there universal industry consensus on the CLARITY Act, and what are some reservations?

ANo, industry consensus is not universal. Some firms have expressed reservations about how authority would be divided between regulators and how certain crypto products would be classified under the act.

Lectures associées

L'informatique quantique va-t-elle tuer le Bitcoin et le minage ? Est-ce une exagération alarmiste ?

En mars 2026, Google Quantum AI a publié un livre blanc indiquant que les ressources nécessaires pour casser le chiffrement du Bitcoin via un ordinateur quantique avaient été réduites d'environ 20 fois. Selon l'étude, une attaque théorique pourrait inverser une clé privée à partir d'une clé publique exposée en environ 9 minutes avec 500 000 qubits physiques, menaçant ainsi environ 35% des bitcoins dont la clé publique est déjà visible sur la blockchain. Cependant, cette menace n'est pas immédiate. Les ordinateurs quantiques actuels (comme ceux de Google ou IBM) ne disposent que de quelques centaines de qubits, loin des centaines de milliers requis. Le risque principal concerne la falsification de signatures via l'algorithme ECDSA, et non la structure fondamentale de la blockchain ou le minage. Par ailleurs, une autre étude montre que le minage quantique est irréaliste : il nécessiterait une énergie proche de celle d'une étoile, bien supérieure à la consommation actuelle du réseau Bitcoin. La solution réside dans la cryptographie post-quantique (PQC), avec des algorithmes comme ML-DSA et SLH-DSA déjà standardisés par le NIST. Bitcoin travaille également sur des mises à jour comme BIP 360 pour réduire l'exposition des clés publiques. En résumé, bien que le risque quantique soit réel, il est gérable et ne conduira pas à la fin du Bitcoin. L'industrie a du temps pour migrer vers des systèmes sécurisés et la menace est plus large, touchant l'ensemble des infrastructures numériques, pas seulement les cryptomonnaies.

marsbitIl y a 19 mins

L'informatique quantique va-t-elle tuer le Bitcoin et le minage ? Est-ce une exagération alarmiste ?

marsbitIl y a 19 mins

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片