Ripple Meets With US And US Government To Talk Crypto – Here’s What Happened

bitcoinistPublié le 2025-09-20Dernière mise à jour le 2025-09-21

Résumé

Ripple is participating in new talks between U.S. and U.K. officials regarding crypto cooperation. With the U.K. establishing itself as...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Ripple is participating in new talks between U.S. and U.K. officials regarding crypto cooperation. With the U.K. establishing itself as a hub for digital assets and the U.S. seeking stronger ties with London, Ripple’s role in these discussions positions the company at the center of the conversation.

Ripple Joins High-Level Talks On Crypto Cooperation

In a tweet shared on X, analyst Nietzbux wrote that Ripple just met with the U.S. and U.K. governments on crypto cooperation. According to the post, Ripple’s involvement in the high-level discussion could shape the next phase of crypto regulation and collaboration. The meeting, which took place on Tuesday when the President of the United States and members of the U.K. Royal family talked, gave the crypto discussions even more weight.

According to Nietzbux’s report, UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves and U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent led the meeting. Both parties discussed new ways the two countries could cooperate on digital assets and how to establish stronger systems for the crypto industry. Reeves and Bessent met with representatives from Bank of America, Barclays, Circle, Citi, Coinbase, and Ripple.

Banks and crypto companies sat in the same room, as Reeves and Bessent pointed out that the governments of the U.S. and the U.K. are considering their differing opinions before implementing crypto rules that may impact the global crypto market. This kind of gathering highlights the international attention now focused on crypto. 

Ripple’s expanding influence in bridging traditional finance and blockchain systems could have earned it its seat at the table. Cassie Craddock, Ripple’s managing director for the U.K. and Europe, points to the governments and crypto companies working together, saying the gains can spread past cryptocurrency and help the global economy. 

Ripple’s Cassie Craddock Says Cooperation Could Shape Global Standards

Discussing the significance of this partnership, Cassie Craddock said the planned collaboration between the two governments has “the potential to set a template for international cooperation in our industry.” By this, she explained that the talks are not only about the U.S. and U.K., but could also guide how other countries decide to work together on digital assets.

Ripple’s Craddock highlighted the strengths of the U.K. financial sector, noting its strong economy, deep financial markets, and skilled workforce as factors that have made the U.K. one of the world’s top financial hubs for many years. 

According to her, the countries are ready to use their existing strengths to lead in digital assets and innovation, which is why Ripple is advocating for deeper cooperation at this level. She added that cooperation between the U.S. and the U.K. could help both countries use blockchain technology more effectively.

Ripple
XRP trading at $0.21 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com
Featured image from Getty Images, chart from Tradingview.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Scott Matherson is a leading crypto writer at Bitcoinist, who possesses a sharp analytical mind and a deep understanding of the digital currency landscape. Scott has earned a reputation for delivering thought-provoking and well-researched articles that resonate with both newcomers and seasoned crypto enthusiasts. Outside of his writing, Scott is passionate about promoting crypto literacy and often works to educate the public on the potential of blockchain.

Lectures associées

Vous serez surpris à quel point WeChat est différent de Telegram au niveau de l'architecture

L'audience mensuelle de WeChat et Weixin a atteint 1,428 milliard d'utilisateurs, confirmant son statut d'outil numérique central en Chine et au-delà. Cette analyse compare l'architecture de WeChat avec celle de Telegram, révélant des philosophies opposées en matière de stockage des données, de monétisation et d'ouverture aux développeurs. **Stockage des conversations :** Telegram utilise un stockage cloud illimité avec synchronisation sur tous les appareils. WeChat stocke les historiques localement sur l'appareil, nécessitant une fonction de migration spécifique pour les transférer et liant strictement la version desktop au téléphone. **Fonctionnalités sociales :** Dans Telegram, les commentaires sous les publications de chaînes sont intégrés. Dans WeChat, les commentaires sous les articles des comptes officiels sont modérés préalablement et ne disposent pas d'un système de discussion unifié. **Développement :** Telegram propose un Bot API ouvert et gratuit. L'écosystème des mini-programmes de WeChat est fermé, nécessitant souvent une vérification et une certification payante pour les développeurs. **Transfert de fichiers :** Telegram permet d'envoyer des fichiers jusqu'à 2 Go (4 Go pour Premium). WeChat limite généralement les envois à 200 Mo, proposant un "assistant de transfert" pour les volumes plus importants. **Paiements :** WeChat Pay est profondément intégré dans la vie économique chinoise, remplaçant souvent les applications bancaires. Telegram ne possède pas de système de paiement fiduciaire intégré comparable, s'appuyant sur des bots tiers et les cryptomonnaies. **Analyse de la sécurité (point de vue IA ajouté) :** L'article soulève indirectement la question de la sécurité. Telegram propose un chiffrement de bout en bout pour ses "chats secrets". WeChat, sans chiffrement de bout en bout standard, fusionne messages et paiements dans une même interface, ce qui pourrait élargir la surface d'attaque en cas de vulnérabilité, comme l'illustrent des cas de fraude signalés à Singapour. En conclusion, WeChat repose sur un modèle intégré et fermé, profondément ancré dans l'économie réelle, tandis que Telegram privilégie les protocoles ouverts, le stockage flexible et une faible barrière à l'entrée pour les développeurs. Ce choix architectural fondamental détermine leurs publics et leurs cas d'utilisation respectifs.

cryptonews.ruIl y a 1 h

Vous serez surpris à quel point WeChat est différent de Telegram au niveau de l'architecture

cryptonews.ruIl y a 1 h

Trading

Spot
活动图片