Grayscale Rolls Out First Multi-Token Crypto ETF In The US

bitcoinistPublié le 2025-09-20Dernière mise à jour le 2025-09-20

Résumé

Digital asset investment platform Grayscale, is making significant headlines in the cryptocurrency space with the launch of the first multi-token...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Digital asset investment platform Grayscale, is making significant headlines in the cryptocurrency space with the launch of the first multi-token exchange-traded fund (ETF) available in the United States. 

The Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF, which begins trading on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the ticker “GDLC,” combines the five largest and most liquid digital assets: Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), XRP, Solana (SOL), and Cardano (ADA). 

Grayscale CEO Declares New Era Of Crypto Index Investing

Peter Mintzberg, CEO of Grayscale, emphasized the nature of this new launch, suggesting it heralds a new era of crypto index investing. 

In an interview with CNBC, he stated, “We are typically in the first mover position. Grayscale will continue innovating at scale for investors to access the fastest growing asset class of the last 10 years.” 

The increasing demand for diversified exposure to cryptocurrencies is evident among both institutional and retail investors amid rising prices. 

The movement towards mainstream acceptance of digital assets has gained momentum, particularly under the Trump administration, which facilitated the inclusion of cryptocurrencies in retirement plans and a new regulatory framework. 

The GDLC fund allocates approximately 70% of its assets to Bitcoin and 20% to Ether, and it has been trading in various forms since 2018, most recently in over-the-counter markets.

In 2025, Grayscale’s GDLC has already achieved major growth, surging over 40% as many cryptocurrencies reach record highs. Notably, the fund has outperformed Bitcoin by nearly 11% since June, thanks to the strong performance of its other constituent assets.

Analyst Predicts Over 100 New Crypto ETFs

Experts are optimistic that this new standard will streamline the process for launching similar products, potentially ushering in a wave of cryptocurrency exchange-traded funds

Eric Balchunas, a Senior ETF Analyst at Bloomberg, noted on social media that the last time a generic listing standard was implemented for ETFs, the number of launches tripled. He predicts a surge of over 100 crypto ETFs could enter the market in the coming year.

Supporters of this initiative argue that it could position digital assets on equal footing with traditional financial products, a goal that past SEC commissions have been hesitant to embrace. 

Greg Xethalis, General Counsel at MultiCoin Capital, commented on the SEC’s previous regulatory stance, noting that prior commissions often used regulatory frameworks as a means of imposing merit regulations on well-established product structures, despite the novelty of the underlying assets. 

He remarked, “As shown by the Bitcoin ETP launch, the market wants this product option, and this latest move both heeds that call and is a welcome return to normal course at the Commission.”

In addition to the GDLC launch, the SEC is reportedly on the verge of approving Bitwise’s BITW, an index fund that tracks the top ten cryptocurrencies by weighted market capitalization. 

Next month, the SEC is also expected to consider a series of individual spot crypto ETPs, including those focused on Ethereum staking, Litecoin (LTC), Solana, XRP, and Dogecoin (DOGE).

Grayscale
The daily chart shows BTC’s price consolidation. Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView.com

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com 

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Ronaldo is a seasoned crypto enthusiast with over four years of experience in the field. He is passionate about exploring the vast and dynamic world of decentralized finance (DeFi) and its practical applications for achieving economic sovereignty. Ronaldo is constantly seeking to expand his knowledge and expertise in the DeFi space, as he believes it holds tremendous potential for transforming the traditional financial landscape.

Lectures associées

Vous serez surpris à quel point WeChat est différent de Telegram au niveau de l'architecture

L'audience mensuelle de WeChat et Weixin a atteint 1,428 milliard d'utilisateurs, confirmant son statut d'outil numérique central en Chine et au-delà. Cette analyse compare l'architecture de WeChat avec celle de Telegram, révélant des philosophies opposées en matière de stockage des données, de monétisation et d'ouverture aux développeurs. **Stockage des conversations :** Telegram utilise un stockage cloud illimité avec synchronisation sur tous les appareils. WeChat stocke les historiques localement sur l'appareil, nécessitant une fonction de migration spécifique pour les transférer et liant strictement la version desktop au téléphone. **Fonctionnalités sociales :** Dans Telegram, les commentaires sous les publications de chaînes sont intégrés. Dans WeChat, les commentaires sous les articles des comptes officiels sont modérés préalablement et ne disposent pas d'un système de discussion unifié. **Développement :** Telegram propose un Bot API ouvert et gratuit. L'écosystème des mini-programmes de WeChat est fermé, nécessitant souvent une vérification et une certification payante pour les développeurs. **Transfert de fichiers :** Telegram permet d'envoyer des fichiers jusqu'à 2 Go (4 Go pour Premium). WeChat limite généralement les envois à 200 Mo, proposant un "assistant de transfert" pour les volumes plus importants. **Paiements :** WeChat Pay est profondément intégré dans la vie économique chinoise, remplaçant souvent les applications bancaires. Telegram ne possède pas de système de paiement fiduciaire intégré comparable, s'appuyant sur des bots tiers et les cryptomonnaies. **Analyse de la sécurité (point de vue IA ajouté) :** L'article soulève indirectement la question de la sécurité. Telegram propose un chiffrement de bout en bout pour ses "chats secrets". WeChat, sans chiffrement de bout en bout standard, fusionne messages et paiements dans une même interface, ce qui pourrait élargir la surface d'attaque en cas de vulnérabilité, comme l'illustrent des cas de fraude signalés à Singapour. En conclusion, WeChat repose sur un modèle intégré et fermé, profondément ancré dans l'économie réelle, tandis que Telegram privilégie les protocoles ouverts, le stockage flexible et une faible barrière à l'entrée pour les développeurs. Ce choix architectural fondamental détermine leurs publics et leurs cas d'utilisation respectifs.

cryptonews.ruIl y a 2 h

Vous serez surpris à quel point WeChat est différent de Telegram au niveau de l'architecture

cryptonews.ruIl y a 2 h

Trading

Spot
活动图片