U.S. Authorities Seek 20-Year Sentence for Celsius CEO Mashinsky

TheCryptoTimesPublié le 2025-04-29Dernière mise à jour le 2025-04-29

U.S. authorities are pursuing a 20-year sentence for Alex Mashinsky, the former CEO of Celsius Network, due to his involvement in a scam that resulted in nearly $7 billion in losses for customers. He has confessed to misleading customers about the safety of their investments and covertly inflating the value of Celsius’s token, CEL, to profit himself.

Prosecutors stated that Alex Mashinsky pleaded guilty in December for lying about the safety of customer money and rigging Celsius’s CEL token, but still, he is not taking responsibility for his actions. Prosecutors also insisted that the Mashinskys’ crimes weren’t accidents or bad luck; they were intentional choices to lie, cheat, and steal to get rich.

Instead of accepting his crimes, he is blaming regulators, the market, and even his victims. As per the reports, in 2021, Celsius handled over $20 billion in cryptocurrency. Alex Mashinsky promoted it as a safer option than banks; he claimed that it offered high profits with little risk.

Moreover, these claims were fake. Celsius made risky loans without backup, traded dangerously, and used customer money to secretly boost its own CEL token’s price, all while telling customers their money was secure.

Alex Mashinsky sold over $48 million of Celsius’s CEL token at artificially high prices, even while telling his customers that he was holding onto his tokens like they were. In July 2022, when Celsius went bankrupt, it left $4.7 billion of customer money stuck. After the bankruptcy, customers were short over $1 billion, and with today’s higher crypto prices, the total loss is now estimated at $7 billion.

Apart from him, other Celsius co-founders who are also pledged as guilty for bankrupt crypto traders are Daniel Leon and Hanoch Goldstein.  

Prosecutors also argue that Mashinsky needs a long prison sentence to show how serious his crimes were, to respect the law, and to warn other crypto bosses not to cheat customers for personal gain. Judge John G. Koeltl will decide Mashinsky’s sentence on May 8.

Also Read: Has the SEC approved ProShare Trust’s LINK ETF? Fact check



Lectures associées

Décryptage du cycle altcoin 2026 : Le capital se détourne-t-il des cryptos à forte capitalisation ?

Le rotation des capitaux ne montre pas de signes clairs d'un cycle altcoin plus large. Les données on-chain révèlent que les altcoins connaissent leur plus forte sous-performance historique face au Bitcoin, indiquant que la liquidité se concentre sur quelques secteurs de conviction plutôt que de se répandre sur l'ensemble du marché. Bien que la capitalisation totale du marché altcoin ait progressé de 4% au T3, 40% des altcoins évoluent toujours sous leurs sommets historiques. La dominance d'Ethereum a augmenté de plus de 4% ce trimestre, un signal technique souvent interprété comme le prélude à un cycle altcoin. Cependant, la sous-performance persistante des altcoins soulève la question de savoir si cette liquidité se cantonne à quelques actifs majeurs. Les analystes invitent à la sélectivité, notant que même les grandes capitalisations comme Ethereum et Solana restent bien en dessous de leurs records. Les indicateurs comme l'explosion de la valeur totale verrouillée (TVL) sur Robinhood Chain (+150% en 24h) contrastent avec la faiblesse de la TVL sur de nombreux écosystèmes de haut de marché. Cela renforce l'idée d'une rotation des capitaux vers des récits spécifiques plutôt qu'un rallye généralisé. La force récente d'Ethereum semble donc davantage technique que fondamentale, et la pression pourrait persister sur les altcoins à grande capitalisation si la liquidité reste sélective au second semestre.

ambcryptoIl y a 39 mins

Décryptage du cycle altcoin 2026 : Le capital se détourne-t-il des cryptos à forte capitalisation ?

ambcryptoIl y a 39 mins

Trading

Spot
活动图片