WLFI alleges coordinated attack as USD1 shrugs off brief depeg

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-02-23Actualizado a 2026-02-23

Resumen

World Liberty Financial (WLFI) alleged a coordinated attack against its USD1 stablecoin on 23 February, after the token briefly depegged below $1 amid heavy trading volume and social media speculation. The company claimed attackers compromised cofounder accounts, spread fear online, and opened large short positions to profit from volatility. USD1 quickly rebounded to its $1 peg, which WLFI attributed to its fully-backed mint-and-redeem mechanism. The price dip coincided with unverified rumors, including claims that cofounder Eric Trump had deleted WLFI-related posts, though no evidence supports this. While the incident highlights how sentiment can impact stablecoins, WLFI provided no technical proof of manipulation, and USD1's rapid recovery suggests a liquidity-driven event rather than a structural failure.

World Liberty Financial [WLFI] said a “coordinated attack” targeted its USD1 stablecoin on Monday, 23 February. This came after the token briefly slipped below its $1 peg amid a burst of online speculation and heavy trading.

In a post shared around mid-afternoon, World Liberty Financial claimed that attackers had compromised several accounts linked to cofounders.

Also, it claimed they amplified fear through social media and opened large short positions in WLFI-related markets to profit from the volatility. WLFI said the effort ultimately failed, pointing to USD1’s rapid return to parity.

“Thanks to USD1’s sound mint-and-redeem mechanism and full 1:1 backing, we are trading steadily at par,” the company said, urging users to rely on verified channels for accurate information.

What triggered the volatility?

Market data shows USD1 trading slightly below $1 for a short period, with prices dipping to the $0.995–$0.998 range before rebounding.

The move coincided with heightened discussion on X following unrelated investigative teases by onchain investigator, ZachXBT. Some users speculated about links to the WLFI ecosystem.

Several posts claimed that Eric Trump — World Liberty Financial cofounder — had deleted WLFI-related messages, fuelling concern around the project.

However, a review of available posts shows no clear evidence that his account had previously published WLFI-related content.

While references to World Liberty Financial as a company do exist, a specific search for WLFI on his page didn’t yield any results. Claims of deleted token-specific posts cannot be independently verified.

Market response, not structural stress

Despite the sharp intraday move, USD1’s price action suggests a liquidity-driven reaction rather than a breakdown in the stablecoin’s backing or mechanics.

The token quickly reverted to trading at or near $1, consistent with WLFI’s assertion that mint-and-redeem flows absorbed selling pressure.

Also, analysis of the WLFI token showed it dipped around the same time as its stablecoin counterpart. Its price dropped to around $0.108 before bouncing back to around $0.113, as of this writing.

WLFI did not provide technical details to substantiate claims of hacked accounts or paid influencer activity, and no independent evidence has yet emerged confirming coordinated manipulation.

Still, the episode underscores how rapidly sentiment-driven narratives can impact even fully backed stablecoins in thin or reactive market conditions.

Final Summary

USD1 briefly dipped below $1 but recovered quickly, suggesting liquidity stress rather than structural failure
WLFI alleges a coordinated attack, though key elements of that claim remain unverified

Criptos en tendencia

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat did WLFI allege was the cause of the brief depeg of its USD1 stablecoin?

AWLFI alleged that a 'coordinated attack' was the cause, involving compromised accounts of cofounders, social media fear amplification, and large short positions opened to profit from the volatility.

QOn what date did the alleged attack on the USD1 stablecoin occur?

AThe alleged attack occurred on Monday, 23 February.

QWhat was the lowest price range that USD1 traded at during this event before rebounding?

AUSD1 traded in the $0.995–$0.998 range before rebounding to its $1 peg.

QAccording to WLFI, what mechanism ensured the stablecoin's rapid return to its $1 peg?

AWLFI stated that USD1's sound mint-and-redeem mechanism and its full 1:1 backing ensured its rapid return to parity, absorbing the selling pressure.

QWhat was the name of the on-chain investigator whose unrelated investigative teases on social media platform X coincided with the increased discussion and speculation about WLFI?

AThe on-chain investigator was ZachXBT.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHace 26 min(s)

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHace 26 min(s)

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbitHace 34 min(s)

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbitHace 34 min(s)

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight NewsHace 38 min(s)

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight NewsHace 38 min(s)

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar WLFI

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Official World Liberty Financial (WLFI) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Official World Liberty Financial (WLFI) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Official World Liberty Financial (WLFI)Después de comprar tu Official World Liberty Financial (WLFI), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Official World Liberty Financial (WLFI)Tradear fácilmente con Official World Liberty Financial (WLFI) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

590 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2025.09.01Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de WLFI (WLFI).