Send a Message to Transfer Coins? Telegram to 'Stuff' a Crypto Wallet into 1 Billion Users This Summer

marsbitPublicado a 2026-07-22Actualizado a 2026-07-22

Resumen

Telegram founder Pavel Durov has announced that a native, non-custodial wallet called Gram wallet will be built into every Telegram app this summer. This move aims to provide instant, fee-free cryptocurrency transfers for the platform's over 1 billion monthly active users. Durov described it as the largest deployment of a non-custodial crypto wallet in history. The new wallet, developed by Telegram itself, differs fundamentally from the existing third-party @wallet bot. It will be non-custodial from the start, meaning users will control their private keys. Following the announcement, the GRAM token (formerly Toncoin) saw a price increase of approximately 8%. This initiative is part of Telegram's renewed control over the TON blockchain and its "Make TON Great Again" roadmap, marking a return to the project after a 2018 SEC lawsuit. The launch comes as other super-apps like X Money and Meta are also expanding into digital payments, with Telegram opting for a crypto-native approach. However, key details remain unclear, including the exact launch date beyond "this summer," how the promised zero fees will be implemented technically, and how asset support and private key management will work for mainstream users.

Author: Claude, Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide's Guide: Telegram founder Pavel Durov announced that this summer, a native non-custodial Gram wallet will be built into all Telegram apps, offering zero-fee instant transfers to over 1 billion users. GRAM subsequently rose about 8% to $1.53. This wallet differs from the existing third-party-operated @wallet bot; it is developed by Telegram itself, with users directly controlling their private keys. Amid a competitive window where super apps like X Money and Meta's stablecoin payments are entering the fray, Durov is betting on a crypto-native route. However, the promise of the "largest deployment in human history" still lacks technical details and a definitive timeline.

Telegram founder Pavel Durov announced in his Telegram channel on July 21 that this summer, a native non-custodial Gram wallet will be built into every Telegram application, providing instant, zero-fee cryptocurrency transfer services to over 1 billion monthly active users.

Durov characterized this launch as "the largest non-custodial crypto wallet deployment in human history." For comparison, the most widely used self-custody wallet in the crypto space, MetaMask, has tens of millions of users; no crypto wallet has ever started with a base of 1 billion users.

Completely Different from the Existing @wallet, Telegram Steps In Directly

This new wallet is fundamentally different from the existing @wallet bot within Telegram.

According to Decrypt, the existing @wallet is a mini-app developed and operated by the independent third-party company The Open Platform (TOP), and is not an official Telegram product. The service already boasts over 150 million registered users, with a default custodial model (meaning a third party holds user private keys), requiring users to actively switch to use its self-custody layer.

The new wallet announced by Durov is a feature natively embedded into the Telegram app, designed from the ground up as non-custodial, with users controlling their own private keys and assets. Non-custodial means there is no intermediary that can freeze, seize, or block transactions.

According to BeInCrypto, TOP founder Andrew Rogozov confirmed that the existing custodial @wallet service will continue to operate independently. However, key questions remain unanswered: whether the old and new wallets will ultimately coexist, which assets besides GRAM the new wallet will support, and how private key management will be handled for ordinary users who have never interacted with cryptocurrency.

GRAM Rises About 8%, But Still 88% Away from Previous High

Following the announcement, GRAM (originally Toncoin, the native token of the TON blockchain) rose approximately 8.5% in 24 hours to around $1.53, with a market cap of about $4.18 billion. According to CoinMarketCap data, this partially offset a cumulative decline of about 25% since July, but significant reversal remains distant.

GRAM's 200-day exponential moving average is far above its current price, indicating a still bearish long-term trend. The token's all-time high was $8.25 (during the Telegram 'Tap-to-Earn' gaming frenzy in June 2024). It reached its yearly high of $2.89 in May 2026 when Telegram announced it was taking over the TON network. A return from the current price to the May high would require an increase of approximately 88%.

From SEC Lawsuit to 'Make TON Great Again', Durov's Seven-Year Comeback Battle

This wallet deployment is the latest chapter in a narrative that began in 2018.

In 2018, Telegram raised $1.7 billion for the TON blockchain project, planning to issue a token called Gram. The SEC subsequently sued, determining the token was an unregistered security. In 2020, Telegram settled with the SEC, refunding investors $1.2 billion and paying an $18.5 million fine, completely withdrawing from the project. Community developers took over, independently operating the token renamed as Toncoin for several years.

In 2026, Durov regained control of the TON network and launched a seven-step roadmap named "Make TON Great Again" (MTONGA). Publicly completed steps so far include: the Catchain 2.0 upgrade achieving a 10x speed increase and sub-second transaction confirmation; a 6x reduction in base transaction fees; Telegram becoming the network's largest validator; and the token name change (from Toncoin back to Gram) passed by 81% community vote on June 15. The built-in wallet is likely step five, with three remaining steps yet to be disclosed.

Super App Payments War Heats Up, Telegram Chooses Crypto-Native Route

Durov's wallet announcement comes during a dense window where multiple super apps are simultaneously deploying payment functions.

According to Glitchwire, Musk's X Money launched on June 26 for US Premium subscribers, offering 6% APY, Visa Direct peer-to-peer transfers, and 3% cashback, but currently only supports fiat currency. Crypto and stock trading features are on the roadmap but not yet live. Meta is also re-strategizing digital payments, reportedly sending partnership invitations to third-party stablecoin providers, planning to integrate stablecoin payments into WhatsApp, Instagram, and Facebook in the second half of 2026.

The route choices of the three super apps present a stark contrast: X Money takes a compliant fiat route (holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 states), Meta explores a stablecoin middle path, while Telegram directly bets on a crypto-native non-custodial wallet. Telegram's advantages lie in its user base (over 1 billion monthly active users) and natural affinity for the crypto community. The risks involve the user education costs associated with non-custodial models and regulatory uncertainty.

Zero-Fee Promise Still Lacks Key Details

Durov's promised "zero fees" is another issue requiring attention. Most crypto wallets still charge network fees, even if minimal. Telegram might bypass gas fees through internal subsidies or by using methods like off-chain settlement, but the specific technical solution has not been announced.

According to CryptoBriefing, in July 2025, Telegram launched a non-custodial TON Wallet to 87 million US users as a proof-of-concept. That deployment demonstrated that a messaging app could distribute wallet infrastructure at scale without the traditional friction of crypto onboarding, but a significant gap remained between the number of on-chain active wallets and the user base.

Beyond "this summer," Durov has not provided a more specific launch date.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the key differences between the new native Gram wallet announced by Telegram and the existing @wallet bot?

AThe new native Gram wallet is a core feature built directly into the Telegram app by Telegram itself, designed from the ground up as a self-custodial wallet where users control their private keys. In contrast, the existing @wallet bot is a third-party mini-app developed and operated by The Open Platform (TOP). It currently operates primarily as a custodial service (where TOP holds the keys), with a self-custodial layer available as an optional switch.

QWhat are some of the unanswered questions and uncertainties surrounding Telegram's planned Gram wallet deployment?

AKey unanswered questions include: a precise launch date beyond 'this summer'; technical details on how the promised 'zero-fee' transactions will be implemented; whether the new wallet will support assets beyond GRAM; how the wallet will manage the user experience and security for crypto-naive users among Telegram's billion-plus user base; and how the new official wallet will coexist with the existing third-party @wallet bot.

QHow has the announcement of the native Gram wallet affected the GRAM (TON) token's price and market position?

AFollowing the announcement, the GRAM token price rose approximately 8.5% to around $1.53. However, its overall market position remains challenging. The price is still about 88% below its year-to-date high of $2.89 from May 2026, and its 200-day exponential moving average is well above the current price, indicating a long-term bearish trend. It is also far from its all-time high of $8.25 set in June 2024.

QHow does Telegram's approach to payments compare with strategies from other 'super apps' like X (formerly Twitter) and Meta?

ATelegram, X, and Meta are taking distinct paths. X Money (on platform X) is pursuing a licensed, fiat-first approach in the US, offering features like yields and cashback, with crypto trading as a future roadmap item. Meta is reportedly exploring a partnership model with third-party stablecoin providers for integration into its apps. Telegram is taking a crypto-native route by directly building and integrating a self-custodial crypto wallet, leveraging its large user base and inherent appeal to the crypto community.

QWhat is the historical context of Telegram's involvement with the TON blockchain and the GRAM token?

ATelegram's history with TON and GRAM dates back to 2018 when it raised $1.7 billion for the TON blockchain project and planned to issue the Gram token. The SEC sued, alleging the token was an unregistered security. In 2020, Telegram settled, refunding investors and paying a fine, completely abandoning the project. Independent developers continued it as Toncoin. In 2026, under the 'Make TON Great Again' (MTONGA) roadmap, Durov and Telegram regained control, with key steps including network upgrades, fee reductions, Telegram becoming the top validator, and the community voting to rename Toncoin back to Gram.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Selling Block Space is Dead: Public Chains Must Find a New Way

"Blockchain infrastructure as a neutral, generalized platform is no longer a viable business model. This article argues that simply selling block space has failed, evidenced by the fact that only one public blockchain, Hyperliquid, was among 14 crypto firms surpassing $200M in annual revenue recently. Hyperliquid's revenue vastly outpaces others like Arbitrum, highlighting a crisis. The future lies in public chains pivoting away from neutrality to become product studios, application distributors, payment rails, or vertical SaaS providers, directly serving paying customers. The piece also covers key industry events: a major exploit on Ostium, attributed to vulnerabilities in its off-chain price oracle, underscores the critical security needs for protocols bridging off-chain markets. Additionally, it discusses the necessity of abstracting complex financial instruments like options. Experts argue that to achieve mass adoption, options should be packaged as user-friendly products—such as yield vaults, binary options, or structured products—rather than marketed with their technical complexity. Finally, the radar section notes developments including Yearn's fixed-rate lending product Flex, community backlash over Base's strategy changes, the launch of a DXY perpetuals DEX called Plether, and Starknet's focus on institutional-grade privacy and quantum resistance."

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

Selling Block Space is Dead: Public Chains Must Find a New Way

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

Hyperliquid’s HIP-4 proposal fuels HYPE staking as long-term conviction grows

Hyperliquid has proposed the HIP-4 upgrade to expand from perpetual futures into a broader, permissionless infrastructure layer for on-chain applications, requiring deployers to stake 500,000 HYPE to launch new markets. This shift aims to enable developers to build on its platform, a strategy backed by growing long-term investor conviction. Evidence includes a major trader staking millions in HYPE instead of taking profits, with total staked tokens reaching 43.9% of the supply, reducing available tokens and strengthening network security. Market metrics like high open interest and balanced funding rates suggest measured, non-speculative trader positioning. Sustained growth in protocol revenue, TVL, and governance participation further supports the positive outlook, contingent on continued user adoption and successful upgrade execution.

ambcryptoHace 59 min(s)

Hyperliquid’s HIP-4 proposal fuels HYPE staking as long-term conviction grows

ambcryptoHace 59 min(s)

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot