When Funds Flow into Gold and Silver, Bitcoin Is Temporarily Left Behind

比推Publicado a 2025-12-26Actualizado a 2025-12-26

Resumen

In 2025, precious metals surged dramatically, with silver rising parabolically to a record $72/oz and gold reaching $4524.30/oz, up 143% and 70% annually, respectively. In contrast, Bitcoin fell 8% year-to-date and dropped 30% from its October peak. This divergence challenges the "digital gold" narrative, as traditional safe-haven drivers—such as a weaker dollar, Fed rate cut expectations, and geopolitical risks—failed to boost Bitcoin. Investors preferred tangible assets like gold and silver, which benefit from institutional credibility and, in silver’s case, robust industrial demand from sectors like solar and electronics. Bitcoin, lacking industrial utility and relying on speculative and financial demand, struggled as ETF flows turned negative. While Bitcoin’s potential remains tied to future regulatory clarity or unique features like censorship resistance, it has yet to be integrated into the hard asset ecosystem. The 2025 trend underscores that macroeconomic tailwinds do not automatically extend to cryptocurrencies.

In 2025, the precious metals market experienced a frenzy. Silver broke through the $50 range in late November and then surged parabolically, reaching a historic high of $72 per ounce on December 24, with a yearly gain of 143%. Gold hit $4,524.30 per ounce on the same day, rising 70% for the year.

In stark contrast, Bitcoin was trading at $87,498 at the time of writing, down 8% year-to-date and 30% from its October peak of $126,000.

This has given pause to proponents of Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, as the macroeconomic trends driving the rally in precious metals do not seem to be transferring to the crypto market.

The core drivers of the precious metals rally—a weaker U.S. dollar, expectations of Federal Reserve rate cuts in 2026, and rising geopolitical risks—are the very conditions Bitcoin supporters have long anticipated as bullish.

However, when allocating funds for避险, the market favors tangible hedging tools with centuries of credibility, like gold and silver. Central banks globally have been increasing their gold reserves throughout the year, and retail funds shifted towards physical precious metals after Bitcoin's decline early in the year.

Multiple studies in 2025 confirmed that gold demonstrates more stable避险 performance during various macroeconomic shocks, whereas Bitcoin behaves more like a high-beta risk asset, correlating positively with stocks and failing to lead in this cycle.

Structural demand differences further widened the gap. Silver's rise was fueled not only by避险 demand but also by record industrial demand from sectors like photovoltaics and electronics. Scarcity of substitutes in the supply chain exacerbated tightness, creating dual support from both macro and industrial factors.

Bitcoin, lacking industrial utility, has demand concentrated in financial speculation and on-chain settlements, with no physical demand buffer. This asymmetry means that even if rate cuts stall and risk appetite cools, silver still has industrial demand as a floor, while Bitcoin can only rely on ETF inflows to absorb selling pressure. With those flows now turning negative, its support has weakened.

The silver surge is a macroeconomic barometer, not a trading signal. It confirms the market's pricing of low real interest rates and a weak dollar, but it highlights that Bitcoin has not yet been integrated into the hard asset trading system.

For Bitcoin to reverse its downtrend, it needs improved regulatory clarity to drive renewed institutional allocation, a recovery in retail sentiment, or a macroeconomic shock where its attributes like censorship resistance and programmability prove valuable.

It is worth noting that silver positions are becoming relatively crowded; a hawkish pivot by the Fed or similar events could trigger asset volatility, which would also indirectly impact Bitcoin.

The divergence in 2025 proves that "hard assets" cannot yet be equated with Bitcoin. Silver combines industrial demand with institutional credibility, gold has institutional credibility and narrative momentum, while Bitcoin is still vying for institutional acceptance and can never possess industrial attributes.

This does not negate Bitcoin's value, but for it to outperform, additional conditions must be met. Once those conditions are satisfied, its upside potential could still surpass that of precious metals.

Until then, we must recognize that macroeconomic tailwinds have not yet propelled the crypto market, and Bitcoin still has a way to go before it becomes a hard asset.

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7598415

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat were the key performance differences between precious metals and Bitcoin in 2025 as described in the article?

AIn 2025, silver surged by 143% and reached a record high of $72/oz, while gold rose 70% to $4524.30/oz. In contrast, Bitcoin fell 8% year-to-date and was down 30% from its October peak of $126,000.

QAccording to the article, what were the core drivers behind the rally in precious metals?

AThe core drivers for the precious metals rally were a weaker US dollar, expectations of Federal Reserve interest rate cuts in 2026, and rising geopolitical risks.

QWhy did the market prefer precious metals over Bitcoin for避险 (hedging/risk-off) allocation, as per the analysis?

AThe market preferred precious metals due to their century-long credibility as tangible hedging tools. Central banks increased gold reserves, and retail funds shifted to physical precious metals after Bitcoin's early-year decline, viewing gold's避险 performance as more stable.

QWhat structural demand difference between silver and Bitcoin contributed to their performance gap?

ASilver's demand was driven by both避险 and record industrial demand from sectors like photovoltaics and electronics, with scarce substitutes creating supply紧张. Bitcoin lacks industrial use, with demand focused solely on financial speculation and on-chain settlements, leaving it without a physical demand buffer.

QWhat does the article suggest Bitcoin needs to reverse its underperformance and potentially outperform precious metals?

AThe article suggests Bitcoin needs improved regulatory clarity to drive institutional re-allocation, a recovery in retail sentiment, or a macro shock where its censorship-resistant and programmable properties prove valuable. It states that Bitcoin still has the potential to outperform precious metals if these conditions are met.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Behind ZEC's Over 30% Plunge: An 'Unlimited Minting' Vulnerability with No Way to Prove if It Was Ever Exploited

A critical vulnerability was discovered in Zcash's Orchard privacy pool, allowing for the theoretical creation of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. Researcher Taylor Hornby found the flaw on May 29th, 2024, within the Orchard circuit's cryptographic constraints, which could let an attacker bypass asset conservation rules. Although a rapid emergency fix was deployed within days via a coordinated soft and hard fork, a core uncertainty remains: due to Orchard's privacy features, it is impossible to cryptographically prove whether this "unlimited mint" flaw was exploited in the nearly four years since the pool's 2022 launch. This uncertainty, rather than the patched flaw itself, triggered a market panic, causing ZEC's price to drop over 30%. While the Zcash Foundation stated no evidence of exploitation was found, independent entity Shielded Labs emphasized the impossibility of definitively proving no counterfeit ZEC was ever created. The incident highlights the unique trust challenge in privacy systems. To address this, developers are proposing a new network upgrade with enhanced auditing to allow verifiable proof of supply integrity. Notably, the researcher utilized the newly released AI model Claude Opus 4.8 as a tool during the security review, signaling the growing role of advanced AI in uncovering complex cryptographic vulnerabilities.

marsbitJusto ahora

Behind ZEC's Over 30% Plunge: An 'Unlimited Minting' Vulnerability with No Way to Prove if It Was Ever Exploited

marsbitJusto ahora

imToken's 10th Anniversary Unveils Strategic Direction for the Next Decade: Evolving from a Trusted Main Wallet to a Personal Digital Hub

On its tenth anniversary, decentralized wallet imToken announced its strategic vision for the next decade: evolving from a "trusted main wallet" into a "personal control interface." This new direction aims to help users manage not only digital assets but also identity, permissions, and AI agent actions in an increasingly open and intelligent internet. imToken outlined that while the past decade focused on Store, Send, and Stake—securing assets, enabling transfers, and facilitating network participation—the future introduces a fourth core proposition: Sign. This expanded concept goes beyond transaction signing to encompass expressing intent, granting permissions, setting rules, delegating actions, and revoking authorizations. As AI agents gain autonomy, imToken emphasizes the need for clear, verifiable, and revocable user control over their actions. CEO Ben He stated that imToken's mission is shifting from enabling ownership of digital assets to ensuring user sovereignty over their entire digital world in the AI era. The company's core principle has been upgraded from "Digital Assets, Under Your Control" to "Your Digital World, Under Your Control." Future development will focus on three areas: upholding self-custody principles, extending security from transactions to authorizations and automated actions, and building product capabilities for managing permissions, delegations, policies, and revocations. imToken views the wallet's role as expanding into a trusted control interface for human-AI collaboration, where managing keys, signatures, and permissions forms the infrastructure for personal digital sovereignty. Founded in 2016, imToken serves millions of users across 150+ countries, providing non-custodial wallet services supporting over 50 blockchain networks.

marsbitHace 1 min(s)

imToken's 10th Anniversary Unveils Strategic Direction for the Next Decade: Evolving from a Trusted Main Wallet to a Personal Digital Hub

marsbitHace 1 min(s)

With 300 Million Financing to Accumulate ETH, the Hidden Concerns Behind BitMine's High-Yield Preferred Shares

BitMine, led by Thomas Lee, plans to raise up to $300 million through an initial public offering of 3 million shares of perpetual Series A preferred stock on the NYSE (ticker: BMNP). The stock offers a fixed 9.5% annual dividend. The funds are intended to further the company's accumulation of Ethereum, expand its staking node operations, and for general corporate purposes. This move comes as BitMine faces significant challenges. Its massive Ethereum holdings, over 5.3 million ETH (roughly 4.5% of circulating supply), are currently at an unrealized loss exceeding $8.5 billion due to the crypto market downturn. The company's core business model relies on staking these ETH holdings to generate yield, which it presents as the primary means to cover the new, substantial annual dividend obligation of approximately $28.5 million if the offering is fully subscribed. While the model is similar to MicroStrategy's bitcoin-focused strategy of using capital markets to fund crypto acquisitions, BitMine's product differs with its fixed, non-adjustable dividend rate. The company acknowledges risks, stating dividend payments could also come from cash reserves, asset sales, or future financing, and warns that staking yields may underperform or be illiquid during market stress. The 9.5% fixed rate reflects the higher risk premium demanded from investors for a company heavily exposed to Ethereum's volatility.

Foresight NewsHace 4 min(s)

With 300 Million Financing to Accumulate ETH, the Hidden Concerns Behind BitMine's High-Yield Preferred Shares

Foresight NewsHace 4 min(s)

A Year of Observing Agent Payments: The Cold Reality Behind the Hot Narrative

A Year in Agent Payments: The Cold Reality Behind a Hot Narrative This article examines the current state of "Agent payments," a year after it became a major trend at the intersection of AI, payments, and crypto. Despite significant investments from major players like Stripe, Visa, and Google, the author—having built products and spoken with merchants and developers—finds genuine, large-scale demand still lacking. Key findings across several hyped scenarios reveal structural challenges: * **Agent-to-Merchant Commerce:** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), AI shopping via chat is inferior to traditional visual e-commerce. Merchant interest is largely defensive, focused on future-proofing rather than current consumer demand. True potential exists only in specific, high-frequency/low-decision scenarios (like food orders) or for simplifying broken checkout experiences, but these require massive consumer distribution, favoring incumbents. * **Agent-to-API/Machine Commerce:** While stablecoin micropayments are touted for API calls, developers already solve small-value payments via prepaid credits and subscriptions. Large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over fragmented micro-pricing. The market exists for long-tail services outside the top providers but is inherently smaller than the hype suggests. * **Agent-to-Agent Payments:** This remains a theoretical long-term vision with negligible real transaction volume. The core challenges—discovery, trust, negotiation, dispute resolution—are unsolved. While the potential for a new, high-speed settlement layer is real, it is not the current market. * **Agent Finance:** This is the sole area with existing, paying customers (fund managers, DeFi users). AI enhances real-time monitoring and autonomous rebalancing, offering real capability gains. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions with existing licenses and client relationships. The author concludes that the core deficiency in the Agent economy is not merely a payment layer, but a more complex **coordination** capability—figuring out how Agents and humans work together, verify task completion, and settle outcomes. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. For large companies, investing now is a defensive, long-term bet with minimal cost. For startups, however, the imperative is to find markets that exist today, not wait for a future wave that remains on the horizon.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

A Year of Observing Agent Payments: The Cold Reality Behind the Hot Narrative

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

China's First Embodied Data Compliance Outbound: How Does Paxini Become a Game-Changer for Industry Development?

"Embodied Intelligence Data Compliance Goes Global: A Breakthrough Moment. At the 2026 World Intelligent Industry Expo, Paxini, the sole Chinese company authorized for cross-border embodied data transfer, launched a pioneering project in Tianjin. This marks the first officially approved case of its kind in China, resolving a major industry bottleneck for compliant international data flow. As the ultimate direction of AI evolution, embodied intelligence relies on vast, multi-modal physical world interaction data. Despite booming global demand, stringent compliance had previously trapped the domestic industry. Paxini's breakthrough establishes a formal compliance framework, setting a benchmark for standardized development. The core of Paxini's success lies in its industry-leading data infrastructure and compliant security architecture, aligning with national data strategy. It operates a large-scale 'data collection factory' for high-quality, multi-modal data and has established a full-chain compliant pathway from 'collection-processing-certification-outbound transfer'. This dual advantage in data scale/quality and compliance secures its leadership. Beyond immediate commercial impact, the project signifies long-term strategic value: international market validation from top-tier financial institutions and the compounding benefits of ecosystem building. High-quality physical world data possesses enduring value. By solving fundamental infrastructure and compliance challenges, Paxini not only contributes a 'Chinese model' to the global embodied intelligence industry but also solidifies a key competitive moat for the long haul. This enables safe, efficient global flow of China's quality embodied data, amplifying its influence in the intelligent manufacturing landscape."

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

China's First Embodied Data Compliance Outbound: How Does Paxini Become a Game-Changer for Industry Development?

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar FLOW

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Flow (FLOW) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Flow (FLOW) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Flow (FLOW)Después de comprar tu Flow (FLOW), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Flow (FLOW)Tradear fácilmente con Flow (FLOW) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

241 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.10Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de FLOW (FLOW).