TROVE token’s 97% wipeout: From $11.5 mln presale to rug-pull accusations

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-01-20Actualizado a 2026-01-20

Resumen

Trove Market's TROVE token experienced a catastrophic 97.5% crash shortly after its launch on January 20, falling from a fully diluted valuation of $20 million to just $500,000. The project had previously raised $11.5 million in a presale but faced immediate backlash after announcing a switch from Hyperliquid to Solana, breaching investor trust. Accusations of a rug pull intensified when it was revealed that funds were allegedly funneled to influencers, casinos, and betting platforms. A key liquidity provider liquidated $12.9 million worth of assets, further destabilizing the project. Most presale investors suffered massive losses, with sentiment remaining extremely bearish and fears of further price declines.

On the 20th of January, the crypto market was stunned when Trove Market launched its native token, TROVE.

Prior to the launch, Trove Market had faced community backlash after the team announced it would abandon the Hyperliquid LI blockchain.

This was a massive breach of its social contracts with investors after raising $11.5 million in an ICO presale, setting the ground for a rough launch.

Trove market accused of rug pull

The TROVE token launched on Trove’s Perp DEX, with a fully diluted valuation of $20 million. Shortly after launch, the token’s FVD plummeted 97.5% to $500k, then rose slightly to $722.8k at press time.

At the same time, its market cap dropped from $612k to $512k, a loss of nearly $100k, indicating capital outflows.

Soon after the TROVE token went live, it dumped 28% in minutes from $0.0006 to $0.00043 before attempting a recovery.

Since then, the altcoin price rose to $0.00078 before slightly retracing to $0.00072, marking an 18% rise on the daily timeframe.

Reasons why TROVE was doomed to fail

In preparation for the token launch, developers ran an ICO on Hyperliquid. The team managed to surpass its $2.5 million target and raised over $11.5 million.

After raising these funds, the team announced it will keep $9.3 million to build its Solana-based Perp DEX. The move was perceived as the first red flag, and the team faced fierce community backlash.

Even worse, the community accused Trove Market of paying KOLs for promotion, with funds flowing to entertainment addresses.

According to Hyperliquid Daily, waleswoosh alone pocketed $8K for pumping and promoting the token. ZachXBT dug up receipts showing ICO money funneled straight to casinos and Polymarket bets.

The last nail in the coffin was driven by the alleged liquidity provider. Days ago, a key liquidity partner lost confidence in the project and liquidated 500k HYPE worth approximately $12.9 million.

The decision to sell these Hype tokens effectively pulled the rug from under Trove’s operational requirements, forcing the team to seek support elsewhere.

With these factors combined, the TROVE token sat as a ticking time bomb, and the launch validated the community’s fears.

Will TROVE see more losses?

TROVE plummeted as negative sentiment had taken hold even before the token launch. As such, earlier buyers rushed to dump, fearing making more losses.

Despite that, most of the presale buyers recorded massive losses. For instance, an earlier buyer argued that his $20k investment should have resulted in $14k in USDC and $6k in TROVE.

However, the buyers received $600, blaming the token’s GIGA nuking. With market sentiment even more bearish, TROVE is at risk of further losses.

If current sentiment persists, the token will plummet to $0.0004. However, if the team can manage to restore community confidence, $0.001 is within reach.

Final Thoughts

Trove Market is accused of a rug pull, following a contentious launch of the TROVE token on Solana Perp DEX.
TROVE FVD dropped 97.5% from $20 million to $500k, warning of liquidity exit.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the initial fully diluted valuation (FDV) of the TROVE token at launch and what did it drop to shortly after?

AThe TROVE token launched with a fully diluted valuation (FDV) of $20 million. Shortly after launch, its FDV plummeted 97.5% to $500,000.

QWhat was the first major 'red flag' that caused community backlash against Trove Market before the token launch?

AThe first major red flag was the team's announcement that they would abandon the Hyperliquid blockchain after raising $11.5 million in an ICO presale, which was seen as a massive breach of its social contracts with investors.

QAccording to the article, how did blockchain investigator ZachXBT claim the ICO funds were being misused?

AZachXBT provided receipts showing that ICO money was funneled directly to casinos and bets on Polymarket.

QWhat specific action by a key liquidity partner was described as 'the last nail in the coffin' for the TROVE project?

AA key liquidity partner lost confidence and liquidated 500k HYPE tokens worth approximately $12.9 million, which pulled the rug from under Trove's operational requirements.

QWhat are the two potential price targets mentioned for the TROVE token, depending on market sentiment and team action?

AIf the current bearish sentiment persists, the token could plummet to $0.0004. If the team manages to restore community confidence, the price could rise to $0.001.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Send a Message to Transfer Coins? Telegram to 'Stuff' a Crypto Wallet into 1 Billion Users This Summer

Telegram founder Pavel Durov has announced that a native, non-custodial wallet called Gram wallet will be built into every Telegram app this summer. This move aims to provide instant, fee-free cryptocurrency transfers for the platform's over 1 billion monthly active users. Durov described it as the largest deployment of a non-custodial crypto wallet in history. The new wallet, developed by Telegram itself, differs fundamentally from the existing third-party @wallet bot. It will be non-custodial from the start, meaning users will control their private keys. Following the announcement, the GRAM token (formerly Toncoin) saw a price increase of approximately 8%. This initiative is part of Telegram's renewed control over the TON blockchain and its "Make TON Great Again" roadmap, marking a return to the project after a 2018 SEC lawsuit. The launch comes as other super-apps like X Money and Meta are also expanding into digital payments, with Telegram opting for a crypto-native approach. However, key details remain unclear, including the exact launch date beyond "this summer," how the promised zero fees will be implemented technically, and how asset support and private key management will work for mainstream users.

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

Send a Message to Transfer Coins? Telegram to 'Stuff' a Crypto Wallet into 1 Billion Users This Summer

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

Hyperliquid’s HIP-4 proposal fuels HYPE staking as long-term conviction grows

Hyperliquid has proposed the HIP-4 upgrade to expand from perpetual futures into a broader, permissionless infrastructure layer for on-chain applications, requiring deployers to stake 500,000 HYPE to launch new markets. This shift aims to enable developers to build on its platform, a strategy backed by growing long-term investor conviction. Evidence includes a major trader staking millions in HYPE instead of taking profits, with total staked tokens reaching 43.9% of the supply, reducing available tokens and strengthening network security. Market metrics like high open interest and balanced funding rates suggest measured, non-speculative trader positioning. Sustained growth in protocol revenue, TVL, and governance participation further supports the positive outlook, contingent on continued user adoption and successful upgrade execution.

ambcryptoHace 30 min(s)

Hyperliquid’s HIP-4 proposal fuels HYPE staking as long-term conviction grows

ambcryptoHace 30 min(s)

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报Hace 43 min(s)

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报Hace 43 min(s)

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot