Toncoin: How profit-taking pressure can cap TON’s rally

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-01-19Actualizado a 2026-01-19

Resumen

Toncoin (TON) faced resistance at the $1.70 level, struggling to maintain bullish momentum despite Bitcoin's recent surge. While a breakout above $1.70 could trigger a short-term rally, on-chain data suggests profit-taking may limit gains. The 90-day MVRV ratio increased, and although Open Interest rose, sideways movement in mean coin age indicates a lack of sustained accumulation. Weekly charts remain bearish, with key resistance at $3.75. However, the $1.70 zone has turned to support, offering a potential long entry. Traders are advised to target profits at $2.16 and $2.37, with invalidation below $1.56. A move toward $2.0–$2.37 is possible, but profit-taking is expected to cap upward movement.

Toncoin [TON] faced resistance at the $1.70 region over the past month. The bullish momentum many altcoins saw in the first week of January was inspired by Bitcoin’s [BTC] rally beyond $90k at that time.

While Bitcoin has managed to reclaim $94.5k as support, Toncoin has not exhibited much bullish momentum over the past week, having shed 1.29% over the past week.

In a recent AMBCrypto report, the importance of the $1.70 area was highlighted. A bullish breakout past this level could see a short-term rally ensue, the report concluded.

The on-chain metrics revealed a sizeable uptick in the 90-day MVRV ratio. Further price gains could be capped as holders take profits.

Open Interest had also surged, but the mean coin age was moving sideways. This was a reflection of a lack of network-wide accumulation, which translated to a lack of market conviction.

What the price charts reveal for TON holders

The weekly trend was firmly bearish, as the DMI and the price action showed. The swing point for the bulls to beat on this timeframe was at $3.75, more than double the current market price.

A move beyond this level will signal a bullish long-term trend.

The OBV has not made new lows over the past two months, which was a slight encouragement. The $2.3-$2.4 and the $2.8 levels were the notable supply zones the weekly chart revealed.

Traders’ call to action: Go long and don’t forget to take profits

The short-term bullish momentum was something traders could capitalize on. The OBV and the daily volume bars indicated a flurry of buying from the final week of December.

The imbalance and local supply zone at $1.70 has been flipped to support.

Swing traders can use this flip to buy TON. They need to be cautious and remember to take profits at $2.16 and $2.37, with a drop below $1.56 being invalidation.


Final Thoughts

  • Toncoin’s on-chain metrics showed network-wide accumulation was not underway.
  • A rally to $2.0 and $2.37 appeared possible in the coming weeks, and swing traders must be ready to take profits during the move.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat key resistance level has Toncoin (TON) been facing over the past month?

AToncoin has been facing resistance at the $1.70 region.

QAccording to the on-chain metrics, what indicator saw a sizeable uptick, suggesting potential profit-taking pressure?

AThe 90-day MVRV ratio saw a sizeable uptick.

QWhat does the sideways movement of the mean coin age indicate for the Toncoin network?

AIt indicates a lack of network-wide accumulation, which translates to a lack of market conviction.

QWhat is the swing point price level that the bulls need to beat on the weekly timeframe to signal a long-term bullish trend?

AThe swing point for the bulls to beat is at $3.75.

QWhat are the two profit-taking target levels suggested for swing traders in the short term?

AThe suggested profit-taking target levels for swing traders are $2.16 and $2.37.

Lecturas Relacionadas

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报Hace 39 min(s)

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报Hace 39 min(s)

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight NewsHace 57 min(s)

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight NewsHace 57 min(s)

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片