Tokenized RWAs grow 4x to $25B – Is $50B by 2030 next target?

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-03-09Actualizado a 2026-03-09

Resumen

Tokenized Real World Assets (RWAs) experienced explosive growth, surging 4x to reach $24.9 billion in value over the past year, driven by institutional demand. U.S. Treasuries and commodities led this expansion, accounting for 58% of the growth. Major players like BlackRock and Ondo Finance saw their tokenized assets hit $2.2 billion and $2 billion, respectively. Concurrently, the number of RWA holders across major blockchains reached a record high, exceeding 663,000, with Ethereum and Solana leading in holder counts. If the current growth trajectory continues, the total value of tokenized RWAs is projected to exceed $50 billion by 2030, with represented assets potentially surpassing $1 trillion.

Real World Assets (RWAs) tokenization continued rapid acceleration in 2026, largely driven by institutional demand. In recent years, large entities have shown strong demand for private credit, on-chain treasury bills, and equities, significantly boosting asset values.

Tokenized RWAs hit $25 billion

Amid surging adoption of Blockchain among TradFi, asset managers, banks, and other entities, significant capital has been pumped into RWAs.

As a result, tokenized assets have skyrocketed, reaching record highs. According to Nexus data, the value of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) reached $24.9 billion, growing 4× over the past year.

This marked a 289% growth, adding over $18 billion Yoy, indicating massive demand in the past year.

The data showed that U.S. Treasuries and commodities dominated the space, accounting for 58% of the growth. These two have exceeded $16 billion in total value, according to RWA.xyz data.

At the same time, corporate bonds and institutional alternative funds also saw a massive jump, with BlackRock hitting $2.2 billion. Also, Ondo Finance saw its tokenized assets hit $2 billion.

Despite the continued rise in the three areas, the top concentration among them dropped 61%, indicating increased competition. However, treasuries defied the trend, with their market share declining from 59% to 43%, indicating increased diversification.

The number of RWA holders hits a record high.

In addition to the rising value of tokenized RWAs, the number of holders has also grown significantly across all major chains.

According to Token Terminal, RWA asset holder counts have climbed significantly across Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, and Celo. Ethereum RWA asset holder counts reached a new all-time high of 169k while Solana followed with 163k.

Celo and BNB chain also printed new highs, recording 77k and 42k, respectively. Other chains, such as Base and Arbitrum One, also recorded significant growth.

As such, total holders jumped 4%, exceeding 663k, while stablecoin holders surged 5% to 233.2 million, signaling increased adoption.

What’s next for RWA?

Tokenized RWAs have experienced exponential growth amid a scramble to accelerate blockchain adoption and continued acceptance in TradFi.

With this growth, the value of the represented assets exceeded $346 billion, despite a 6% decline over the past 30 days. At the same time, the total stablecoin value climbed to $301 billion.

At the current rates, and if market players continue to dive into RWA, the assets are likely to record significant growth in the mid to long term. Holding the current growth rate, the total value could exceed $50 billion by 2030, with assets represented exceeding $1 trillion.

Final Summary

Tokenized real-world assets [RWAs] surged to $25 billion, marking 4x growth over the past year.
The total number of RWA asset holders jumped 4% to 663k, reflecting increased adoption.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the total value of tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) reached in 2026, and what was the growth rate?

AThe total value of tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) reached $24.9 billion, marking a 289% growth (4x) over the past year.

QWhich two asset types dominated the RWA tokenization space and what percentage of the growth did they account for?

AU.S. Treasuries and commodities dominated the space, accounting for 58% of the growth.

QWhich two networks had the highest number of RWA asset holders, and what were their respective counts?

AEthereum had the highest number of RWA holders at 169,000, followed by Solana with 163,000 holders.

QWhat is the projected total value of tokenized RWAs by 2030 if the current growth rate continues?

AIf the current growth rate continues, the total value of tokenized RWAs is projected to exceed $50 billion by 2030.

QBesides the value of RWAs, what other metric also saw significant growth, increasing by 4% to 663k?

AThe total number of RWA asset holders also saw significant growth, jumping 4% to 663,000.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Zcash Suffers Historic Collapse As Billions Vanish From Market Value

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, suffered a historic collapse in price, losing over 50% of its value in 24 hours and erasing billions from its market cap. The dramatic sell-off was triggered by the disclosure of a major vulnerability in the Zcash Orchard privacy pool that had remained undetected since May 2022. A security researcher, using AI, developed a proof-of-concept to generate counterfeit ZEC. While the bug was patched by June 2, Zcash's privacy design makes it impossible to verify if any fake coins were minted before the fix, fueling market panic and uncertainty. This event highlights the trade-off between privacy and transparency. In response, Shielded Labs is exploring a network upgrade to allow supply verification. Despite the crisis, proponents argue that the discovery by world-class security researchers demonstrates the network's commitment to proactive hardening and resilience.

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Zcash Suffers Historic Collapse As Billions Vanish From Market Value

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

AI Bubble Is Bursting

The AI Bubble is Bursting: A Necessary Purge on the Path to Ubiquitous Intelligence Market volatility has reignited debates about an AI bubble, with figures like Ray Dalio pointing to high valuations. However, this parallels the dot-com bubble, which, despite its crash, laid the physical infrastructure for today's internet era. The current AI investment frenzy, with tech giants planning trillions in infrastructure spending far outstripping current AI application revenues, appears similarly imbalanced. This 'bubble' is seen as an inevitable phase for a disruptive technology, paying the "innovation tax." Critically, AI inference costs have plummeted over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence nearly free at the margin. This hasn't reduced spending but has instead unlocked massive new demand, as seen in enterprise AI cloud expenditure tripling. This follows the Jevons Paradox: efficiency gains lead to greater total consumption. The market is now entering a cleansing phase, weeding out speculative ventures lacking real moats. The deeper shift is a move from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to value creation in operational expenditure (OpEx) through AI applications that solve real industry problems. While infrastructure valuations are high, rapid earnings growth from widespread AI adoption across sectors—from manufacturing and finance to law and healthcare—may digest these valuations over time. Ultimately, this creative destruction will leave behind robust infrastructure and optimized models, cheaply powering an AI-augmented future for all industries, much as the internet became indispensable after its own bubble burst. The core productive potential remains undiminished.

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros