Tether and Circle mint $1.5B as stablecoin liquidity rebuilds after market volatility

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-01-20Actualizado a 2026-01-20

Resumen

Tether and Circle minted a combined $1.5 billion in stablecoins, with Tether issuing $1 billion USDT (primarily on Tron) and Circle minting $500 million USDC (including on Solana). This follows a period of market stress where Bitcoin fell below $93,000, triggering liquidations. Large stablecoin mints are often a sign of liquidity positioning rather than immediate buying, as funds are typically sent to treasury or intermediary wallets first. Their deployment to exchanges or market makers will determine if this leads to renewed buying pressure. USDT and USDC continue to dominate the market, accounting for nearly 90% of the stablecoin supply on Ethereum. The minting suggests liquidity remains engaged with crypto, but does not yet confirm a market reversal.

Tether and Circle minted a combined $1.5 billion in stablecoins over two hours, signaling a notable expansion in on-chain dollar liquidity following recent market volatility.

On-chain data shows that Tether issued $1 billion USDT, primarily on the Tron network. Also, Circle minted roughly $500 million USDC, including fresh supply on Solana.

The issuance comes after a sharp crypto market pullback that briefly pushed Bitcoin below $93,000 and triggered widespread liquidations.

Stablecoin mints signal liquidity positioning, not Immediate buying

Large stablecoin mints are often misunderstood as instant bullish signals. In practice, newly issued USDT and USDC are typically sent to treasury or intermediary wallets before being deployed.

These funds may later flow to exchanges, market makers, or institutional desks, depending on market conditions.

As a result, stablecoin issuance usually reflects liquidity positioning rather than immediate risk-on behavior.

Minting follows period of market stress

The timing of the $1.5 billion mint aligns with a broader risk-off move across crypto markets.

Over the past week, heightened volatility and macro uncertainty led to sharp drawdowns across major assets, with total market capitalization falling and leveraged positions unwinding.

During such periods, stablecoins often serve as a liquidity buffer, allowing traders and institutions to park capital while waiting for clearer market direction.

USDT and USDC continue to dominate stablecoin supply

On Ethereum, USDT and USDC account for nearly 90% of the circulating stablecoin supply, according to Dune Analytics data. This reinforces their role as the primary dollar rails for crypto trading and settlement.

Tether remains the largest stablecoin issuer by market capitalization with 60%, while Circle’s USDC maintains its position as the second-largest with 30%.

The latest minting activity further strengthens their dominance across major blockchains, including Tron, Ethereum, and Solana.

What comes next depends on deployment

Whether the newly minted stablecoins translate into renewed buying pressure will depend on follow-through indicators, such as inflows to centralized exchanges or increased spot market demand.

Historically, sustained price recoveries tend to follow stablecoin deployment, not issuance alone. Without clear evidence of capital moving onto exchanges, large mints should be viewed as capital readiness, not confirmation of a market reversal.

For now, the surge in stablecoin supply suggests that liquidity remains engaged with the crypto ecosystem, even as traders remain cautious amid ongoing macro and market uncertainty.

Final Thoughts

The $1.5 billion stablecoin mint suggests liquidity is being positioned on-chain. Still, it does not yet confirm renewed risk appetite across the market.
Whether this capital translates into upside will depend on broader macro conditions and follow-through in spot and derivatives demand.

Preguntas relacionadas

QHow much in stablecoins did Tether and Circle mint combined, and over what time period?

ATether and Circle minted a combined $1.5 billion in stablecoins over a two-hour period.

QOn which blockchain network did the majority of Tether's $1 billion USDT issuance occur?

AThe majority of Tether's $1 billion USDT issuance occurred on the Tron network.

QAccording to the article, what do large stablecoin mints like this one typically signal, rather than immediate buying pressure?

ALarge stablecoin mints typically signal liquidity positioning rather than immediate risk-on behavior or buying pressure. The funds are sent to treasury or intermediary wallets first.

QWhat event preceded this significant stablecoin minting activity?

AThe minting activity followed a sharp crypto market pullback that briefly pushed Bitcoin below $93,000 and triggered widespread liquidations.

QWhat percentage of the circulating stablecoin supply on Ethereum do USDT and USDC collectively account for?

AOn Ethereum, USDT and USDC account for nearly 90% of the circulating stablecoin supply.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbitHace 33 min(s)

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbitHace 33 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros