Artículos Relacionados con Misinformation

El Centro de Noticias de HTX ofrece los artículos más recientes y un análisis profundo sobre "Misinformation", cubriendo tendencias del mercado, actualizaciones de proyectos, desarrollos tecnológicos y políticas regulatorias en la industria de cripto.

Study: 90% of Influencers' Financial Advice on Social Media is Ineffective

New research from Queen Mary University of London confirms widespread suspicions: nearly 90% of financial advice from social media influencers is ineffective or low-quality, often lacking proper sources, disclaimers, or genuine expertise. The study analyzed nearly 2,500 influencers on Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube and surveyed over 4,200 UK adults. It found that while two in five UK adults use social media for financial advice, only about one in ten consult a licensed professional. Complementing this, a Chainalysis report on 2024 crypto tokens revealed that 74,037 newly launched tokens displayed patterns of "pump-and-dump" schemes, with 94% of these cases involving the wallet that created the liquidity pool also conducting the asset dump. The median suspicious scheme lasted less than a day. In a coordinated April 2026 operation, the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and 17 global regulators targeted this issue directly, flagging 120 influencer accounts for removal. These accounts were responsible for 1,267 illegal financial promotions that reached at least 2.3 million UK accounts, with 66% of the ads linked to entities already on the FCA's warning list.

cryptonews.ru07/28 15:16

Study: 90% of Influencers' Financial Advice on Social Media is Ineffective

cryptonews.ru07/28 15:16

3 Million-Follower Goddess Fully AI-Synthesized, Fake Orphanage, Cross-Border ‘Fake Charity’ Collapses Overnight

An Australian influencer named Lily Jay, with nearly 3 million Instagram followers, is at the centre of a major AI-fueled charity scam. Her 'Lily Jay Foundation' claimed to build orphanages, mosques, and deliver aid in places like Uganda and Gaza, using emotionally powerful videos of herself with children. However, an investigation by ABC NEWS Verify revealed these scenes—including a key video announcing an orphanage's opening—were entirely AI-generated, complete with telltale flaws like garbled text on clothing. The foundation's 'humanitarian award' was also faked using AI images. The foundation admitted in small print on its website that it is not a registered charity, avoiding financial transparency laws. While based in Kosovo, its operations and the influencer's lavish personal lifestyle raised further red flags. Following media inquiries, the foundation selectively hid donation buttons and removed fraudulent content for Australian visitors, but kept them active internationally. Experts warn this case is a textbook example of how AI can be weaponized to exploit public trust and generosity, creating believable but entirely fabricated narratives of aid. The incident highlights the growing danger of deepfakes in eroding trust within the charitable sector, urging donors to critically verify causes before giving.

marsbit07/21 12:57

3 Million-Follower Goddess Fully AI-Synthesized, Fake Orphanage, Cross-Border ‘Fake Charity’ Collapses Overnight

marsbit07/21 12:57

15 Reasoning Models Flip Collectively: Unpacking the Latent Risks Hidden in the Chain of Thought Behind Their Outputs

"15 Reasoning Models Collectively Fail: Revealing Hidden Risks in Chain-of-Thought Outputs" A systematic study led by researchers from Harvard, USC, Brown, and MIT warns that evaluating only the final output of large reasoning models (LRMs) is insufficient for safety. The research highlights that the intermediate reasoning chains (CoT) these models expose can contain dangerous content—like bomb-making instructions or poisoning recipes—even when the final answer appears safe. The core methodology involves separately assessing the reasoning chain and the final answer against 20 safety principles, each scored 1-5 for risk. This identifies three key failure modes: 'Unsafe' (both stages unsafe), 'Leak' (unsafe reasoning but safe answer), and 'Escape' (safe reasoning but unsafe answer). The team evaluated 15 reasoning models on a combined in-distribution dataset of 41K prompts from seven public harmful/jailbreak datasets. A universal finding across all 15 models was that reasoning chains are consistently riskier than final answers. Risk is concentrated in categories like misinformation, illegal activity, bias, and physical/psychological harm, with illegal compliance showing the starkest divergence. Case studies reveal instances where harmful operational details are 'leaked' in reasoning or a seemingly harmless chain 'escapes' into a dangerous final answer. To mitigate this, the researchers propose 'Adaptive Multi-Principle Steering,' a white-box, test-time intervention method. It identifies unsafe principles being activated during reasoning and gently steers the model's internal representations towards safer directions. Validated on open-source models, this approach reduced unsafe outputs by up to 40.8% while preserving 97.7% of benchmark performance. The work underscores the critical need to monitor and secure the entire reasoning process, not just the final output.

marsbit07/06 23:54

15 Reasoning Models Flip Collectively: Unpacking the Latent Risks Hidden in the Chain of Thought Behind Their Outputs

marsbit07/06 23:54

‘AI Broke Through NSA in Hours’ Goes Viral, But Is It Actually a Red Team Exercise?

The viral claim that Anthropic's AI model 'Mythos' breached almost all of NSA's classified systems in 'hours, not weeks' has been clarified as a misinterpretation. The statement originated from a U.S. Senator citing the NSA director within a broader argument for mandatory pre-release testing of frontier AI models. The author of the original Economist article later clarified that the feat was achieved under very specific, controlled conditions during an authorized red-team exercise, where Mythos was used alongside other tools to find vulnerabilities in a replica of NSA systems, not a live breach. This highlights Mythos's advanced capabilities in vulnerability discovery and attack path reasoning during security testing. Anthropic restricts access to such powerful models through its 'Project Glasswing' program for vetted defense organizations. The incident underscores the U.S. government's conflicted stance: while citing security risks to justify actions like export controls on Anthropic's models, agencies like the NSA reportedly continue using them for defense purposes. The narrative evolved from a call for regulation into a sensationalized 'AI hacks NSA' headline, demonstrating how technical achievements in controlled environments can be misconstrued as real-world attacks.

marsbit06/23 00:54

‘AI Broke Through NSA in Hours’ Goes Viral, But Is It Actually a Red Team Exercise?

marsbit06/23 00:54

Claude Requires ID Verification and Facial Recognition? The Facial Recognition Requirement is an Old Story from Two Months Ago, and "Sharing Data with Police" is a Misinterpretation

Anthropic's updated privacy policy, effective July 8th, has sparked misinterpretations in Chinese social media, primarily concerning new identity verification and data sharing with law enforcement. A detailed comparison reveals these claims are largely unfounded. First, identity verification (including submitting government ID and a live selfie via third-party provider Persona) is not a new July policy. This mechanism was actually implemented in mid-April 2026 for certain high-use or flagged accounts, particularly Claude Max subscribers. The July update merely formally documents this existing practice in the policy text under a new "Verification Data" section. Second, the widespread claim that the new policy lowers the threshold for sharing user data with law enforcement is incorrect. Comparing the new text with the old version (dated September 28, 2025) shows no substantive tightening. While the new policy more clearly structures the conditions for disclosure—including having a "good-faith belief" it's necessary for legal compliance, preventing harm, fraud detection, or enforcing terms—the old policy already allowed Anthropic to disclose data based on its judgment for similar reasons (e.g., protecting safety, preventing fraud, or complying with law). The term "good-faith belief" acts as a limiting standard, not a lowered barrier. A 2025 court case where Anthropic resisted disclosing user data in a copyright lawsuit further demonstrates the complexity of such standards. The policy's actual substantial changes address data flows for Claude's Agent capabilities. New clauses clarify that when users connect third-party services or instruct Claude to perform multi-step tasks (reading files, sending messages), their inputs, outputs, and instructions are shared with those third parties, governed by the third parties' own policies. This update fills a compliance gap for Claude's evolving functionality beyond simple Q&A. Other additions include a "Research Participation Data" section and refined marketing legal bases. Anthropic reaffirms core commitments: not selling user data, keeping Claude ad-free, and allowing users to control if chats are used for model training. Overall, this update is primarily a compliance catch-up to existing product features, not a significant new privacy tightening. The heightened concern stems from conflating April's verification rollout, standard legal clauses, and the genuine new provisions regarding Agent tasks.

marsbit06/15 08:55

Claude Requires ID Verification and Facial Recognition? The Facial Recognition Requirement is an Old Story from Two Months Ago, and "Sharing Data with Police" is a Misinterpretation

marsbit06/15 08:55

Ethereum Founder Dumps 100,000 ETH Worth $170M, What’s Going On?

A viral rumor in the crypto space claimed Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin had sold 110,000 ETH (worth ~$170M), sparking fears of a major market downturn. Analysts suggested it could be a bearish signal, comparing it to past sell-offs before crashes. However, the community quickly countered, revealing the transaction was actually by co-founder Joseph Lubin. On-chain analysis showed the ETH was not sold but moved as collateral into a DeFi vault to manage loan liquidation risk, with no tokens entering the open market. Critics called the initial reports exaggerated misinformation and urged verifying data through reliable on-chain tools.

bitcoinist06/09 01:33

Ethereum Founder Dumps 100,000 ETH Worth $170M, What’s Going On?

bitcoinist06/09 01:33

Pope Issues First AI Encyclical: 40,000 Words, 10 Key Points, Clarifying AI Anxiety

Pope Leo XIV's historic encyclical "Magnifica Humanitas," released in May 2026, marks the Catholic Church's first major document addressing artificial intelligence. The 40,000-word text moves beyond theological abstraction to confront practical AI anxieties affecting society. It argues that AI is no longer a mere tool but an embedded environment influencing daily decisions in areas like employment, healthcare, justice, and information, often without users' awareness. The encyclical presents ten core concerns. It highlights that the central issue isn't just regulation, but who holds the underlying *power*—control over data, compute, and platforms—often concentrated in private entities. It warns that even developers cannot fully explain AI systems, creating accountability gaps. While AI can simulate human interaction and creativity, it cautions against treating it as a moral agent capable of bearing true responsibility or forming genuine relationships. Key risks identified include AI's role in opaque decision-making for jobs or welfare, the amplification of persuasive disinformation, and the potential for education to focus on tool use over critical thinking. The document stresses that work has value beyond efficiency, and AI should enhance human capabilities, not merely replace roles. It firmly states that irreversible decisions, especially involving life and death, must remain under human judgment. Ultimately, the encyclical frames AI's challenge as anthropological, not just technological. As AI simulates uniquely human capacities like judgment and creation, it forces a re-examination of what makes human action meaningful: our capacity for responsibility, vulnerability, and bearing real consequences. The Pope concludes that technology is never neutral; its development and deployment are shaped by human values and choices, making an inclusive, ethically grounded dialogue essential for its future.

marsbit05/28 00:19

Pope Issues First AI Encyclical: 40,000 Words, 10 Key Points, Clarifying AI Anxiety

marsbit05/28 00:19

AI Has Started Forging Local Media

AI-Generated Fake Local Media Outlets Proliferate in the US A recent investigation by *The Florida Trident* exposed a network of fake local news websites, including the *South Florida Standard*, that are entirely generated and operated by artificial intelligence. These sites present fabricated editorial teams with AI-generated journalist photos, biographies, and bylines. Their content is not original reporting but consists of articles scraped from legitimate news outlets and rewritten by AI. The investigation traced the operation to Drew Chapin, a Philadelphia-based online reputation manager and convicted fraudster. Chapin admitted to running an "experiment" involving 17 such AI-driven news sites across the U.S., which generated over 3,500 URLs and attracted approximately 44,000 visitors. He demonstrated that a fully functional site, complete with a fake staff and content, could be created for just $10 and 15 minutes using AI prompts. These sites are part of a growing phenomenon known as "pink slime" journalism—low-quality, often deceptive outlets filling the vacuum left by the decline of local newspapers. Experts warn that such AI-forged media not only deceive readers but also threaten legitimate news organizations by scraping their content. A greater danger lies in future AI models potentially being trained on this fraudulent, low-quality information, polluting the digital information ecosystem.

marsbit05/16 03:40

AI Has Started Forging Local Media

marsbit05/16 03:40

Tens of Millions of Errors Per Hour: Investigation Reveals the 'Accuracy Illusion' of Google AI Search

A New York Times investigation, in collaboration with AI startup Oumi, reveals significant accuracy and reliability issues with Google's AI Overviews search feature. Testing over 4,300 queries showed the accuracy rate improved from 85% (powered by Gemini 2) to 91% (Gemini 3). However, given Google's scale of ~5 trillion annual searches, this 9% error rate translates to nearly 57 million incorrect answers generated hourly. A critical finding is the prevalence of "unsubstantiated citations." For correct answers, the rate of citations that do not support the AI's summary surged from 37% to 56% with the Gemini 3 upgrade, making it difficult for users to verify information. The AI heavily relies on low-quality sources, with Facebook and Reddit being among its top-cited websites. Furthermore, the system is highly manipulable. A BBC journalist successfully "poisoned" it by publishing a fabricated article; Google's AI began presenting the false information as fact within 24 hours. Google disputed the study's methodology, criticizing its use of the SimpleQA benchmark and an AI model (Oumi's own) to evaluate another AI. The company maintains its AI Overviews, combined with its search ranking systems, perform better than the underlying model alone. Critics note this defense does little to bolster user confidence in the feature's reliability.

marsbit04/13 02:09

Tens of Millions of Errors Per Hour: Investigation Reveals the 'Accuracy Illusion' of Google AI Search

marsbit04/13 02:09

Tens of Millions of Errors Per Hour: Investigation Reveals the 'Accuracy Illusion' of Google AI Search

A New York Times investigation, in collaboration with AI startup Oumi, reveals significant accuracy and reliability issues with Google's AI Overviews search feature. Testing over 4,300 queries showed the accuracy rate improved from 85% (Gemini 2) to 91% (Gemini 3). However, given Google's scale of ~5 trillion annual searches, this 9% error rate translates to over 57 million incorrect answers generated hourly. A more critical issue is the prevalence of unsubstantiated citations. For correct answers, the rate of "unfounded citations"—where provided source links do not support the AI's claims—worsened, rising from 37% with Gemini 2 to 56% with Gemini 3. This makes it difficult for users to verify the information. The AI also heavily relies on low-quality sources, with Facebook and Reddit being its second and fourth most cited domains. Furthermore, the system is highly susceptible to manipulation. A BBC journalist successfully "poisoned" it by publishing a fake article; Google's AI began presenting the false information as fact within 24 hours. Google disputed the study's methodology, criticizing the use of the SimpleQA benchmark and an AI model (Oumi's HallOumi) to evaluate its own AI. The company maintains that its internal safeguards and ranking systems improve accuracy beyond the base model's performance.

marsbit04/10 12:30

Tens of Millions of Errors Per Hour: Investigation Reveals the 'Accuracy Illusion' of Google AI Search

marsbit04/10 12:30

活动图片

Project Updatesright-arrow

Market Analysisright-arrow