Artículos Relacionados con Intermediaries

El Centro de Noticias de HTX ofrece los artículos más recientes y un análisis profundo sobre "Intermediaries", cubriendo tendencias del mercado, actualizaciones de proyectos, desarrollos tecnológicos y políticas regulatorias en la industria de cripto.

Understanding the Key Issues of Tokenization in One Article

The core of tokenization lies in eliminating friction in financial infrastructure, not speculative digital assets. The true value is in near-instant settlement (T+0 vs. traditional T+2), 24/7 liquidity, fractional ownership, and the disintermediation of financial processes. Tokenization represents real-world assets (real estate, bonds, private equity) as digital tokens on a blockchain, functioning as programmable digital deeds that enable self-custody and automated ownership tracking. It addresses four key problems: 1) Settlement Speed: Atomic, near-instant settlement replaces multi-day processes. 2) Liquidity: Enables secondary markets for historically illiquid assets. 3) Fractional Ownership: Drastically lowers investment minimums by automating administrative overhead. 4) Disintermediation: Replaces trust-based functions of custodians and clearinghouses with self-executing smart contracts. This is not about cryptocurrency speculation. Major institutions like J.P. Morgan (Onyx), BlackRock (BUIDL), and Goldman Sachs are building the infrastructure, focusing on reliable asset management. Significant hurdles remain, including uncertain legal frameworks, lack of different blockchain platforms, and resistance from intermediaries protecting their revenue streams. Tokenization doesn't create a frictionless utopia but fundamentally reshapes the cost structure and efficiency of global financial infrastructure, representing its largest reorganization since the advent of electronic trading.

marsbitHace 10 hora(s)

Understanding the Key Issues of Tokenization in One Article

marsbitHace 10 hora(s)

a16z: After Securities Go On-Chain, Intermediaries Will Be Replaced by Code

a16z and the DeFi Education Fund proposed a "Software Safe Harbor" framework to the SEC, aiming to exempt certain non-custodial, disintermediated blockchain applications from traditional broker-dealer regulations. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The proposal argues that such applications—acting as neutral software interfaces without asset control, trade execution, or investment advice—should not be subject to existing intermediary-focused rules. Former SEC Chief Economist Craig Lewis provided an economic analysis, highlighting potential benefits: atomic settlement (reducing counterparty risk), on-chain transparency, 24/7 trading, lower operational costs (e.g., 40-60% reduction in bond tokenization), and increased competition. Potential costs include reduced investor protection (e.g., inability to freeze assets), regulatory arbitrage, market fragmentation, and retail transaction risks (e.g., gas fees). Lewis emphasizes comparing these to existing opaque, costly traditional systems. The analysis concludes that the safe harbor could unlock significant economic value by enabling peer-to-peer trading of tokenized securities, aligning with the SEC’s Project Crypto initiative to modernize markets through blockchain technology.

marsbit04/08 09:16

a16z: After Securities Go On-Chain, Intermediaries Will Be Replaced by Code

marsbit04/08 09:16

Crypto Should Be Judged By Economic Role, Not Tech Design: ASIC Fintech Chief

According to Rhys Bollen, head of fintech at the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), consumer harm in crypto primarily stems from intermediaries—exchanges, custodians, lenders—rather than the tokens themselves. In a paper presented at the Melbourne Money and Finance Conference, Bollen argued that Australia should regulate digital assets based on their economic function, not their technological design. Tokens that act like securities should be treated as such, stablecoins moving money should fall under payments law, and consumer protection rules should cover the rest. This approach contrasts with jurisdictions like the U.S. and EU, which are creating crypto-specific laws. Australia is already implementing this through its Digital Asset Framework bill, which integrates digital assets into existing financial regulations rather than building a separate legal structure.

bitcoinist03/11 18:32

Crypto Should Be Judged By Economic Role, Not Tech Design: ASIC Fintech Chief

bitcoinist03/11 18:32

活动图片

Project Updates

Others