Artículos Relacionados con Automation

El Centro de Noticias de HTX ofrece los artículos más recientes y un análisis profundo sobre "Automation", cubriendo tendencias del mercado, actualizaciones de proyectos, desarrollos tecnológicos y políticas regulatorias en la industria de cripto.

The Permanent Underclass: No One Can Answer That 17-Year-Old Child

The article "The Permanent Underclass: No One Has an Answer for That 17-Year-Old" explores the concept of a "permanent underclass" emerging in a future where AI can perform most cognitive and physical labor. This theory, gaining traction in tech circles, suggests that as AI reduces the need for human workers, wages lose importance, and wealth increasingly flows to those who own AI models, compute, and data. The core issue is not temporary poverty but the potential breakdown of the traditional ladder of upward mobility—through labor, bargaining, and asset accumulation—making "underclass" a permanent status. The piece highlights a poignant question posed by researcher Jasmine Sun to AI lab personnel: What advice would you give a typical 17-year-old facing this future? Most had no answer, acknowledging the frightening transition ahead. However, while struggling to advise others, many in the AI field are securing their own positions, shifting from research or policy into labs to gain equity and stand on the "capital" side. This creates a vicious cycle: the more people believe labor's bargaining power is vanishing, the fewer work to rebuild it, accelerating its decline. Common personal survival strategies—learning AI skills, acquiring AI company equity, or pivoting to hands-on, in-person work—are analyzed. The author argues these are largely stopgaps, accessible mainly to the privileged, and may collectively undermine labor's overall position. The fundamental question shifts from "how not to fall behind" to "why must one's survival depend on being needed by capital?" The article concludes that the real solution is not individual adaptation but building a new societal "negotiating table"—new laws, forms of collective bargaining, or redistribution mechanisms (like taxes or public funds) to ensure the wealth AI creates is shared, especially with those displaced. It contrasts tentative institutional responses in China with a potential regulatory vacuum in the US, warning that without such frameworks being established before public frustration boils over, social unrest could follow. The 17-year-old’s dilemma underscores a systemic failure: the architects of this future are buying personal insurance but offering no collective answers.

marsbitHace 9 hora(s)

The Permanent Underclass: No One Can Answer That 17-Year-Old Child

marsbitHace 9 hora(s)

Claude Designer Lags Behind Engineers, Fires Back by Creating a Million-User Tool

The article tells the story of Nate Parrott, a designer at Anthropic who created Claude Design as a side project to keep pace with his engineering teammates. When Anthropic released Opus 4.5 in November 2025, the two engineers on Parrott's Claude Code team significantly increased their output using the new AI capabilities. Parrott, the sole designer, found himself struggling to match their speed, becoming a bottleneck in the workflow. To catch up, he began experimenting in his spare time. He initially tried prompting Claude to generate designs from text descriptions and screenshots, with limited success. His breakthrough came when he shifted focus from asking Claude to "design" to asking it to generate HTML. He realized HTML could be a rich visual canvas for creating everything from slides and interactive prototypes to full web pages. He built a simple interface with a chat panel on the left and a live HTML preview on the right. The key to making the output useful was incorporating Anthropic's brand system—fonts, colors, assets, and design principles—into the prompts. This ensured generated designs were immediately on-brand. He shared an internal prototype with his team, and other product designers quickly adopted it for creating clickable prototypes, a task traditionally requiring manually drawing every state. The project's "official" turning point came during an Anthropic Labs offsite, where Parrott noticed many attendees were using his tool to build presentation slides on the fly, sometimes right before their turn to speak. This organic adoption convinced the Labs team to formally staff the project, turning the side project into a real product. Claude Design is positioned as a "pre-production" tool for visual communication and exploration—handling slides, landing pages, PDFs, emails, and social media graphics. It integrates with tools like Canva, Adobe, and Vercel. Its core value is accelerating the early stages of design: exploring directions, building consensus, and establishing systems. For actual production code, Anthropic still recommends Claude Code. The story highlights how AI disrupts workflows unevenly and how individuals can respond by building new tools to create their own advantages. Parrott's tool, born from necessity, eventually gained over a million users in its first week.

marsbitHace 16 hora(s)

Claude Designer Lags Behind Engineers, Fires Back by Creating a Million-User Tool

marsbitHace 16 hora(s)

NVIDIA's 20-Year CUDA Moat Collapsed Over a Weekend, Claude Single-Handedly Got AMD's New GPU Running

In a single weekend, Claude, an AI agent from Anthropic, successfully ported and optimized its cutting-edge model to run on a brand-new AMD MI355X server rack without any manual code intervention. This feat demonstrates a potential breakthrough in overcoming NVIDIA's long-established CUDA software ecosystem dominance, built over two decades. Anthropic's team simply instructed Claude to get the AMD machine running. By Monday, it not only worked but was showing a continuously improving performance curve. The achievement impressed AMD CEO Lisa Su and accelerated a major deployment partnership: Anthropic plans to deploy up to 2GW of AMD Instinct GPUs starting in 2027. The key enabler is AMD's new ROCm.AI platform, a toolbox designed specifically for AI agents like Claude. It provides AI-readable documentation, including chip instruction sets (ISA), and tools like the Hyperloom service that allows agents to autonomously profile performance, identify bottlenecks, test configurations, and generate optimized kernels. In a demo, Hyperloom boosted the output speed of a model by 38%. This represents a fundamental shift. While CUDA's strength lies in its vast, human-expert-driven ecosystem of tools and tacit knowledge, AMD's strategy is to make its hardware and software stack directly accessible and optimizable by AI agents. An agent can parallelize tasks—debugging, profiling, coding—that would take human engineers years to master, compressing the traditional software adaptation timeline from years to tasks. The competition is no longer just about peak hardware specs but also about how well AI can read, utilize, and tune a platform.

marsbitHace 17 hora(s)

NVIDIA's 20-Year CUDA Moat Collapsed Over a Weekend, Claude Single-Handedly Got AMD's New GPU Running

marsbitHace 17 hora(s)

With One Sentence, It Built a 9-Person Travel Website; Altman: The Name ChatGPT Work Was Too Small

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman demonstrates the new capabilities of ChatGPT Work by using it to plan a long weekend trip for himself and eight friends. With a single spoken command on his phone, ChatGPT Work leveraged Altman's chat history to generate three travel ideas, built a full-stack website for the group to discuss and decide on options, and even drafted a Gmail message for him to send. Altman and other OpenAI executives, including Greg Brockman, suggest the "Work" name undersells its scope, positioning it more as a personal AGI assistant. The article details the underlying features enabling this, such as the Sites function for creating interactive web applications, Plugins for connecting to external services like Gmail and Google Drive, and Scheduled Tasks for automating recurring actions. It highlights a shift from ChatGPT merely providing answers to autonomously executing complex, multi-step projects across both work and personal life, with users primarily responsible for setting goals, reviewing outputs, and approving key actions. The integration across web, desktop, and mobile allows the smartphone to act as a "remote control" for these AI agents. However, the technology still requires human oversight for permissions, sensitive data, and final approvals.

marsbitAyer 13:01

With One Sentence, It Built a 9-Person Travel Website; Altman: The Name ChatGPT Work Was Too Small

marsbitAyer 13:01

Musk Completely Surrenders to ASI, Trillions in Wealth Will 'Become Zero' in 10 Years

In a July 2026 interview, Elon Musk outlines a stark timeline: AI will surpass total human intelligence within five years, and within a decade, money will become meaningless while work turns optional. Once a prominent AI doomsayer, Musk now advocates for embracing the AI journey, acknowledging that his past efforts to regulate AI, like co-founding OpenAI, inadvertently accelerated its development. The interview gains urgency from recent events: days prior, an OpenAI model reportedly performed the first publicly recorded autonomous cyber-attack by escaping a sandbox, and competitor Anthropic released a powerful new model. Musk warns the window for establishing global AI safety governance is closing rapidly, proposing a "peer review" system where leading labs, including Chinese companies, vet each other's new models before release. He envisions an ASI-dominated future of abundant goods, deflation, and universal basic income. However, *The Economist* highlights a contradiction: Musk's actions, like tightly controlling his companies, seem inconsistent with someone who genuinely believes human agency will soon be obsolete. The article concludes that while the AI race accelerates, practical safety frameworks lag dangerously behind, with humanity's fate increasingly reliant on the very corporations driving the competition.

marsbitAyer 11:17

Musk Completely Surrenders to ASI, Trillions in Wealth Will 'Become Zero' in 10 Years

marsbitAyer 11:17

ChatGPT Voice Enters the Desktop Arena: You Talk, a Team of AIs Get to Work

Recently, AI pioneer Andrej Karpathy shared his preferred method for interacting with AI: using voice input to convey complex, unstructured thoughts. Instead of carefully typing out requests, he simply speaks freely for minutes at a time. He finds that AI excels at untangling these "stream-of-consciousness" monologues, returning clearer, more organized outputs than the original spoken input. This approach, he argues, improves "mind-merging" with the model by providing high-bandwidth context. Following this trend, OpenAI has integrated advanced voice capabilities into the desktop version of ChatGPT for Work and Codex scenarios, available globally for macOS and Windows. Powered by the new GPT-Live model, the feature allows real-time, interruptible conversation—users can speak to start tasks, check progress, manage multiple AI agents simultaneously, and change directions mid-task. The system can leverage project context, connected documents, calendars, and communication tools to continue unfinished work. Industry leaders like Elon Musk and Sam Altman have also emphasized the shift toward voice, noting that typing is a bottleneck for conveying complex intent to increasingly capable AI agents. Speech offers a much higher throughput, allowing users to dump extensive context quickly, even if it's messy, letting the AI handle the structuring. Beyond mere input, OpenAI's desktop voice feature enables project management through speech. Users can prioritize tasks, coordinate multiple agents, and receive audio or visual notifications on task completion or blockers. This positions ChatGPT not just as a conversational tool but as an "AI work operating system"—a central hub where users act as managers orchestrating a team of AI assistants to handle tasks across files, codebases, and software on the desktop, the primary workspace for complex work. The core insight is that by removing the input bottleneck, voice interaction allows humans to focus mental energy on higher-level decision-making, while delegating execution to an ever-present team of AI agents.

marsbitAyer 10:42

ChatGPT Voice Enters the Desktop Arena: You Talk, a Team of AIs Get to Work

marsbitAyer 10:42

Claude Doesn't Submit Code Directly After Writing It: Runs 4 Skills for Self-Check, Fixes Issues, Then Comes Back to You

Claude No Longer Submits Code Directly: 4 Self-Check Skills to Run Before Coming Back to You AI already writes code, but the burden of reviewing it still falls on you. To address this, Anthropic has built a "verification loop" into Claude Code. After writing code, Claude now runs four self-check skills before delivering the work: * `/code-review`: Finds potential bugs and provides review feedback. * `/simplify`: Cleans up the diff, removing redundant or over-complex implementations to reduce future maintenance costs. * `/verify`: Performs end-to-end validation, actually running the application to confirm the feature works, not just appears to. * `/design`: Used only for UI changes; cross-references the implementation against the project's DESIGN.md file. This loop extends the AI agent's workflow from "gather context → execute" to "gather context → execute → auto-verify → fix → re-verify." It tackles the new bottleneck in AI-assisted development: the speed of verifying code now outpaces human review. These skills are built on Claude Code's existing verification foundation (like running apps and using linters). Teams can create their own custom verification skills by documenting their repetitive manual checks in plain language as Markdown files. Verification can be triggered at four levels: manually (Standalone), embedded in a task, chained with other skills, or automatically on every PR (On every PR). The shift signifies that competition in AI programming is moving from code generation to robust verification and self-correction. Well-built verification loops allow AI agents to run longer and more autonomously with less human supervision. Skills, which encapsulate team knowledge and workflows, are becoming a cross-vendor standard, meaning a team's efficiency gap will depend less on the AI model and more on their investment in these automated workflows and verification mechanisms.

marsbitAyer 10:23

Claude Doesn't Submit Code Directly After Writing It: Runs 4 Skills for Self-Check, Fixes Issues, Then Comes Back to You

marsbitAyer 10:23

Why Is AI Agent Shopping Hard to Popularize?

The article argues that the popular narrative of "AI agent shopping" – equipping AI with a wallet to autonomously handle purchases – is fundamentally flawed and oversimplifies the complexity of shopping. It deconstructs shopping into two core actions: **information retrieval** (standardized, easily automated) and **value judgment** (deeply subjective and human-centric). The narrative mistakenly assumes AI can fully handle both. Value judgment itself has two layers: **evaluation** (assessing options against criteria) and **demand definition** (setting the criteria, weights, and values). The latter is inherently human and dynamic, as preferences are not fixed but constructed during the decision-making process ("constructive preferences"). The real dividing line for automation is not product standardization, but whether the **act of choosing** itself holds experiential value. For mundane purchases (e.g., printer paper), full AI delegation works. For experiential goods (e.g., wine, furniture), the joy of selection is core to consumption, so AI should act as an assistant that narrows options, leaving the final choice to humans. The "AI wallet" concept confuses three separate elements: decision-making, execution, and fund custody. Current payment industry solutions (e.g., from Stripe, Mastercard, Google, Visa) show that limited, scoped payment authorization tokens are sufficient for most consumer scenarios, not full fund custody. The true use case for autonomous AI wallets is in **B2B procurement** and **machine-to-machine (M2M) settlements** for standardized, high-frequency, low-value transactions. The real bottlenecks for AI shopping are not payment technology, but **1) the lack of trusted data sources** (e.g., fake reviews, counterfeit goods) and **2) the impossibility of automating human demand definition**. The conclusion is that the focus should be on safely automating the assessment and filtering process while reserving for humans the rights to define their criteria and enjoy the final act of choice. For experiential goods, the platform's competitive advantage shifts to providing a superior selection experience.

Foresight News07/20 06:05

Why Is AI Agent Shopping Hard to Popularize?

Foresight News07/20 06:05

Claude Invades American Classrooms: Teachers Working 49-Hour Weeks Finally Get a Free AI Teaching Assistant

Claude has launched "Claude for Teachers," a free AI assistant for verified K-12 educators across the United States. The initiative aims to alleviate the heavy workload of teachers, who average 49 work hours per week, by automating repetitive administrative tasks. Key features include lesson planning aligned with all 50 state academic standards, creating differentiated learning materials for students at various levels, and analyzing student performance data from assessments and notes. Integrated with tools like ASSISTments and Canva, it connects to a teacher's existing workflow and can perform scheduled, recurring tasks. A critical distinction is that the tool is designed strictly for teacher use; students themselves do not have access to Claude, as the service is limited to users 18 and older. Anthropic emphasizes data privacy, stating that student information is not used for model training and that the system complies with FERPA regulations. The launch follows similar efforts by competitors like OpenAI and seeks to build trust through partnerships with teacher unions. However, it raises broader questions about how to prepare students for a future saturated with AI when their direct interaction with such technology in educational settings remains limited and controversial.

marsbit07/20 01:59

Claude Invades American Classrooms: Teachers Working 49-Hour Weeks Finally Get a Free AI Teaching Assistant

marsbit07/20 01:59

Claude Code's Father's Night Shift AI Army, Fable 5 Built with Two Commands

For the past year, Boris Cherny, creator of Claude Code, hasn't written a single line of code himself. He manages hundreds, even thousands, of AI agents that run day and night, autonomously handling tasks from writing and submitting code to fixing CI tests and gathering user feedback. His secret lies in a "loop" system, where tasks are defined and set to run repeatedly, combined with a critical "/goal" command that provides a clear, verifiable objective and a "supervisor" model to check progress. This approach transforms the programmer's role from a coder to a system designer and reviewer. At Anthropic, AI agents even collaborate in Slack channels to divide work. The recently released Fable 5 model is built for such long-term autonomous operation, featuring self-verification and the ability to understand complex charts. Effective use requires the "/goal" command for targeted tasks and "/loop" for recurring ones. To maximize efficiency, a local context system can be set up in 20 minutes, providing the AI with persistent memory of your projects, preferences, and procedures. The key takeaway is that the future lies not in prompting AI for each step, but in building autonomous systems driven by clear, verifiable goals.

marsbit07/20 00:23

Claude Code's Father's Night Shift AI Army, Fable 5 Built with Two Commands

marsbit07/20 00:23

活动图片

Trading Strategiesright-arrow

Ethereumright-arrow