Racking Up 24,000 Stars: With One Command, AI Can Now Find Its Own Skills

marsbitPublicado a 2026-07-06Actualizado a 2026-07-06

Resumen

Vercel, known for its developer tools like Next.js, has launched 'skills', a package manager for AI coding agents, garnering 24,000 GitHub stars. It allows developers to add specialized capabilities, such as React best practices, to AI assistants like Claude Code or Cursor with a single command: `npx skills add <package>`. Skills are shareable, reusable modules that define an AI agent's behavior for specific tasks, moving beyond one-off prompt engineering towards standardized 'capability engineering'. A key innovation is the 'find-skills' skill, which acts as an internal search engine, allowing an agent to autonomously find and install the right skill for a user's request. This lowers the barrier for non-developers to leverage advanced AI coding assistance. However, this 'npm moment' for AI brings significant security risks. Security audits of thousands of skills on platforms like skills.sh and ClawHub found over 30% contained security flaws, with about 13% classified as severe. Threats include malicious scripts that can access local files and credentials, and prompt injection hidden within skill documentation. Unlike traditional code packages, skills blend instructions, code, and system access, posing a direct risk to user machines and data. Experts advise treating skills like code—reviewing them carefully before installation, especially their scripts, and being wary of excessive permissions. Ultimately, Vercel's initiative represents a major shift towards modular, reusab...

In the past, developers exchanged prompt templates.

Now, the trend has changed. People are asking each other, "Which skill should you install?"

Behind this lies a bigger shift: AI programming tools are starting to "install packages."

On the morning of January 17th this year, Guillermo Rauch, founder and CEO of Vercel, posted on X: We are launching skills—the "npm" for AI skills.

所谓「npm」, is the package manager front-end engineers use every day, where one command can install others' work into their own project.

Rauch's implication was: This experience of "installing others' work with one command" is now being brought to AI.

Peter Steinberger, the "Father of Lobster," replied immediately: "Cool! Gotta sync this with ClawHub."

ClawHub is another skill marketplace for the agent ecosystem, not affiliated with Vercel. Yet Peter's first reaction was "to align."

Three days later, Vercel officially announced it in an update log: a command-line tool for installing and managing capability packages for AI agents.

The official repository, vercel-labs/skills, reached 24,000 GitHub stars in just five months after its release.

Why is it so popular? It's as simple as one command:

npx skills add .

In short, it's a package manager for AI agents.

Like npm, used daily by front-end engineers, one command installs others' work into a project—except this time it's not code libraries, but "capabilities."

Even better, it's tool-agnostic. Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI... over 68 officially supported agents. One capability package runs on any tool.

Vercel also launched skills.sh, a skill directory with an installation leaderboard, showing which skills are popular and how many times they've been installed at a glance.

The top package, called find-skills, has already been installed 2.3 million times.

skills.sh skill directory installation leaderboard. find-skills leads with 2.3 million (2.3M) installs, followed by frontend-design, vercel-react-best-practices, etc. (Source: skills.sh)

For the first time, AI programming capabilities have a "Top Downloads" chart.

One Command

AI Learns a New Skill

First, let's see what it actually does.

npx skills add vercel-labs/agent-skills, enter.

Seconds later, your Claude Code gains a set of React and Next.js engineering standards, plus a set of design principles. Next time it writes code, it automatically follows these rules.

This is officially called a "skill package." Essentially, it's a folder, with a SKILL.md file with a YAML header at its core, clearly stating two things: what this skill is, and when to use it.

The folder can also contain reference docs, templates, and a dedicated scripts/ directory containing executable scripts.

It solves a very practical pain point.

Models understand general programming languages and frameworks, but they don't know your project's "local conventions": your code style, naming habits, pitfalls you've encountered.

Before, you had to repeat these in every new conversation. Now, they're packaged into a skill, installed once, and remain effective long-term.

After installation, you can manage it like npm packages: list to see what's installed, update with one click, remove to delete.

Underlying it is a shared specification. What you install for Claude Code runs just the same when switched to Cursor.

If even installing is too much trouble, there's an even lighter way: use it without installing.

A single npx skills use temporarily pulls the skill over, pipes it to Claude to run, and discards it after use, without even "soiling" the local directory.

In the past, the boundary of AI's capabilities depended on how you described them verbally. Now, capabilities have become packages that can be directly taken off the shelf.

The "npm-ification" of the AI Tool Layer

Many might mistake it for a new Claude feature. But it comes from Vercel, not an innate capability of Anthropic.

Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf... all are supported targets. The skills CLI connects them all, unifying the entry point.

Behind this entry point lies the "npm-ification" of the AI tool layer.

Vercel packages these fragmented experiences into reusable, distributable, version-managed modules.

AI capabilities are shifting from "prompt engineering" to "capability engineering." The former solves "how to say it this time," the latter solves "how to do this thing every time from now on."

Vercel has played this game before.

Back then, it used Next.js to lock down the deployment gateway for the entire front-end ecosystem; front-end developers couldn't avoid it.

Now it wants to tell the same story again, but at the AI agent layer.

Find Skills

AI Gets Its First "Capability Search Engine"

The most futuristic touch is Find Skills, a "skill for finding skills."

The official definition of the find-skills skill—when users ask "how to do X" or "is there a skill that can...", or want to expand capabilities, it is responsible for discovering and installing the corresponding AI agent skills.

You say "help me do X," and it runs the entire process for you: search, filter, and install the most suitable one.

Even better, it comes with built-in quality checks. When selecting skills, it checks installation counts, compares sources, prioritizes popular and official ones, and warns you to be cautious about dubious ones.

The source code of find-skills' SKILL.md explicitly includes three quality verification rules before recommendation: prioritize 1000+ installs, be wary of those below 100, prioritize official sources like Vercel, Anthropic, Microsoft, and question repositories with fewer than 100 stars.

This means AI has its first "capability search engine." You don't need to know what skills exist or their names; just say what you want to do, and let it find the rest.

More importantly, it's not just useful for programmers.

The ones most tormented by "fragmented capabilities" are actually designers, product managers, and content creators who rely on AI to write code.

They lack engineering habits, relying on AI for git commits, documentation standards, making them the ones who most need ready-made skill packages for support.

Find Skills essentially gives them an entry point to deploy capabilities without needing to understand the details.

Behind the Hype

An Unbacked Liability

It sounds great, but don't get carried away just yet.

Let's go back to that scripts directory. Skills contain execution logic, not just harmless descriptions; they actually run commands on your computer.

But most people don't check which files a third-party package they casually installed might have touched.

How many landmines could be hidden within?

Snyk's ToxicSkills research conducted the first systematic audit of 3984 skills on ClawHub and skills.sh: over 30% had security flaws, 13.4% (534) were critical severity, covering malware distribution, prompt injection, and key leakage.

This means, on average, one out of every 7 or 8 could directly harm you.

Snyk's "ToxicSkills" research audited 3984 skills: 1467 (36.82%) had any security flaw, of which 534 (13.4%) were critical severity, with 76 malicious payloads confirmed, and another 8 still existing on ClawHub. (Source: Snyk)

Another organization, Koi Security, audited 2857 skills and found 341 malicious ones.

The main methods follow two paths.

One is through scripts, making your AI download things from unfamiliar IPs and execute them locally, or stealing to read your SSH, AWS configurations.

The other is more subtle, directly poisoning the text within SKILL.md, where AI reads the attacker's hidden instructions as legitimate work descriptions and acts accordingly.

The most severe ones specifically steal memory files where agents store private conversations.

You might say, npm also has constant poisoning incidents, but the risk here is on another level.

npm installs pure code, separating data and instructions; skill blurs this boundary. It combines prompts, code, and full permissions; a single SKILL.md can rewrite the agent's behavior, with direct access to your filesystem, network, and shell.

npm's risks at most affect build artifacts; skill's risks directly access your local credentials and entire codebase.

Of course, this isn't to advise against installing. Vercel itself reminds: treat skills like code, read them before installing, and be especially careful with the scripts directory.

The simplest rule of thumb is: high download count doesn't equal safety. What you should really look at is the source and permissions. Why would a weather-checking skill need to read your server's SSH key?

The long-awaited "npm moment" for AI capabilities has truly arrived.

But it didn't just bring convenience; it also bundled in all the pitfalls npm has stepped on over the years, arriving even before the ecosystem matured.

Installing capabilities with one command is certainly satisfying, but this road has just begun. It lets you reuse peers' accumulated expertise, but also requires you to bring judgment to the table.

Selecting packages, checking sources, verifying permissions—this old craft of developers must still be brought along this time.

Twenty Years

One Command

Ultimately, the origin of all this is still Vercel founder Guillermo Rauch.

He comes from Lanús in Buenos Aires, Argentina. In his own words, much of his life's work is thanks to the Web and open source.

In his youth, he was passionate about promoting Linux, teaching people how to use it, later diving headfirst into JavaScript; after joining the core team of the open-source project MooTools, he got his first full-time front-end engineering job at 18 and moved to San Francisco.

Guillermo Rauch

One of his famous works is Socket.io: a widely used real-time communication library. The real-time sync in Notion, Coinbase's earliest trading products—they all run on it underneath.

Later, he focused on a direction: building tools and cloud infrastructure to make the Web faster and maximize developer experience. Next.js and Vercel were born.

Today, this platform supports the online operations of companies like The Washington Post, Porsche, Under Armour, and Nintendo.

And Vercel's real killer app lies here: code, preview, deploy—all done with one command. Once developers use it, it's hard to leave this ecosystem.

Ultimately, Rauch has done one thing for twenty years: compress originally complex engineering into that one command developers dare to run with their eyes closed.

From one line `now` to spin up a server, to Next.js, to today's `npx skills add`, the same craft, now applied to AI agents.

References:

https://github.com/vercel-labs/skills#supported-agents

https://www.skills.sh/

https://snyk.io/blog/toxicskills-malicious-ai-agent-skills-clawhub/

This article is from the WeChat public account "Xin Zhi Yuan" (New Wisdom Source), author: ASI Apocalypse, editor: Yuan Yu

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the core functionality and significance of the Vercel-labs/skills tool mentioned in the article?

AThe Vercel-labs/skills tool is a command-line interface that functions as a package manager for AI agents. Its core command, `npx skills add `, allows developers to install pre-packaged AI 'skills'—which are essentially reusable modules containing knowledge, templates, and scripts—into various AI coding tools like Claude Code, Cursor, and others. Its significance lies in transforming how AI capabilities are distributed and managed, moving from ad-hoc prompt engineering to reusable 'capability engineering,' making specialized knowledge accessible and persistent across projects and tools.

QAccording to the article, what potential security risks are associated with installing AI agent skills from public repositories?

AInstalling AI agent skills from public repositories poses significant security risks, as highlighted by security audits from companies like Snyk. Risks include: 1) Malware distribution via executable scripts that can download and run arbitrary code. 2) Prompt injection, where hidden instructions in the SKILL.md file can manipulate the AI agent's behavior. 3) Stealing sensitive data like SSH keys, AWS credentials, or private conversation histories. The risk is heightened because skills combine instructions, code, and direct system access, making them potentially more dangerous than traditional npm packages where code and data are more separated.

QDescribe the role and function of the 'find-skills' skill mentioned in the article.

AThe 'find-skills' skill is a meta-skill designed to discover and install other AI agent skills. When a user requests help for a task (e.g., 'How do I do X?'), this skill automatically searches the skills repository, filters options based on criteria like installation count and trusted sources (e.g., Vercel, Anthropic), and installs the most suitable skill. It essentially acts as an 'ability search engine' for AI agents, allowing users, especially non-engineers, to extend AI capabilities without needing to know specific skill names or manually browse directories.

QWhat major shift in AI development does the Vercel skills initiative represent, as discussed in the article?

AThe Vercel skills initiative represents a major shift from 'prompt engineering' to 'capability engineering.' Previously, developers shared prompt templates to guide AI for specific tasks in a one-off manner. Now, they are packaging comprehensive knowledge, project-specific rules, and executable scripts into reusable and distributable 'skill' modules. This 'npm-ification' of the AI tool layer allows for standardized, version-controlled, and easily shareable AI capabilities, moving beyond transient instructions to durable, installable components that can be managed across different AI agent platforms.

QBased on the article, what is a key piece of advice for safely using AI agent skills from public sources?

AA key piece of advice for safely using AI agent skills is to treat them with the same caution as external code libraries. Users should: 1) Review the skill's source code, particularly the `SKILL.md` file and any scripts in the `scripts/` directory, before installation. 2) Prioritize skills from verified and official sources (e.g., Vercel, Anthropic). 3) Be wary of skills requesting excessive or unnecessary permissions (e.g., a weather skill asking for SSH keys). 4) Not rely solely on high download counts as a guarantee of safety. The article emphasizes the need for developers to apply their existing judgment about dependencies to this new ecosystem.

Lecturas Relacionadas

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手Hace 9 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手Hace 9 min(s)

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手Hace 25 min(s)

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手Hace 25 min(s)

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar ONE

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Harmony (ONE) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Harmony (ONE) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Harmony (ONE)Después de comprar tu Harmony (ONE), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Harmony (ONE)Tradear fácilmente con Harmony (ONE) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

329 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.12Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar ONE

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de ONE (ONE).

活动图片