Now is the Best Time to Interact with Polymarket (Exclusive Tutorial Included)

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2026-03-18Actualizado a 2026-03-18

Resumen

Polymarket, a prediction market platform, is currently offering an exceptional opportunity for users to earn liquidity provider (LP) rewards, particularly due to a massive $2 million subsidy program for NCAA's "March Madness" basketball tournament events. The core strategy for effective interaction is to focus on accumulating these LP rewards instead of solely trading, as a significant majority of users have never received any. To qualify, users must provide liquidity on specific, subsidized events by placing orders within a maximum spread (e.g., ±1¢) and a minimum share amount (e.g., 1000 shares). Rewards are distributed daily, but only if they exceed $1. The article provides a step-by-step guide: First, select an event with high subsidies from the Rewards page, preferably one starting later to minimize price volatility and inventory risk. For example, a game starting days later showed almost no price movement. Next, use the Split function to create equal buy and sell shares from a minimum of $1000, then place limit sell orders on both sides. It's advised to place orders slightly away from the market price (e.g., the second position) to reduce the risk of orders being filled, which would require rebalancing. Users should monitor their positions and consider withdrawing orders about one day before the event starts to avoid last-minute volatility, then potentially move funds to a later event. The author reports earning $4.31 in rewards over a few hours with minimal effort,...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Azuma (@azuma_eth)

Earlier this year, Odaily Planet Daily compiled an article by data analyst arise titled "Data Modeling: How to Improve the Quality of Polymarket Interactions?".

The core logic of the article is that, considering about 80% of users have never received even $1 in Polymarket liquidity (LP) subsidies, while everyone is frantically competing for trading volume, a more efficient interaction strategy is actually to do everything possible to accumulate LP rewards.

So-called "LP rewards" are real cash subsidies issued by Polymarket to improve the liquidity conditions of its platform for specific prediction markets. All reward details can be viewed in real-time on the official Rewards page (https://polymarket.com/rewards).

Users first need to select an event that has subsidies, then place orders for at least the specified amount (Min Shares) within the specified spread range (Max Spread) to automatically accumulate LP rewards. The closer the order price is to the market price, the higher the efficiency of earning rewards. LP rewards are distributed daily at 8:00 UTC, but only rewards of $1 or more are distributed.

Although the rules for obtaining LP rewards are not complicated, the difficulty of market making in prediction markets is inherently higher (refer to "Only One in Ten Prediction Markets Will Survive Until the End of the Year, Not an Exaggeration"). Coupled with the minimum $1 threshold for daily reward distribution, many ordinary users with limited funds find it difficult to accumulate rewards when trying to operate, and may even suffer capital losses due to inventory risk.

However, right now, Polymarket is providing an excellent opportunity window — with the arrival of the NCAA "March Madness", Polymarket has announced that it will provide $2 million in LP subsidies for related events.

It is important to note that the total amount of LP subsidies Polymarket has distributed for all subsidized events so far is only $13 million. This $2 million+ subsidy will be concentratedly distributed for specific 63 games in less than a month — this directly means an expansion of the subsidy intensity per event, and also represents an excellent opportunity for ordinary users.

Next, Odaily Planet Daily will walk you through the process of market making for NCAA-related events step by step, and briefly mention a few points I think are worth noting.

First, open the Polymarket Rewards page, click on Reward, and you can sort all events by subsidy intensity. It's easy to see that the events with the highest subsidy intensity on Polymarket currently are all NCAA "March Madness" games. (I have been providing liquidity on Polymarket for the past few months and have never seen such a level of subsidy intensity.)

The next most important thing is choosing a pool. It should be added that there is a column called COMP (Competitive) on the right side of Rewards, which indicates the current competition status for providing liquidity in that event. Theoretically, greener is better (representing less competition), but in practice, the competition gap has basically been leveled by professional market making funds, so what you basically see is "three yellow bars", meaning the current competition status is "medium".

Here, it is more recommended to choose games that start later. For example, I chose to put funds into this game between the University of Iowa and the University of Houston on March 19th EST (March 20th Beijing time).

The reason later start times are better is that the trading volume peak for a single sports event on Polymarket often only arrives shortly before the game starts, and Polymarket has already started injecting subsidies. Taking this "University of Iowa vs. University of Houston" game starting the day after tomorrow as an example, the current total trading volume is only $12,000. With a certain liquidity base, lower trading volume often means smaller fluctuations — the chart below clearly shows the probability fluctuation status since Polymarket listed this game. You saw it right, it's a straight line!

Extremely small fluctuations mean users can temporarily avoid "inventory risk", the biggest risk source in market making. Simply put, you don't have to worry too much about the price suddenly moving unilaterally, causing your one-sided orders to be filled while the market price has moved to an unfavorable direction.

After finding a suitable pool (not necessarily this one; I put funds into this one in the morning, you can look for later times), it's time to provide liquidity. Polymarket's liquidity requirements for all NCAA games are a minimum of 1000 shares, with a maximum spread not exceeding ±1¢.

Compared to placing buy orders, it is more recommended to use Polymarket's Split function to split $1000 (the minimum requirement) into equal bilateral shares (which can be reversely minted into $1000 through the Merge function), and then place sell orders on both sides.

As for the specific price points for placing orders, it depends on your own risk appetite. The closer to the market price, the higher the efficiency of earning LP rewards. But still considering inventory risk, I prefer to place orders at the "second best" price level, and then pay attention to price fluctuations, trying to ensure the orders don't get filled — if they are filled, the order amount will no longer meet the requirements, and you will need to consider how to handle the shares on the other side.

Finally, regarding the order cancellation time, it is recommended to cancel the orders about 1 day before the game starts, and then look for later games. If you are interested in continuing, you can repeat the above operation.

Finally, here are the data: I placed the orders around 10:00 in the morning. The probability for this game did not fluctuate at all during this period. Although I said I needed to monitor it, I didn't really do much. As of 17:00, the LP reward I have earned is $4.31 (which will be distributed tomorrow).

The profit is small change, but the key point is to enrich the interaction behavior on Polymarket. Compared to a few days ago, you might have needed to博弈 with the market in relatively low subsidy conditions. Under the current subsidy intensity and event fluctuation conditions, this operation can basically be considered brainless now.

Finally, a quick advertisement: Friends interested in prediction markets are welcome to join our TG chat group for casual discussion anytime: https://t.me/OdailySeer

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the core strategy recommended for interacting with Polymarket to maximize rewards?

AThe core strategy is to focus on accumulating Liquidity Provider (LP) rewards rather than just trading volume, as approximately 80% of users have never received even $1 in LP subsidies.

QWhat specific event has created a prime opportunity for users to earn LP rewards on Polymarket recently?

AThe NCAA 'March Madness' tournament has created a prime opportunity, as Polymarket is providing over $2 million in LP subsidies concentrated across 63 specific games within a month.

QWhat are the two main requirements for users to start accumulating LP rewards on a subsidized event?

AUsers must place orders of at least the 'Min Shares' amount (e.g., 1000 shares for NCAA games) within the specified 'Max Spread' (e.g., ±1¢ for NCAA games) on a subsidized event.

QWhy does the article suggest choosing markets for games that start later?

AGames that start later have lower current trading volume, which often results in minimal price volatility (a nearly flat line on the chart), significantly reducing the inventory risk for liquidity providers.

QWhat specific Polymarket feature does the article recommend using to provide liquidity easily and what is the suggested action regarding order placement?

AThe article recommends using the 'Split' function to divide $1000 into equal opposing shares, then placing sell orders on both sides. It also advises placing orders at the 'second price level' from the market price to balance reward efficiency and risk, and to cancel orders about one day before the game starts.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Three Months, 35 Billion Yuan: Investors Rush to Grab the OpenAI of the Physical World

Investors flock to a physical AI startup as the race for the "OpenAI of the physical world" heats up. Ji Jia Shi Jie (GigaWorld), a company dedicated to developing Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) for the physical world, has raised 3.5 billion RMB (approximately $490 million) in just three months, according to a report from investment media outlet Touzijie. The latest B2 funding round of 1 billion RMB attracted a wide range of top-tier investors, including sovereign wealth funds, industrial capital, and financial institutions. This brings the total funding for the young company, now valued over 10 billion RMB, to 3.5 billion RMB across three recent rounds. The company is led by Huang Guan, a post-90s Tsinghua University PhD with extensive experience in AI, autonomous driving, and entrepreneurship. Its core innovation is a "dual-pyramid" system comprising a five-layer data pyramid (from internet videos to real-world robot data) and a three-layer algorithm pyramid focused on world simulation, action alignment, and reinforcement learning. This system underpins its key models: the "World Action Model" (e.g., GigaBrain series for robot control) and the "World Generation Model" (e.g., GigaWorld series for simulating and understanding the physical world). Its models have reportedly achieved top rankings in global robotics benchmarks. Ji Jia Shi Jie argues that while current digital AGI excels in information processing, the next frontier is physical AGI—systems that can understand and interact with the real world. The company believes the field is approaching its "GPT-3 moment," a key inflection point in capability scaling. To achieve this, the company is pursuing a dual-market strategy. For the consumer (C) market, it launched the "SeeLight" brand and its S1 general-purpose humanoid robot, which has secured initial orders for deployment in real homes. For the business (B) market, it focuses on industrial automation with its Maker series robots, having signed agreements for large-scale deployment in factories, and its DriveDreamer world model for autonomous driving, which is already in use with over 30 automakers and tech companies. The report concludes that by bridging the gap between digital intelligence and physical action, Ji Jia Shi Jie aims to unlock a new wave of productivity, ultimately bringing physical AGI into everyday life.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Three Months, 35 Billion Yuan: Investors Rush to Grab the OpenAI of the Physical World

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

This text explores the unexpected connection between Pinduoduo founder Colin Huang and blockchain, as suggested in his article *Turning Capitalism Upside Down*. Huang argues Pinduoduo's core business is about managing "uncertainty." He posits that wealth flows to the rich because they absorb life's uncertainties (e.g., illness, job loss) that devastate the poor, who pay a premium for certainty through insurance or stable prices. Pinduoduo's model attempts a "reverse insurance": by aggregating consumer demand via group-buying and flash sales, it creates a large, predictable order for manufacturers. This certainty allows factories to remove risk premiums, passing savings back as lower prices, thus partially reversing the wealth flow. The key obstacle, Huang notes, is that an individual's buying intent is an unreliable promise. He then asks if blockchain is the natural solution for this "reverse insurance." The text elaborates that blockchain, through smart contracts with binding deposits, could transform casual intent into a costly-to-break, enforceable commitment. This replaces interpersonal trust with coded rules, making promises credible, pricable, and resistant to fraud. Finally, the author draws a parallel to Bitcoin, framing two paths to creating certainty: the "Pinduoduo path" of aggregating decentralized will into scale, and the "Bitcoin path" of locking rules into immutable code. Both sacrifice something—personal freedom or system flexibility—to manufacture trust and predictability.

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

**Summary:** "The Memory Magnate Who Built a Trillion-Dollar Empire, Yet Never Became the Richest" explores the journey of Zhu Yiming, founder of GigaDevice (603986) and co-founder of the soon-to-IPO ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). The article positions GigaDevice, a fabless chip designer now valued at ~¥340 billion, as a prequel to the massive IDM (Integrated Device Manufacturer) venture, CXMT. Starting in 2005 with minimal capital, Zhu strategically "picked up the pieces" by focusing on niche markets like NOR Flash and microcontrollers (MCUs), areas major players were exiting. This allowed GigaDevice to grow into a diversified semiconductor company, maintaining robust profitability even during industry downturns by controlling costs. However, the piece argues that in the highly cyclical and capital-intensive memory chip industry, the fabless model has limits. True resilience and scale require the ability for "counter-cyclical expansion" – investing heavily during downturns – a tactic only possible for IDMs like Samsung or SK Hynix. This insight led Zhu to partner with the Hefei city government in 2016 to establish CXMT, an IDM focused on DRAM. Zhu's symbolic moves, like forfeiting salary and diluting his equity, were crucial in securing the massive state and bank funding needed. CXMT's equipment base is now valued even higher than that of BYD's vast auto manufacturing empire. Despite the potential for CXMT to reach a market cap of ¥1-2 trillion upon its IPO, Zhu's indirect stake in both companies is estimated below 3%, placing his personal wealth far below that of China's top billionaires. The article concludes that his strategic vision built a trillion-yuan memory landscape, but the capital structure necessary to achieve it precluded a personal fortune of similar scale.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

The XRP Ledger is drawing attention as daily network fees have fallen below $400. While low fees align with XRPL's design for affordable transactions and are often seen as a strength, the metric can also serve as an indicator of network demand and paid transaction volume. This data point of around $3,100 in weekly fee burn highlights the stark contrast with higher-fee chains like Ethereum and Bitcoin. The development fuels an ongoing debate. Proponents view low fees as a sign of efficiency and accessibility, while critics may question if the network is generating sufficient high-value activity relative to its market cap and payments-focused narrative. The article cautions against overstating the finding, noting a single low-fee day does not signify network failure. It instead adds context to discussions about XRPL's usage, especially alongside Ripple's broader initiatives in stablecoins (RLUSD), AI payments, and enterprise infrastructure. The report recommends monitoring for a fee rebound, checking transaction counts for a fuller picture, and confirming the trend via native explorers like Bithomp. It frames the story within a larger market shift where on-chain data, protocol updates, and infrastructure developments are becoming crucial alongside price action. The editorial stance is to present the verified data, explain its significance for assessing network activity, and avoid hype, positioning it as part of the daily crypto conversation.

bitcoinistHace 6 hora(s)

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

bitcoinistHace 6 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片