MYX drops 11% as liquidity dries up – Can bulls defend THIS support?

ambcryptoPublicado a 2025-12-19Actualizado a 2025-12-19

Resumen

MYX Finance's price dropped 11% amid a significant decline in liquidity and investor confidence. On-chain data shows Total Value Locked (TVL) fell by $1.16 million to $22.64 million, driven by a 99.37% collapse in protocol earnings since October. Perpetual traders turned bearish, with funding rates turning negative and open interest declining by 14% to $21.27 million. Spot volume also dropped sharply from $171.96 million to $44.74 million. Although MYX is near the lower boundary of an ascending channel, suggesting a possible short-term bounce, key support levels are at $0.34 and $0.23. A break below these may reinforce the broader downtrend. Recovery depends on stabilizing demand across markets.

MYX Finance has stayed in the hot seat over the past day, with sellers dominating market activity as the altcoin plunged 11% during this period.

Sentiment across on-chain and derivatives data stayed weak. That weakness suggested downside risk may persist if demand failed to recover.

Liquidity outflows intensify

On-chain liquidity has declined sharply, with bearish sentiment strengthening as investors continue to exit the protocol.

Total Value Locked (TVL), a key metric that measures a protocol’s health based on investor deposits, points to a fragile outlook.

According to DeFiLlama data, MYX Finance’s [MYX] TVL fell by roughly $1.16 million over eight days. It dropped to about $22.64 million.

AMBCrypto traced the primary driver of this outflow to a sharp decline in the protocol’s earnings in December.

The protocol, which recorded peak earnings of $16,685 in October, has seen revenue collapse to just $105 as of press time. This represented an unprecedented 99.37% decline.

Lower earnings suggested reduced protocol usage, since revenue depended on transaction activity. At the same time, unlocks and withdrawals added selling pressure.

That combination pointed to weakening demand across the ecosystem.

Perpetual traders turn bearish

Perpetual traders have increasingly tilted toward the bearish side of the market.

The Open Interest-Weighted Funding Rate turned negative, signaling short-side dominance. At press time, it printed around -0.0140%.

This shift has coincided with a notable 14% decline in Open Interest, which fell to $21.27 million, reflecting a $3.06 million outflow from the Derivatives market.

On top of that, taker-driven Spot Volume declined sharply. Volume fell to $44.74 million from $171.96 million earlier.

Falling price alongside shrinking volume typically confirm bearish conditions. Even so, selling momentum appeared to be slowing.

Possible price movement

Chart analysis showed that MYX has moved into a short-term bullish price structure.

MYX traded near the lower boundary of an ascending channel, suggesting a temporary bullish structure. That positioning could allow a short-lived bounce.

However, the broader structure remained fragile when viewed in historical context.

That setup left traders focused on two key downside levels. The first sat near the recent higher low around $0.34. Below that, the channel’s origin near $0.23 marked the next critical support.

A failure to hold either level could reinforce MYX’s broader downtrend.


Final Thoughts

  • MYX’s recent price weakness reflected broader cracks in liquidity, participation, and trader conviction.
  • While short-term technical support remained intact, sustained recovery may depend on demand stabilizing across both spot and derivatives markets.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the percentage drop in MYX's price and what key metric indicates a fragile outlook for the protocol?

AMYX's price dropped by 11%. The key metric indicating a fragile outlook is the Total Value Locked (TVL), which declined sharply.

QWhat was the primary driver of the liquidity outflow from the MYX Finance protocol according to the article?

AThe primary driver of the liquidity outflow was traced to a sharp decline in the protocol's earnings, which collapsed by 99.37% from its peak in October.

QWhat does a negative Open Interest-Weighted Funding Rate signal in the derivatives market?

AA negative Open Interest-Weighted Funding Rate signals short-side dominance, meaning perpetual traders are bearish and betting on the price to decrease.

QWhat two key downside price levels are traders focused on for MYX, according to the chart analysis?

ATraders are focused on the recent higher low around $0.34 as the first key level, and the channel's origin near $0.23 as the next critical support level.

QWhat does the combination of falling price and shrinking spot volume typically confirm?

AThe combination of a falling price alongside shrinking volume typically confirms bearish market conditions.

Lecturas Relacionadas

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报Hace 37 min(s)

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报Hace 37 min(s)

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight NewsHace 55 min(s)

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight NewsHace 55 min(s)

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片