Hedge Fund Q1 Interpretation: Everyone Is Selling Software, Buying Chips

marsbitPublicado a 2026-05-27Actualizado a 2026-05-27

Resumen

Hedge Funds and Mutual Funds Aligned in Q1: Dumping Software, Buying Chips A clear consensus emerged among major U.S. hedge funds and mutual funds in Q1: they were simultaneously selling software stocks and pouring capital into the semiconductor sector. This aggressive rotation pushed semiconductor exposure in hedge fund long portfolios to a record high. Hedge funds delivered a 7% return year-to-date, while only 30% of large-cap active mutual funds outperformed their benchmarks. The average short interest for S&P 500 constituents rose to 3% of market cap, the highest since 2011. Within technology, the structural shift was stark. Hedge funds' semiconductor weighting hit an all-time high, while software fell to its lowest since 2019. Excluding Microsoft, mutual funds' relative overexposure to semis vs. software was the largest since 2012. Microsoft was among the most net-sold stocks by both groups. Hedge funds net purchased semiconductor names like LRCX and AMAT. Strategies diverged on leverage and cash. Hedge funds increased their net exposure to near a one-year high after an initial cut. Mutual funds raised their cash allocation, though it remains historically low at 1.4%. Sector alignment was high in Industrials (both overweight) but divergent in Tech: hedge funds increased their Tech net tilt by a record 853 basis points, while mutual funds reduced theirs. Clear splits also appeared in Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Four stocks appeared on both Goldman's hedge...

Author: Zhao Ying

Source: Wall Street News

In the first quarter, U.S. hedge funds and large mutual funds reached a rare consensus: selling software and rushing into semiconductors, pushing the long-side weight of semiconductors in hedge fund portfolios to a record high.

According to Goldman Sachs' latest "Hedge Fund Trend Monitor" and "Mutual Fund Fundamentals" reports, this analysis covers 1,059 hedge funds (total equity holdings of $4.6 trillion) and 509 large active mutual funds (equity assets under management of $3.9 trillion). The reports show that hedge funds have achieved a return of 7% year-to-date, while only 30% of large mutual funds outperformed their benchmarks, lower than the historical average of 37% since 2007.

The Q1 13F filing data from the U.S. reveals a clear market consensus: hedge funds and mutual funds are simultaneously selling software stocks and flocking to the semiconductor sector. The intensity of this rotation is so great that it has pushed semiconductors' weight in hedge fund long portfolios to an all-time high.

In terms of positioning structure, hedge fund net leverage has rebounded to the 85th percentile over the past five years, near a one-year high; meanwhile, the average short interest as a percentage of market capitalization for S&P 500 constituents has risen to 3%, the highest level since 2011, indicating simultaneous intensification of market long/short activity.

Semiconductor Positioning Hits Record High, Software Faces Systematic Reduction

The structural rotation within the technology sector was the most prominent theme this quarter.

Goldman Sachs data shows that semiconductors' weight in hedge fund long portfolios has risen to its highest level on record, while software's weight has fallen to its lowest since 2019. Regarding mutual funds, their positioning in software has dropped to its lowest level since 2012. Excluding Microsoft, the magnitude of mutual fund overweight in semiconductors relative to software is also the largest since 2012.

At the individual stock level, Microsoft (MSFT) became one of the stocks with the largest net selling by both hedge funds and mutual funds last quarter. Mutual funds also reduced holdings across the remaining members of the "Magnificent Seven." While hedge funds trimmed most "Magnificent Seven" holdings, they achieved net buying in META and AAPL.

For semiconductor stocks, hedge funds net bought LRCX, AMAT, and ASML; mutual funds net bought INTC and SITM.

Leverage and Cash: Hedge Funds Aggressive, Mutual Funds Conservative

Faced with escalating geopolitical tensions in Q1, the response strategies of the two types of institutions showed clear divergence.

Hedge funds initially cut net leverage but then quickly increased positions as markets rebounded in Q2, with net exposure rebounding to near a one-year high. Overall leverage relative to historical levels remains elevated.

Mutual funds, on the other hand, opted to increase cash allocations, raising the cash-to-assets ratio from a historical low of 1.1% at the start of 2026 to 1.4% in early April. However, this level remains historically very low, indicating that mutual funds overall have not significantly withdrawn from equity markets.

Sector Consensus and Divergence: Overweight Industrials, Tech Divergence

Regarding sector allocations, there is high consensus between the two types of institutions, but also clear exceptions. Both hedge funds and mutual funds are overweight the Industrials sector and underweight the Information Technology sector, but their reallocation directions were opposite.

Hedge funds increased their net tilt towards Information Technology by 853 basis points in Q1, the largest single-quarter move for the sector on record, while simultaneously reducing their net tilt towards Industrials by 297 basis points. Mutual funds operated in reverse, increasing Industrials exposure by 24 basis points and cutting Information Technology by 20 basis points.

The two sectors with the most prominent divergence are Financials and Consumer Discretionary: mutual funds are overweight Financials while hedge funds are underweight; hedge funds are overweight Consumer Discretionary while mutual funds are underweight.

Four 'Shared Favorites' Outperform the Market Year-to-Date

Goldman Sachs screened for four stocks appearing simultaneously on both the hedge fund VIP list (GSTHHVIP) and the mutual fund overweight list (GSTHMFOW) this quarter: Boeing (BA), Mastercard (MA), Marvell Technology (MRVL), and Visa (V). MRVL is a new member this quarter, while Citigroup (C) and Vertiv (VRT) exited the list.

These four stocks have generated a year-to-date return of 10%, outperforming the equal-weighted S&P 500 index by 3 percentage points. Over a longer horizon, since 2013, the "Shared Favorites" basket has an annualized return of 16%, but with a high standard deviation of 22%, indicating significantly higher volatility. Currently, the median stock in this basket trades at a P/E of 34x, a significant premium to the S&P 500 median stock's 18x.

Notably, all "Magnificent Seven" stocks are included in the hedge fund VIP list, yet all are underweighted by mutual funds, forming a sharp contrast in attitudes between the two types of institutions towards these core assets.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the analysis of US 13F holdings, what major shift in positioning did both hedge funds and mutual funds make in the tech sector during the first quarter?

ABoth hedge funds and mutual funds engaged in a significant sector rotation within tech: they sold software stocks and aggressively bought into the semiconductor sector. This shift pushed hedge funds' semiconductor long weight to a record high, while software weight fell to its lowest since 2019.

QWhat was the contrasting strategy between hedge funds and mutual funds regarding their use of leverage and cash in response to market conditions?

AHedge funds and mutual funds adopted divergent strategies. Hedge funds increased their net leverage to near a one-year high. In contrast, mutual funds became more conservative, raising their cash allocation from a record low of 1.1% at the start of 2024 to 1.4% by early April, although this level remains historically low.

QWhich specific stock was net sold the most by both hedge funds and mutual funds last quarter, and which two semiconductor stocks did hedge funds net buy?

AMicrosoft (MSFT) was one of the largest net sells for both hedge funds and mutual funds last quarter. Hedge funds were net buyers of Lam Research (LRCX) and Applied Materials (AMAT), among other semiconductor stocks.

QWhich four stocks were identified as 'Shared Favorites' by Goldman Sachs this quarter, and how has their performance been year-to-date?

AThe four 'Shared Favorites' stocks (appearing on both the hedge fund VIP list and mutual fund overweight list) are Boeing (BA), Mastercard (MA), Marvell Technology (MRVL), and Visa (V). This group has delivered a 10% return year-to-date, outperforming the equal-weighted S&P 500 index by 3 percentage points.

QHow did the positioning of hedge funds and mutual funds differ regarding the 'Magnificent Seven' stocks and the Financials and Consumer Discretionary sectors?

ARegarding the 'Magnificent Seven,' all members are on the hedge fund VIP list but are underweighted by mutual funds. For sector positioning, mutual funds are overweight Financials while hedge funds are underweight. Conversely, hedge funds are overweight Consumer Discretionary, while mutual funds are underweight that sector.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbitHace 26 min(s)

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbitHace 26 min(s)

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片