From Calling for $150 to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2026-06-09Actualizado a 2026-06-09

Resumen

Arthur Hayes, co-founder of BitMEX and a prominent crypto figure, is facing scrutiny over his market credibility. Recent on-chain data and public criticism, notably from detective ZachXBT, question whether he uses his influence to create exit liquidity for his followers. Hayes has executed several abrupt sell-offs, including publicly advocating for HYPE to reach $150 before completely selling his holdings just three days later, after which the price dropped sharply. He similarly promoted WLD with a $10 target, only to sell his entire position three days afterward, citing vague concerns about SpaceX's pre-IPO activity and causing a significant price decline. Hayes justifies these moves with detailed macroeconomic analyses, such as a recent essay citing energy costs and AI market risks, explaining his shift into energy stocks and core cryptocurrencies BTC and ETH. However, his pattern of bullish public statements followed by unannounced sell-offs—previously seen with tokens like ETHFI and ENA—has led many investors to adopt a strategy of ignoring his commentary but closely monitoring his on-chain actions for sell signals. Analysts warn that this "cry wolf" pattern risks eroding his market trust, with Hayes himself admitting in a recent article, "I remain an unapologetic gambler."

Original |Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author|Golem(@web3_golem)

How much market credibility does Arthur Hayes have left? Recently, "the father of crypto perpetual contracts" and BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes has faced public criticism. On-chain detective ZachXBT has also publicly questioned how much exit liquidity he has created using his followers.

Liquidating HYPE, NEAR, WLD

Starting last week, Arthur Hayes performed several unexpected sell-offs to exit at the top.

Arthur Hayes had repeatedly stated publicly that HYPE would rise to $150 in this cycle. On June 1, Arthur Hayes passionately clashed with former Multicoin Capital co-founder Kyle Samani, who had disparaged Hyperliquid, and even made a $100,000 bet with him. However, just 3 days later, Arthur Hayes announced he had completely liquidated his HYPE and NEAR holdings. HYPE fell over 13.6% that day. His sell-off indeed allowed him to exit at the peak. HYPE reached a new high of $75.5 on June 4 before starting a continuous decline, currently trading around $62-64.

Besides HYPE and NEAR, Arthur Hayes also liquidated ZEC and WLD. Liquidating ZEC due to the Orchard Pool attack might be somewhat understandable. However, his sell-off of WLD resembles a classic "KOL dumping on retail" operation involving pre-positioning, public shilling, and finally pumping and dumping.

Because from publicly shilling WLD to liquidating it, Arthur Hayes only "pretended" for 3 days. On June 3, the day before selling HYPE, Arthur Hayes publicly shilled WLD with a $10 target, suggesting WLD would become an alternative for investors who couldn't directly participate in SpaceX equity trades. After the news spread, WLD rose over 35% that day. But by June 6, Arthur Hayes changed his tune, stating he had liquidated WLD because SpaceX's pre-IPO price action was "abnormal." This flimsy explanation caused WLD to drop over 20% that day.

The difference between Arthur Hayes and "third-rate KOLs" is that he writes lengthy posts, often justifying his actions from macroeconomic and top-level design perspectives.

On June 9, Arthur Hayes published a long article titled "Reality Test" (requiring about 20 minutes to read fully) explaining his recent moves. He believes three factors will burst the AI bubble: rising energy costs due to restricted traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, the IPOs of three major AI stocks (SpaceX, Anthropic, OpenAI), and Trump turning against AI for the midterm elections.

Therefore, his family office Maelstrom holds significant positions in U.S.-listed energy producers and has sold AI-related stocks and non-core crypto assets, holding only BTC and ETH.

Don't Listen to Arthur Hayes's Words, But Watch His Actions

Arthur Hayes's articles not only skillfully use extensive economic data and charts to argue his points but sometimes also overlay political and historical perspectives, which can be quite impressive. But when you take his words seriously and invest real money following his moves, he might announce a liquidation and turn bearish the very next day, seemingly forgetting what he said the day before, while your portfolio takes a simultaneous hit.

Such operations are not uncommon. As early as 2025, Arthur Hayes repeatedly performed the "bullish one day, liquidate the next" routine. The most classic example remains HYPE. In August 2025, Arthur Hayes promoted HYPE during a speech at Japan WebX, claiming the token still had up to 126x upside potential (Odaily note: the price was $45.9 that day). Yet just one month later, he announced liquidating HYPE, profiting millions, citing the need to avoid token unlock risks.

Arthur Hayes's sell-off then occurred precisely at the peak of HYPE's previous bull run, after which HYPE fluctuated downward. It wasn't until mid-January 2026 that Arthur Hayes again made large-scale purchases of HYPE. Judging from the price chart, his entry point for HYPE was again at the low point of this current cycle.

Similar examples include ETHFI and ENA, where he publicly expressed bullish views, then sold off without warning, achieving precise exits at the top. (Related reading:You Ran First Again! A Record of Arthur Hayes's Top Exits)

Long-term followers of Arthur Hayes have summarized a methodology: don't listen to Arthur Hayes's words, but you must watch his actions; follow his entries cautiously, and decisively liquidate when he sells.

However, if Arthur Hayes continues such performances, especially cases like manipulating WLD price volatility this time, no matter how reasonable the excuses are disguised, his market credibility will be threatened. This is like a crypto version of "The Boy Who Cried Wolf." In the end, Arthur Hayes will surely face backlash.

He said one thing right in his latest article—"I remain an unapologetic gambler," and gamblers usually don't end well.

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWho is Arthur Hayes and why is his market credibility being questioned?

AArthur Hayes is the co-founder of BitMEX, often called the 'father of crypto perpetual contracts.' His market credibility is being questioned due to recent actions where he publicly promoted certain cryptocurrencies like HYPE and WLD, only to sell his holdings shortly after, which critics label as a classic 'pump and dump' strategy, manipulating exit liquidity from his followers.

QWhat specific cryptocurrencies did Arthur Hayes recently sell, and what were the consequences?

AArthur Hayes recently sold his holdings in HYPE, NEAR, ZEC, and WLD. For example, after publicly stating HYPE would reach $150, he sold it three days later, causing its price to drop over 13.6%. He also sold WLD just three days after promoting it, leading to a price drop of over 20%.

QWhat reasons did Arthur Hayes give in his article 'Reality Test' for selling his AI-related crypto assets?

AIn his article 'Reality Test,' Arthur Hayes cited three main reasons for selling AI-related crypto assets: 1) Rising energy costs due to restricted traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, 2) The potential IPO of major AI companies (SpaceX, Anthropic, OpenAI) bursting an AI bubble, and 3) His belief that former President Trump would oppose AI to aid midterm elections. Therefore, his family office shifted to holding energy stocks and core cryptocurrencies like BTC and ETH.

QAccording to the article, what is the suggested strategy for investors regarding Arthur Hayes's actions?

AThe article suggests that investors should not blindly follow Arthur Hayes's public statements but should closely monitor his actual on-chain transactions. The recommended strategy is to be cautious when he buys ('建仓谨慎跟随') and to decisively sell when he sells ('卖出果断清仓').

QWhat historical example does the article provide to show a pattern in Arthur Hayes's behavior?

AThe article provides the example of HYPE from August 2025. Arthur Hayes publicly promoted HYPE at the Japan WebX conference, claiming it had 126x growth potential. Just one month later, he sold all his HYPE holdings near the peak of that price cycle, citing token unlock risks, and re-entered the market at a low point in early 2026.

Lecturas Relacionadas

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手Hace 7 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手Hace 7 min(s)

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手Hace 24 min(s)

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手Hace 24 min(s)

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbitHace 51 min(s)

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbitHace 51 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar HYPE

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Hyperliquid (HYPE) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Hyperliquid (HYPE) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Hyperliquid (HYPE)Después de comprar tu Hyperliquid (HYPE), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Hyperliquid (HYPE)Tradear fácilmente con Hyperliquid (HYPE) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

252 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.11Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar HYPE

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de HYPE (HYPE).

活动图片