DeFi Education Fund Urges Senators To Reject Proposed Amendments In Crypto Bill Markup

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-01-15Actualizado a 2026-01-15

Resumen

The DeFi Education Fund is urging the Senate Banking Committee to reject specific proposed amendments to a new crypto market structure bill, warning they could harm the DeFi ecosystem and software developers. Key concerns include #42 (Reed, Kim), authorizing Treasury to sanction smart contracts; #45 (Reed), creating a new digital asset definition under the Bank Secrecy Act; and #47 (Reed), removing a provision on unlicensed money transmission. Amendments #72 and #73 (Cortez Masto) aim to narrow developer definitions and expand FinCEN's authority, while #74 and #75 could stifle growth by prohibiting transactions with unlawful protocols. Amendment #104 (Warren) would strike a key distribution carve-out for crypto. The fund argues these changes pose significant risks to innovation and operational flexibility in the decentralized finance space.

As the Senate Banking Committee prepares to mark up the newly proposed draft of the crypto market structure bill, the DeFi Education Fund has released a list of amendments it strongly urges senators to oppose.

In a recent post on social media platform X (formerly Twitter), the organization expressed concerns that the descriptions of the draft indicate potential harm to decentralized finance (DeFi) and could negatively impact software developers.

Red Flags Emerge From Crypto Market Structure Bill Draft

In its message, the DeFi Education Fund emphasized the importance of safeguarding the integrity of the emerging DeFi landscape and called on senators to consider the far-reaching consequences of these proposed changes.

Among the amendments highlighted were Amendment #42, proposed by Senators Reed and Kim, which seeks to authorize the Treasury to sanction smart contracts and centralized platforms involved in illicit activities.

This amendment raised significant red flags for advocates who worry about its implications for innovation and operational flexibility within the decentralized finance ecosystem.

Another amendment of concern, Amendment #45 by Senator Reed, aims to create a specific definition for digital assets under the Bank Secrecy Act.

Similarly, Amendment #47, also from Senator Reed, intends to remove a provision related to federal criminal offense concerning unlicensed money transmission.

These changes, according to the DeFi Education Fund, loom dangerously over the operational landscape for developers and financial institutions that interact with digital assets.

Stifling DeFi Growth

Additionally, Senators Cortez Masto’s proposed amendments, specifically #72 and #73, aim to narrow the definition of non-controlling developers and expand the authority of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) alongside the Treasury for blockchain-enabled platforms.

Amendments #74 and #75 further seek to strengthen existing laws related to money transmission and prohibit transactions involving unlawful DeFi protocols, which the Fund suggests could stifle the industry’s growth.

Amendment #104, proposed by crypto-skeptic Senator Elizabeth Warren, also drew attention by striking a key distribution carve-out for crypto offerings.

This follows similar calls by Summer Mersinger, CEO of the Blockchain Association, who recently claimed that the “Big Bank Lobby” is pushing Congress to change key provisions of the already enacted GENIUS Act concerning stablecoin rewards, further highlighting the current state of the future of crypto in Congress.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap recovery above $3.2 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main concern expressed by the DeFi Education Fund regarding the proposed crypto market structure bill?

AThe DeFi Education Fund is concerned that the proposed amendments could harm the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem and negatively impact software developers.

QWhich amendment, proposed by Senators Reed and Kim, has raised significant red flags for DeFi advocates?

AAmendment #42, which seeks to authorize the Treasury to sanction smart contracts and centralized platforms involved in illicit activities, has raised significant red flags.

QWhat is the purpose of Senator Elizabeth Warren's Amendment #104 according to the article?

AAmendment #104, proposed by Senator Elizabeth Warren, aims to strike a key distribution carve-out for crypto offerings.

QWhich senators proposed amendments to narrow the definition of non-controlling developers and expand FinCEN's authority?

ASenator Cortez Masto proposed amendments #72 and #73, which aim to narrow the definition of non-controlling developers and expand the authority of FinCEN and the Treasury.

QWhat recent claim did Summer Mersinger, CEO of the Blockchain Association, make about the 'Big Bank Lobby'?

ASummer Mersinger claimed that the 'Big Bank Lobby' is pushing Congress to change key provisions of the already enacted GENIUS Act concerning stablecoin rewards.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The Era Has Arrived Where Human Writers Must Prove They Are Not Machines

The article describes an era where AI-generated content is flooding the market, forcing human authors to prove they are not machines. It begins with the example of dozens of AI-written, error-ridden biographies of Henry Kissinger appearing on Amazon within hours of his death, a pattern repeated for other deceased celebrities and even living experts who find fraudulent books under their names. This spam content has exploded, with monthly new book releases on platforms like Amazon reaching 300,000 by late 2025. The issue spans genres, from suspiciously high proportions of AI-written teen romance and self-help books to dangerous, AI-generated foraging guides containing lethal advice. The platforms' automated review systems, designed to catch plagiarism and banned words, are ill-equipped to detect AI-generated text that avoids these pitfalls while being nonsensical or fraudulent. The problem has infiltrated traditional publishing. A major publisher, Hachette, had to recall a bestselling horror novel after AI detection tools suggested 78% of its content was machine-generated. An acclaimed European philosophy book was later revealed to be entirely written by AI under a fake author persona. In response, authors are fighting back. At the 2026 London Book Fair, 10,000 writers published a blank book titled "Don't Steal This Book" containing only their signatures—using emptiness as a protest weapon in an age of AI overproduction. Initiatives like the "Human Author Certification" program have emerged, ironically placing the burden on humans to prove their work is not machine-made. The article warns of a vicious cycle: AI-generated low-quality books pollute the data used to train future AI models, leading to "model collapse" and an ever-worsening flood of digital waste, eroding trust in publishing and devaluing human creativity.

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

The Era Has Arrived Where Human Writers Must Prove They Are Not Machines

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Strategy CEO Highlights Scenarios Where Company Would Sell Bitcoin — Report

Strategy CEO Phong Le outlined potential scenarios for the company to sell portions of its massive Bitcoin holdings, a departure from its "Never Sell" philosophy. In a CNBC interview, Le stated sales could occur to finance dividend payments for its Perpetual Preferred Stock if doing so increases shareholder value, defined as a rise in "Bitcoin per share." He emphasized a data-driven approach, prioritizing math over ideology. Other reasons include when the company's book value is below market value or to capture tax benefits. As the largest corporate holder with 818,334 BTC (~$65 billion), Strategy has significant annual dividend obligations (~$1.5 billion). Le believes the Bitcoin market's high liquidity (~$60B daily volume) can absorb such sales without major price impact. Bitcoin currently trades around $80,840.

bitcoinistHace 20 min(s)

Strategy CEO Highlights Scenarios Where Company Would Sell Bitcoin — Report

bitcoinistHace 20 min(s)

Crypto Funds See Six Consecutive Weeks of Net Inflows, CLARITY Act Drives $858 Million Influx

Global cryptocurrency investment products recorded a net inflow of $857.9 million last week, marking the sixth consecutive week of positive flows and the largest single-week inflow since April 24, according to CoinShares' latest report. The primary catalyst was legislative progress on the U.S. CLARITY Act, specifically the final compromise text for stablecoin yield provisions, alongside Bitcoin's price breaking above $80,000. U.S.-listed products dominated with $776.6 million in inflows, a significant jump from the prior week's $47.5 million. European markets also saw increased participation. Bitcoin products led with $706.1 million in inflows, while short-Bitcoin products experienced their largest weekly outflow of 2026, indicating unwinding bearish positions. Major altcoins like Ethereum, Solana, and XRP all saw renewed positive flows, with Ethereum reversing its prior week's outflow to attract $77.1 million. Total assets under management (AUM) climbed to $160 billion.

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Crypto Funds See Six Consecutive Weeks of Net Inflows, CLARITY Act Drives $858 Million Influx

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Silicon Valley Wang Chuan: How Can You Not Feel Anxious When the Neighbor Lao Wang Earned 30x by Investing in Storage Stocks?

The author explores anxiety, attributing it to the amygdala's stress response, and suggests writing down worries to shift control to the rational prefrontal cortex, easing anxiety more effectively than mere reassurance. The piece then examines a source of financial anxiety in May 2026: a 150% surge in the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index, with storage stock SNDK skyrocketing 38x. The author analyzes the underlying logic behind this boom, tracing it to soaring valuations of AI startups like Anthropic (Anth). Anth's reported $400 billion ARR is scrutinized, revealing that cumulative revenue since founding is only about $108 billion, with the company still losing billions monthly and relying on continuous funding (having raised $723 billion). The author contrasts Anth's $1+ trillion valuation speculation with Berkshire Hathaway's fundamentals ($3.7 trillion revenue, $669 billion profit, $4 trillion cash, $1 trillion market cap), questioning the belief that a loss-making, funding-dependent startup could be worth more than the established giant. The narrative concludes by linking the massive valuations of Anth and OpenAI to a surge in AI industry capital expenditure (capex), which in turn fueled the storage sector's prosperity, setting the stage for a further discussion.

marsbitHace 34 min(s)

Silicon Valley Wang Chuan: How Can You Not Feel Anxious When the Neighbor Lao Wang Earned 30x by Investing in Storage Stocks?

marsbitHace 34 min(s)

The King of Blind Date Attire in Korea: How SK Hynix Made a Comeback Against Samsung?

In South Korea's dating scene, SK Hynix employees are now highly sought after, a status shift fueled by the company's astronomical profits and employee bonuses, projected to reach up to 6.1 million RMB per person by 2027. This marks a dramatic reversal for the long-time second-place player in memory semiconductors, which has now surpassed its rival Samsung in annual operating profit. The turnaround story began in 2008 when a struggling Hynix, emerging from bankruptcy restructuring, took a risky bet by agreeing to develop High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) with AMD. At the time, HBM had no clear market beyond high-end graphics cards and was a costly, complex technology. Major players like Samsung, pursuing its own HMC technology, declined. For Hynix, with only memory as its core business, it was a gamble born of necessity. The pivotal moment came in 2012 when SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won acquired Hynix. Defying industry downturns, he invested heavily in R&D and fabrication, sustaining the HBM project through over a decade of commercial uncertainty and internal challenges. A key break occurred around 2016-2017 when Samsung faced production issues supplying HBM2 for Google's TPU, allowing SK Hynix to gain a crucial foothold in the data center market. The AI explosion post-ChatGPT in 2022 was the catalyst, turning HBM into a critical bottleneck for AI accelerators like NVIDIA's GPUs. By 2025, SK Hynix captured 62% of the global HBM market, leaving Samsung at 17%. For the first time, its annual operating profit exceeded Samsung's. Analysts point to the "innovator's dilemma" to explain Samsung's miss: its vast, successful business portfolio made it risk-averse, preventing an all-in bet on the initially niche HBM technology. In contrast, SK Hynix, as a challenger with its back against the wall, had no choice but to commit fully. The story highlights how Korea's chaebol system allows for ultra-long-term bets beyond quarterly pressures. However, SK Hynix's lead isn't guaranteed. Samsung is aggressively catching up on HBM4, and challenges like customer concentration (heavy reliance on NVIDIA) and technical hurdles in advanced packaging remain. The narrative underscores a market truth: the greatest alpha often comes from betting on uncertain, long-term directions others dismiss, much like HBM in 2008.

marsbitHace 48 min(s)

The King of Blind Date Attire in Korea: How SK Hynix Made a Comeback Against Samsung?

marsbitHace 48 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros