Crypto card payments overtake P2P stablecoin transfers: Artemis report

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-01-15Actualizado a 2026-01-15

Resumen

According to a blockchain analytics report by Artemis, crypto card payments have surpassed peer-to-peer (P2P) stablecoin transfers as the primary driver of on-chain stablecoin activity. The data shows that crypto card payments now operate at a monthly run rate exceeding $15 billion, compared to approximately $11 billion for P2P transfers. This shift indicates that stablecoins are increasingly being used through traditional card networks rather than through direct on-chain transactions. Visa dominates this segment, accounting for over 80% of the tracked volume, while Mastercard holds a smaller but growing share. The growth is attributed to expanding merchant acceptance and integration with existing payment infrastructure, allowing users to spend stablecoins without requiring merchants to directly accept crypto. Although P2P transfers remain important for remittances and cross-border settlements, their growth has been slower. The report highlights a structural evolution in stablecoin usage—from infrastructure-led to interface-led adoption—where cards act as the primary user-facing access point, embedding crypto liquidity into global commerce and driving mainstream adoption.

Crypto-linked card payments have surpassed peer-to-peer [P2P] stablecoin transfers as the dominant driver of on-chain stablecoin activity. This is according to a new report published on 15 January by blockchain analytics firm Artemis.

The report, titled Stablecoin Payments at Scale: How Cards Bridge Digital Assets and Global Commerce, shows that stablecoin volumes routed through crypto cards now exceed direct wallet-to-wallet payments. It marks a structural shift in how stablecoins are being used in practice.

Artemis data indicates that crypto card payments have reached a monthly run rate of over $15 billion, compared with roughly $11 billion in P2P stablecoin transfers.

While P2P usage continues to grow steadily, card-based payments have accelerated faster. The growth is driven by expanding merchant acceptance and tighter integration with existing payment rails.

Cards emerge as stablecoins’ primary payment interface

Rather than replacing traditional payments outright, stablecoins are increasingly being used behind the scenes through familiar card networks.

The report highlights that most stablecoin-backed card transactions ultimately settle through major card processors.

This allows users to spend dollar-pegged tokens without requiring merchants to accept crypto directly.

Visa dominates this segment, accounting for more than 80% of stablecoin card volume tracked in the report. Mastercard represents a smaller but growing share, while regional card programs contribute marginally.

This model has allowed stablecoins to scale in consumer payments without requiring new merchant infrastructure. It effectively embeds crypto liquidity into existing global commerce systems.

P2P payments remain relevant but grow more slowly

Artemis notes that P2P stablecoin transfers continue to play a critical role in remittances, treasury movements, and cross-border settlements, particularly in emerging markets.

However, growth in this segment has been more incremental compared with the rapid expansion seen in card-linked spending.

The divergence suggests that while stablecoins are widely used for moving value between wallets, everyday consumer usage is increasingly mediated through cards rather than direct on-chain payments.

Stablecoin usage shifts from rails to interfaces

The report frames the trend as an evolution from infrastructure-led adoption to interface-led adoption.

Stablecoins remain the settlement layer. However, cards have become the dominant user-facing access point, lowering friction for mainstream users and businesses.

According to Artemis, this dynamic helps explain why stablecoin transaction volumes continue to rise even as direct on-chain payment activity grows at a slower pace.

The findings underline how stablecoins are integrating into traditional financial systems. They do this not by replacing them outrightly, but by quietly powering familiar payment experiences at scale.


Final Thoughts

  • The Artemis report shows a clear shift in how stablecoins are being used, with card-based payments now playing a central role in everyday transactions.
  • As traditional payment rails increasingly bridge digital assets and commerce, stablecoin adoption appears to be moving closer to mainstream consumer behavior rather than remaining a niche crypto-native activity.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the Artemis report, which method has become the dominant driver of on-chain stablecoin activity?

ACrypto-linked card payments have surpassed P2P stablecoin transfers as the dominant driver of on-chain stablecoin activity.

QWhat is the monthly run rate of crypto card payments compared to P2P stablecoin transfers as reported by Artemis?

ACrypto card payments have reached a monthly run rate of over $15 billion, compared with roughly $11 billion in P2P stablecoin transfers.

QWhich card network dominates the stablecoin card payment segment and what is its market share?

AVisa dominates this segment, accounting for more than 80% of stablecoin card volume tracked in the report.

QWhat key role do P2P stablecoin transfers continue to play, according to the report?

AP2P stablecoin transfers continue to play a critical role in remittances, treasury movements, and cross-border settlements, particularly in emerging markets.

QHow does the report frame the evolution of stablecoin adoption in terms of infrastructure and interfaces?

AThe report frames the trend as an evolution from infrastructure-led adoption to interface-led adoption, where stablecoins remain the settlement layer but cards have become the dominant user-facing access point.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片