BP Price Soars 300% in 2 Weeks: What Is Backpack Betting On?

Foresight NewsPublicado a 2026-06-15Actualizado a 2026-06-15

Resumen

"BP, the native token of the Backpack exchange, surged over 300% in two weeks to $0.475, driven by the launch of its new regulated stock brokerage and asset tokenization arm, Backpack Securities. The platform enables users to trade U.S. stocks and tokenize them on Solana, with the SpaceX tokenized stock (SPCX) generating significant on-chain volume. This expansion into bridging traditional finance with DeFi aligns with the RWA narrative. BP's unique tokenomics, where 25% was airdropped at TGE with zero allocation to the team, and a staking mechanism allowing conversion to equity upon a company IPO, underpins its value proposition. Over 66% of the circulating supply is currently staked."


Author: Ma He, Foresight News


On June 15, the exchange token of Backpack, BP, surged over 30% again within 24 hours, currently quoted at $0.475, with a market cap of $118.48 million and an FDV of $473.94 million. BP has skyrocketed significantly from around $0.16 in early June this year, peaking above $0.48.



The immediate driving force behind this rally comes from the platform's latest breakthrough in traditional U.S. stock brokerage and asset tokenization services.


Entering U.S. Stock Brokerage and Tokenization Business


In March 2026, BP completed its TGE on Solana, with a total supply of 1 billion tokens and an initial circulating supply of 250 million. After listing, the price briefly hit a high before quickly retracing, with a single-day maximum drop exceeding 40%, filling the market with profit-taking pressure. For several weeks thereafter, the price consolidated at lower levels until the turn-around in early June.


On June 2, Backpack announced the launch of the Backpack Securities platform, which will offer regulated U.S. stock brokerage services while also supporting the tokenization of traditional stocks for circulation on the blockchain, enabling seamless conversion between traditional securities and on-chain assets. The brokerage services are planned for a gradual rollout in June, with initial tokenized products launched on the Solana ecosystem through a partnership with Sunrise. BP surged over 80% in a single day, rapidly climbing from the $0.14-0.15 range to around $0.27, with its market cap approaching $70 million at one point.


On June 12, the same day SpaceX listed on NASDAQ, its tokenized product SPCX went live on Solana. BP subsequently rose approximately 27% within the next 24 hours, reaching above $0.347. This token is pegged 1:1 to real SpaceX shares, supports 24/7 on-chain trading, and can be redeemed to a traditional securities account via Backpack's brokerage account, achieving interoperability between on-chain and off-chain assets. On its first day, the product generated approximately $35-38 million in on-chain trading volume across DEXs like Jupiter and Raydium. According to the latest official data, the total on-chain trading volume for SPCX exceeded $86 million.



Backpack is building a bridge between traditional U.S. stocks and Solana DeFi. Users can not only trade crypto assets on the platform but also access real stocks through the same account, and tokenize some of those assets for on-chain use, trading, or composability. This path aligns well with the current RWA narrative and has also provided the BP token with clearer use cases and demand support.



BP's rise this round stems more from the substantial expansion of the platform's business rather than short-term hype. Currently, its official website shows that Backpack's Total Custodied Assets (nominal value) has rebounded to $390 million.


Team Receives Zero Tokens Unless the Company Goes Public


Supporting the development of the above business is the BP token and its unique economic structure launched by Backpack as early as March. The total supply of 1 billion tokens is divided into three phases: The TGE phase allocates 25% (250 million tokens) entirely to community users via airdrop, with approximately 240 million given to Points Program participants and 10 million to Mad Lads NFT holders. At launch, the team, founders, and investors received zero token allocation; The Pre-IPO phase allocates 37.5%, tied to growth triggers like regulatory milestones and product launches, and continues distribution to users upon unlocking; The Post-IPO phase allocates 37.5% to the company treasury, locked for at least one year post-IPO, with the team benefiting only through equity, not directly from tokens.



The most notable mechanism is the equity conversion design: Users staking BP for at least 1 year gain the right to convert their tokens into company equity upon an IPO or acquisition, with the base unlock bonus increasing with holding time up to the 4th year.


Additionally, staking grants benefits such as tiered trading fee discounts, extra yield on USD collateral, free wire transfers, and priority access to the Backpack Card. Currently, about 66% (approximately 165 million tokens) of the circulating supply is staked.


Although the airdrop process was technically smooth, it sparked community discussion. Supporters argued that the "no insider TGE allocation" model was quite radical, and the points system genuinely rewarded trading and ecosystem participation; criticism centered on the relatively strict Sybil filtering mechanism, which led to some long-term users having their points invalidated and receiving less than expected, as well as noticeable profit-taking during the post-listing price correction. CEO Armani Ferrante publicly denied allegations related to team OTC selling.


These controversies affected market sentiment in the short term, but as real products like Backpack Securities land, the focus is gradually shifting from distribution details to the platform's long-term growth and the token's actual utility. Against the backdrop of the platform's expansion into U.S. stock brokerage and tokenization services, the long-term alignment value of BP's staking and equity mechanisms is being re-examined.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the primary driver behind the recent surge in Backpack Exchange's BP token price?

AThe primary driver behind the recent surge in BP token price is the platform's expansion into traditional U.S. stock brokerage and asset tokenization services, particularly the launch of Backpack Securities and the tokenization of SpaceX shares (SPCX).

QWhat key feature of the BP token's economic structure aims to align long-term user and platform interests?

AA key feature is the equity conversion design: users who stake BP for at least one year gain the right to convert their tokens into company equity during an IPO or acquisition, with the conversion bonus increasing up to the fourth year of staking.

QWhat was a significant immediate market reaction following the launch of the tokenized SpaceX (SPCX) product?

AA significant immediate market reaction was that BP's price rose approximately 27% within 24 hours after the SPCX tokenized product launched on Solana on June 12, coinciding with SpaceX's Nasdaq IPO.

QAccording to the article, what portion of the initially circulating BP token supply was allocated to the team, founders, and investors at TGE (Token Generation Event)?

AAccording to the article, 0% of the BP tokens were allocated to the team, founders, and investors at the TGE. The entire initial circulating supply of 250 million tokens (25% of total supply) was airdropped to the community.

QWhat is the total supply of BP tokens and what percentage is designated for the 'Post-IPO' stage to be held in the company treasury?

AThe total supply of BP tokens is 1 billion. 37.5% of the total supply is designated for the 'Post-IPO' stage and will enter the company treasury, locked for at least one year after an IPO.

Lecturas Relacionadas

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报Hace 17 min(s)

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报Hace 17 min(s)

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight NewsHace 35 min(s)

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight NewsHace 35 min(s)

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片