Bitwise: This Weekend's Surge Accelerates the On-Chain Migration of the Financial World

marsbitPublicado a 2026-03-05Actualizado a 2026-03-05

Resumen

Financial migration to the blockchain is inevitable, and recent geopolitical events have dramatically accelerated this shift. Traditional markets operate with delays, high costs, and limited hours, but blockchain enables 24/7 global trading, instant settlement, and lower costs. While many assumed this transition would take 5–10 years, a weekend military strike against Iran—occurring when almost all traditional markets were closed—proved a turning point. On February 28, during widespread market closures, decentralized platforms like Hyperliquid saw explosive activity. Hyperliquid’s oil perpetual contracts became a key price reference, even cited by Bloomberg. Tether’s gold token XAUT reached over $300 million in trading volume, and prediction markets like Polymarket hit record highs. For the first time, crypto markets functioned as the primary real-time financial system during a major event. This event underscores that investors, funds, and institutions can no longer ignore on-chain finance. The barrier to entry—learning wallets, stablecoins, and DeFi platforms—is diminishing as necessity drives adoption. Once engaged, users gain access to a faster, more open financial system. Critics may argue extended traditional hours could suffice, but history shows that disruptive technology, like blockchain, often outperforms incremental improvements. The move to on-chain finance is happening faster than anyone expected.

I have always believed that the migration of the financial industry to on-chain is inevitable.

Blockchain enables assets to be traded 24/7, 365 days a year, with instant settlement and costs far lower than the traditional system. It makes traditional stock trading platforms and T+1 settlement seem incredibly antiquated.

But I've always wondered: When exactly will this transition happen? And what event will catalyze the system's complete transformation?

After all, most people don't feel the delays of the current system. When my uncle buys stocks in his Charles Schwab account, he doesn't care that it takes a day to settle, nor does he care about the complex processes involving mysterious institutions like the NSCC, DTCC, and Cede & Co. He buys, the stock appears in his account, simple and straightforward, no fuss.

So I once thought that crypto-driven markets would grow on the fringes first. Over the next 5 to 10 years, they would primarily serve crypto-native users and those who don't fit perfectly into the traditional financial system, like global retail investors wanting to trade U.S. stocks. Eventually, these systems would become good enough to gradually take over the existing system, and institutions like the NYSE would transition to tokenized markets, much like they moved from floor trading to electronic trading.

This would be a classic tech story: disrupt the edges first, then take over the core. I thought this would take 5 to 10 years.

But this weekend proved me wrong. I am now convinced that this will happen much faster than anyone anticipated.

What Happened This Weekend

At 2:30 AM EST on Sunday, February 28th, Trump announced a strike against Iran. This timing is very specific for global financial markets; almost all markets were closed.


· U.S. stock markets were closed
· U.S. futures markets were closed
· Major forex markets were closed
· European markets were closed
· Asian markets were closed

Essentially, the only markets still trading were those in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and other Middle Eastern countries (which operate on a Sunday-to-Thursday schedule), but these markets are limited in size and scope, with little participation from Western investors and covering few assets.

In the past, if a major geopolitical shock occurred on a Sunday morning, investors would have had to wait until 6:00 PM Sunday evening for U.S. futures to open to see the market's reaction. But this weekend showed us: they now have another choice—turning to the 24/7, globally traded crypto infrastructure.

And this weekend, they actually did it.

Throughout Sunday, on-chain finance became the core of global finance. The decentralized exchange Hyperliquid, in particular, was the focal point. It offers perpetual contracts for crypto assets as well as real-world assets like crude oil.

Hyperliquid's trading volume surged so much that Bloomberg, in its coverage of the airstrike's impact on oil, directly cited the price of the crude oil contract on Hyperliquid as the most significant reference price. This was no coincidence; Hyperliquid's native token, HYPE, rose about 30% over the weekend. In my view, this is more like investors paying upfront for its future.

But it wasn't just Hyperliquid. The trading volume for XAUT, a gold token issued by Tether, soared to over $300 million in 24 hours. Prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket hit record trading volumes. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other crypto assets were also in the spotlight.

In my memory, this is the first time the cryptocurrency market has truly functioned as a "market" in the real sense.

Why This Matters

If you are a hedge fund, a bank, or any investor who wants to stay competitive, you now have no choice: you must open a stablecoin wallet, you must learn to trade on Hyperliquid, you must understand XAUT, you must research tokenized stocks.

Because even if you don't, someone else will.

This trend will accelerate. The biggest barrier to participating in on-chain markets is getting used to tools like wallets, stablecoins, Hyperliquid, and Uniswap. Once you get the hang of it, all the new capabilities of DeFi and on-chain finance are within reach. Exposure leads to exploration, and exploration leads to trading.

Of course, some will surely say: Traditional markets can do this too! Nasdaq is moving towards 23-hour trading, 5 days a week! We don't offer 24/7 trading because no one needs it!

Fine, whatever. That's what Blockbuster said about Netflix, and what Microsoft said about the iPhone.

The shift to on-chain finance is inevitable. And after this weekend, I am certain: its arrival will be much sooner than any of us imagined.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what event over the weekend accelerated the migration of the financial world on-chain?

AThe announcement of a U.S. military strike on Iran in the early hours of Sunday, February 28th, a time when almost all traditional global financial markets were closed.

QWhich on-chain platform became a focal point for trading during the weekend's market closure and was even cited by Bloomberg?

AThe decentralized exchange Hyperliquid, which offers perpetual contracts for crypto assets and real-world assets like crude oil.

QWhat is the author's view on the traditional argument that 24/7 trading is unnecessary?

AThe author dismisses this argument, comparing it to past dismissals of disruptive technologies like Netflix by Blockbuster and the iPhone by Microsoft, and believes the shift to on-chain finance is inevitable and will happen sooner than expected.

QWhat specific asset, issued by Tether, saw its 24-hour trading volume surge to over $300 million during this event?

ATether's gold token, XAUT.

QWhat does the author identify as the biggest hurdle for participating in on-chain markets, and what is the consequence of overcoming it?

AThe biggest hurdle is getting accustomed to the tools like wallets, stablecoins, and platforms like Hyperliquid and Uniswap. Once this is overcome, it leads to exploration and, subsequently, more trading activity as all the new capabilities of DeFi and on-chain finance become accessible.

Lecturas Relacionadas

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报Hace 27 min(s)

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报Hace 27 min(s)

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight NewsHace 45 min(s)

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight NewsHace 45 min(s)

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片