Analyzing if Polygon’s 94M stablecoin transfers milestone will push POL to $0.1

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-02-10Actualizado a 2026-02-10

Resumen

Polygon has achieved a significant milestone with 94 million stablecoin transfers, the highest among major blockchains, supported by 5.2 million addresses and a $3 billion stablecoin supply. This reflects increased on-chain liquidity and trading activity, with $32.2 billion in adjusted transaction volume. Despite generating $4 million in fees over 30 days and burning 28.9 million POL tokens to increase scarcity, the token’s price remains under pressure. POL fell 2.76% daily to $0.092, with a 42% monthly decline, and technical indicators suggest potential further downside to $0.08–$0.09. A reversal would require reclaiming the $0.1082 resistance level, driven by sustained demand from network usage and token burns.

In recent years, blockchain technology has seen widespread adoption among individual and institutional users. On the back of such mainstream adoption, the Polygon chain has now taken center stage, outperforming all other major chains along the way.

Stablecoin transfers hit record high!

Since the U.S Congress passed the GENIUS Act, stablecoin use has become widely accepted as a means of payment.

In light of this perception shift, the Polygon chain has massively capitalized on this mainstream acceptance. In what is a major milestone for the chain, Polygon recorded 94 million stablecoin transfers recently – The highest among the market’s chains.

This surge in transfers was backed by 5.2 million stablecoin addresses, driving the total stablecoin supply to $3 billion.

Such a surge in stablecoin transfers is indicative of a hike in on-chain liquidity usage and trading activity. In fact, Polygon recorded over 32.2 billion in Adjusted Transaction volume too – More evidence of the aforementioned trading activity.

At the same time, the chain registered $1.49 billion in USDC supply – Another daily ATH.

Token burns hit 28.9 million!

In addition to stablecoin transfers, the 0xPolygon chain continues to generate significant revenue from the hike in usage. According to Neganweb3, for instance, the chain saw $4 million in fees over the last 30 days and $140k in the last 24 hours.

Typically, higher revenue usually indicates that the chain has been seeing real demand, with users actively transacting too.

From the generated revenue, the team has channelled it into the token burns now. In the last 24 hours, Polygon burned 3 million POL – Bringing the total burned to 28.9 million.

As the number of tokens burned increases, the circulating supply declines, effectively increasing scarcity. Often, greater scarcity accelerates momentum upwards – A prelude to higher prices on the charts.

Worth pointing out, however, that sustained higher scarcity still eludes POL. For example – The Stock-to-Flow Ratio (SFR) has continued to decline, hitting a low of 4.5 at press time.

Such a low SFR implied that even token burns have been insufficient to sustain higher scarcity.

In fact, most market participants have been active on the supply side, further increasing the supply available for immediate selling.

What are the price charts saying?

Despite an uptick in on-chain activity and token-burning measures, POL’s price has failed to move. Put simply, even higher network usage has failed to translate into demand for POL

On the contrary, POL has faced sharp downward pressure. At the time of writing, Polygon [POL] was valued at $0.092, down 2.76% on the daily charts on the back of 42% monthly decline.

As a result of the prolonged bearish streak, POL held on below both its short and long-term moving averages, including the 20-, 50-, 100-, and 200-day EMAs.

Finally, the altcoin’s Stochastic Momentum Index (SMI) fell deeper into negative territory, with a value of -38. The SMI in the negative zone suggested that downside pressure was dominant, with sellers commanding the market.

Usually, such a market setup signals the continuation of the prevailing trend. Therefore, if the trend persists, POL risks falling to $0.08-$0.09.

However, if on-chain activity translates into actual POL demand, driven by token burns, the altcoin could reclaim the EMA20 at $0.1082. A return to this critical level will signal a significant trend reversal, with $0.13 as the key resistance level.


Final Thoughts

  • Polygon outperformed all other chains, recording 94 million stablecoin transfers and driving total stablecoin transactions to 32.2 billion.
  • Despite rising on-chain activity, POL faced strong bearish pressure, falling by 42% in just 30 days.

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat milestone did Polygon achieve in terms of stablecoin transfers, and how does it compare to other chains?

APolygon recorded 94 million stablecoin transfers, which is the highest among all major blockchain networks.

QHow much POL has been burned in total by the Polygon chain as mentioned in the article?

AThe total number of POL tokens burned is 28.9 million.

QWhat was the value of Polygon's POL token at the time of writing, and what was its monthly decline?

AAt the time of writing, POL was valued at $0.092, reflecting a 42% monthly decline.

QAccording to the article, what does a low Stock-to-Flow Ratio (SFR) of 4.5 imply for POL?

AA low SFR of 4.5 implies that token burns have been insufficient to sustain higher scarcity for POL.

QWhat critical price level must POL reclaim to signal a significant trend reversal, as per the analysis?

APOL must reclaim the EMA20 at $0.1082 to signal a significant trend reversal, with $0.13 as the key resistance level.

Lecturas Relacionadas

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报Hace 37 min(s)

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报Hace 37 min(s)

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight NewsHace 54 min(s)

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight NewsHace 54 min(s)

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar POL

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Polygon Ecosystem Token (POL) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Polygon Ecosystem Token (POL) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Polygon Ecosystem Token (POL)Después de comprar tu Polygon Ecosystem Token (POL), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Polygon Ecosystem Token (POL)Tradear fácilmente con Polygon Ecosystem Token (POL) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

312 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.11Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar POL

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de POL (POL).

活动图片