U.K. regulator mulls £20K cap on ‘systemic stablecoins’ for retail users

ambcryptoPublicado a 2025-11-10Actualizado a 2025-11-11

Key Takeaways 

Why has BoE ditched 2023 stablecoin proposals?

To cater to industry demands and mirror other frameworks in other regions. 

When will these rules be implemented? 

The Bank of England will issue the final rules in H2 2026 after reviewing industry feedback early next year.


In the latest revised plans for the stablecoin guidelines, the Bank of England (BoE) proposed that issuers back their Sterling-based stablecoins through a 60/40 formula. 

The 60% reserve backing would be in interest-bearing short-term government debt or bonds (T-bills), while parking another 40% (non-interest) with the bank. 

In contrast, the U.S. stablecoin law, the GENIUS Act, requires 100% of reserve backing to be in T-bills or cash equivalents, and issuers get all the yield. 

The BoE’s move comes after industry players pushed back against the 2023 proposal, which sought to have the entire 100% reserve assets held by the bank, with no yield. 

At that time, the players argued that the prior proposal was inconsistent with U.S. law and the stablecoin revenue model. 

Reacting to the changes, BoE’s Governor, Andrew Bailey, said, 

“We have listened carefully to and are grateful for the feedback received, which has shaped the proposals we are consulting on today. Following this consultation, we will consider the feedback received before consulting on and finalising our rules in 2026.”

Stablecoin caps remain

Despite the softer stance on reserve assets, the bank will continue to implement the controversial stablecoin caps for individual and business holdings at £20K and £30 million, respectively. 

Worth noting that major financial hubs don’t have similar strict restrictions on stablecoin holdings. But for BoE, it would, 

“Cap potential outflows of bank deposits to systemic stablecoins in aggregate and so limit the potential impact on credit availability.”

The so-called “systematic stablecoins” or payment stablecoins, which are widely used, will fall under the purview of the bank. Think of it as Sterling-based versions of USDT or USDC. 

However, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) will monitor “non-systematic stablecoins” currently used for buying or selling crypto assets.

Additionally, issuers will keep the yield they accrue instead of sharing it with holders.

Timeline and implementation

After collecting industry feedback on the latest proposals by February 2026, the regulator will finalize the rules, which are expected to go live in H2 2026. 

UK stablecoin

Source: BoE

While the U.K.’s stablecoin approach closely mirrors the U.S framework, it appears more conservative to safeguard against any unforeseen systemic risk to the broader financial system. 

Besides pushing for clarity for the same, the U.K. has also softened its stance on retail owning crypto ETNs. 

Share

Lecturas Relacionadas

When Hyperliquid Takes Away Solana's "Internet Capital Markets" Script

The article discusses how Solana's vision of becoming the "Internet Capital Markets" is being challenged, primarily by the rise of Hyperliquid. While Solana positioned itself as a high-performance blockchain for tokenizing all global assets, its native token SOL has significantly underperformed, and its core narrative faces pressure. Hyperliquid, initially a perpetual contracts platform, has evolved into a specialized Layer 1 financial network. Its focused, trading-optimized design is attracting users and capital, suggesting a vertical L1 may be better suited for a core capital market than a general-purpose chain like Solana. This external competition was compounded by an internal $200M+ exploit on Solana's key derivatives protocol, Drift, creating a strategic vacuum. In response, Solana founder Anatoly Yakovenko heavily promoted the Phoenix protocol as a decentralized, composable alternative. However, Phoenix's trading volume remains far behind leading platforms. Solana supporters also launched critiques against Hyperliquid's decentralization, citing its limited validators and closed-source code. Critics countered that Solana's own decentralization metrics have weakened, and the foundation's overt backing of Phoenix caused friction with other ecosystem builders. The piece concludes that Solana risks losing the "Internet Capital Markets" race if it cannot regain dominance in derivatives, potentially remaining a meme coin hub rather than achieving its grand ambition of hosting all global assets.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

When Hyperliquid Takes Away Solana's "Internet Capital Markets" Script

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trump Signs Executive Order, Kraken, Coinbase and Others May Gain Access to Fed Payment Channels

President Trump has signed an executive order, "Incorporating Financial Technology Innovation into the Regulatory Framework," pressuring the Federal Reserve to reassess its rules on granting non-bank financial companies—including crypto and fintech firms—access to its payment systems, specifically master accounts that connect to the Fedwire settlement system. Currently, such accounts are primarily reserved for depository institutions. The order mandates a review to determine if broader access is permissible and to establish an application process. This move, supported by figures like Senator Cynthia Lummis, aims to reduce barriers to innovation and lower public payment costs by fostering fairer competition. It does not grant immediate access but could pave the way for companies like Kraken, Coinbase, Ripple, and Circle to reduce reliance on intermediary banks, lowering costs and speeding up settlements. A key precedent is the Kansas City Fed granting Kraken's parent company a restricted master account in March, offering limited payment services without interest or credit privileges. This model is seen as a potential template for allowing controlled access while mitigating systemic risk. Other firms like Anchorage, Paxos, and BitGo, which hold specialized banking charters, are also well-positioned to apply. The banking industry, represented by the American Bankers Association, opposes easing access, arguing any institution handling bank-like payments must meet the same stringent regulatory, consumer protection, and risk-management standards as traditional banks. Their core concerns include potential systemic risks, compliance gaps in areas like anti-money laundering, and the diversion of liquidity from the traditional banking system. The outcome of the Fed's review will be crucial in determining whether and how crypto and fintech firms can integrate more directly into the core U.S. financial infrastructure, balancing innovation with financial stability.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trump Signs Executive Order, Kraken, Coinbase and Others May Gain Access to Fed Payment Channels

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

The First Large-Scale Strike in the AI Era Comes from the Factories That Build AI

The article describes a potential large-scale strike at Samsung Electronics, narrowly averted in May 2026 after a temporary agreement. The strike, planned by the company's union, would have been the first major labor action in the AI era targeting a core AI supply chain player. Samsung, alongside SK Hynix, produces roughly two-thirds of the world's memory chips, critical components for AI training and data centers like HBM. An 18-day strike could have disrupted global supply, affecting prices and production for tech companies and cloud providers. For South Korea, where semiconductors constitute about 35% of exports and Samsung represents a quarter of the stock market's value, such an action threatens national economic stability. The union's demands include a 7% base wage increase and, crucially, a clear, substantial profit-sharing model. They want 15% of annual operating profit as an employee bonus pool and the removal of the existing cap (about 50% of annual salary). This frustration is amplified by seeing rival SK Hynix successfully negotiate a deal granting employees 10% of operating profit as bonuses, with reports suggesting some workers could receive bonuses equivalent to hundreds of thousands of dollars. The conflict stems from deeper issues in South Korea's chaebol (conglomerate) system, where rapid national industrialization often prioritized corporate growth over labor rights. Samsung long maintained a "no union" policy until a 2020 apology from its leader. The article argues this strike highlights a fundamental tension in the AI age: as technology advances and corporate profits soar—often driven by AI—the workers who build the infrastructure are demanding a fair share and dignity, rejecting the notion that they are mere expendable components in a machine that "must not stop." The piece concludes that the true test of the AI era isn't just computational power, but whether the people who build the future can secure a stable and valued place within it.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

The First Large-Scale Strike in the AI Era Comes from the Factories That Build AI

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Ripple’s Fed Master Account Bid Gains Momentum After Trump Order

President Donald Trump has signed an executive order directing financial regulators and the Federal Reserve to review expanding fintech and crypto firms' access to core payment infrastructure. This order significantly advances the industry's push for direct Fed connectivity, a central issue for Ripple. The company has been seeking a Federal Reserve master account as part of its strategy for its RLUSD stablecoin, which would allow it to hold reserves directly with the central bank and access its payment rails. The order, titled "Integrating Financial Technology Innovation into Regulatory Frameworks," mandates a Fed review within 120 days on allowing access for entities like uninsured depository institutions and non-bank financial companies, including those in digital assets. This creates a formal policy timeline for resolving whether crypto payment firms must rely on traditional bank intermediaries. Ripple's application for a national bank charter and a master account is part of this broader landscape. The issue gained precedent when Kraken Financial received a limited-purpose master account, while Custodia Bank's application was denied after a legal battle. The Fed has also proposed a more restricted "payment account" option. Trump's order does not guarantee approval for Ripple but forces a high-level examination of the regulatory barriers, bringing the company's long-running effort to the forefront of Washington's financial policy agenda.

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Ripple’s Fed Master Account Bid Gains Momentum After Trump Order

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片