7 XRP ETFs Draw Close To Their Decision Deadlines With The SEC – Here Are The Dates

bitcoinistPublicado a 2025-09-30Actualizado a 2025-09-30

Resumen

The race to launch XRP ETFs in the US is reaching a critical stage, with several issuers awaiting final decisions...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

The race to launch XRP ETFs in the US is reaching a critical stage, with several issuers awaiting final decisions from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Multiple applications, filed by some of the world’s largest asset managers, are already approaching strict approval deadlines in October. 

SEC Faces Wave Of XRP ETF Deadlines In October

According to a recent update from crypto analyst Stedas, seven XRP ETF applications are now pending with the US SEC. These filings represent a mix of major institutional players and crypto-focused firms, all seeking to secure a first-mover advantage in what could be one of the most competitive markets for digital asset ETFs. 

The earliest deadline falls on October 18, when the SEC must issue a decision on Grayscale’s XRP ETF application, which seeks to leverage the firm’s $40 billion Assets Under Management (AUM). Just a day later, 21Shares will face its own deadline on October 19, with a proposal for its Core XRP Trust ETF backed by $7 billion AUM. Bitwise, another well-known crypto asset manager, will follow on October 20 with its ETF filing and a $5 billion AUM.

CoinShares is expected to enter the spotlight on October 23, with its $5 billion product pending SEC judgement. On the same day, Canary Capital, a smaller but equally ambitious issuer with $200 million in AUM, will also face a final ruling. WisdomTree, with an eye-watering $113 billion AUM, rounds out the October deadlines on October 24, as the SEC decides the fate of its proposed XRP ETF. 

XRP
Source: Chart from Stedas on X

Notably, Franklin Templeton, which oversees approximately $1.5 trillion in assets, will not face its deadline until November 14, giving the firm slightly more runway than its October competitors. Collectively, these ETF applications highlight the broader institutional demand for XRP-based investment vehicles. 

Although REX-Shares and Osprey Funds were the first to launch an XRP ETF in the US, they did so in a collective bundle with the Dogecoin ETF. Furthermore, future-based products from companies such as ProShares, Volatility Shares, and Purpose Investments, among other issuers, are already live. 

Could A US Government Shutdown Affect The Funds Decision Dates?

While October promises to be a decisive month for the funds, concerns have been raised over whether a potential US government shutdown could disrupt the timeline of these products. Funding for the US government is set to expire at the end of Tuesday, September 30, unless an agreement is reached between Republicans and Democrats on a new spending bill. If no deal is signed, the country will enter its first government shutdown in almost seven years. 

The US SEC, as a federal agency, would not be immune to a potential government shutdown. While no official reports have confirmed whether a shutdown would impact the regulator’s ability to decide on XRP ETFs in October, the SEC’s Operations Plan, dated August 7, indicates that such an event would leave it running on a skeletal staff. This would severely restrict its capacity to review corporate filings, investigate misconduct, and oversee markets.

XRP
XRP trading at $2.87 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com
Featured image from Getty Images, chart from Tradingview.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Scott Matherson is a leading crypto writer at Bitcoinist, who possesses a sharp analytical mind and a deep understanding of the digital currency landscape. Scott has earned a reputation for delivering thought-provoking and well-researched articles that resonate with both newcomers and seasoned crypto enthusiasts. Outside of his writing, Scott is passionate about promoting crypto literacy and often works to educate the public on the potential of blockchain.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Agents Take Over Traffic Distribution Power: What Are Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba Competing For?

In the race to dominate the AI era's entry point, China's tech giants—Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba—are aggressively deploying AI Agents to control the future of traffic distribution. Alibaba is pursuing a dual-track "closed loop + openness" strategy. Its Qianwen app is evolving into a super-Agent integrated across its ecosystem (Taobao, Alipay, etc.) to handle complex tasks like travel planning. Concurrently, it is opening its platform to external brands (Luckin Coffee, KFC) and has launched a B2B Agent platform, "Wukong," targeting enterprise automation. Its other flagship, Quark, aims to be an "AI super search box" for information and tasks. ByteDance is executing an omnipresent "sprawl strategy." Its Doubao app boasts over 300 million monthly active users and is evolving into a default AI entry point for daily life, with plans for paid versions and e-commerce integration. Its core weapon is the Kouzi platform, a visual "AI assembly factory" for developers to build custom Agents. ByteDance is also pushing hardware integration, collaborating on AI phones and developing smart glasses to embed Doubao everywhere. Tencent is playing its long-held "ultimate card" by quietly embedding an AI Agent directly into WeChat. This Agent, accessible via a swipe, can understand user commands and automatically execute tasks by calling upon WeChat's millions of mini-programs (e.g., finding and ordering coffee). This leverages WeChat's unparalleled 1.4-billion-user ecosystem to position the app as an AI-powered "service operating system," a move that could dramatically reshape the competitive landscape. The core battleground is shifting from competing for "user screen time" to competing to be the "default execution layer" for user intent. The business model is evolving from an "attention economy" to an "intent economy," where the Agent that can most efficiently fulfill a user's need gains control over service access and token flow. This represents a fundamental change in how users connect with digital services, making the fight for the Agent入口 (entry point) a pivotal moment for redefining industry leadership in the AI age.

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Agents Take Over Traffic Distribution Power: What Are Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba Competing For?

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

From Banning Doubao to Embracing Honor: Why Did WeChat Suddenly 'Change Its Face'?

The article explores the sudden shift in WeChat's strategy towards AI assistants from mobile phone manufacturers, transitioning from strict opposition to active collaboration. For over a year, WeChat fiercely resisted attempts by phone AI assistants (like ByteDance's Doubao in late 2025) to control its features via GUI automation ("simulated clicking"), citing security and data control concerns. This stance created a significant barrier for system-level AI integration. Now, Tencent has initiated A2A (Agent-to-Agent) partnerships with major phone brands like Honor, Xiaomi, OPPO, and vivo. This model allows a phone's system AI (e.g., Honor's YOYO) to parse a user's voice command and send a structured request directly to WeChat's own internal AI agent via secure APIs. WeChat then executes the action (e.g., sending a message) and returns the result. The article attributes Tencent's "change of face" to strategic pressure. While leading in social app usage, Tencent trails rivals like ByteDance and Alibaba in standalone AI app popularity. WeChat, with its vast mini-program ecosystem, is Tencent's key asset for an AI comeback. The upcoming WeChat AI agent aims to handle tasks like booking and payments within the app. However, phone system assistants remain the primary AI entry point for most users. The A2A collaboration allows Tencent to extend WeChat's AI reach to this crucial system layer while maintaining control over its core functions and data. For phone manufacturers, embracing A2A is a pragmatic move. The GUI route proved unviable due to WeChat's blocks. A2A offers a compliant path to integrate a vital service, enhancing their AI assistants' usefulness. It allows them to focus on developing their own AI ecosystems for other services while cooperating on WeChat access. The collaboration is framed as a mutual, strategic necessity: Tencent gains a distribution channel, and manufacturers gain a key functionality. The partnership relies on a "dual authorization" mechanism for security, requiring both user and app consent for each action. While questions about long-term data privacy practices remain, experts note A2A is more secure and compliant than GUI automation. Ultimately, this cooperation is seen as a tentative, calculated truce. Tencent's long-term goal is to make WeChat an AI-powered "service OS." Phone manufacturers aim to make their system AI the central user interface. Their paths may converge or clash in the future, but for now, the A2A deal represents the opening chapter in the battle for the AI-era user入口, driven by necessity and strategic calculus on both sides.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

From Banning Doubao to Embracing Honor: Why Did WeChat Suddenly 'Change Its Face'?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

On-Chain Figures on the Eve of Kickoff: 1.6 Billion Traded Before the World Cup Even Begins

"On-Chain Numbers on the Eve of the World Cup: $1.6 Billion Traded Before Kick-off" Analysis of on-chain markets before the 2026 FIFA World Cup reveals significant crypto integration into football. The most striking figure is the approximately **$1.6 billion** in total trading volume on the single "World Cup Winner" contract on the Polymarket prediction market platform, accumulated before a single match was played. This represents explosive growth for a sector whose annual volume surged from ~$16B in 2024 to ~$64B in 2025. The ecosystem is maturing beyond speculation. Key developments include: 1) **Infrastructure upgrades** like Polymarket's migration to native, regulated USDC stablecoin for settlements; 2) **Reliable data oracles**, such as Chainlink, being used to resolve real-world match outcomes on-chain; and 3) **Official recognition**, with FIFA appointing its first-ever "Prediction Markets" partner. Over 100 contracts now cover everything from the outright winner to individual match results and even non-sporting risks like venue relocation. This evolution marks a fundamental shift. While crypto firms are absent from FIFA's top-tier sponsor list, the technology has deeply penetrated the tournament's financial and predictive infrastructure through regulated stablecoin settlements, decentralized oracles, and new official partnership categories. The regulatory landscape remains complex and varies by jurisdiction, but on-chain markets for the World Cup are already a multi-billion-dollar reality.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

On-Chain Figures on the Eve of Kickoff: 1.6 Billion Traded Before the World Cup Even Begins

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片