BONK slips below key support: Can buyers stop a 23% decline?

ambcryptoPublicado a 2025-08-18Actualizado a 2025-08-18

Key Takeaways

BONK could face a 23% decline after breaking below a key support level on the chart. Liquidity outflows from the market, combined with technical indicators, reinforce the bearish outlook.


Bonk [BONK] joined the list of major decliners in the past day. According to CoinMarketCap, the asset led the market with an 8% drop.

Analysis shows that the decline could deepen in upcoming trading sessions after breaching a crucial support level. Liquidity indicators also warn that further losses may be ahead in the coming days.

Key support breaks—What’s BONK’s fate?

After weeks of strong gains, BONK now risks erasing a significant portion of those profits, as it broke down from a critical support level.

The breakdown of the $0.00002393 support could trigger a broader decline, potentially driving prices toward $0.00001835—the nearest support level.

BONK price action.BONK price action.

Source: TradingView

If this next support fails to hold, BONK will likely continue on a downward trajectory, intensifying investor losses over the coming weeks.

While a rebound could be possible, AMBCrypto’s analysis suggests that a further breakdown in the days ahead cannot be ruled out.

Indicators point to intensifying losses

Technical indicators imply that the decline could worsen, with both the Money Flow Index (MFI) and Relative Strength Index (RSI) signaling weakness.

The Money Flow Index showed consistent liquidity outflows, at 50.97 at press time. If it drops below the neutral threshold of 50, the downtrend could accelerate and magnify BONK’s losses.

BONK technical indicator.BONK technical indicator.

Source: TradingView

The Relative Strength Index also weakened, plunging below the neutral zone to a reading of 39.61.

A low RSI signaled fading momentum and confirmed that sellers now outweighed buyers, putting additional pressure on prices.

Off-chain data showed that activities among investor remained divergent, with bearish and bullish alignment.

Liquidity remains weak in the market

Market liquidity continued to weaken. At the time of writing, liquidity outflows have been increasing.

The Open Interest-Weighted Funding Rate indicated that although long positions outnumbered shorts, the metric trended downward as short positions rose.

Open Interest-Weighted Funding Rate chart.Open Interest-Weighted Funding Rate chart.

Source: CoinGlass

If this reading slips into negative territory, BONK’s decline could intensify further in the coming weeks.

CoinGlass Spot Exchange Netflow data, however, showed some buying activity. Over the past three days, inflows have grown, with $2.55 million worth of BONK purchased in the last 24 hours.

Continuous accumulation by spot investors will add to the tendency for a rebound, or reduce the potential for a rapid decline due to massive sell-side presure.

Share

Criptos en tendencia

Lecturas Relacionadas

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

The article "Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?" explores the complex and often contentious integration of AI into the cultural and creative industries, particularly film and television. It begins with the cancellation of Amazon's AI-generated animation "Punky Duck," highlighting the ethical debates surrounding AI content. AI's rapid advancement is transforming video production, enabling cost-effective, full-length AI films (e.g., "RAPHAEL," "Dreams of Violets") while sparking industry resistance over issues like "synthetic actors." The core debate has shifted from whether to use AI to how to use it responsibly. The article analyzes why AI's entry into film is uniquely unsettling. It distinguishes between "cultural fast food" (short-form, fast-paced content like micro-dramas) and "cultural main courses" (traditional, long-form film/TV). AI currently excels at the former, matching its fragmented narratives, shallow emotional needs, and free-to-consumer models. However, venturing into the latter challenges the human-centric essence of storytelling—creativity, emotional depth, and the unique value of human labor and experience. While AI can generate massive volumes of content and lower costs, it risks devaluing human creativity, leading to homogenized output, and creating unfair competition through potential intellectual property infringement. Its efficiency also amplifies content safety risks, making preemptive governance crucial. To counter these risks, the article proposes establishing clear boundaries guided by a human-centered AI content perspective. It outlines four principles: 1) Amplify, rather than displace, human creative space; 2) Respect and protect human creative output; 3) Ensure human creative control and responsibility remain paramount; and 4) Guarantee transparency and traceability in AI creation. The conclusion emphasizes that humans must act as the "helmsmen" of technology, steering AI development to enhance, not replace, the core human values at the heart of cultural expression.

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

Planck Retracted? The Father of Quantum Tripped by an Algorithm

The recent discovery that two articles (published in 1940 and 1942) by Max Planck, the Nobel laureate and founder of quantum theory, are marked as "retracted" on Springer's digital platform highlights a curious clash between historical publishing practices and modern automated systems. An investigation suggests these retractions are algorithmic errors, not due to fraud or misconduct. The papers, philosophical reflections on science published in *Die Naturwissenschaften*, were likely flagged by the platform's systems. One article, a republished lecture, may have been mistaken for duplicate publication. Another, sharing a title with a prior article by a different author (a common practice for continuing debates at the time), may have triggered a similar automated check. The digital versions have even been replaced with blank pages, contrary to normal practice of preserving retracted texts. This incident underscores how contemporary digital infrastructure, built around concepts like "self-plagiarism" and strict copyright, can misclassify and obscure legitimate historical scholarly communication. It serves as a warning that digital archives are not neutral mirrors of the past but are filtered by platform rules, potentially distorting the scientific record. As AI systems increasingly rely on such databases, such erroneous metadata could propagate, affecting how future tools interpret and access historical knowledge.

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

Planck Retracted? The Father of Quantum Tripped by an Algorithm

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

Refunds! Claude 4.8 Sees Overnight Major 'Dumb-Down', GPT-5.6's Computational Power Reportedly 'Halved'

The AI community is currently alarmed by widespread reports of significant performance degradation in two leading models. This article details a "mass self-testing frenzy" triggered by a mysterious prompt designed to detect a hidden "Juice" value, representing a model's reasoning compute budget. On OpenAI's side, users suspect a covert, limited test of a "GPT-5.6-sol" model is underway. When using a specific XML prompt on the Codex platform, a normal "gpt-5.5 xhigh" model reportedly returns a Juice value of 768. However, some users routed to the suspected GPT-5.6 test receive a drastically reduced value of 128—a six-fold decrease. This has sparked debate on whether it signifies a major efficiency leap or a "watered-down, low-cost version" achieved by slashing reasoning depth to save computational expenses. Simultaneously, Anthropic's Claude models, particularly the flagship Opus 4.8 Max, are facing intense user backlash for a perceived "physical brain cut." Users on platforms like Reddit report a dramatic decline in the model's once-impressive reasoning, with complaints of it becoming "absurdly" weakened, performing worse than older, lighter models like Haiku. Specific criticisms include: losing long-context memory, refusing to think deeply even in high-reasoning modes, providing instant incorrect answers, and engaging in unhelpful, argumentative, or "gaslighting" behavior where it contradicts users unnecessarily. The article speculates these "stealth downgrades" might be a calculated corporate strategy. Companies could initially release models with temporarily boosted compute to create an illusion of a major breakthrough, then silently scale back parameters later to manage unsustainable inference costs. A proposed underlying cause is a tightened funding environment, potentially exacerbated by SpaceX's massive IPO soaking up market liquidity, which could delay AI company IPOs and force cost-cutting measures like model "nerfing." The core issue highlighted is the asymmetry of information: subscribers pay for a service that can be silently and fundamentally altered without notification or explanation. The viral "Juice test" resonates because it represents users' desire for transparency about what they are actually paying for.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Refunds! Claude 4.8 Sees Overnight Major 'Dumb-Down', GPT-5.6's Computational Power Reportedly 'Halved'

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar BONK

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Bonk (BONK) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Bonk (BONK) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Bonk (BONK)Después de comprar tu Bonk (BONK), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Bonk (BONK)Tradear fácilmente con Bonk (BONK) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

378 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.11Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar BONK

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de BONK (BONK).

活动图片